Thread Number: 31022  /  Tag: Recent Vacuum Cleaners from past 20 years
the rise in popularity of cylinder vacuums in the UK
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 342822   2/4/2016 at 12:06 (3,002 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

Hi Everyone,

I noticed today that one of my neighbours has replaced her Vax Naked upright thing with a Dyson Ball Animal cylinder thing. And this got me thinking about something I hadn't really picked up, but cylinders definitely are on the rise in the UK.

I can't quite put my figure on when this happened or why. I did think it was due to the increased popularity of hard floors, but even people with all carpeted homes seem to be buying them.

Has anyone else picked up on this? What do we think prompted this cylinder boom?

One of the collectors on Facebook made a good point that the popularity of Vax tub vacs in the 90's, which used to be demonstrated live in department stores and electrical shops, could have vastly contributed. Especially given that the 80's saw something of a revolution in cylinders as the major brands all introduced new designs of floortools that were far superior to the older ones (think Hoover Sensotronics with the Contour head and the Lux 2000 style tool).

Any other ideas? I'm not wanting to start a cylinder vs. upright debate as we all know there are advantages to both styles, just interested to hear people's thoughts on the current market and changing trends :)


Post# 342835 , Reply# 1   2/4/2016 at 14:26 (3,001 days old) by citroenbx (england)        

citroenbx's profile picture
hard flooring I think

Post# 342842 , Reply# 2   2/4/2016 at 14:59 (3,001 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        
Nice thread :) Here are my questions;

Maybe people find it satisfying to give the carpets a good "scrubbing" with the floor tool which they think works best?

Maybe they have a lot of furniture and British homes are tiny so something like a cylinder is more agile, especially with loads of furniture people can't be bothered to move? I can't be bothered moving the glass coffee tables we have (which are also popular) and need a low profile vacuum.

Maybe uprights look bulky and people find them too heavy with previous experiences?

Maybe people know that a hose is easier to pull off the cylinder wand rather than removing one off an upright and assembling tubes?

Maybe people believe cylinder vacuums are better for car cleaning than uprights?

Maybe people find the powerful suction to be very good and think it cleans really good?

Maybe they see Numatic Henry's everywhere which set a good example of cylinder vacuums? I see way more Henry's than any other commercial upright.

The list goes on...


Post# 342865 , Reply# 3   2/4/2016 at 22:25 (3,001 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
A lot of people I know in my town haven't bought cylinder vacs but rather the cordless hand helds from Dyson and countless other cordless type vacs. As mentioned in other forums, I believe people are returning to the idea of a cylinder vacuum VIA the hand held or cordless vacuums. Once they realise that small tools can work dependent on the design, then they can naturally make the same assumptions with more conventional vacs.

I have noticed that a lot more shops are selling cylinder vacs versus uprights, too.. There seems to be a trait here based on the fact that for every one upright vacuum in a box, you can effectively have three boxes of cylinder vacs and one box alone tends to be a lot easier to take out of a high street shop from the buyer's point of view.

The cost price also helps too, particularly when not many other budget brands other than existing ones PLUS the supermarket exclusives offer budget priced uprights versus a cheap pull along vac.


Post# 343296 , Reply# 4   2/9/2016 at 17:24 (2,996 days old) by DaveTranter (Central England, U.K.)        
Cylinders in the U.K.

I think Parwaz has pretty well summed up the 'pros and cons'.

Sadly, I doubt that many of the 'buying public' think so deeply as to consider the type of flooring that they have, or the amount of clutter that they have to clean around/under..... The odds are that it boils down to the two factors of-

Small, lightweight machine with small, lightweight wand/head...
And.....
Less moving/mechanical parts = (usually, anyway) CHEAP!!!!!!

Most purchasers are female, and (generally) want something lightweight, regardless of how impractical it is. I have had several through my hands recently for 'servicing/unblocking' where the only fault is that the tiny disposable bag is crammed full, along with the last foot or so of the (extremely narrow) hose. I suppose that people are surprised at how very little they will hold!!

It is easy to forget that we (??) are enthusiasts/specialists. The 'average' customer sees something compact and 'pretty' and buys it. 'Cheap' helps, too!! ;-)

Just my 2 cents' worth!!

All best

Dave T


Post# 343309 , Reply# 5   2/9/2016 at 19:39 (2,996 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
I haven't noticed that many people near me with cylinders. The vast majority seem to have uprights.

I do agree that the cordless type has really taken off at the moment, probably partly because of that very flashy advert from G-tech. Vax and Dyson also advertise on TV their cordless machines, so it is hardly surprising about the cordless being popular. I think it will just be a faze with those, though, since people will quickly realise they are incapable of the "fulsize" job they are put up against.

Back to the topic of cylinders, I really think that people buy them because they are in general cheaper to buy than uprights.

I will always buy/stick with uprights, just what I grew up with, I think they are far easier to use, store and are superior in performance to a cylinder, possibly more convenient than a cylinder too.

My opinion.

Alex.


Post# 343338 , Reply# 6   2/9/2016 at 23:54 (2,996 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)        

delaneymeegan's profile picture
I wonder if it is the very success of Henry and his pals, that is prompting other manufacturers to think it's a potential market. What' more, Henry is cute, but lets admit, he's a bit outdated. Perhaps these other manufacturers see a maturing flower, thus potential for stealing market share?

I've heard there is a limited number on offer, that have an electric carpet brush.

Apparently this guy is no longer available? Too bad...



Post# 343339 , Reply# 7   2/9/2016 at 23:56 (2,996 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)        

delaneymeegan's profile picture
Even though I'm lowly, and live in the U.S., I got my first Henry and he has a PN, he even came from the U.K. via Royal Mail.....

---- but, I don't know IF-F-F.... he "counts".


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 3         View Full Size
Post# 343350 , Reply# 8   2/10/2016 at 02:01 (2,996 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        
Reply #5

I noticed that there are more upright users in my area as well. There are cylinders, but mostly Henry's, Hetty's, Dyson DC19's, DC28C's and high end ball models

Post# 343352 , Reply# 9   2/10/2016 at 04:01 (2,996 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Sorry, I should've been a bit more specific.

