Thread Number: 38845
/ Tag: Recent Vacuum Cleaners from past 20 years
Bissell Quicksteamer Plus Model 1950 (FAIL) |
[Down to Last] | ![]() |
Post# 412613   8/11/2019 at 20:27 (1,987 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Here's a failed vacuum experiment I just had.
My mom was given a Bissell Quicksteamer Plus by a good friend of hers, who stated that sometimes the soap doesn't come out of it. This particular machine is from the early 2000s, and uses a stationary "Cross Action Brush" that just brushes over the carpet, so it doesn't loosen dirt as well as a machine with rotating brushes. I'm currently at her apartment, so she asked me if I could try and get it working again. I was able to remove the nozzle, brush assembly and spray bar just by unscrewing 4 Phillips head screws. There was a lot of dog hair trapped in the nozzle (the original owner has a Miniature Schnauzer), but I got it out by using a butter knife and soaking the nozzle in water. I also rinsed off the spray bar and brush. The spray bar was connected to a tube, which I had to forcefully pull off to wash the bar. In addition, the measuring cap on the clean water tank was stuck on, making it very difficult to remove. I tried twisting it off, but it wouldn't budge. I ended up using the butter knife to pry off the cap; from there I could attach and remove it normally. Then the magic moment arrived. I filled up the clean water tank with nothing but hot tap water, even though my mom just purchased Bissell formula. I took the Quicksteamer for a test run on a small area of carpet. I used my normal cleaning technique: I squeezed the trigger and slowly moved the machine forward and back, and then I repeated the same strokes without pressing the trigger to extract the remaining water. The first section I did turned out very well; the carpet was left damp, not soaking wet. However, upon doing the next section, while the machine was extracting water, the motor began to stutter and sound rough. I immediately turned the machine off and unplugged it, and then there was a slight but noticeable burning smell! I killed the machine right off the bat. The most likely cause of death was that I sucked up too much water at once, which made its way to the motor. Overall, this is the second time I've had a vacuum motor burn out on me (first was my Fantom Fury). The dirty water that I managed to recover wasn't very dirty, most likely due to the stationary brush. However, there is a cosmetic issue with this machine: one of the latches to the dirty water tank is missing. But the tank stays on well enough with just one latch. My mom is going to tell her friend about what happened. I've never had experience with a Bissell Quicksteamer until now, so what should we do? I'm scared to turn the machine on again after this. Below are some pics; the test area is to the right of the machine. This post was last edited 08/11/2019 at 23:47 |
Post# 414581 , Reply# 1   10/4/2019 at 12:56 (1,933 days old) by EurekaFanSquid (Sacramento, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 414591 , Reply# 2   10/4/2019 at 18:33 (1,933 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, IN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
How did the wheel axles get so rusty? It must have been leaking before you used it. The early 2000's was 2 decades ago. The rubber tubes might have had some cracks or splits in them that allowed a slow drip.
I'd let it dry out for a week or so, and then turn it on again. if it still doesn't come on, she dead. I have a Bissell shampooer from the late 90's and the tube has a split in it. Last time I used it in 2004-ish, bubbles were coming out of the exhaust vent like a bubble blower, lol. |
Post# 414594 , Reply# 3   10/4/2019 at 21:20 (1,933 days old) by MadMan (Chicago, IL, USA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 414601 , Reply# 4   10/4/2019 at 22:55 (1,933 days old) by kirbyklekter (Concord,Ca.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
Can you open it up to expose the motor. Might be a clue in there. If you're comfortable with doing that, what's to lose? |
Post# 414681 , Reply# 5   10/6/2019 at 19:57 (1,931 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
I’m at my mom’s apartment, and I was able to take the Quicksteamer apart down to the motor. The thing I like about this machine is that it comes apart really easily! There’s nothing to it.
I was able to get to the motor, and it looks fine and turns smoothly, but the armature is a bit charred. I’m honestly half-tempted to put the machine back together, turn it on again and see if the water has evaporated. If the motor still sounds rough, it’s dead, Jim. Huskyvacs, I honestly don’t know how the wheel axles got so rusty. Maybe the former owner somewhat abused the machine? At least they turn smoothly enough. Here are some pics of the motor and motor housing. I found this large impeller mounted close to the suction opening, very similar to that of a dirty air vacuum. I think that’s the big downfall of this machine, which led to its possible demise. |
Post# 414716 , Reply# 8   10/7/2019 at 18:59 (1,930 days old) by crazykirbydude (Lexington, KY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
There's a saying on here that these home extractors are only meant to last around 4 uses. I'm actually surprised it made it this long!. It was like a $90 disposable extractor when it came out, and it might be time to take it behind the shed. I'll attach a link to the new and improved version of this.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO crazykirbydude's LINK |
Post# 414723 , Reply# 9   10/7/2019 at 19:47 (1,930 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, IN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Yeah the motor looks clean, I don't think it ever got wet at all. It must have just been used a lot and the motor burned out or a wire terminal overloaded somewhere on it. Spade terminal connectors are easy to jostle loose and create enough arcing that it melts the wire off. There could be something like that somewhere in the motor.
|
Post# 414729 , Reply# 10   10/7/2019 at 22:34 (1,930 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
I'm almost certain that the Quicksteamer series utilize a "dirty-air" design, where all the dirty water is pulled through an impeller before being sprayed into the dirty water tank. I don't think I've ever seen a carpet cleaner with this kind of design.
