Thread Number: 32710  /  Tag: Recent Vacuum Cleaners from past 20 years
Opinions on Oreck XL's
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 358403   8/30/2016 at 07:48 (2,789 days old) by wyaple (Pickerington, OH)        

wyaple's profile picture
I'm beginning to see these show up in the thrift stores in the central Ohio area for around an $18 typical price. I have read various comments, ranging from "these are great" to "worst machine ever." In attempting to ascertain this model's performance, I have found something around 80" of water lift and over 100 CFM for airflow. I know the Orecks have soft brush rolls and can lay flat. So my big question is, how bad are they and why?

Bill


Post# 358407 , Reply# 1   8/30/2016 at 08:39 (2,789 days old) by Blackheart (North Dakota)        
Ya know

blackheart's profile picture
I really don't feel that Orecks are all that bad. Especially when you compare them to most big box store vacuums. Sure they're a little shrill but they are simple, light and they clean alright. I have noticed that some models came with a white brushroll which has extremely soft bristles, but if you install a stiffer...i'm assuming CWP made red one it does much better. I've actually got a Teal 4090 on the way from ebay, I kinda missed having a "classic" style Oreck.

Post# 358408 , Reply# 2   8/30/2016 at 09:26 (2,789 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)        

dysonman1's profile picture
In my opinion, almost any vacuum removes more dirt from the rug than an Oreck. They have very poor suction and airflow. Most of the cleaning comes from the brush, the suction just moves the dirt to the bag. I wouldn't waste my time plugging in an Oreck, when a Bissell for $48 from Wal-Mart will clean circles around it.

Post# 358420 , Reply# 3   8/30/2016 at 11:30 (2,789 days old) by wyaple (Pickerington, OH)        
So all the YouTube videos are wrong then?

wyaple's profile picture
When I see regular users vacuuming with their XL, most videos appear to show generally OK performance, at least with view-able surface dirt. Does anybody who owns one and regularly uses it have any comments? Of course if I get one, I'll be sure to measure it and post the results. I'm very curious as to how a very lightweight machine works.

Bill


Post# 358421 , Reply# 4   8/30/2016 at 12:19 (2,789 days old) by Kirbysthebest (Midwest)        
Orecks are ok machines

For what they are designed for.   Usually lower pile carpet.

 

I still contend that if someone, say an older adult or physically disabled individual were able to use an Oreck daily, or every other day.  They are able to maintain a carpet better than only using a full sized machine once a month.

 

 


Post# 358423 , Reply# 5   8/30/2016 at 12:29 (2,789 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)        

panasonicvac's profile picture
I don't know why the Carpet and Rug Institute would rate the Orecks on the Gold level because I don't think they are that good on carpets. I will agree that they are ok but there are better machines out there. I also do perfer Orecks better than dysons or Garry which in my opinion that Garry is the worst vacuum ever made.

Post# 358428 , Reply# 6   8/30/2016 at 14:23 (2,789 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
They were popular in the beginning due to their light weight

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
'Weighing only 8 pounds". People liked them for that..
I have a friend who bought a very expensive "Top of the line". She's an older woman. Once, she broke something in her kitchen and asked me to 'help her clean it up'. I had to run this "Top of the line" cleaner....hm it was ok.
At the last place where I worked, they had one. I, too, had to use it once or twice. The handle was completely blocked with debris. When I took it apart to unclog it, it read, WHEN it blocks.....do....etc. Not IF, but WHEN.
I was given one after I helped clean out a friend's home. I quickly 're-gifted' it to someone who'd appreciate it., Do I bash"? No.
They do seem to do better on low pile carpet. Best of luck with yours.


Post# 358436 , Reply# 7   8/30/2016 at 15:35 (2,789 days old) by Vinvac (Dubuque IA)        

vinvac's profile picture
Orecks,

I have the Oreck XL21 and love it.

Many here have a bad opinion of the Oreck. Mine is very different. The XL21 I have is a very good vacuum. Not overly loud, grooms the carpet and has good airflow.

