Thread Number: 20716
"Blue" Kirby Classic III? |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 231914   5/9/2013 at 10:51 (4,005 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Does anyone here remember any Kirby Classic IIIs rebuilt in Tradition blue? Yes, I understand these were bojacked.
These rebuilds would have occurred between 1979 and 1981 (the period in which the Tradition was then being sold). Some rebuilds involved the Classic III's original belt lifter being painted blue (being careful enough as not to obscure the Vis-A-Belt window), while others just used the Tradition nozzle. I suspect the ones with the painted belt lifter were 1979 rebuilds (while the Tradition was being made with the headlight safety switch). ~Ben |
Post# 231921 , Reply# 1   5/9/2013 at 11:59 (4,005 days old) by jfalberti (Visalia, CA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I've never seen a Classic III re-trimmed to look like a Tradition, but have seen plenty of Classics and Classic Omegas that were.
When I worked for Kirby selling the Tradition, there were two local vacuum stores that were advertising "brand new Kirby and attachments"for $299. At the time the K and A sold for $569 The RR and HB were $100 each so a full boat Tradition was $769.00 We went to check them out, and what they were displaying was either a Classic or a Classic Omega that was re-trimmed in blue with a blue Eureka style paper bag adapter. If a customer came in asking about them, he would try to switch them to a Royal. A lot of the time he was successful. If the customer stuck to their guns and wanted a Kirby, he was conveniently out of them.
Here is a picture of a re-trimmed Classic I saw at a local Thrift Shop last year |
Post# 231923 , Reply# 2   5/9/2013 at 12:08 (4,005 days old) by kloveland (Tulsa)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I’ve seen many Kirby rebuilds that were rebuilt by independent vac shops. Tracking every rebuild would be impossible. Figuring out their reasoning for using multi-colored bojack parts is beyond me. Some of the Kirby rebuilds that I’ve seen look really ugly. I’m sure many vac shops back in the day rebuilt Kirbys to look like the current model being sold at that time. A couple of weeks ago I saw a Classic III with a Heritage II style rug nozzle. Some vac shop must have shaved down the rug nozzle. I'm not a Kirby expert by any means. I’m not sure if any documentation exists on the Tradition rebuilds by non-Kirby dealers. |
Post# 231924 , Reply# 3   5/9/2013 at 12:21 (4,005 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The example I'm referring to, I'd last seen it at the defunct Complete Vac and Sew independent distributor in Gladstone, OR, in 1990-91. The other bojack thing about it was the common Eureka F/G disposable bag setup.
Of course, the real Heritage II nozzle will not fit on the Classic III. I tried doing so, getting the Legend II nozzle to jibe with the Classic III safety switch, and the operation didn't work. ~Ben |
Post# 231999 , Reply# 5   5/10/2013 at 00:01 (4,004 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 233286 , Reply# 6   5/20/2013 at 01:19 (3,994 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Joe,
It should be known that the Royal 880 and 888 (the latter with the removable head) were not very strong in suction with their 3 amp motor (that was the motor size for these two back in '79) while the Kirby still had the 6 amp motor and, consequently, better suction. They only got more competitive with the Kirby, motor-wise, after they got stronger 4.5 amp (1980) and 5.4 amp (1985) motors. ~Ben |
Post# 355697 , Reply# 7   7/8/2016 at 21:01 (2,848 days old) by KirbyCollector (Columbus Ohio USA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 355709 , Reply# 9   7/9/2016 at 01:24 (2,848 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|