Thread Number: 38624
/ Tag: Brand New Vacuum Cleaners
Real life shark attack |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 410521   6/15/2019 at 16:40 (1,747 days old) by vacuumdevil (Vacuum Hell )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 410525 , Reply# 1   6/15/2019 at 18:11 (1,747 days old) by DesiredName (Utah)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 410542 , Reply# 3   6/16/2019 at 00:01 (1,747 days old) by CMBCOOL01 (Texas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I will say though early shark wasn't terrible with their steam mops and sweepers but they really should've stayed out of the vacuum industry |
Post# 410567 , Reply# 7   6/16/2019 at 12:53 (1,746 days old) by vacuumdevil (Vacuum Hell )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
@n0oxy Couldn't agree more with you!
@tolivac For the price of a soggy Benjamin some vacuum shops will actually repair these. Oh believe me we tried to sell the owner on buying a dishwasher several times. @DesiredName are you on" vac talk with the pros"? Also this is the proper service technique for Shark vacuums. |
Post# 410569 , Reply# 8   6/16/2019 at 14:26 (1,746 days old) by mark40511 (Lexington, KY)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
has to be energy efficient - Everyone has to be green....We mustn't waste our resources, right? And yet companies produce planned obsolescence appliances, vacuums, the list goes on - wasting TONS and TONS of resources & prouducing unnecessary waste. It's like where are the environmental nazis when it comes to this?
|
Post# 410570 , Reply# 9   6/16/2019 at 15:13 (1,746 days old) by CMBCOOL01 (Texas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yeah this is a massive waste of resources that just goes straight to the dump not to mention the waste of manpower going in to build this crap, it's sad really how we waste resources in the construction of this disposable trash |
Post# 410571 , Reply# 10   6/16/2019 at 15:40 (1,746 days old) by huskyvacs (Gnaw Bone, Indiana)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 410572 , Reply# 11   6/16/2019 at 15:51 (1,746 days old) by CMBCOOL01 (Texas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Well I don't use a shark because it's not worth me paying for it, i have used a Dyson and found the results more or less similar to what many on here and other places have said, i see no reason why thier would be some conspiracy against shark |
Post# 410573 , Reply# 12   6/16/2019 at 15:53 (1,746 days old) by CMBCOOL01 (Texas)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Also there's videos of people testing shark's and showing what poor preformmce they have |
Post# 410580 , Reply# 13   6/17/2019 at 00:32 (1,746 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I know!!!Be GREEN and buy an expensive vacuum cleaner that can be easily REPAIRED!!On rare occasions-the owner of the place I go sometimes uses crappy vacuums as targets!! |
Post# 410680 , Reply# 14   6/19/2019 at 12:55 (1,743 days old) by vacuumdevil (Vacuum Hell )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
@CMBCOOL01 The poor performance of these very narrow Little machines cannot be stated enough until you use one. These vacuums really make most of the TTI products look very good.
@tolivac @mark40511 why I'm not a big environmentalist by any stretch of the imagination. I agree with both of you that it's quite a waste of money and resources. Not to mention everybody's time. Such a shame that consumers are going towards products like this.
View Full Size
|
Post# 410682 , Reply# 15   6/19/2019 at 13:19 (1,743 days old) by Mike811 (Finland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Motors in the Shark vacuums are hilariously small. They run at very high rpm and they run hot. Just look at the contrast to the Nilfisk GM80 motor. |
Post# 410834 , Reply# 17   6/23/2019 at 17:11 (1,739 days old) by vacuumdevil (Vacuum Hell )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 410888 , Reply# 18   6/25/2019 at 10:15 (1,738 days old) by Mike811 (Finland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
@tolivac What model your "silver bullet" is? Mine is this
View Full Size
|