|
Thread Number: 44028
/ Tag: Recent Vacuum Cleaners from past 20 years
Some concerning info about 1998-99 Self Propelled Windtunnels |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 458647 12/18/2022 at 18:11 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
So I was looking through the CPSC's articles about vacuum recalls, when I came across one about Hoover Windtunnel Self Propelled models from 1998-99. Apparently, there was some problem with the switches on them that caused them to overheat the handle and toolholder areas of the vacuums, resulting in a fire hazard. I'm not sure if this problem still occurs on the ones that you can find on Ebay, Cragslist, etc., but i still think it's wort putting this out there.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO AmtrakSebo1997's LINK | ||
| Post# 458650 , Reply# 1 12/18/2022 at 19:16 by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 458658 , Reply# 2 12/18/2022 at 21:04 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
Also, I've noticed that there's a lot of listings for Hoover Windtunnel S3765 bagless canister vacuums on Ebay, even after those were recalled too. I know that the problem was just with the power nozzle's cord, and all that needed to be done was to take it to Hoover for a free repair, but I'm not entirely sure how many people actually got that repair. Also, there was a recall for some of the Windtunnel T-Series bagless uprights with a cord rewinder, because the cord was improperly seated in the cord rewinder assembly, and could be pulled loose, posing fire and shock hazards. Was the problem on those also fixed on most of those Windtunnels? Anyways, here's the links to the S3765 canister and T-Series upright's recall articles:
www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2011... www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2010/httpww... | ||
| Post# 458672 , Reply# 3 12/19/2022 at 15:30 by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, Indiana) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 458674 , Reply# 4 12/19/2022 at 16:52 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458683 , Reply# 5 12/19/2022 at 20:45 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458698 , Reply# 6 12/20/2022 at 16:48 by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, Indiana) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458701 , Reply# 7 12/20/2022 at 17:51 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458740 , Reply# 8 12/22/2022 at 15:24 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 458741 , Reply# 9 12/22/2022 at 18:53 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
Post# 458742 , Reply# 10 12/22/2022 at 19:11 by luxlife  (Under a Pecan Tree) |
||
|
This post has been removed by the member who posted it. | ||
| Post# 458743 , Reply# 11 12/22/2022 at 19:53 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458744 , Reply# 12 12/22/2022 at 20:48 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
|
Unfortunately the used ones I'd come across with are totally worthless. All of them had the idler cables broken off. Because these Windtunnels are no longer made, they don't even make parts for them anymore. When I first got my Ultra, the cable broke but was lucky enough to get a replacement as soon as I did because that was when they were still being made. But if you want to get a Windtunnel, locally is your best option. Only if it works of course, I would not buy one that doesn't work. And I would not buy one from online like eBay or Craigslist, that is a risk, especially with how ridiculously expensive these are being sold for as is. I could buy a brand new Hoover today for less money and that even works better. Not to say that the self propelled models are terrible cleaners because honestly, I've used more worse Hoovers before.
| ||
| Post# 458747 , Reply# 13 12/22/2022 at 21:52 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
panasonicvac Ok? lots of vacuums that are second hand are trashed when you get them. I don't see how they're any different from any other vacuum in that regard. As for parts, I'm sure you'd be able to at least get a new switch for them, because come on, it's a rocker switch. Speaking of, did you ever replace the one on your Ultra that you showed off on your Youtube channel?
| ||
| Post# 458749 , Reply# 14 12/23/2022 at 01:21 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
|
Mine is from 2001, never had the switch replaced and I don't see a need to. Even if it was one of the models with a defective switch, I'm not going to bother fixing up something that I don't really use. This is one of the reasons why I'd recommend finding something locally because you can be able to see the vacuums up close in person before you'd consider buying. I always inspect the machines that would catch my interest to see if I want to buy it or not. Doesn't just include where it's been from the last home but also by estimating how much it'd cost to fix and restore it to like mint condition. I know there were machines in the past that I've sadly had to pass on even though I would've loved to have them. But I wasn't happy with the shape they were in. Either they were heavily abused like severely scratched up for example, too costly to fix, or parts were just not available to get anymore. There were a few Ultra Windtunnels that I saw at my local thrift store recently but all had broken cables so I chose to pass on them.
| ||
| Post# 458753 , Reply# 16 12/23/2022 at 10:06 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458770 , Reply# 18 12/23/2022 at 20:08 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
|
There's a black Turbopower 7500 and a green premium model made around during 1998-99 that I would love to find for my collection someday. But when or if I do, I'm still not going to bother replacing the switches on them. Seems rather pointless anyways because I wouldn't use either machine except for when I do YouTube videos.