I would definitely say that uprights are still the more popular, but I'm noticing more and more people buying new cylinders rather than uprights. Even people who used to have uprights are switching to cylinders.

Tayyab made some good points above, especially regarding cylinder pressence in commercial environments possibly influencing the domestic market - we see so many commercial cylinder vacs in the workplace, schools, hotels etc that perhaps people are cottoning on the reliability factor?

I have to say, there seems to be far more choice in terms of cylinders on the market than uprights. Since Panasonic stopped making vacuums, there's no "decent but cheap" uprights on the market anymore.


Post# 343353 , Reply# 10   2/10/2016 at 04:11 (2,996 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

The fact that Henry has been described here as "outdated" and yet is one of the best-selling cleaners highlights perfectly the difference between an enthusiast and a consumer.

The reason Henry might look outdated is because he is similar to older cleaners which did only what was needed in order to perform well in the days before vacuum cleaners had so many bells and whistles.

The Henry cleaners which have been discontinued were poor sellers. It wasn't that consumers didn't want Henry per-se, they just didn't want the models that did more than the standard.


Post# 343354 , Reply# 11   2/10/2016 at 04:53 (2,996 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
I really see little point in a cylinder with a Powernozle, might as well get an upright if you want a revolving brush, adding a power head to a cylinder tales away the whole convenience aspect.

Post# 343376 , Reply# 12   2/10/2016 at 10:44 (2,996 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
If the cylinder in question comes with interchangeable floor heads I see no convenience being taken away, but rather an added convenience - particularly when owners may have to do that presently changing from combi or turbo brush to combi or when taking said machine out to the car.

Ive said it before and I'll say it again. Whilst Im sure canisters with PNs are popular, I have not been that much of a fan of them; hoses aren't as flexible as non-electric and other brands have exterior power cords that sit outside that sit too vulnerable to the floor head.

Also Im not keen on the weight. From the front of the floor head no matter if the PN brush bar floats or aids gliding to the weight of the machine at the back. Much prefer a traditional upright where the weight is all in one place.


Post# 343396 , Reply# 13   2/10/2016 at 13:58 (2,996 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

In theory, power nozzle cylinders should be perfect. I mean, it's upright carpet performance coupled with the convenience and flexibility of a cylinder, what's not to love? But in reality, I'm inclided to agree with Nar. The heavier hoses and often chunky handles to cope with the remote controls, in my experience, take away from the benefits of using a cylinder. I'd much rather use an air driven turbo brush or just straight suction with a well designed floortool.


Post# 343403 , Reply# 14   2/10/2016 at 15:00 (2,995 days old) by Kirbysthebest (Midwest)        
delaneymegan

Your little Henry is so cute.  I don't often tell another guy his Henry is cute btw.  

 

I wonder if this is what Jeanie had in her bottle on I Dream of Jeanie?

 


Post# 343407 , Reply# 15   2/10/2016 at 15:24 (2,995 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

Not sure if you've noticed delaneymorgan, but your Henry is actually a Harry.

Here's some more toy Henry's - the Casdon toy version, the soft toy Henry, racing wind up Henry & Hetty and the desk Henry.

This amount of merchandise should give you some kind of idea as to how popular Numatics actually are here.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 4         View Full Size
Post# 343411 , Reply# 16   2/10/2016 at 15:33 (2,995 days old) by PARWAZ786 ( )        

I seen a Henry laundry basket in town once (one of those fabric spring loaded laundry baskets) looked really cool- didn't get one for reasons I am unaware of sadly.

Post# 343429 , Reply# 17   2/10/2016 at 19:42 (2,995 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)        

delaneymeegan's profile picture


".... give you some kind of idea as to how popular Numatics actually are here"

I know, Chris. If there is one thing I've learned in the last couple of months, it's that Henry and his pals, are much loved in Britain. I'm constantly amazed at how prolific Numatic has been.

I'm easing into getting a Henry vac, and I'm not really open to expanding my collection. Still Henry is intriquing.

I watched this video and was rather impressed with George, as well.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO delaneymeegan's LINK


Post# 343477 , Reply# 18   2/11/2016 at 08:18 (2,995 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
The thing about Numatic is that like a lot of SEBO vacs, the bags last for months and in Numatic's case, sometimes more than SIX months dependent on the model and dirt required to be picked up.

A lot of happy Numatic owners I know just love the basic design, bigger travel and general reliability.


Post# 343533 , Reply# 19   2/11/2016 at 14:42 (2,994 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)        
In the USA

dysonman1's profile picture
We don't buy canister (cylinder) vacuums much because they generally are not available. The average U.S. consumer buys their vacuum from Wal-Mart, Target, K-Mart, etc. while shopping for other things at the same time. There simply aren't canister cleaners on the shelves, so we really can't buy one except through a large SEARS store or a vacuum specialty shop. Bed, Bath, and Beyond carry Miele canisters, but there aren't many B.B.and B. stores except in major cities - there's a Wal-Mart everywhere.

Post# 343537 , Reply# 20   2/11/2016 at 15:00 (2,994 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
Funny actually becaude our supermarkets tend to sell cheapo cylinders that are often un branded of the cheap brands.

Post# 343552 , Reply# 21   2/11/2016 at 16:47 (2,994 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)        

delaneymeegan's profile picture
Chris- I apologize for calling my Harry a Henry.


Tom- That's a good observation about the lack of available canisters (cylinders) in the U.S. I was at a Walmart (Asda) recently, and just had to walk down the vacuum isle. You're right, it was just all Hoover, Bissell, and Shark UPRIGHTs. blah.

I'm looking to get a 'Henry Micro' and am wondering what the differences are between this and a standard Henry.
Will he have a 2 speed motor?
The "auto save" feature. I take it this is a 2 speed motor, but..... does it switch between the 2 speeds Automatically?

And do the Numatics come with an accessory plug (receptacle) built-in, even though they don't come with an electric power nozzle?


