Are "lift-off" vacuums overrated?

This is another in-depth topic that I've been meaning to post about for a long time now.

I'm referring to upright vacuums that have a "lift-off" or "lift-away" design. This feature was pioneered by Bissell, and later arguably popularized by Shark. The basic idea sounds neat on paper, seeing as you can detach the main unit and use the vacuum like a handheld canister for above floor cleaning.

This feature has baffled me for a number of reasons. First off, you have to carry the full weight of the canister in one hand, which can get tiresome. I often like to do my hose cleaning with both hands, particularly when I clean walls and ceilings.

Second, stair cleaning becomes a challenge. I had a Bissell Pet Hair Eraser Lift-Off over the course of two years, and doing stairs with it was a huge pain in the rear end. Both hose and telescopic wand were very short, and the wand would constantly collapse in the middle of cleaning, since the locking collar wasn't very secure. Whenever I used the turbo brush, the hose would get stiff, causing the canister to flop all over the place during stair cleaning. It was impossible to get it to stay put.

Third, weight distribution. Lift-off vacuums tend to distribute the weight somewhat unevenly, due to the nature of the detachable design. This makes the machine a little hard to manuever, at least for Sharks. They have a harder time going under furniture for that very reason. However, Shark has solved that problem with their "Powered Lift-Away" models.

What exact benefit does the "lift-away" design provide over conventional upright designs? In my mind, it's not that convenient, for the very reasons I listed above. Sadly, I haven't seen any companies offer a shoulder strap for easier carrying. I personally prefer the standard upright form factor. The reason I'm partial to Dyson is due to most of their uprights having a long hose and wand. This makes above floor cleaning a breeze.

Photos... < > Photo 1 of 3 View Full Size


Forum Topics & Rules Manuals & Literature	New users Click-here to sign-up

Post# 473552 10/7/2024 at 17:42 (202 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)
Checkrate/Likes This is another in-depth topic that I've been meaning to post about for a long time now. I'm referring to upright vacuums that have a "lift-off" or "lift-away" design. This feature was pioneered by Bissell, and later arguably popularized by Shark. The basic idea sounds neat on paper, seeing as you can detach the main unit and use the vacuum like a handheld canister for above floor cleaning. This feature has baffled me for a number of reasons. First off, you have to carry the full weight of the canister in one hand, which can get tiresome. I often like to do my hose cleaning with both hands, particularly when I clean walls and ceilings. Second, stair cleaning becomes a challenge. I had a Bissell Pet Hair Eraser Lift-Off over the course of two years, and doing stairs with it was a huge pain in the rear end. Both hose and telescopic wand were very short, and the wand would constantly collapse in the middle of cleaning, since the locking collar wasn't very secure. Whenever I used the turbo brush, the hose would get stiff, causing the canister to flop all over the place during stair cleaning. It was impossible to get it to stay put. Third, weight distribution. Lift-off vacuums tend to distribute the weight somewhat unevenly, due to the nature of the detachable design. This makes the machine a little hard to manuever, at least for Sharks. They have a harder time going under furniture for that very reason. However, Shark has solved that problem with their "Powered Lift-Away" models. What exact benefit does the "lift-away" design provide over conventional upright designs? In my mind, it's not that convenient, for the very reasons I listed above. Sadly, I haven't seen any companies offer a shoulder strap for easier carrying. I personally prefer the standard upright form factor. The reason I'm partial to Dyson is due to most of their uprights having a long hose and wand. This makes above floor cleaning a breeze. Photos... < > Photo 1 of 3 View Full Size

Post# 473553 , Reply# 1 10/7/2024 at 17:54 (202 days old) by RainbowD4C (Saint Joseph, Michigan )
Checkrate/Likes I don't think it's overrated any any /means. While I'm more of a canister person and don't actually own one. I love the idea of being able to detach the pod and move around rather than carry around the extra. Cleaning the car is easier because you don't have to haul around the extra bulk. I have used a couple of lift away or lift offs depending on what your brand is. And I have never felt any reason to complain. Stair cleaning was easy cleaning ceilings was easier because it gave you more reach. I do like your idea of a shoulder strap or some kind of carrying device. Plus I feel like you get better hoses and attachments when it comes to the lift off or lift away. Thats always a bonus. But over all in my own opinion I see no actual problems with these types of vacuums.

