Thread Number: 18291
Weekend estate sale find!!! FILTER QUEEN!! |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 200916 , Reply# 1   9/16/2012 at 19:34 (4,239 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Look as if it has been used more than once or twice...All paperwork, bought new July 5 1984, price,730.45! |
Post# 200917 , Reply# 2   9/16/2012 at 19:35 (4,239 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Not a scratch! |
Post# 200943 , Reply# 3   9/16/2012 at 22:10 (4,239 days old) by kloveland (Tulsa)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 200944 , Reply# 4   9/16/2012 at 22:29 (4,239 days old) by BrianKirbyClass (Eudora Kansas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
WOW,,that is an excellent deal! Looks like a nice machine. I have always loved Filter Queen vacs. An elderly neighbor lady had one when i was a kid, and she would let me come over and use it anytime i wanted to. She knew she would get her vacuuming done for free! lol
Hers was one of the older, pink models from the 1960s, early 70s, and did not have the PN, but i remember how quiet the machine was, and the incredible suction. My only gripe with the modern day FQ is the power Nozzle. Just not very agressive, but is OK on low/no pile carpets. Of course a new brush roll, and new belt will always help. I keep a FQ in my laundry room for cleaning out the dryer, and often use it to clean out the garage and car. And/or to grab for a quick clean up here and there. They really are an excellent vacuum cleaner, with all of the sealed connections and metal attachments. Jeesh, over 700 dollars back in 1984,,,that was a very expensive vacuum in its time! |
Post# 200953 , Reply# 5   9/17/2012 at 03:01 (4,239 days old) by electromatik (Taylorsville, North Carolina, U.S.A.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Incredible! I love it and I want one just like it. |
Post# 201022 , Reply# 6   9/17/2012 at 17:25 (4,238 days old) by cam2s (Nebraska)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I"m still waiting to hit the jackpot on a filter queen system, but my day will come. Hope you enjoy your machine! |
Post# 201032 , Reply# 7   9/17/2012 at 18:18 (4,238 days old) by shag (Ontario, Canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I found a similar Queen this summer. Mine was a bit cheaper, free. No instructions, but came with a full bottle of 25+ year old carpet shampoo and all the tools.
I thought the brown Filter Queens were from the early 70's? I would have never guessed they were from the 80's? If you use the inflation calculator, your vacuum in 1984 that cost $730.45, in today's money would cost $1512.69, give or take a few bucks. The inflation calculator only goes up to the year 2010. |
Post# 201058 , Reply# 8   9/17/2012 at 19:36 (4,238 days old) by jodan3399 (Brownsville, PA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Beautiful. Congrats! : ) I've been hoping to stumble across one someday soon. I love the look of them. |
Post# 201066 , Reply# 10   9/17/2012 at 21:15 (4,238 days old) by kirbyman99 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
My grandma has one just like it that she ought new in 1980-81 ( dont know the year for shure) which replaced her kirby tradition. I've used it several times it still runs good. |
Post# 201068 , Reply# 11   9/17/2012 at 21:31 (4,238 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 201079 , Reply# 12   9/17/2012 at 22:28 (4,238 days old) by kirbyvertibles (Independence, KS)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 201084 , Reply# 13   9/17/2012 at 22:51 (4,238 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'm confused on the statements of how much suction and the great cleaning Filter Queens have?
A house cleaning client of mine had a Majestic Triple Crown and it was very quiet but the airflow I didn't feel was very good. Covering your hand over the end of the hose, the suction had good pull, but cupping your hand around the opening as a way to test CFM's there was very little. With the bare floor attachment, it would push small stones around. I was always replacing exhaust filter, checking the bin to ensure it wasn't full and the filter cone was in good shape. We kept the speed switch set to high. Also every month I had to change the belt, it stretched quite noticably over a months time and it was only used on occasion for small area rugs. Due to the problems I had with it, I usually ended up attaching an extension hose to our Hoover Windtunnel Supreme and using it, or I would use a Eureka Might Mite canister. Some days I even brought my Hoover PowerMax Deluxe canister. My Hoover PowerMax Deluxe ran circles around that Filter Queen. I would run the Filter Queen it would push dirt around, so I tried my PowerMax and the dirt was gone in 1 pass on the bare floors. I was highly unimpressed with Filter Queen and so to this day, I am dumbfounded by experience of others. Just for info, my client is practically a neat freak. The place doesn't look too bad before I even start working. They take care of everything when there is a problem. The Filter Queen motor sounded fine, no squeaks, rumbles extra noises with shut down, all of the filters I was aware of were kept clean. So it was deemed that the machine was in full working order. |
Post# 201095 , Reply# 14   9/18/2012 at 06:57 (4,238 days old) by kenkart ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Remove the metal cone and replace the filter under it, that sometimes kills the airflow, otherwise there is something off somewhere, because there is not much out there any better in my book. |
Post# 201256 , Reply# 15   9/19/2012 at 23:15 (4,236 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
She ended up getting rid of the Filter Queen, but I did check that filter too!! The power nozzle motor died, she had it replaced, then the suction unit had an issue she got that fixed, it broke again and she had enough sinking money into it.
I wasn't here for any of that, but I heard. Long story summed up: I live just outside of State College and worked for these people while going to college. Then I graduated and moved away in January 2006. Well in November 2010, I moved back to the area and actually live with them now. We've remained in contact and I became kind of "extended family." So sometime between January '06 and November 2010 the Filter Queen had lots of issues. However the cleaning lady that took over when I left was a vacuum abuser. I returned to both the Filter Queen, and Windtunnel Supreme broken and no longer here, one of the Central vacuum power nozzles completely nonfunctional and a Eureka Widetrack Boss lightweight vacuum broken. The other cleaning lady liked to run agitator vacs on bare floors and suction only vacs on carpet, talk about backwards!!!!!! Everything was a mess here!! The workshop building had a Kirby G4 which she thought was too heavy so she wasn't using that at all, so the carpets here weren't getting ANY agitation, just a quick go over with a crappy newer style Eureka Rally canister which broke and I got rid of. Granted the rugs here are very low profile, but in my book, all carpets must recieve an agitator!!!!!!!!!! I'm not a fan of the G4 either but I used it so the place would be clean. When the Eureka Mighty Mite died which the cleaning lady never used so at least that was still here when I returned, I replaced it with the Riccar 1700 power head canister vac, which is posted in another thread on here. This solved all of my problems for the workshop building, until the recent hose break. |
Post# 201276 , Reply# 17   9/20/2012 at 06:40 (4,236 days old) by eurekastar (Amarillo, Texas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|