Post# 343568 , Reply# 22   2/11/2016 at 19:45 (2,994 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        
"Like a lot of SEBO vacs, the bags last for months"

alexhoovers94's profile picture
You should see Hoover Elite, Type A bags, now that is BIG!!

Post# 343569 , Reply# 23   2/11/2016 at 19:49 (2,994 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture


Post# 343592 , Reply# 24   2/12/2016 at 02:21 (2,994 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Delaneymorgan, the Henry Micro is the same as a regular Henry except it has upgraded filters.

The Autosave is no longer in production. Numatic have gone back to twin speed motors with a normal rocker switch. AutoSave was similar but had a spring loaded switch to put the cleaner into high power so it defaulted to low power when you turned the cleaner on, hence the term "AutoSave".

I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "built in accessory plug"?


Post# 343594 , Reply# 25   2/12/2016 at 04:36 (2,994 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

"built in accessory plug" : I read "socket". I can only speak of the UK models and have not seen a power socket in years, probably because Numatic bought out a whole cleaner with power head and stopped the option to purchase the PN for any model.

Post# 343595 , Reply# 26   2/12/2016 at 04:53 (2,994 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Ah, you could be right Benny.

And no, there isn't a socket for a power nozzle on any of the current Numatic line up.


Post# 343607 , Reply# 27   2/12/2016 at 09:53 (2,994 days old) by sebo4me (Cardiff)        

sebo4me's profile picture
The only problem with leaving the Henry bag in for 6 months is it starts to smell like a buffalos breath. Phewy! Pass me the gas mask!

Post# 343619 , Reply# 28   2/12/2016 at 10:09 (2,994 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
If it starts to smell, all it needs is a dose of bicarbonate powder or carbon brickette powder crushed up.

Post# 343671 , Reply# 29   2/12/2016 at 11:54 (2,994 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
That won't make a hell of a difference, Nar.

Post# 343673 , Reply# 30   2/12/2016 at 12:01 (2,994 days old) by sebo4me (Cardiff)        

sebo4me's profile picture
No it might reduce it to a skuunks arse :-)

Post# 343676 , Reply# 31   2/12/2016 at 12:18 (2,994 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Lol

We never had a smelly vacuum TBH,bagged or bagless probably because we have no pets! We will be getting more pets this year (19 goldfish is boring) ;D


Post# 343678 , Reply# 32   2/12/2016 at 12:33 (2,994 days old) by sebo4me (Cardiff)        

sebo4me's profile picture
You have a Dyson. That's an animal

Post# 343681 , Reply# 33   2/12/2016 at 13:02 (2,994 days old) by n0oxy (Saint Louis Missouri, United States)        
rise of canisters in the United States

Uprights are still really popular here too, but some people think canisters are making a come back here. Personally I'm not a fan of uprights, I think canisters are far more flexible, if you need to clean carpets, get a canister or central vacuum kit with a power nozzle. The backpacks are really nice too, those are basically the same as canisters, you just wear them on your back.

Post# 343684 , Reply# 34   2/12/2016 at 13:14 (2,994 days old) by sebo4me (Cardiff)        

sebo4me's profile picture
My preferred option is an upright for cleaning carpets and a cylinder for everything else.

Post# 343701 , Reply# 35   2/12/2016 at 14:06 (2,994 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)        

delaneymeegan's profile picture

Thanks guys, for the information on Henry.


As for a smelly vac bag, I learned quite a while ago to carefully store the bag, inside another bag (or sealed container) and in the freezer, whenever the vacuum isn't in use.

Why? Because the freezing kills most all dust mites and bacteria that typically have a big party in the dust bags, when the vac isn't in use.

Also, there is a nice neutral fresh smell when you vacuum.

The ease of removing, and the size of the bag, is thus, an issue. This is one reason I like my 80s Electroluxs. Just open the door and slide out the bag. Not as easy on Kenmore, Eureka, and Hoover canisters. I'm not sure Henry would be as simple, either.


Post# 343702 , Reply# 36   2/12/2016 at 14:09 (2,994 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

I prefer an upright for a quick clean and a cylinder for a full weekly house clean.

 


Post# 343713 , Reply# 37   2/12/2016 at 14:35 (2,993 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
That is so backwards, the upright is what would do a better job, would make more sense to use the upright at the weekend.

Post# 343716 , Reply# 38   2/12/2016 at 14:57 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Actually have 22 Animals;

Dyson DC14 Animal
DC33 Animal
DC41 Animal Mk2

19 goldfish


Post# 343717 , Reply# 39   2/12/2016 at 15:00 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

I never choose cylinders, an upright does everything a cylinder can (well mine can anyways)

I can't get along with cylinders, even if I try. I really want to like them but I can't, literally! Too annoying to use and less fun IMHO.


Post# 343718 , Reply# 40   2/12/2016 at 15:19 (2,993 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

"That is so backwards, the upright is what would do a better job, would make more sense to use the upright at the weekend".

Good job my mother is not alive to read that. She always used her upright to vacuum the main areas of the carpet on a regular basis, and her cylinder for floors & deep cleaning. She was NOT deep cleaning the carpet, as the upright did that every time she vacuumed. She was deep cleaning the ROOM, using the cylinder to get into every corner of every part & every thing in the room that could be vacuumed.


Post# 343723 , Reply# 41   2/12/2016 at 15:43 (2,993 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
An upright can do all that too...

Post# 343724 , Reply# 42   2/12/2016 at 15:52 (2,993 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Well that would all come down to how convenient the user found the upright. For anything more than a quick flick about, I do not like the tools on uprights. I find they lack the performance of a cylinder and the expanding hose drives me mad. Furthermore, pulling an upright by the hose is not something I was keen on either.

At the end of the day, uprights were designed to sweep & suck on carpets, and cylinders to suck only, but with increased convenience. Tools on an upright and power heads on a cylinder are a compromise to turn one into the other.


Post# 343726 , Reply# 43   2/12/2016 at 16:13 (2,993 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
I wouldn't say modern upright lack the performance of a Cylinder with the tools.

