Thread Number: 11613
I'm not a Hoover person, really, buuuut....... |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
Post# 125012 , Reply# 1   2/15/2011 at 02:29 (4,910 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Well I resisted it, but then I already have one.
Yes, it is a 1334 and a metal bodied one at that. For once the advertising hype is true the Hoover Junior really must have been the most popular upright cleaner in the Uk for even this one, which must be 49 years old at the very least, is by no means rare although often they are not in this condition which is not bad. Shame it does not have the original bag, but they are getting more and more rare and in all fairness I am sure they were not designed with a life of 50 years in mind. These old girls just go on and on and, with a little attention, can often perform as well as when new. Al |
Post# 125243 , Reply# 3   2/16/2011 at 22:21 (4,909 days old) by twocvbloke ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Hope this arrives soon, I'm bored and want to get on with repairing it and tidying it up... :( |
Post# 125346 , Reply# 4   2/18/2011 at 09:52 (4,907 days old) by twocvbloke ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Erm, the Hoover Junior seems to have morphed into an Electrolux 500, I'm not averse to owning one, but, it's not what I paid for.... :S Best send 'em an e-mail, I wanted the Junior..... :( |
Post# 125352 , Reply# 5   2/18/2011 at 14:07 (4,907 days old) by Vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 125445 , Reply# 8   2/19/2011 at 17:20 (4,906 days old) by alaskabob ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
of all the hoovers the Junior in my favorite neat little vacs |
Post# 125708 , Reply# 10   2/22/2011 at 08:33 (4,903 days old) by twocvbloke ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Here it is with a scrappy temporary spare bag while the one it came with dries: ![]() |
Post# 125709 , Reply# 11   2/22/2011 at 08:34 (4,903 days old) by twocvbloke ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
And another view: ![]() |