|
Thread Number: 45293
/ Tag: 80s/90s Vacuum Cleaners
Curious about this Panasonic Jet Flo upright |
[Down to Last] |  |
Post# 469117 , Reply# 1 1/30/2024 at 19:09 by JustJunque  (Western MA) |
||
 | ||
| Post# 469120 , Reply# 3 1/30/2024 at 19:15 by EvolutionClean1 (Nampa, Idaho) | ||
|
I just wanted To know why they went with the dual belt design instead of a single belt | ||
|
Post# 469121 , Reply# 4 1/30/2024 at 19:24 by JustJunque (Western MA) |
||
|
| ||
| Post# 469134 , Reply# 6 1/30/2024 at 22:09 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
This was technically Panasonic's first attempt of making an upright that uses a clutch. They later improved it where two belts wasn't necessary anymore, my MC-6357 similar to your Jet-Flo uses just one belt. And then they've adopted the foot pedal where you didn't had to bend over anymore to shut the brushroll off.
| ||
|
Post# 469293 , Reply# 10 2/5/2024 at 22:05 by Durango159 (State College, PA) |
||
I had a Jet-Flo MC-6210 and it had the same design. To my understanding it was Panasonic's design for a clutch to turn the brush roll off. When the user switch the clutch, it shifted the belt to an idler. Neat system and it did work well. I always loved how quiet the Jet-Flo and many Panasonics were. I don't think many models were ever known for being the best deep cleaners out there but they certainly weren't awful. All had great agitation, were fairly easy to use and made carpets look great.
| ||
| Post# 469295 , Reply# 12 2/5/2024 at 22:12 by EvolutionClean1 (Nampa, Idaho) | ||
|
Durango Check your messages if you get a chance, btw | ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}