Thread Number: 9195
WOWWWWWWW!!! |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 101262   6/19/2010 at 15:02 (5,059 days old) by electrolux~137 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
CLICK HERE TO GO TO electrolux~137's LINK on eBay |
Post# 101263 , Reply# 1   6/19/2010 at 15:05 (5,059 days old) by vac-o-matic (Saint Louis, Mo.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
what a bargain in these economically challenged times.... |
Post# 101264 , Reply# 2   6/19/2010 at 15:07 (5,059 days old) by vintageroyal611 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
mooks. all of them. |
Post# 101267 , Reply# 3   6/19/2010 at 15:36 (5,059 days old) by scvacuumguy (SC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 101268 , Reply# 4   6/19/2010 at 16:09 (5,059 days old) by bagintheback (Flagstaff, Arizona)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 101269 , Reply# 5   6/19/2010 at 16:12 (5,059 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Monkey Ward version...anyone want it for that price LOL!!! |
Post# 101283 , Reply# 7   6/20/2010 at 00:20 (5,058 days old) by hoovercelebrity (Germany)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That's a gorgeous specimin of vacuum cleaner! |
Post# 101284 , Reply# 8   6/20/2010 at 00:22 (5,058 days old) by hoovercelebrity (Germany)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Specimen. |
Post# 101287 , Reply# 9   6/20/2010 at 00:30 (5,058 days old) by electrolux~137 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I keep looking at it and, while it's in beautiful condition, it's obvious that it has been cleaned up and waxed. I don't think the body of this machine was that shiny even when new. |
Post# 101333 , Reply# 10   6/20/2010 at 17:09 (5,058 days old) by portable (Corvallis, OR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 101337 , Reply# 11   6/20/2010 at 18:06 (5,058 days old) by electrolux~137 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yeah, that crossed my mind as well. I was thinking that this machine originally had a leatherette covering instead of being painted but I'm not sure about that. John, you would know more about that than I do. |
Post# 101339 , Reply# 13   6/20/2010 at 18:13 (5,058 days old) by eurekastar (Amarillo, Texas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 101346 , Reply# 16   6/20/2010 at 18:55 (5,058 days old) by joe22 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
some low end wards tak vacs were cardboard with stamped metal ends, covered in glossy paint |
Post# 101355 , Reply# 17   6/20/2010 at 20:24 (5,058 days old) by eurekastar (Amarillo, Texas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I would have never thought of making a vacuum out of cardboard (or wood)! But it makes sense. If the vacuum is indeed circa 1948, steel may have been in short supply and therefore somewhat expensive in the aftermath of WWII. So I guess cardboard would have been the material of choice for low end products.
|
Post# 101356 , Reply# 18   6/20/2010 at 20:30 (5,058 days old) by portable (Corvallis, OR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
....starting with Fred......yes, they were made out of a condensed fibreboard/cardboard, but they were pretty durable. You could feel it though, if you pressed hard on the sides of the tank. I had a Eureka VERY similar to that one, but mine was the tan/brown version. It was made out of the same stuff. Yes, this guy could be inhaling the fumes from his paintjobs, given his nutty pricing. I hope NO ONE buys it..... ARE you going crazy, Fred?! |
Post# 101357 , Reply# 19   6/20/2010 at 21:36 (5,058 days old) by electrolux~137 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Ah, looking even more closely -- if you view the 6th photo (the furthest-right on the top row), you can see the interior of the bag chamber and that it's clearly cardboard. |
Post# 101384 , Reply# 21   6/21/2010 at 10:51 (5,057 days old) by ohio_tuec ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Just found this Eureka on eBay. Beautiful machine, but really? At that price, I'll take ten ;-) CLICK HERE TO GO TO ohio_tuec's LINK on eBay |
Post# 101389 , Reply# 22   6/21/2010 at 11:12 (5,057 days old) by portable (Corvallis, OR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 101430 , Reply# 23   6/21/2010 at 21:34 (5,057 days old) by electrolux~137 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
"New in the box, mint condition" ??????? And, again... "SUCH a deal!!!" Good Lord! CLICK HERE TO GO TO electrolux~137's LINK on eBay |
Post# 101434 , Reply# 24   6/22/2010 at 00:08 (5,056 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Looks like it sat outside for 10 years!! |
Post# 101437 , Reply# 25   6/22/2010 at 00:52 (5,056 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That Kirby and attachments doesn't look so "Mint" to me either.Probably sat too long in a garage or attic before it was offered for sale.Overpriced.Now if it were truely Mint-may be worth it. |