My sister owns the same vacuum and it is still running well. Any vacuum that can stand up to my sister has to have some merit. She also has a central vac unit with the Turbo Cat power brush. I vacuumed her living room with the central vacuum and was not impressed. So I dug out the Oreck. Her carpet is not a low pile carpet and I was amazed at the amount of dirt the Oreck pulled up. You could hear the dirt going up thru the fan on the Oreck. Now, had her central vacuum been using an electric power head the results may not have been the same. Her vacuum is a Haydan bagless unit...

The biggest complaint I have with the Oreck is the cost. But really not out of line when you compare them to Hoover, Riccar, Lux, Meile and other light weight uprights similar in style. But in my opinion they are all over priced.




Post# 358437 , Reply# 8   8/30/2016 at 15:44 (2,789 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)        

human's profile picture
My former girlfriend had an Oreck. I was never at all impressed with its performance. One time she borrowed my Kirby Heritage I to do some 'deep cleaning' and the next thing I knew, the Oreck had disappeared from her apartment. She told me later she'd pitched the Oreck in the trash. When I jokingly asked her if I'd just lost me a Kirby, she said "yes" and it turns out she meant it. We parted company a year ago and I've haven't seen that machine since.

Post# 358440 , Reply# 9   8/30/2016 at 16:50 (2,789 days old) by bearwise (Bakersfield, CA)        

I have to agree that they are ok machines and work best on low pile carpets. Anything thicker and it's like dragging a sleeping cat by the tail...no fun at all.
One positive...you get a decent arm workout :)


Post# 358454 , Reply# 10   8/31/2016 at 06:08 (2,788 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Yes, light,

and appreciated for being made in America. Now Oreck is just another choice from TTI.

Post# 358461 , Reply# 11   8/31/2016 at 09:20 (2,788 days old) by singerman (Missouri)        
Well

singerman's profile picture
Oreck's are not my personal favorites. They are alright even though I would never want one. If I had to pick a lightweight vacuum it would be a simplicity freedom.

Post# 358463 , Reply# 12   8/31/2016 at 10:25 (2,788 days old) by vac-o-matic (Saint Louis, Mo.)        

I have plush cut pile carpeting over a premium pad that's getting on in age. When I use my XL21 it brings it back to life! My dog gets two Milk Bones a day, and some of the crums make it into the pile that she doesn't get. The Oreck gets those crums that work their way down into the pile. I had a Simplicity model RSL3 IIRC. I picked one up in a thrift store that was in excellent condition. While it cleaned well, talk about a screamer! Not bashing, just observation/opinion. I quickly flipped it, and don't think it did any better than my XL21, and it's way quieter. Like any vacuum if you keep them serviced, they serve their owners well.

Post# 358465 , Reply# 13   8/31/2016 at 10:52 (2,788 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
My "lightweight" cleaner is the

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
Hoover Platinum.

Post# 358472 , Reply# 14   8/31/2016 at 12:13 (2,788 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)        

panasonicvac's profile picture
I have a neighbor that has a XL21, I used to like it at first because it was so fun to use but I got bored with it very quickly. One thing I didn't like cleaning with it was it was a little hard to push because they had very high pile carpet but I thought it still cleaned good, another thing I didn't like was it definitely spew dust around where the fill tube was and close to the fan chamber, I also didn't like changing the bags because it was a mess to pop out, and I don't like the handle on the XL21 because I thought it was very uncomfortable to use (One time I got a blister from it). After that I switched over to their central vac with a Lindhaus powerhead they later upgraded because it was much better to use.

Just my overall experience.


Post# 358525 , Reply# 15   9/1/2016 at 03:33 (2,788 days old) by jpow30 (seattle)        

we have 2 oreck commercial in one office that dose pretty good job on med pile carpet it leave good vacuum marks
we have a oreck xl 21 in the other office has low pile carpet we dump it every 2 month or more you may know this but oreck and oreck xl21 have differ fans oreck has 5 blade oreck xL 21 has 7 blade


Post# 358533 , Reply# 16   9/1/2016 at 07:44 (2,787 days old) by wyaple (Pickerington, OH)        
Maybe I Shouldn't Have Passed This One Up

wyaple's profile picture
Saw this at a thrift store two weeks ago, looked in very good condition. Can anybody date this machine based on the label? Would it be either December of 2005 or May of 2012?

Bill


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 4         View Full Size
Post# 358536 , Reply# 17   9/1/2016 at 08:34 (2,787 days old) by vac-o-matic (Saint Louis, Mo.)        

It came off the line on the 52nd day of 2012. Very basic Oreck with the switch on the base, shorter cord, and non-hypo-allergenic outer bag. Everything looks to be in good shape. I worked for an Oreck store part time for over 8 yrs. and know how to date the vacuum. Around Christmas these sold for 199.99 for the upright only, sold a ton of them.

Post# 358539 , Reply# 18   9/1/2016 at 08:39 (2,787 days old) by Rainbowd4 (TN )        
Date

It's positively not from 2012. These were available even back in the mid nineties, and probably earlier, but yours is from '05 it seems.

Post# 358542 , Reply# 19   9/1/2016 at 10:38 (2,787 days old) by vacman117 (Chicago, IL)        

vacman117's profile picture
The 2200 in the previous picture has been the entry model for the past few years now. Big Lots had them for around $100 about four years ago.

I believe you can still get them on Amazon for around $199..

Chase


Post# 358567 , Reply# 20   9/1/2016 at 22:39 (2,787 days old) by daknx1994 (Southern Indiana)        

Vac-o-matic is right, it was made the 52nd day of 2012. The C designates it was series C or the third series of that paticular 2200. These were in Biglots for a while but on the box they said remanufactured I remember because I ended up buying one from Biglots. I sold it on to a family member in need of a decent plain Jane vacuum.

Post# 358588 , Reply# 21   9/2/2016 at 09:56 (2,786 days old) by kirbyvertibles (Independence, KS)        

kirbyvertibles's profile picture
Oreck seem to be like Kirby meaning collectors either love it or hate it. Personally I love both. Some Orecks are great some not so much. I have some authentic vintage DEEEEEP shag carpet and my orecks look at it and say "um no" but I love them for shorter carpet and even though I hate an upright on tile floor I will say the Oreck isn't bad on the bare floor.

Post# 358636 , Reply# 22   9/3/2016 at 00:32 (2,786 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)        

durango159's profile picture
I have used about 15 different Oreck upright units of various models: Commercial XL, 2 XL-21 series, pivoting head model, Dual Stack Commercial, several XL Ultras. Every single one that I have used has given me an allergic spasm within just a few minutes of use!!! Many of the units had just returned home from their included service annual checkups from Oreck or were refurbished by collectors or new!!

Additionally, these units weigh 8-9 pounds, I think the Dual Stack Commercial unit may have weighed around 15 pounds. All of them feel like pushing bricks across the carpet. The brush roll does nothing to propel them at all on any of the models that I've tried.

I have found cleaning mediocre. The XL-21 does a better job but still not great. Noise is loud on most of the models I have found.

The filtration issue I think comes from poor sealing around the bag and not being powerful I think the brush roll kicks a lot of dirt up into the air and the airflow isn't powerful enough to catch it all. In comparison I have Hoover Celebrity canisters, Eureka B bag canisters, Hoover A bag convertible with vinyl bag, and have used TONS of vacuums over the years none of those Hoovers or Eurekas would be rated very well for filtration but I have never experienced any sort of allergic attack to them during use!! The Oreck and also the Garry Vac give me the same allergic reaction!!!

I have tried the Riccar SupraLite and although a little loud, it glided itself across the floor with ease, the floor looked very clean, construction seemed significantly better than Oreck and I had no issues whatsoever with filtration and being able to actually use the vacuum!!!

Oreck had a power nozzle canister years ago known as the DutchTech series. There was a green unit and a white TOL unit. The second generation of these canisters came equipped with a Wessel Werk EBK 340 power head. Very nice, powerful cleaning canister vacuum cleaners!! If you ever see one of these, I highly recommend it. They are very powerful and quiet with great filtration. But their uprights I can not recommend at all!!!


Post# 358637 , Reply# 23   9/3/2016 at 00:37 (2,786 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)        
Also I agree with DysonMan1

durango159's profile picture
Bissells may not be the best cleaners either but for $42 I believe is the going price for the bagged Bissell PowerForce vacuum at Walmart, it will clean circles around any of the Orecks I have used over the years!!! The Bissell is also lighterweight, more pleasant sounding, better filtration-- I feel. The Bissell is significantly easier to manuever and push around the room but you can also feel its power on the carpet! Orecks are just stiff overall to push whether on or off!

Unlike an Oreck that has to be carried around the house due to its wheel design, the Bissell has great wheels to tip the vacuum bag and pleasantly roll around the house from room to room!

I heavily recommend the Bissell bagged PowerForce upright over an Oreck!!! A few years ago there was a royal blue colored Bissell Powerforce-- really stunning color that machine was!!


Post# 358641 , Reply# 24   9/3/2016 at 02:16 (2,786 days old) by stormcrash (Seattle, WA)        

Having grown up with them I'm a fan of Oreck vacuums. My current vacuum is an Oreck Graphite model and my parents have an XL2 that's over 10 years old and still runs like a champ. They've always cleaned our medium height carpet well and the bushy bristles on the brush roll groom the carpet really nicely. I've never had a problem with them clogging and while they are loud I find them less annoying than vacuums with a shrill high pitch motor like a shark I used for a year.

In terms of the TTI buyout most of the models are still made in the USA including the whole new elevate line. The Magnesium series is made in china but the classic and commercial uprights are still made in TN. I do think TTI needs to up their game on advertising for the brand and get it back out there more.

I do wish that they would add a headlight to the XL Classic, but I think the new elevate models look quite nice


Post# 358655 , Reply# 25   9/3/2016 at 08:51 (2,785 days old) by rvarley (illinois)        

To original poster - If you've never tried an Oreck, I suggest you try one and form your own opinion. Not having ever used one, I can't comment on the machine, but for my own use cases, a light weight, smaller machine is best. And I do like simple uprights that are plain vacuums without all the silly attachments. My personal fav is the lightweight Riccar or Simplicity. Although loud, they are easy to push, maneuverable and powerful. Mine is top of the line, so it has the low speed switch for hard surfaces and it does great on them. And the cord is the longest I've ever seen on a vacuum. I think Tacony also makes a version which is battery powered which would be interesting to try. Getting rid of the cord makes the task that much easier. Big, heavy, clumsy uprights with a ton of attachments - no thanks.

Post# 358680 , Reply# 26   9/4/2016 at 01:02 (2,785 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

the battery powered Simplicity Freedom works really well-love using it a the vac shop-soon I will be getting one-a great partner to my Volt powernozzle.Same vacuum but configured to be a powernozzle to be used with any canister or central vacuum-the Volt really works-Love mine!

Post# 358691 , Reply# 27   9/4/2016 at 12:06 (2,784 days old) by Blackheart (North Dakota)        
Oreck

blackheart's profile picture
The 4090 i ordered from Ebay arrived yesterday. I started it up right after assembly to clean my rug....then realized it had a broken belt It actually did pick up some surface litter despite that. It's no powerhouse...but it does a respectable job and grooms very well.

  View Full Size
Post# 358696 , Reply# 28   9/4/2016 at 13:57 (2,784 days old) by wyaple (Pickerington, OH)        
I'll definitely pick one up the next time

wyaple's profile picture
I see one at the thrift stores. Now since I know how to read the year from the serial number, that'll help me decide if it's worth whatever they might be asking.

Bill


Post# 359299 , Reply# 29   9/14/2016 at 14:35 (2,774 days old) by Blackheart (North Dakota)        
A week's worth of dirt

blackheart's profile picture
In order to find out if they are really effective or not I ran the Oreck 4090, pictured above 6/7 days in a week (I skipped Sunday due to feeling ill, and having to work)
I live in a 1 bedroom apt, it's just my cat and I, only my living room and bedroom have carpeting, there's also a rug by the door.

