|
Thread Number: 43448
/ Tag: Recent Vacuum Cleaners from past 20 years
Proof older Bissells are better |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 453903 6/18/2022 at 10:50 (677 days old) by OldCrankman (Lawrenceburg, Indiana) | ||
Here is a video to show that bagged Bissells are better than Bagless. Not trying to offend anyone but just want you to tell me what you learn in this video.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO OldCrankman's LINK | ||
| Post# 453918 , Reply# 1 6/18/2022 at 13:43 (677 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina) | ||
The video is too dark to watch and the sound is too soft to hear but it's not a news flash that older, bagged machines are generally superior to their newer, bagless, plasticrap counterparts. The former are designed to be serviced, repaired and maintained almost indefinitely, while the latter are intended to be (ab)used for a couple of years and then tossed and replaced in a viciously wasteful cycle.
| ||
| Post# 453945 , Reply# 2 6/18/2022 at 23:29 (676 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
Well technically there are still bagged Bissells that you can buy brand new today on the market. You have the Bissell Big Green Commercial line and you also have Sanitaire which is owned by Bissell. Not all Bissells today are bagless. Also I will say this, some of the Bissells like the Big Green Commercial line, they're one of the best Bissells ever sold if not one of the best vacuums ever. In fact I just recently bought this Bissell canister cause I don't think you could ever find a brand new canister that's just as good as this for the price range. If you had either the BG1000 or the BGUPRO14T against all of your other Bissells in the paper pickup test, they would do the best job.
www.bissellcommercial.com... www.sanitairecommercial.com/coll... | ||
| Post# 453989 , Reply# 3 6/21/2022 at 09:11 (674 days old) by Dysonman1 (the county) | ||
The Bissell is also a clean obsessed as well as a perfect. All made by Nationwide Sales and Service.
View Full Size
| ||
| Post# 453998 , Reply# 4 6/21/2022 at 11:23 (674 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 454150 , Reply# 5 6/27/2022 at 16:45 (668 days old) by vaclab (Pickerington, Ohio) | ||
oldCrankman, That's The BEST Video | ||
| Post# 454158 , Reply# 6 6/27/2022 at 19:55 (667 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, Indiana) | ||
Eureka also had great vacuums of the same vintage.
I think the early bagless vacuums started costing way too much R&D to make so then they started cheapening them and then they lost their effectiveness. Then Dyson swooped in and obliterated the market. 1999-2001 seems to have been a good period for bagless vacs.
View Full Size
| ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
