A YouTube channel named Vacuum Facts doesn’t know how bagged vacuums works.


Forum Topics & Rules Manuals & Literature	New users Click-here to sign-up

Thread Number: 45787 / Tag: Pre-1950 Vacuum Cleaners
A YouTube channel named Vacuum Facts doesn’t know how bagged vacuums works.

[Down to Last]

Post# 473138 9/8/2024 at 06:03 by Bransvacuums (Edmonton Alberta Canada)
Checkrate/Likes I wanted to make this thread to show how out of touch someone can be when it comes to bagged vacuums. I’m not starting any drama, I just want to see what other people think of this dude. To give you the best description of this guy, he is simply a Dyson fanatic that hasn’t really used that many kinds of vacuums. In his own world, bagless vacuums are better since they not only “save time” and “money”, but they work better since they have cyclones. That right there shows us that he has NEVER taken apart or even looked at the insides of the cyclones that Dyson has. He also thinks that agitation isn’t important. That just blew me away. I was swearing left and right when he said that. Apparently, the so called “science” shows that cyclones work better. In my opinion, this is kind of a liberal thing to do. They always go off on science, but never see the reality. I don’t give a rats ass how cyclones work. If they just collect dust and odours, then the so called science is meaningless. He also thinks that a full vacuum bag loses suction. I told him that I’ve used a vacuum bag made out of cloth that was more than full, and it still performed like normal. This might sound like a waste of time, but I told him how bagged vacuums were better in every way possible. All he mentioned was what his fake video said. I also told him that I have experience from using all kinds of vacuums. I won’t tell you everything I said since that would take so much of your time, but he continued to say how I was wrong. Apparently me even fixing vacuum motors wasn’t enough. Two last bizarre things he has said was how vacuum stores were a scam and how people who use bagged vacuum for allergies were “ignorant”. Yes, he actually said those things. He stated how vacuum stores were a “scam” and how they were praying on poor and ignorant technology. You can tell this dude knows nothing about owning a business. He also thinks that people who have allergies are dumb for using bagged vacuums since they don’t know how to empty the bin. There is only one way to empty the bin! What is he thinking? He doesn’t know that they aren’t fully sealed or that dust goes back into the air when emptying them. After watching his videos and getting his horrible reply, this guy hasn’t used that many vacuums like I’ve said. I’ve heard some people claiming he gets paid by Dyson. What do you think of this man? Is he just that out of touch? Let me know.

Post# 473139 , Reply# 1 9/8/2024 at 09:00 by Human (Pines of Carolina)
Checkrate/Likes 4 What do I think of him? I prefer not to rent him space in my head.

Post# 473142 , Reply# 2 9/8/2024 at 11:59 by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)
Checkrate/Likes 1 *Just forget about it* There's already another thread about him and no matter what people say, it certainly won't change his views or beliefs and that's one of the reasons why I've never left a comment on his videos. There's a huge difference between joining in the fire versus stepping away. While I may not agree with him on alot of things, I will say though that he has some points. It is true that bags can lose suction even if they are cloth bags, because dust can plug up the pores it'd breathe out of. That's why James Dyson's Hoover Junior got clogged. It is also true that cyclones can same time and money. Take a look at this video that backs up my claims, in fact this was how James Dyson got the inspiration from is a cyclone from a dust collector in a woodshop. While I may be a bagged person myself, I can't say that they're in every way better.

Post# 473149 , Reply# 3 9/8/2024 at 23:09 by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)
Checkrate/Likes 4 Such meaningless drama over something so meaningless.

Post# 473158 , Reply# 4 9/9/2024 at 11:17 by AmtrakSebo1997 (Vacmasterthegreats basement)
Checkrate/Likes . He's probably just a troll. Although, I find it odd that he'd pick us of all communities to pick on if he is.

Post# 473168 , Reply# 5 9/10/2024 at 09:11 by Kirbyman65 (USA)
Checkrate/Likes 1 *What??* How could anyone make such claims on vacuums if he has (what I assume) little to no experience. It really annoys me what he said. When I fix people’s vacuums, It’s all bagless! They clog so much easier.

Post# 473170 , Reply# 6 9/10/2024 at 09:39 by human (Pines of Carolina)
Checkrate/Likes 2 Looking at vacuum cleaner advertising, say, from the 1950s and '60s, compared to the past 20 years, it's interesting to see that the 'advantages' touted back then for disposable filter bags and for bagless machines today is virtually identical. Phrases like 'quicker', 'less mess', and 'more convenient' dominate both, but they tend to ring hollow for the bagless plasticrap machines. Yeah, it's quick to dump the dirt cup and put it back into place, but that ignores the necessary maintenance of also cleaning the filter(s), which takes a lot of time and can be very messy. For me, filter bags are the only to go.

Forum Index:

Other Forums:

Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?
Discuss-O-MAT Log-In

New Members Click Here To Sign Up.

automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy