|
Thread Number: 31245
/ Tag: Pre-1950 Vacuum Cleaners
Hoover Knowledge?? - Which Hoover is worth restoring? |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 345638 2/27/2016 at 19:40 (2,979 days old) by chicagomike (Plover, WI) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 345639 , Reply# 1 2/27/2016 at 19:44 (2,979 days old) by chicagomike (Plover, WI) | ||
|
Hoover 105 Pics
1. I believe it is missing a part from the underside.
2. Definitely missing a wheel and brush roll, cloth bag 3. Possibly missing something from the rear of the vac as there is a stray curved piece of metal not doing anything. 4. The handle could possibly not be the correct for the machine 5. And I am sure it has other issues. | ||
| Post# 345640 , Reply# 2 2/27/2016 at 19:48 (2,979 days old) by chicagomike (Plover, WI) | ||
|
Hoover 725 Pics
1. I believe it is missing a part from the underside.
2. Definitely missing brush roll 3. And I am sure it has other issues. | ||
| Post# 345641 , Reply# 3 2/27/2016 at 19:51 (2,979 days old) by chicagomike (Plover, WI) | ||
|
Hoover 800 Pics
1. Definitely has some rear wheel issues (missing chunks or pieces), missing a brush roll and cloth bag
2. And I am sure it has other issues... | ||
| Post# 345643 , Reply# 4 2/27/2016 at 20:34 (2,979 days old) by CoffeeCanMan (Ferndale, MI) | ||
Mike, give me a call sometime and I'll tell you anything you want to know about these. The short answer is that the 800 is probably the one I'd choose to restore, followed by the 105 (the handle is correct but it's missing several pieces which may be hard to find). The 725 is common, though still worth saving.
| ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}