In my opinion it did rather well, and i'd feel comfortable using an oreck (older or newer) as a sole vacuum (along with a companion canister). Sure it's not a tandem air, kirby, or sanitaire but i do feel it does a respectable job.

Here's some shots of the debris it gathered in it's week long run, some of the grittier particles were still caught in the folds, especially the bottom.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 4         View Full Size
Post# 359303 , Reply# 30   9/14/2016 at 16:27 (2,774 days old) by vac-o-matic (Saint Louis, Mo.)        

Devin, that amount in the bag after a week shows that Orecks are viable cleaners. There are so many haters out there that bash the brand. When I worked at the Oreck store, people would bring them in and they weighed 15lbs. instead of 8, they'd set it up on the platform, and say "it's not pickin' up"! That's because they filled the bag to the max, and it was like a brick! Oh well, hard to help stupid. Where did they think the dirt went? If you keep a good brushroll/belt on them, they work well. As for people complaining about them leaking dust around the tubes, tighten the collars around each end of the tube, and make sure there's a rubber ring inside the collar! I use my Orecks frequently and never have that problem.

Post# 359336 , Reply# 31   9/15/2016 at 07:33 (2,773 days old) by wyaple (Pickerington, OH)        
I'm Always Amazed When People Have Such

wyaple's profile picture
Varying opinions and experiences with nearly the same machine. For this simple XL model, it's "supposed" to have high airflow and at least medium water lift, so I get confused when one group can't seem to get these to work well and another group has great results for over 10 years.

I never use a vac to pick up debris, only dust and dirt that humans normally can't pickup by hand. And all my machines are kept squeaky clean, brush rolls included. If your cleaner is clogged, brush roll has enough hair to cover someone's head and bag is jam-packed, you're not getting the best cleaning experience possible.

Bill


Post# 359341 , Reply# 32   9/15/2016 at 08:39 (2,773 days old) by kloveland (Tulsa)        

kloveland's profile picture
I personally like them. The tall handle is great for taller people. And they groom carpet nicely. I currently have two of the older style Oreck uprights. They are also very easy to service! :)

Post# 359349 , Reply# 33   9/15/2016 at 11:14 (2,773 days old) by daknx1994 (Southern Indiana)        

I personally like them. People complain about the noise level but have you used a Tacony lightweight? Those are not by any means any quieter. Are they over priced? Somewhat even when compared to Tacony models. They sell well and most consumers seem to love them. I have two classic type models as well as a platinum model. I have fifteen year old carpet and the Oreck's are one of the only machines that makes the carpet stand up and look refreshed. I hear many people complain that they are not real durable. I would have people bring them into work and most of the time the fans were jammed due to a coin or Bobby pin being picked up. The worst I have seen is on the xl21 models, the early ones having fan housings split apart. Other than that I have never seen major problems out of these units.

Post# 359457 , Reply# 34   9/17/2016 at 03:10 (2,772 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

Maybe like Simplicity--Oreck should try to come out with a cordless Oreck.The dealer I frequent carries both Oreck and Simplicity-the Simplicitys outsell the Orecks.Customers really like the cordless Simplicity.I am getting one in the near future.

Post# 359467 , Reply# 35   9/17/2016 at 08:56 (2,771 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
But TTI

already has a cordless Dirt Devil.

Post# 359519 , Reply# 36   9/19/2016 at 00:32 (2,770 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)        

durango159's profile picture
A Simplicity Supralite will zoom itself across a room if in upright handle and turned on!! They will run away from you quick if switch is on when the unit is plugged in. An oreck doesn't have that power.

Orecks are lightweight to carry but hard to push I've noticed. The Simplicity's maneuver easy and clean fantastic.