The non-self propelled models are definitely for sure more reliable. But despite that, I still would buy the self propelled models over the non self propelled models. I really like the self propelled feature and I like that the brushroll can turn off either in upright position or when you switch it over to bare floors. When TTI took over, they've definitely made some improvements but also cheapened some things as well on these Windtunnels. Personally, I prefer the older Maytag/Whirlpool Self Propelled Windtunnels. The Ultra that I have, it's my all time favorite one. | ||
| Post# 458784 , Reply# 19 12/24/2022 at 06:36 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458798 , Reply# 20 12/24/2022 at 16:44 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
|
Nah, that wouldn't ever happen in my lifetime I can guarantee it because those two Windtunnels definitely played a huge role during my earlier days. But when or if I get those two machines, there's a 50-50 chance that they may already have their switches replaced anyways since that recall happened a while ago. This is not something new, and Maytag has been long gone now. As long as they both turn on, I still don't see a need to replace the switches. I had a bagless non self propelled Windtunnel U5768-900 before and that one I did had to have the switch replaced. Not because the switch was hot or sparking. But the switch had a hard time turning on or off. huskyvacs definitely has a point here, recalls are less likely to be concerned about, even Samsung who just recalled their top load washers yesterday. If you look at the recall page, only a over couple hundred were reported to have the issue out of over six hundred thousand Windtunnels. That's very little. And both huskyvacs and eureka prince said theirs's never had any problems.
| ||
| Post# 458810 , Reply# 21 12/25/2022 at 07:53 by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada) | ||
|
Truth is, I guess any old vintage vacuum could develop an electrical problem that might make it dangerous to use. We just have to be really careful with using anything electrical that is no longer covered by a manufacturer’s warranty. Especially power nozzle canisters where a cracked hose could be dangerous to use, or where the wand contacts are not in good condition.
I remember being sooo disappointed that Eureka’s Excaliber upright was developing electrical problems at the switch. I thought the design was such a great idea - a two motor bag-first upright that could be set for suction only. But I remember the switch was not designed properly and users found that it overheated. | ||
| Post# 458823 , Reply# 23 12/26/2022 at 07:56 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458830 , Reply# 25 12/26/2022 at 16:27 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
|
No vacuum is made to be perfect, all parts can wear out and go bad eventually. Even these Windtunnels. And again, that recall is just old news. Nothing new, especially to us collectors who'd take the best care of vacuums than anybody else. And I'm betting most people don't have those older Windtunnels anymore mainly because they've moved on to something more modern or even better. Yeah despite the fact that I really like these machines, I know I've used other Hoovers and brands that are better. Example the HushTone Commercial CH54115 which I humbly think is Hoover's best bypass upright that they've ever sold by far. If I was a consumer and if I was using one on those 98 or 99 Windtunnels as my only vacuum that like broke down today, I would just simply upgrade and buy the CH54115 or a different brand. Even if it was just the $5 switch that like sparked or overheated, I'd be ready for something new and better.
Brain, I didn't know those Excalibur uprights had switch problems. And I agree with you that it was a nice design. I do know that the Boss 4D uprights had switch problems as well because not only I've read reviews that the switches overheated but I've also experienced it myself. I've used one when I was vacuuming an empty apartment as my laundry was being washed and dried because there was nothing else better to do than to just sit and wait or go back to the apartment I was living at (I had to go to this other apartment and use the laundry set there because our washer broke down). Anyways, the switch was at my fingertip and I remember the switch got hot very quickly. I knew that wasn't normal to have. And for it being a later version, I was surprised the switches didn't get upgraded. | ||
| Post# 458835 , Reply# 26 12/26/2022 at 19:35 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
I get the feeling that most people on this thread don't care about what I'm saying. How does anybody know that people have widely moved on from the older windtunnels? I don't think any of us do. So there might be someone, somewhere in the world (yes, the windtunnels were sold outside the U.S.) that is using one of those 98 or 99 windtunnels that might have the problem. Or, a young, inexperienced vacuum collector might buy one of these, and might run into this issue. I still think there's a possibility.
| ||
| Post# 458837 , Reply# 27 12/26/2022 at 20:41 by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, Indiana) | ||
|
It's not the fact that we don't care, it's the fact that this is a post with no direction. The intentions are good, but you seem to be misguided. You're getting all riled up about a recall from nearly 20 years ago that was already addressed that applied only to a specific serial number group of the very first run of Hoover Windtunnels sold in 1998. Plus the T-series which hardly anyone even bought to begin with. The recalls already notified people.
