|
Thread Number: 42903
/ Tag: Pre-1950 Vacuum Cleaners
Hoover innovative |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 449273 1/16/2022 at 12:28 (823 days old) by Chan55 (Green Bay, WI) | ||
|
What was the deal with the innovation uptight? Didn’t seem to be around for long. Looked like a nice machine. | ||
| Post# 449274 , Reply# 1 1/16/2022 at 12:58 (823 days old) by Hoover300 (Kentucky) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 449276 , Reply# 2 1/16/2022 at 14:49 (823 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, Indiana) | ||
It was a rebadged domestic import of the UK Hoover Turbomaster U4932. For what reason, don't know. Perhaps a trade agreement, perhaps were using up spare parts. They were not around long. It's a rare vacuum.
I got mine at Goodwill on 4/13/2021 for just $4.99. Ironically two people had just left with bagless Bissell vacuums right before I went in and left this one behind. 2nd photo courtesy of AlexHoovers94 | ||
| Post# 449278 , Reply# 3 1/16/2022 at 15:17 (823 days old) by Chan55 (Green Bay, WI) | ||
|
Inovation Thanks I always wondered about these, when the pix shows up on the opening page of this websight. It looks like a good machine. Did it work well? There seems to be a hard body and a soft bag. Anyone know. If they worked well? | ||
| Post# 449279 , Reply# 4 1/16/2022 at 16:55 (823 days old) by Maytag142c (Somewhere over the rainbow. ) | ||
 | ||
Post# 449291 , Reply# 5 1/17/2022 at 12:36 (822 days old) by gottahaveahoove  (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640) |
||
I have 2 in different colors | ||
| Post# 449316 , Reply# 6 1/18/2022 at 09:10 (821 days old) by dysonman1 (the county) | ||
The cordwinders on the hard body version were troublesome and difficult to repair. I cursed my share of them. I called them the Hoovrah Aggravation. They were also really expensive, and while you could find them in retail stores, most were sold in Hoover Factory Service Centers and Showrooms. At least in St. Louis they were.
| ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}