I find cylinders more cumbersome and less convenient to be honest.

Alex.


Post# 343727 , Reply# 44   2/12/2016 at 16:18 (2,993 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

"I wouldn't say modern upright lack the performance of a Cylinder with the tools."

I know you wouldn't.


Post# 343728 , Reply# 45   2/12/2016 at 16:21 (2,993 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
Well considering that most uprights are pretty much clean air, they are basically a cylinder design anyway, in an upright form!

Post# 343731 , Reply# 46   2/12/2016 at 16:34 (2,993 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

And that, Alex, is the thought process of many who do not appreciate the difference. The design of an upright is such that the airflow cannot always be maximised, and the motors often smaller, producing less suction power, or I should say suction power than cannot be moved thoroughly over a long distance. Electrolux proved this with their Slimline and Microlite cylinders which had the exact same motor as the uprights. The design of the cleaner did help to a point in maximising suction power, but it was never great.

My mother had an Electrolux 504 with a rigid hose, and that was not too bad at being pulled round, but neither she nor I thought it to be as easier as her cylinder cleaner was.


Post# 343733 , Reply# 47   2/12/2016 at 16:44 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
I can't see Alex's comments, but I do the same as your mother, Benny. The upright is my go to for vacuuming the open areas throughout the week and then the cylinder is my deep cleaner for getting in the tight corners of the room and, of course, above floor. Sofa, curtains, stairs etc, as well as dusting down surfaces like windowsills and book cases.

And re: the backwards comment, frankly I'm not taking advice from anyone who can't grasp the idea that vacuuming is not just about carpets and doesn't vacuum their sofa. I'll stick to my system, it's working well for me.


Post# 343740 , Reply# 48   2/12/2016 at 19:13 (2,993 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
Chris, My sofa is leather, it doesn't need to be vacuumed, apart from down the sides.

Post# 343745 , Reply# 49   2/12/2016 at 20:37 (2,993 days old) by Mike81 ()        

I use my canister few times per week to vacuum the hard floors + turbo brush for the quick carpet vacuuming. It has long hose and nozzles are light so it's easy and effortless to use. I no longer use the powerhead in it, because canister works best when it has the light nozzles.
Once in a week I take my heavy (9,5 kg) upright to give the carpets thorough clean. In fact I don't use it for anything else than for the carpets. Reason: In my large open area carpet is where the large upright shines. It does has a stretch hose and tools, but I don't like to use them. Hose is quite short and suction constantly tries pull it back.


Post# 343784 , Reply# 50   2/13/2016 at 06:43 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
The weekly clean in my house involves cleaning all of these areas, which are tricky with an upright. I can't abide having to use 2 vacuums to do a thorough clean, so I'll stick to my system.

  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 9         View Full Size
Post# 343790 , Reply# 51   2/13/2016 at 07:09 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

I find that an upright can do anything a cylinder can and is more convenient to store

Stair cleaning with cylinders is a pain aswell

Well let's just be specific- I use a Dyson DC41 Mk2 and DC33 Animal (Cos I like both)

Both excellent for hard floors- Large debris channel and active base plate either way. All I need to do is press a button on mine. With cylinders, sometimes the hard floor setting is stubborn to change on certain machines.

You can go from vacuuming the floor to using the wand extended with it's hose ready within 2 seconds.

The tools are all on board. If I want to get into a confined space, just pull the wand out and attach the tangle free turbine head - Much better than straight suction and much smaller! I can shove it behind the sofa and get a deep clean without moving the sofa. Lots of dust accumulates there.

Car cleaning with cylinders?

I can't imagine how much easier it is than an upright. Cylinder vacuums (except Numatic and Dyson) all have a banana handle which is too big and makes it awkward to go in different places when car cleaning. An upright just has a hose cuff which is more simplified and still comfortable to hold in use. A good example of this is a Hoover purepower- Very small and comfortable to hold the hose cuff with.

Why I dont like cylinders:

-They get stuck in door frames and anything they touch

- Long hoses like on the Henry are a pain. The hose flaps about and especially in UK houses with small rooms they are worse- A long hose gets in the way.

-We had a Vax 6140 a few years ago and the hose would get caught by the big handle and tip the vacuum over

- They are a pain to clean stairs with- Imagine a tub vacuum. A Henry can only reach up 10 steps but that's because it has a long hose but still not long enough for stairs.

They are annoying to store regardless of having park feature or not. You can take the main vacuum unit and put it in a different place and have to put the hose and wand away somewhere else and have to assemble it again next time

OR

Have it in the cellar and the wand will just be loose against the wall and fall with the hose taking up a lot of space.

Or you can just wrap the hose around the wand if it has a park feature but that's annoying and time consuming.

Even a Dyson Stowaway requires effort to make it stowed away.

What do I do with an upright? Well it has wheels and I can just push it into the cellar and it doesn't take up much space. Actually I can put it anywhere in my house against the wall or on a corner because it will just thay there. No flappy bird hoses and all that




This post was last edited 02/13/2016 at 07:26
Post# 343796 , Reply# 52   2/13/2016 at 07:57 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Ok, there's a few well made points to address here. Obviously what vacuum is easiest for you depends on your own cleaning regime and the style of your house.

With regards to cylinders on stairs, I find them much easier. Tub vacs like Henry are, granted, more difficult to use. I can either do this as pictured and then go the other way from the top or, my preference, carry the vacuum with one hand and the hose with the other.

Sledge style cylinders like in picture 2 are the easiest I find as they sit perfectly on the step and are considerably lighter than most uprights and tub cylinders, with a few exceptions.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 343797 , Reply# 53   2/13/2016 at 08:00 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
In terms of cylinder storage, I have a few options. The most obvious being just to wheel it into the cupboard.