Post# 359523 , Reply# 37   9/19/2016 at 01:34 (2,770 days old) by stormcrash (Seattle, WA)        

I've never found Oreck vacuums hard to push, I actually sometimes find myself vacuuming too quickly especially towards the end. And while not fast, growing up if our Oreck was on and in the upright locked position it would start to slowly crawl forward under its own power.

One other thing I will say is that I think Oreck nailed it with the Helping Hand handle design in terms of ergonomics. I still see so many vacuums with the traditional slight bend stick handle (maybe with a guard) that are terrible for wrist position. After looking up info on ergonomics last year when my bad computer posture at work started bothering my mouse hand I've realized that the Oreck handle design really does keep your wrist in perfect alignment when in the vacuuming position


Post# 359607 , Reply# 38   9/19/2016 at 19:36 (2,769 days old) by Kirbyloverdan (Egg Harbor Twp . NJ aka HOOVERLOVERDAN ❤️)        
The XL 21

kirbyloverdan's profile picture
Through the pilots to the newest Oreck the Elevate
Conquer all do that with handle in upright position .


Dan


Post# 359715 , Reply# 39   9/21/2016 at 18:46 (2,767 days old) by rise2it (Tenn)        
Oreck opinion

My opinion was that Oreck was the "Bose Stereo" of the vacuum world...massively overpriced due (in part) to the insane amount of advertising done...what should have been an $89 vacuum that sold for $300. (..and their customer's loved them, at least when they first got them..)



Post# 359819 , Reply# 40   9/24/2016 at 03:32 (2,765 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

It was said that--by the vac shop owners I know-the Orecks and other lightweight uprights were liked by older or elderly folks because they are easy to pick up and push-esp with the "handplane" handle on the Orecks.When I use one-I feel like I am pushing an old Stanley handplane.That handle does have those merits-you can exert some push with little effort on your part.

Post# 361306 , Reply# 41   10/21/2016 at 20:30 (2,737 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)        

panasonicvac's profile picture
Well I got a call earlier today from this same neighbor that wanted me to come vacuum for her. Turns out the lindhaus powerhead wasn't working so I had to use her other vacuum. They don't have the XL21 anymore, they now have a black XL2 they got not too long ago. Wow that thing was TERRIBLE. It was VERY HARD to push on their rugs and medium pile carpet. It was okay on cleaning carpets, I think the XL21 did a little better job than the XL2 but I can't remember. I thought the worst part was I was disgust on how much dust and dirt was blowing out on the neck of the nozzle, I even vacuumed up a few screws accidently and a huge dust cloud came out of the neck.

I haven't used a Oreck in years but now I gotta say that Oreck is another brand I would say to stay away from.


Post# 361674 , Reply# 42   10/29/2016 at 23:08 (2,729 days old) by stormcrash (Seattle, WA)        

Sounds like there's something quite wrong with that vacuum then. The XL2 is from the early/mid 2000's so that vacuum is probably about a decade old and in need of a tune up. While you shouldn't have sent a screw up the vacuum, it sounds like the gaskets on the tube collars are bad if there's dust coming out. The wheels may be stuck too if its that hard to push vs a 21. The 21 is newer and a higher end model but it sounds unfair to judge based on what appears to be a machine in very rough shape

Post# 361679 , Reply# 43   10/30/2016 at 00:27 (2,729 days old) by panasonicvac (Northern Utah)        

panasonicvac's profile picture
The XL2 was bought a year ago refurbished from a nearby Oreck dealer, that thing looked like brand new to be quite honest. All the wheels were fine, they weren't stuck at all. The neck of the nozzel was also fine, gaskets were fine, no cracks, and all screws were tighten in place (This was when I replaced the belt on the Oreck to make sure underneath was fine). I always check to make sure a vacuum is in good shape before I would clean a house with it or give my overall final thoughts on a vacuum when I test one out. Even after inspecting the Oreck including replacing the bag and belt on it, it really didn't make much of a difference when I went to cleaning with it. I would still give credit to the XL21 because I remember that thing wasn't hard to push at all on area rugs compare to the XL2 but neither of them would outclean their Central Vacuum.