People had their warning in the mid 2000s and can use google and look it up if they want to or care to. It's not your job to badger people about defective vacuums on a forum devoted to vacuum collectors who can readily fix these issues if they so choose, or leave them alone and not have any problems at all with them. As was already stated in my posts above, just because something is recalled doesn't mean it is dangerous or should even be acted on. It means there is a small enough chance that the company could be sued so they are protecting themselves by making a recall on it. That is your answer. The recalls only apply at time of sale or shortly after within reason of warranty periods, and lose any and all merit secondhand and especially nearly 2 decades later. They do not even sell bags for this vacuum in department stores anymore, and their brushrolls or transmission usually have gone out long before then at this point in time going into 2023. And trying to address this recall today, guess what will happen? They will send you a discount voucher for a new Hoover Windtunnel bagless vac made in china that will have even bigger issues than these do and last maybe 3 years before the motor burns up. Maytag doesn't even own Hoover anymore so who knows if the recall claim will even be answered. The main reason why people even donate these vacuums to thrift stores is because they tear out their carpeting and install vinyl flooring, as these vacuums can not do bare floors and they will mangle up and chew apart area rugs. Any time I get a bagged vacuum, the date on the bags that come with it is usually 2009-2012, and they haven't been used for over a decade. Furthermore, Shark, Dirt Devil, Dyson, Aldi, even Rainbow vacuums have all had recalls on them, why focus on Hoover and specifically the Windtunnel? If your goal was to create awareness, why not cover all the other recalls as well? Heck, every vacuum Aldi sold in the last 5 years has been recalled for "fire hazard" (generic terms). | ||
| Post# 458839 , Reply# 28 12/26/2022 at 21:57 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
I'm sorry.
The reason I made this thread is mainly because I have anxiety issues, and I felt that if I didn't warn people about these recalls, I would be letting people continue to use dangerous vacuums that could potentially cause people injury, or worse, death. Also, the reason I only covered Hoover recalls was because I'd probably drop dead from the stress of trying to warn everyone about other every vacuum recall. I really don't want to be worrying about this stuff, but my anxiety keeps making me. It also extends into other things. For example, I'm worried that my old kirby D50 has asbestos in it, as well as two of my other vintage vacs. Heck, I'm worried that my whole house is filled to the brim with asbestos, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. So yeah, I'm sorry.
| ||
| Post# 458856 , Reply# 30 12/27/2022 at 13:23 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
wstonehockertv | ||
| Post# 458859 , Reply# 31 12/27/2022 at 14:04 by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada) | ||
|
Hi Bailey….no need to apologize…you were just doing a good service to us all to remind us to be careful with older vacs….especially ones that had official recalls on them due to something dangerous. Thank you for starting this thread…it is an important topic.
And I understand the challenges of severe anxiety…many of us do here on Vacuumland. So you are among friends here….🤗 | ||
| Post# 458870 , Reply# 32 12/27/2022 at 19:41 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458872 , Reply# 33 12/27/2022 at 20:27 by Hoover300 (Kentucky) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 458878 , Reply# 34 12/27/2022 at 22:08 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458879 , Reply# 35 12/27/2022 at 22:31 by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 458899 , Reply# 37 12/28/2022 at 13:35 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
maytag142c | ||
| Post# 458900 , Reply# 38 12/28/2022 at 13:36 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
panasonicvac | ||
| Post# 458903 , Reply# 40 12/28/2022 at 14:34 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
maytag142c | ||
|
Post# 458904 , Reply# 41 12/28/2022 at 14:37 by maytag142c (….) |
||
|
Of course! | ||
| Post# 460203 , Reply# 42 2/10/2023 at 21:16 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
eurekaprince | ||
| Post# 460208 , Reply# 43 2/11/2023 at 11:04 by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 460213 , Reply# 44 2/11/2023 at 12:36 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Im stuck in the backrooms, help) | ||
|
| ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