Post# 343798 , Reply# 54   2/13/2016 at 08:02 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

However, we also have a storage bracket courtesy of IKEA that works well. Again, sledge cylinders are even easier than tubs due to the smaller footprint. This is how I usually store Henry. Bear in mind, I use the upright as my quick whip round vac throughout the week, so Henry only comes out on a weekend to do the deep clean.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 343799 , Reply# 55   2/13/2016 at 08:02 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

I know but those style of sledge cylinders are oldies not and modern vacuums are much bigger and more "bagless" shaped. They need to be carried and are not designed to be dragged up the stairs. I have two flight of stairs in my house: One if a normal flight of 13 stairs and the second flight of stairs has 14 steps and is curved like yours is. It's quite difficult to vacuum the curved stairs because if you handle a cylinder by carrying it, with the hose in the other hand and the cable hanging out, the curved part of the stairs are very tiny because there's a vanishing point of the step. It's best to use a vacuum with a stretch hose or an extension hose with a crevice tool at this point, or a very narrow stair tool like what Henry's have

Post# 343800 , Reply# 56   2/13/2016 at 08:05 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

That's a pretty nice and big cellar! :D When was your house built?

I live in a Victorian terraced house built in 1894 so it's about 122 years old and the cellar is about a door's width and the length is about 3 metres so it's long and narrow like a hallway


Post# 343802 , Reply# 57   2/13/2016 at 08:06 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

Re: the bagless design/sledge design...nearly all bagged cylinders are the sledge style and will sit on the stairs. With a bagless cylinder, surely that would be the same process as using the Henry?
We have 2 flights of stairs also - our house is a 3 story town house.


Post# 343804 , Reply# 58   2/13/2016 at 08:10 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

That's true! To be honest I have never ever seen a Miele or bagged cylinder (except tub vaxes and henrys) in my city in he flesh, except a box for a Miele S5 being thrown out. People hardly buy them :|

Post# 343805 , Reply# 59   2/13/2016 at 08:10 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

It's not a cellar Tayyab, it's a cupboard under the stairs. A cellar would be bigger. Certainly the cellar at my old house was bigger than a cupboard as it ran underneath the full length of the house.

The house was built in 2006. My old house was a tall, narrow Victorian terrace built in the late 1800's.


Post# 343806 , Reply# 60   2/13/2016 at 08:11 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Is that IKEA bracket designed specifically for vacuum hoses?

Post# 343807 , Reply# 61   2/13/2016 at 08:11 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Well the space under the stairs is what we call cellars :|

Post# 343808 , Reply# 62   2/13/2016 at 08:12 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        
People hardly buy them :|

turbo500's profile picture

That's not true, otherwise Miele wouldn't continue to make them lol. And I don't think it's possible to have been in every house in Birmingham - it's kind of a big place lol.

I know a fair few people with Miele's. My Dad has one (given that has all wood floors and tile, it seemed like a logical choice), plus I work with a fair few people who live in city centre apartments that have them also.


Post# 343809 , Reply# 63   2/13/2016 at 08:13 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Haha :P I know what about 90% of people on my road have because I seen them :D

And the other streets surrounding me :P


Post# 343810 , Reply# 64   2/13/2016 at 08:17 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

the space under the stairs is what we call cellars

 

That's not a cellar. A cellar is a room underneath your house - it would be called a basement if we were in the US. I've never seen a new build with a cellar, but lots of older houses tend to have them. They used to be used to store coal and keep meats cold in the days before fridges existed. I know a lot of people who have converted them into playrooms, guest bedrooms and utility rooms. A friend of ours has converted hers into a huge kitchen-diner and resotred the original Victorian slate floor - it looks fantastic. 

 


Is that IKEA bracket designed specifically for vacuum hoses

It certainly is! Link below

 

 

Haha :P I know what about 90% of people on my road have because I seen them :D

And the other streets surrounding me :P

 

That's only one area though. If Miele and other cylinders didn't sell, they wouldn't make them. Which? and other consumer reports always rate them very highly, which boosts their sales. I loved my Miele Cat & Dog, but sold it on in favour of the Henry and my C3 Electro Comfort with the powernozzle.

 



CLICK HERE TO GO TO Turbo500's LINK

Post# 343816 , Reply# 65   2/13/2016 at 08:36 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Awesome! You learn something new everyday :D My uncle has a cellar and one of our relatives also have one too, I called that a basement like the Americans do haha

Post# 343822 , Reply# 66   2/13/2016 at 08:50 (2,993 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

Cellars are handy storage spaces. I had my vintage vacs and the tumble dryer in my cellar at my old house, along with things like ladders, tools etc.


Post# 343824 , Reply# 67   2/13/2016 at 09:06 (2,993 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

For some reason we don't have a cellar despite it being built in the 1890's o_O

I would love one and convert it to a room!

Kinda off topic but I know people who converted their garages into living rooms aswell! Lovely ideas


Post# 343836 , Reply# 68   2/13/2016 at 09:49 (2,993 days old) by Mike81 ()        

I have a "minor" space issue, but everything is there.

  View Full Size
Post# 343840 , Reply# 69   2/13/2016 at 10:05 (2,993 days old) by Mike81 ()        

Before this thread goes totally off topic I am curious to ask has anyone tried to use the upright with the long hose for hard floor vacuuming?
Then I wouldn't need to use more than one vacuum.


Post# 343843 , Reply# 70   2/13/2016 at 10:13 (2,993 days old) by singingrainbow (Texas)        

Mike81, I have. Some older clean air machines sold in the U.S (and some that are still sold) don't have on board tools, but rather have a hose port on the back of the bag casing right where the small, rigid hose from the floor head comes into the bag compartment. A tool kit is available for these machines with a long, non-stretch hose that can be simply plugged in. The kit comes with wands and a floor brush. The times I have used a machine like this they worked fairly well, slightly less suction than a canister but still fairly convenient thanks to the very long, non-stretch hose. If you can get an extension hose for your karcher I think it would be worth a shot.

Post# 343847 , Reply# 71   2/13/2016 at 10:36 (2,993 days old) by Mike81 ()        

Nice to hear. I can borrow a hose from one of my cylinders to give it a try and see how convenient it is.

Post# 343853 , Reply# 72   2/13/2016 at 11:20 (2,993 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Its a bulky solution no matter how many times you try and put an upright "upright" with a hose and an extension hose tagged to it.

One point that hasn't been mentioned is that whilst there are those who think an upright does a better job than a canister vacuum may well like to consider modern homes; they're not all open spaces. This has been discussed before where it is impossible to get an upright under lots of low furniture never mind around furniture in a home.

Unless you live in an open space where everything is stored on a wall, I find cylinders are a lot easier to manage around a home than trying to steer through obstacles with a traditional upright vac. Of course, those with swivel joints improve movement.


Post# 343873 , Reply# 73   2/13/2016 at 13:43 (2,993 days old) by Mike81 ()        

Good point there. If I had a wall to wall carpeting in my apartment I wouldn't be able to vacuum under the furniture with my upright. Who wants to move sofas and other heavy objects when vacuuming.
Canister with the full-size powerhead does equally good job at carpet cleaning than good upright + no problem getting under the furniture. I don't get the idea why upright would be better than canister at carpet cleaning (if canister has full-size powerhead).


Post# 343919 , Reply# 74   2/13/2016 at 20:40 (2,992 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)        

delaneymeegan's profile picture
Uprights are good for covering large areas of carpet. Generally, the tools, the hose, and the suction isn't adequate for things like cleaning out a car, or doing steps.

Can you imagine using this? It's about 3 times as wide as a typical upright. It has a 7 GALLON bag and a 60' cord. Think of how fast you'd clean your house.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO delaneymeegan's LINK


Post# 343969 , Reply# 75   2/14/2016 at 03:16 (2,992 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

I have one of those PowerFlite uprights in my collection-of course too big for home vacuuming unless you have HUGE rooms with little amount of furniture.Those huge "lawnmower" vacuums were made for really large commercial building spaces.I take mine down the hall occasionally.The machine was at a good price-so I bought it.
Canisters-Use these for many cleaning jobs for bare floors or above floor work.Presently use my MD central unit-machine placed in the hall-the 35' hose can reach anywhere I need it.I have another central unit in the kitchen-just put out the hose to the garage to do the car.Can reach all around the car.Uprights to me are just too awkward to use as "canisters"they are tippy,like trying to dance with a drunk!Their short hoses contibute to the awkness-esp if they are perm on board-when floor vacuuming they just get in the way.For my floor cleaning like an upright best that DOES NOT have a hose on board.My other favorite canister in my NSS M1.Like Meiles-but their hoses and cords need to be longer-and they need to improve the handtools.Get rid of the "doll dust brush" as some here call it.It does work for detailing cars or Hi-Fi gear,computer gear.


Post# 343983 , Reply# 76   2/14/2016 at 07:46 (2,992 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
hard floors, and cylinder vs. upright versatility

Even in California, or Florida near sandy beaches and homes with more ceramic and marble floors have always had a larger market for canister types.
Uprights were touted more as carpet "sweepers" because the old designs with the open fans with a belt pulley in the suction path of all the dirt had little suction power for above the floor cleaning.
The brush rolls also did not shut off, so a no no on hard flooring.
Since the sealed design style emerged, even before sealed hepa types, where a hose connected the floor nozzle to the bag chamber, and enclosed squirrel cage design fans, such ah Hoovers Dial-a-matic had as far back as the 1960's the suction issue on a hose had been resolved.
Panasonic was the next to copy.


Post# 344123 , Reply# 77   2/15/2016 at 10:59 (2,991 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Oreck in the UK have forever advertised that their uprights can clean hard floors because of the design. I wouldn't tar every upright vac as a "sweeper" though. But when you said "sweeper" I thought instantly of the Oreck XL having owned one.

Post# 344132 , Reply# 78   2/15/2016 at 12:46 (2,991 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Lol, Nar :)
Just our of curiosity, would you say the Oreck cleans better than a Dyson DC01 and Dc03? Reason being it's a dirty air :)


Post# 344134 , Reply# 79   2/15/2016 at 12:51 (2,991 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Thats a tricky one. Yes it will naturally be better on pick up being a dirty fan, but because of the one we owned had the hellish push on bag to dock principle, the bag had a tendency of coming off compared to more modern ones with a bag push in and lock holder.

Regardless of the updated bag holder, the main problem with the Oreck is the airflow/suction channel inside the spine at the back leading to the bag - terribly narrow and a tendency to clog. So although it might have better pick up than a Dyson, the Dyson has more modern and wider suction airflow channels to pass the dirt to the bin.


Post# 344190 , Reply# 80   2/15/2016 at 18:26 (2,990 days old) by Parwaz786 ( )        

Brilliant answer, thank you :) Was considering an Oreck to play with, thought it was a cute design, but heard they are noisy so no really tempted anymore lol

Post# 344231 , Reply# 81   2/16/2016 at 04:52 (2,990 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Oreck

The older upright Orecks did get noisy when the brush roll bearings wore out, which was frequent.
The only Oreck which ever tempted me was the Dutch tech canister (cylinder).
Long gone as well, as David Oreck has sold his company to TTI floor care, aka (Hoover, Dirt Devil, etc.)
Now they are all imported from China.


Post# 344256 , Reply# 82   2/16/2016 at 09:20 (2,990 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
David Oreck had nothing to brag about. He didn't even invent the Oreck vacuum. It was a design that Whirlpool had ditched that he bought the patents for. It was originally sold as the McDonald Electric upright here in the UK. All David Oreck did was stick his name on a discarded design.

Post# 344257 , Reply# 83   2/16/2016 at 09:40 (2,990 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Well the Oreck design keeps the bag at the front but its not as easy as the original MacDonald upright. I quite like that MacDonald design over the Oreck.






Post# 344260 , Reply# 84   2/16/2016 at 10:48 (2,990 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Nar, the McDonald Electric and the first Oreck are the same vacuum. They use the same design, but with a different name stamped on it.

Here is the Oreck branded version and McDonald Electric side by side. Oreck evolved over the years to become the more familiar design, but the basis of them all was the original, which David Oreck had no involvement with the design of at all.

Incidentally, the McDonald Electric was one of the loudest vacuums I've ever known to exist.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 344262 , Reply# 85   2/16/2016 at 11:03 (2,990 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
McDonald

Wow! Thanks for that info. I was just about to comment, it looks very similar to an Oreck. I'd like to see the Whirlpool prototype.
Hence the loud noise and low price point.
Several people used to tell me their Oreck always broke.
An old Eureka upright used to vacuum up pennies suffered broken fan blades, but that was only a $6 part, and easy to fix.


Post# 344267 , Reply# 86   2/16/2016 at 12:00 (2,990 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
McDonald same as oreck?

I wonder about that? I did some searching online. Only an Avanti came up. All older Orecks had stepped motor hoods, which tells me they had a larger motor.
Nothing on A lightweight Whirlpool upright either. Prototype or production.


Post# 344270 , Reply# 87   2/16/2016 at 12:54 (2,990 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Vacerator, look at the 2 photos I posted. The first Oreck was, screw for screw and bristle for bristle, a McDonald Electric, which was made by Whirlpool. Not produced by the same company, but using the exact design. Over time, Oreck made their own adjustments, but the basis was always the original patent that David Oreck bought from Whirlpool.

Post# 344275 , Reply# 88   2/16/2016 at 13:40 (2,990 days old) by Kirbysthebest (Midwest)        
One thing I will hand to David Oreck

He was a marketer.   As for the vacuum, I once heard it described as "a Hokey with a motor."

 

 


Post# 344279 , Reply# 89   2/16/2016 at 14:52 (2,989 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Chris -= respectively though just because David Oreck didn't invent anything doesn't make anything wrong. Look at Bissell - they go about lauding up the fact that they were probably first to market the carpet upright washer, yet for years they actually only came to market in the 1990s with their carpet upright washers. Not exactly "years of experience" Infact Bissell market themselves as having 135 years in the cleaning business but Im sure the average buyer would mistakenly think Bissell have been making vacuums for 135 years.


Post# 344293 , Reply# 90   2/16/2016 at 17:12 (2,989 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Turbo500;

Ok, but that is not the identical motor hood as an Oreck, as I can tell by watching the video above.
News also to me that Whirlpool was even in the UK back then.
The joint venturted with Philips in the 90's, and bought Bauknecht after that.
No European Whirlpool products are like our US domestic ones still. Unless you order a US style washer, or refrigerator there.
Only in Australia, where Omalleys built them under license.
Did you know the Canadian Whirlpool division was called Inglis?


Post# 344332 , Reply# 91   2/17/2016 at 02:19 (2,989 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Vacerator, here is the first Oreck.

Post# 344333 , Reply# 92   2/17/2016 at 02:20 (2,989 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
And here is the McDonald Electric.
They're the same cleaner. They're absolutely identical.


Post# 344337 , Reply# 93   2/17/2016 at 04:21 (2,989 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Vacerator, Chris is spot on both with info about Oreck and about these models.

As for Whirlpool, well of course the U.S products are different but it doesn't mean all brands act in the same way.


Post# 344348 , Reply# 94   2/17/2016 at 06:51 (2,989 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Like I said, the Oreck cleaners may have evolved over time with redesigned hoods and larger motors, but the original Oreck as pictured above was a direct copy of the McDonald Electric. The ME was not in itself a popular seller and David Oreck knew that, hence he very cleverly aimed the early models exclusively at the commercial floorcare market where this type of cleaner would excel, before launching into the domestic market.

Numatic in the UK have done a similar thing, although I don't think that was ever intentional as Oreck and has happened over a much longer period of time.


Post# 344498 , Reply# 95   2/18/2016 at 05:35 (2,988 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Turbo500,

That Oreck was never sold in the states. Seems to me Mr. O-Wreck wanted into the UK market, so did a deal with McDonald.
Here in the states, by the mid 70's, Whirlpool was out of the vacuum cleaner business. Panasonic bought it.
The last Whirlpool branded machines in the 80's were made by Panasonic, also the Sears Kenmore supplier.


Post# 344502 , Reply# 96   2/18/2016 at 06:10 (2,988 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

It was sold in the US as a commercial vacuum - it was never sold in the UK branded as Oreck as per the picture above, which belongs to a US collector and was posted on here some time ago. It was old sold here as McDonald Electric, which wasn't made by Oreck and pre-dates the Oreck by a good few years.

Why would David Oreck start a company in America only to sell the product in the UK? That's madness, not to mention expensive. Given that we know Mr. O was pretty much broke and bought the patent with the last of his savings.


Post# 344507 , Reply# 97   2/18/2016 at 06:57 (2,988 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Oreck cont.

That makes sense. I didn't mean he only went into business to sell in the UK, but was trying to copy Eureka, like when they sold the 1959 Parnall there. A re branded for the UK Mobile Air Vibra-Beat.
My mom had one. I called it the farter.


Post# 344513 , Reply# 98   2/18/2016 at 07:49 (2,988 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
I have come to believe: uprights are best for carpets, and suction only canisters/cylinders are best for everything else. The combination machines are too heavy, bulky, complicated, over-engineered and prone to problems. Which is why you saw a lot of companies marketing "cleaning team" pairs in the 1950's.

I first use a simple, quiet, powerful suction-only Miele with an arsenal of attachments to clean a room from top to bottom. I finish the job by deep cleaning the wall-to-wall broadloom with my sleek Hoover Lightweight bagged upright Oreck clone- working from far end to entry so I don't leave any footy-prints on the carpet. My vacuum team together cost under CAD$1,000 and does not take up any more room in the closet than a power-nozzle canister.


Post# 344514 , Reply# 99   2/18/2016 at 08:30 (2,988 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
two vacuum pairs

True, sounds like it works well for you.
I use a central vac for both.
The Miele uprights have hoses and plenty of suction power. Their canisters with elelctrobrushes also. Light, maneuverable. Follow close to you.
However, one advantage for you is if that Hoover goes caput, you replace only one machine at half the cost, roughly.'
Same for my CV system. Power units, hoses, and power nozzles are mainly interchangeable. I spent a grand on everything. Installed it myself.
A Miele S7 electronic costs about $800 ish. A C3 Kona $929 with the good power head. For $1049, you get the Marin with Led headlight and the best nozzle.


Post# 344579 , Reply# 100   2/18/2016 at 19:53 (2,987 days old) by Mike81 ()        
Oreck XL suction fan size

I have always liked the Oreck XL design. I mean lightweight, low profile, large bag and nice wooden brushroll.
But what I have not liked is that it is VERY loud and suction fan is tiny.
So my assumption is that the airflow isn't very good at all.


  View Full Size
Post# 344604 , Reply# 101   2/19/2016 at 07:39 (2,987 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Bag sizes, Oreck

Right Mike in Finland. To me, that tiny fan makes it a carpet sweeper only.
Alex, you should see a Eureka B, or S type bag. At least 6 litres.
I saw a pick up truck yesterday with two tennis balls hanging in a mesh "bag" from the trailer hitch.


Post# 344605 , Reply# 102   2/19/2016 at 08:08 (2,987 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
Truth is, the fan of a classic, fan-first upright is so close to the carpet surface that it does not have to be that powerful to remove the dirt deeply embedded in deep carpets. Most of the dirt is removed and disconnected from the carpet fibres by the action of the brush roll.

Post# 344640 , Reply# 103   2/19/2016 at 16:01 (2,986 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Yes but if the dust channel from the floor head to the bag is hopelessly narrow then it doesn't make for an efficient vacuum.

Post# 344657 , Reply# 104   2/19/2016 at 18:40 (2,986 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

All very interesting and much food for thought.

In the UK, the Oreck was only ever sold direct via mail order. Adverts were shown in magazines and on TV. There was also a money-back in-home trial.

This is all very important, because when people can go to a shop to buy anything they can afford, why would they need to send away for it? People who bought via mail order (and I don't include modern online shopping in that) were often in a whole different mind-set. They bought-in to whatever it was they were looking at from the comfort of their own homes. Anything which was sold mail-order had to be unique when compared to the mainstream, and I think we can all say Oreck ticked that box, with a lightweight cleaning ensemble that resembled nothing like one could buy in the shops.

The fact that the Oreck was noisy and not especially great at cleaning would have been neither here nor there to the purchaser who liked it for what it was. They were sold in the UK for decades, in fact I see they are still for sale online., but I am sure I heard that Oreck themselves had sold the company.


Post# 344660 , Reply# 105   2/19/2016 at 20:52 (2,986 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)        

alexhoovers94's profile picture
Well said Benny, I agree.

Post# 344675 , Reply# 106   2/20/2016 at 04:36 (2,986 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Benny,

Yes, Oreck was sold to TTI floor care in Ohio. They also own Dirt Devil and Royal.
All from China, except the old style metal uprights if those are even still being made by Royal. Nice machines, but a step below the Kirby, made not very far from there also. Cleveland also turns out the worlds most exspensive blender, the Vita-Mix. Our daughter just got one. It cost about $400. It makes hot soups from the heat of the friction from blending at high speed. Peanut, cashew or almond butter, no problem.
Then of course, Greenville Ohio turns out eh world renouned Kitchen Aid stand mixers. Even Jaime Oliver uses one.


Post# 344679 , Reply# 107   2/20/2016 at 05:41 (2,986 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        
They also own Dirt Devil and Royal.

turbo500's profile picture

They also own Hoover US and Vax in the UK. Our Vax uprights are usually rebadged US Hoover and Dirt Devil.


Post# 344699 , Reply# 108   2/20/2016 at 08:34 (2,986 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
I have not seen a Vax

product in the states since the Thermax by Vax hot water carpet extractor.

Post# 344723 , Reply# 109   2/20/2016 at 12:31 (2,986 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        
Vax

Is a British brand that took the UK vacuum cleaner market by storm during the 1980's. The original 3-in-1 cleaner was launched in 1978, and from 1983 it was heavily advertised, promoted, and demonstrated. Sales peaked around 1988 and from then on declined steadily. By 1993 Dyson had moved in with the latest 'trend' for consumers to buy.

Vax as a company and brand name was eventually sold off, and I have read with interest on this website the comments that the quality of today's Vax is nothing like it used to be, and what a great travesty this is. But what is never acknowledged is the fact that Vax as we knew it was going to go out of business unless it changed direction from making 3-in-1 cleaners(which was practically all it made), or was sold off to someone else to do as they pleased. There were not enough consumers buying the old Vax products to keep the company going.

Were it not for the fact that the Vax company was bought by another (presumably because the name Vax by then was so very well known and trusted in this country), there would be no discussion on the quality of the product, more a simple reference to another brand that had disappeared.



Post# 344726 , Reply# 110   2/20/2016 at 12:40 (2,986 days old) by sptyks (Skowhegan, Maine)        
if those are even still being made by Royal.

sptyks's profile picture

Royal is owned by TTI Floorcare who build an exceptional all metal cleaning machine.

I have a Royal Everlast 8300 and it is extremely well built even though it was made in China. Built as well as any of my Kirby's. TTI is capable of building an exceptionally well made machine, contrary to popular belief.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 344727 , Reply# 111   2/20/2016 at 12:44 (2,986 days old) by sebo4me (Cardiff)        

sebo4me's profile picture
For once I agree with Stan the man :-)

Post# 344728 , Reply# 112   2/20/2016 at 12:53 (2,986 days old) by sebo4me (Cardiff)        

sebo4me's profile picture
They are capable of building quality in China but rarely do.



Post# 344730 , Reply# 113   2/20/2016 at 13:11 (2,986 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

"good quality" anything can be built anywhere. It comes down to what those who commission the goods want to pay.

Post# 344752 , Reply# 114   2/20/2016 at 16:22 (2,985 days old) by sptyks (Skowhegan, Maine)        

sptyks's profile picture

Marcus, Thanks for agreeing with me. 

Yes Benny. I agree with you 100%.

 


Post# 344803 , Reply# 115   2/21/2016 at 07:39 (2,985 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
I agree,

and second, or third Benny and Marcus!


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy