Thread Number: 11779
2 speed Royal 259 !!! |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 126621   3/4/2011 at 10:25 (5,031 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Since some of our younger members may have never seen one of these.... |
Post# 126622 , Reply# 1   3/4/2011 at 10:27 (5,031 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The castings are different on this ,the rug nozzle is cast with the fan housing, not 2 pieces as all Royals since. |
Post# 126623 , Reply# 2   3/4/2011 at 10:28 (5,031 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Brass covered brushroll! |
Post# 126624 , Reply# 3   3/4/2011 at 10:30 (5,031 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
same micrometric height adjustment as most Royals. |
Post# 126636 , Reply# 6   3/4/2011 at 14:30 (5,031 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
They got away from this because of weight,this thing is about as heavy as a Kirby! |
Post# 126637 , Reply# 7   3/4/2011 at 15:04 (5,031 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 126641 , Reply# 8   3/4/2011 at 16:49 (5,031 days old) by vac_whisperer ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That brass brushroll must offer some serious agitation! Nice vac! :) VW |
Post# 126644 , Reply# 9   3/4/2011 at 17:04 (5,031 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Actually it is not much different from any Royal, except it had horsehair instead of nylon bristles, ... I will try to get a nameplate pic.if I can get it to focus. |
Post# 126645 , Reply# 10   3/4/2011 at 17:09 (5,031 days old) by vac_whisperer ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
How good of agitation does it have? I have a 1996 panasonic performance plus. It has a metal brushroll and the agitation is GREAT. VW |
Post# 126653 , Reply# 11   3/4/2011 at 17:52 (5,031 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Agressive, it cleans well, but dosen't really tear up the nap like a Eureka Disturbulator will. |
Post# 126667 , Reply# 12   3/4/2011 at 19:41 (5,031 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 127428 , Reply# 13   3/13/2011 at 03:31 (5,023 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'm thinking it was the top of the line model that sold next to the 189 (midrange) and 153 (economy). The bag looks just like the ones on my 189 and 153. Front cover plate looks like the one on my 189, too.
I think Ben is close on the dates, but it could have been built as late as 1951 or 52. I know my 189 was built in 1946, as when I was working on it I noticed the month and year were stamped on the armature. However, it doesn't have the fancy motor housing like yours. Jeff |
Post# 127683 , Reply# 14   3/17/2011 at 00:18 (5,019 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
How many of you remember another version of the red and black bag, where on the black portion it says "R-O-Y-A-L" in red and the crown logo is on the red portion, the two portions separated by a vertical silver stripe?
This motif was briefly brought back in the mid '60s on models 602, 603, 801 and 880, for by 1967 the motif changed (esp. on the 880) to a light blue denim bag, with R-O-Y-A-L (lettering still red) with a big crown logo on top of all that. ~Ben |