Post# 473554 , Reply# 2 10/7/2024 at 18:44 (202 days old) by Hoover300 (Kentucky)
Checkrate/Likes The OG Bissell ones like in the first pic are SO big and heavy. It is a workout to use. The Shark lift offs, at least the older ones, are a bit clunky with the way they lift off, I hear they improved it with later models though I haven't tried them myself. I have been wondering about this model for a few years now though. It seemed like a good blend when it came out. View Full Size

Post# 473559 , Reply# 3 10/8/2024 at 01:06 (202 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)
Checkrate/Likes I have no problem with the liftoff design. I like the idea and can be useful. Lindhaus in my opinion makes the best ones and I think are the best overall upright designs I've ever seen. I like you can simply remove more than just the canister such as the the handle or the powernozzle. If carrying it by the hand is an issue, they offer a backpack kit as an option. Unlike the bagless liftoff vacuums, Lindhaus gives a far greater chance of reaching underneath furniture as the canister is much slimmer and the nozzle stays on the floor. View Full Size

Post# 473560 , Reply# 4 10/8/2024 at 06:50 (201 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)
Checkrate/Likes The Lindhaus has a BAG!!!No MESSY,dirty dusty bagless!

Post# 473566 , Reply# 5 10/8/2024 at 14:00 (201 days old) by AmtrakSebo1997 (Vacmasterthegreats basement)
Checkrate/Likes *My Opinon.* I wouldn't call them overrated, more-so oversaturated. Here's a fun drinking game, go out to your local Walmart and take a shot every time you see a Shark Lift-Away or Lift-Away knockoff in the vacuum aisle. I think it's a good concept, but the plastivacs have done it to death. There are good Lift-Off vacuums, even from back before they were popular. There's the Sebo Feilx, which is a bit awkard to use as a canister, but it is otherwise a fantastic machine. There's the Bissell Plus/OG Lift Off, which, assuming their durabilty and performance were good, may have been Bissell's best vacuum ever conceived. Finally, there's the Kenmore Intuition, which seems like an ok machine, it's bagged, anyway. Photos... < > Photo 1 of 3 View Full Size

Post# 473580 , Reply# 6 10/9/2024 at 10:15 (200 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)
Checkrate/Likes The new Shark models are slimming down the weight. There was a Shark that I actually thought "humm...not bad". The 'pod' weighed maybe 4 pounds, and the non-electric hose and light weight wand were easy to hold and use. I can see someone with stairs falling in love with the design. I've also seen many lift off vacs where it was way to heavy to hold as a 'lift off'.

Post# 473596 , Reply# 7 10/10/2024 at 14:58 (199 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)
Checkrate/Likes *Well!* Looks like I was proven wrong about lift-off vacuums. I considered them "overrated" due to my own experiences, but I'm glad to see that others are fond of the design. My mom owns a Shark Navigator Lift-Away with Zero-M, and I like to use the Lift-Away feature to tackle cobwebs in her apartment. panasonicvac, that Lindhaus looks very nice. I like how the slimmer profile would eliminate the need for a Powered Lift-Away design, unlike Shark.

Post# 473612 , Reply# 8 10/11/2024 at 13:16 (198 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)
Checkrate/Likes They are awesome machines. It's not just Lindhaus but with any bagged vacuum that can reach in a low slim profile without lifting the nozzle up. However in situations like these is where I'd favor a central vac or a canister with a power nozzle to reach underneath the beds. View Full Size

Post# 473687 , Reply# 10 10/16/2024 at 07:56 (193 days old) by kloveland (Tulsa)
Checkrate/Likes Yes, use a tank/canister/central.

Post# 473679 , Reply# 9 10/15/2024 at 16:16 (194 days old) by RainbowD4C (Saint Joseph, Michigan )
Checkrate/Likes 1 *@ Nick.* Everyone has a point of view Yours isn't necessarily wrong. It's just something that you view. But I also look at things from a different perspective when it comes to lift off's I love what Shark has done especially having the powered series. I would have one if they came with a bag. I'm not all that fond of anything bagless unless it's a Rainbow. If the Powered Lift Off had a bag I would own one in a minute.

Post# 473750 , Reply# 11 10/20/2024 at 00:41 (190 days old) by Djub85 (Virginia)
Checkrate/Likes The idea is cool. Six years ago, My parents had one of these Sharks new for 6 months until it died. They replaced it with an Aerus product. I like the sort of modular concept, but I'm hesitant about the reliability.