One observation I've found is that when extracting a lot of dirty solution at once, the motor noise lowers in pitch, most likely due to the water exerting extra stress on the impeller. I think that, to prevent this from happening, I have to squeeze the trigger ONLY on the FORWARD stroke. One last thing: the motor is rather loud and annoying, despite it being 4 amps. But that doesn't surprise me, as carpet cleaners in general tend to have noisy motors. The Quicksteamer just seems louder due to the dirty-fan design. |
Post# 414736 , Reply# 11   10/8/2019 at 01:42 (1,930 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, IN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
I did find a random fix-it video for this shampooer, it's not your problem, but on this guy's model there is some kind of red rubber flapper or gasket over the motor suction channel. I wonder if yours is missing that piece and this is why it failed?
This video here for a slightly newer model from 2003 also shows the red flapper |
Post# 414740 , Reply# 12   10/8/2019 at 11:58 (1,929 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 414742 , Reply# 13   10/8/2019 at 14:47 (1,929 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, IN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Oh is it? Maybe the orange gasket was changed later to make it easier to see.
If the date code is in Julian format, and the number at the top right of the model tag is the date code, it could be the 246th week of 2000. The manual was printed in 2001 though. But with Bissell usually the first two numbers are the year. |
Post# 414845 , Reply# 15   10/11/2019 at 16:35 (1,926 days old) by EurekaFanSquid (Sacramento, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 415005 , Reply# 16   10/16/2019 at 23:29 (1,921 days old) by myles_v (Fredericksburg, VA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]() 1    
![]()
There is no way that it has a "dirty air" design, the water is not designed to go through the fan. I had one of these many years ago, they're just cheaply made. I'd bet that the previous owner allowed a lot of water to get into the motor, possibly by not emptying it when it was full or even by using a cleaning solution that produced too many suds which may have been sucked into the motor. I've had that happen to me before with a similarly designed machine.
|
Post# 415036 , Reply# 17   10/17/2019 at 18:05 (1,920 days old) by bobby1 (indiana)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
These do infact use a "dirty air" design, its the only carpet cleaner ive seen use it. If you suck up to much water at once it will slow the motor down as it's not super powerful. |
Post# 415064 , Reply# 18   10/18/2019 at 22:54 (1,919 days old) by kirbyklekter (Concord,Ca.)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
where I can get the stopper valve that screws to the bottom of the solution/clean water container, mine sticks open, big mess. Thanks. |
Post# 415370 , Reply# 19   10/28/2019 at 02:10 (1,910 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
I'm sad to report that my Quicksteamer saga has NOT come to a happy ending. I went to my mom's apartment after putting the machine back together the prior weekend. I plugged it in and tried turning it on. The motor is now completely shot; it runs slow and stutters, causing the lights in the room to flicker rapidly. I promptly turned the machine off and unplugged it before we suffered any electrical damage.
It doesn't really surprise me that the machine died after running flawlessly for so many years. After all, these Quicksteamers were not built to last, due to the low price and subpar construction. I'd say these Quicksteamers cost around $80 when they were brand new back in the day, but I could be wrong. So I simply took the Quicksteamer outside and set it by the dumpster where it belongs. It's dead, Jim. We will not miss this machine. That is not daylight; this pic was taken at about 7:00 at night.
View Full Size
|
Post# 415372 , Reply# 20   10/28/2019 at 03:33 (1,910 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, IN)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]()
Oh wow, I guess there is wiring inside that possibly must have overheated and burned and shorted across the coils of the armature. Only a heavy arcing can cause such a load on the house wiring that makes the lights flicker but not enough of a current fault to trip the breaker. That is really weird how that happened. It must have just been used a lot and melted the insulation until it touched together.
I found an old Sears ad from 2003 (just a preview unless you buy a subscription to the site) www.newspapers.com/newspa... It looks like the QuickSteamer Plus was selling for $78.99 in 2003 - this equals to $110.01 today. The closest thing Bissell has out there today to compare to this model is the TurboClean Powerbrush which is a compact shampooer weighing 12 lbs and it sells for...$119.99. So that is about right. |
Post# 418181 , Reply# 21   1/5/2020 at 17:01 (1,840 days old) by EurekaFanSquid (Sacramento, California)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |
Post# 418334 , Reply# 22   1/8/2020 at 19:39 (1,837 days old) by edog192 (Lowell, MA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
I hate those Bissell Quicksteamers. I had one and it never actually cleaned the carpet, it just made the carpet wet. I finally threw that Quicksteamer in the garbage where it belongs. |
Post# 418368 , Reply# 24   1/9/2020 at 15:44 (1,836 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
![]()      
![]() |