Post# 361717 , Reply# 44   10/30/2016 at 20:22 (2,728 days old) by Luxkid1980 (Richmond, Virginia)        

I have an Oreck XL Classic that I bought refurbished at BigLots a few years ago and it's been great! The only maintenance i've done is to replace the bags and I replaced the belt once. I like the very simple components of this vacuum. It cleans my medium pile carpet and hard wood floors very well. I'm not sure how the vacuum could possibly get a poor review. Its a simple vacuum and it gets up dirt very well. It doesn't need all the silly contraptions that some newer style vacuums seem to come with these days..HEPA filters. The Oreck dust bag filters the air. What more do you need? Thus far, my Oreck has been trouble free and it only cost me $99. Also, the vacuum isnt hard to push, no more than a vacuum should be. Besides...vacuuming is a chore. You have to put in some effort to vacuum with any machine, except maybe the robot ones. If you find one at a thrift store at a good price, they are worth it. Just spend some time to clean it up and replace the maintenance parts (brush roll, belt, bag, etc.)

Post# 361734 , Reply# 45   10/31/2016 at 11:14 (2,727 days old) by sptyks (Skowhegan, Maine)        

sptyks's profile picture

For me vacuuming is not a chore, in fact I look forward to it 2 or 3 times a week. I own 4 Kirby's, a Royal metal upright, and a Hoover Windtunnel Air. The Hoover lives in the bathroom since it is the smallest. It is on constant standby for kitty litter pickup as that is where the litter box resides. 

 

I love to vacuum the rest of my home with my Kirby's and Royal which all do an excellent job. I also shampoo my carpets every 3 or 4 months with my Kirby Sentria.

 

I have never owned an O'wreck and because of all the negative reviews I have read here on VacuumLand and elsewhere, I doubt I ever will.

 

 


Post# 361742 , Reply# 46   10/31/2016 at 14:32 (2,727 days old) by Luxkid1980 (Richmond, Virginia)        

I still consider vacuuming a chore, because what is a chore? It's a task that we routinely do; be it daily, weekly, etc. There are many chores that I like.. including vacuuming :) I also like washing clothes..though I hate folding them afterwards! Oreck XLs are great vacuums for what they are intended to do.. get dirt off the floor. They are not great at vacuuming the couch or a chair :)



Post# 361867 , Reply# 47   11/2/2016 at 18:00 (2,725 days old) by daknx1994 (Southern Indiana)        

Things just don't seem to add up. I feel some people on here stick their nose up at a vacuum just because of a few others thoughts. If you have never owned one or really used one (and I am not talking about just a few minutes using one), don't comment on it. Orecks are hard to kill and actually do a pretty damn good job. If I had to give up all of my vacuums and keep one, it would be my Oreck's. They are lightweight, easy to use, and do not give me a headache like other vacuums. So if you do not have any sound experience using one, don't comment. I don't go around saying things about brands that I have never used or damn near owned.

Rant over, long day at work.


Post# 362949 , Reply# 48   11/30/2016 at 17:17 (2,697 days old) by icee (Indiana)        
They are ok

icee's profile picture
I have an oreck xl signature gold edition, it's basically a normal xl with a diffirent color bag. It does ok lol. It definitly is for low pile carpet. The brushes are fairly soft and suction could be higher. Those with low pile carpet, elderly, or physically handicapped would be fine using it (the later two because its light weight).

Post# 362958 , Reply# 49   12/1/2016 at 09:12 (2,696 days old) by kirbyvertibles (Independence, KS)        

kirbyvertibles's profile picture
Those that have only used the lower end models with the smaller motor really need to try the bigger ones like the XL21 and newer. If you think the basic Oreck is meh just ok, you will love the bigger ones.

Post# 363016 , Reply# 50   12/2/2016 at 19:34 (2,695 days old) by wyaple (Pickerington, OH)        
I wasn't aware that the XL-21 had a bigger motor

wyaple's profile picture
I'll have to re-adjust my sights for that model then. Maybe the larger motor won't be such of a screamer as the standard XL.

Bill



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy