Thread Number: 30692  /  Tag: Brand New Vacuum Cleaners
My Vax / TTI nightmare and now ruined carpet
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 339674   12/20/2015 at 13:46 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

On the 24th October I decided to replace my Numatic George.
George had been bought purely to be used as an extraction machine and was at this point only a few months old, however I decided he was hard work.

Don't get me wrong, the results he gives were satisfactory, but I'm around 6ft4 in height and it was back breaking work for me. So I decided I'd try an upright carpet cleaner - The Vax Dual Power Pro.

I had high hopes for this machine and intended to do a full review on it, so before I'd even powered it up for the first time I'd taken some pics of the machine and a 'before' picture of our living room carpet.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 5         View Full Size
Post# 339677 , Reply# 1   12/20/2015 at 13:54 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

I knew this carpet was okay to wash, as I'd previously cleaned it with both my Kirby Sentria II and the Numatic George.

So off I went. First impression was that the Vax was so much easier to use. However it was very noisy and the water recovery wasn't too impressive.

For every tank of clean water used I was lucky to recover half a tank of dirty water.

The machine had been used as per the user manual, two strokes on wash mode and then two strokes on rinse mode. Followed my multiple dry strokes to try and extract as much water as possible. I've had upright carpet cleaners before so the whole 'how to use' was something I was more than familiar with.

I finished the room and decided the carpet was left damper than I'd like, so I went to fetch George to go over it all and try and extract some more water.

Upon going to plug George in to the power outlet I discovered my worst nightmare - The Vax had perfromed so poorly it had caused the carpet to shrink!!!


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 339678 , Reply# 2   12/20/2015 at 13:58 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

When I lifted a corner of the carpet I found the backing and underlay were saturated.

I went over the room with the Numatic George machine and extracted as much of what the vax had left as I could. However the damage was done. It took FOUR days for the carpet and underlay to dry. And that was with us running the central heating constantly along with running a dehumidifier in the room too.

Once dry the carpet had not only shrank, but had began to buckle and ripple up in places


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 3         View Full Size
Post# 339680 , Reply# 3   12/20/2015 at 14:06 (3,043 days old) by kirbymodel2c (Nottingham, England)        
Hi Matt...

kirbymodel2c's profile picture

Sorry to hear about your carpet. It was such a nice carpet. I had a Vax once do a similar thing to my granny's carpet many years ago. I hope you get your carpet sorted out.

 

James


Post# 339681 , Reply# 4   12/20/2015 at 14:07 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

I was straight on to Vax.
They seemed more than helpfull at first and arranged for an independant company - Service Master - to come and inspect the damaged carpet.

A few days later Service Master arrived and took a look at the carpet.
The man said it was clear the machine had dispensed too much water and not recovered it properly, causing the backing of the carpet to become staturated thus causing the shrinkage. He indicated he would be stating this in his report to Vax and off he went.

I then had to send the machine off to Vax for them to inspect.

Prior to me sending the machine to Vax I inspected it myself. I found that when powered up on a low pile entrance rug, the force from the brushes spinning caused the suction nozzle to lift away from and loose contact with the floor. If it had been doing this on the living room carpet it would explain the poor extraction results - pictured are two images. One with the machine powered off and the other with the machine powered on. I also took a detailed video of this issue just in case Vax tried to be awkward


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 339683 , Reply# 5   12/20/2015 at 14:20 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

While inspecting the machine I also managed to cause a small amount of damage to the hose assemly... You'll see why this comes in usefull later in the saga....

So anyway I inspected the machine, found the issue with the nozzle loosing contact with the floor and then packed it up and sent it off to Vax.

28 days later I got their official reply.

Basically they weren't going to pay for the damage caused as there was NOTHING wrong with the machine. They stated the the Service Master report said the carpet was not suitable for washing and that I had failed to do a spot test ect.


The whole letter was riddled with inaccuracies.

First off I contacted Service Master ragarding Vax's references to their report. Service Master indicated that what Vax had said was not correct, and they requested a copy of the letter Vax had sent me. They then sent a copy of Vax's latter along with a copy of their actual report to their head office for it to be investigated.

I then sent Vax a scathing reply.

Here is a copy of my reply to their decision not to pay for the damaged flooring...




Thank you for your letter regarding Case Ref : XXXXXXXX
It really was a laugh a minute... I mean where do I even begin?

To start with, please take this as my appeal regarding the decision not to pay for the damage to my flooring.
As requested in the letter I will also send a copy of this e-mail in the post.

I'll go through the letter I have received and point out the many issues -

First off, you say you received the machine back in 'almost unused condition' and that there were 'no signs of failure or malfunction on any part or component'.
I'd like to draw your attention to the two images I sent to you, showing how when the machine was powered up the brush assembly lifted the suction nozzle away from the flooring. I'll include these two images again with this email.
I'd also like to point out that I have a detailed video of this and I will upload it to YouTube and send you a link if required.
Would this not be considered a malfunction?

I'd like to focus a bit more on the claim that ''there were no signs of failure or malfunction with any part or component'.
See here's the issue I have with this claim. When packing the machine to return it to yourselves, I noticed there was a split in part of the hose assembly.
I assumed this damage had been caused since using the machine, as I would assume I would have noticed it during use.
This split is momentarily visible during the video I have made to show the issue of the brushes pushing the suction area away from the floor. I have taken a screen shot of this and highlighted the split in red for you.
I noticed it when packing the machine, it can be seen in the video, and yet your inspection department missed it?
May I ask, do you perhaps have Stevie Wonder working for you? Because these are just two potentially major issues with the machine that they seem to of missed.

I've also included a picture of my saturated underlay - is it considered normal for one of your machines to do this?

Regarding the references to my damaged carpet. You say 'the pile on your carpet has distorted and the user guide recommends testing for this' - No. The pile on my carpet has NOT distorted. The pile of my carpet still looks like new. After all, the carpet is barely two years old. You can clearly see the carpet pile is undamaged from the many many pictures already sent.

In your letter you also claim that the Vax machine was used to clean all other rooms in the house without issue.
This again is not the case. As I have explained to yourself already, and also to the man from Service Master, I had cleaned all the other rooms in my home with my Numatic George machine prior to buying the Vax. I decided the Numatic machine was hard work and bought the Vax to clean the final room - the living room. The room with the now ruined carpet.

Regarding your claims reference the Service Master report. This shocks me. As the man that visited us from Service Master seemed to think the damage was cause by your machine over wetting the floor. He even said to us that he was going to say this in his report.
Needless to say I have contacted the Service Master branch that visited my home regarding your letter. They seemed very concerned with what you have suggested in your letter and have requested a copy of it so that they can contact your head office.

Regarding Service Masters claim that 'the shrinkage would of occurred within minutes of the cleaning commencing' - please do 'google' how a carpet shrinks. The carpet has shrank from being over wet - due I assume to the incredibly poor extraction from your machine - this has allowed the water to soak through the pile, into the backing of the carpet and the underlay, causing the carpet to shrink. It is NOT something that happens in the blink of an eye, and is in fact something that continued to happen for the 4 days to took the carpet to dry. This is not something that would of been visible had I tested the machine in a small area as your user manual suggests. Again, I understand Service Master will be in touch regarding this.

Perhaps you could supply me with a copy of the report Service Master have sent you?

Regarding your user guide reference towards checking with the carpet maker prior to cleaning. Tell me, how is it that I have washed this carpet multiple times before using both a Numatic George extraction machine and a Kirby Sentria II without issue, yet your machine has ruined it? Surely this confirms the carpet is more than suitable for cleaning as no other machine has caused any issue?

And regards the machine not being suitable for the carpet type because it had a brush bar - my Kirby shampoo system has a brush bar - a much larger brush assembly than that in the Vax - and yet this has caused no damage? But then again, the Vax brush bar has caused no damage either, as the pile distortion you refer to does not exist.

I would advise you refer my case to your appeals department, with my many concerns listed above.
In the mean time I will be in contact with trading standards and chase up Service Master in regards to their concerns and them contacting your head office.
I will also seek advice from my solicitor if needed.

Regards






  View Full Size
Post# 339685 , Reply# 6   12/20/2015 at 14:33 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

I told you the damage to the hose would come in useful didn't I?

Vax had sent me a letter saying there was nothing wrong with the machine and that the damage caused was my fault.

Yet I had photographic and video evidence of faults AND damage on the machine.

So my appeal was launched and they would review my case.

14 days later I got a cracking letter from them.

They've apologised for admin errors causing my case to be mixed up with another case, resulting in a lot of the untrue rubbish they had said in the first letter.

Apparently they've offered more training to their staff to avoid this happening again and have thanked me for highlighting the issue LOL apparently they were genuine mistakes and not just them thinking I could be fobbed off easily so they could get out of paying for any damage.

They've also inspected the machine again and guess what.... this time they can find faults!!!!
Funny, because the first time they inspected it everything was fine.
Apparently the huge hole in the side of the hose wasn't an issue, but they found a fault with the handle release that has apparently resulted in the poor extraction job as it wasn't allowing the floor head to contact the floor properly.

They offered £450 compensation and I grabbed it with both hands. I just wanted to put the whole nightmare behind me and get the carpet replaced


Post# 339687 , Reply# 7   12/20/2015 at 14:49 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

As the ruined carpet is barely two years old, the premium underlay is still like new and can be re-used, helping reduce cost.

We're going for a Tartan pattern carpet (hoping it will look good) and a rough costing is £630 for the carpet itself while re-using our current underlay.

I'm pleased that Vax have coughed up anything at all, and the 450 from them certainly goes a long way towards replacing the carpet, but I'll never buy another TTI product again. This experience has left a very bitter taste in my mouth and in regards to an extraction type carpet washer I'll be sticking to my Numatic George. He may be hard work but at least he has never ruined a carpet!!


  View Full Size
Post# 339690 , Reply# 8   12/20/2015 at 15:10 (3,043 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        
I should probably add.....

that Vax have also refunded the money I spent buying the machine in the first place as well

Post# 339735 , Reply# 9   12/21/2015 at 10:09 (3,042 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
Well it's about time!

Glad you got it sorted at long last.


Post# 339745 , Reply# 10   12/21/2015 at 12:44 (3,042 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Good on you for taking on Vax!



Post# 339748 , Reply# 11   12/21/2015 at 13:12 (3,042 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

Carpet company have been today to measure properly. It's ordered. We're going tartan LOL

Comes to £700 exactly without the underlay. The guy took a look at our current underlay today and agreed it was pointless replacing it. Gets fitted on 6th January :)


I'll be glad once it is fitted and I can forget the whole saga!


Post# 339765 , Reply# 12   12/21/2015 at 19:35 (3,042 days old) by henrydreyfuss (Ohio)        
Great investigative work

henrydreyfuss's profile picture
Honestly I'm surprised Vax is giving you money to replace your carpeting. I've NEVER heard of a vacuum company doing something like that. But clearly the machine is at fault. Good to know that despite the nice looking agitation, this is a model to steer clear of.

Post# 339793 , Reply# 13   12/22/2015 at 04:52 (3,041 days old) by citroenbx (england)        

citroenbx's profile picture
vax are not like they were back in the day

byebye good vax vacuums


  View Full Size
Post# 339794 , Reply# 14   12/22/2015 at 04:56 (3,041 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

I suppose if the machine was at fault they have a level of responsibility to rectify the damage caused.

And Citroen....how can you call those machines 'good'? They had poor filtration and gave a poor wash performance due to the lack of a powered water pump!


Post# 339808 , Reply# 15   12/22/2015 at 11:06 (3,041 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        
I saw your Facebook post on this to Vax UK

We had a Vax 6140 (Pets version of the 6131 but in red) like 5 years ago, was an okay vacuum, but for washing i wasn't that great. It would be alright for sucking up spills etc, but even extracting the water from the carpet was minimal. The wash head had extremely little suction, even though the vacuum itself had powerful suction from the hose and wand. I wonder what Bissell are like.

Post# 339809 , Reply# 16   12/22/2015 at 11:22 (3,041 days old) by floor-a-matic (somewhere)        

Why not get a new Rainbow E3 Onyx? The AquaMate will do MUCH better than a carpet steam vac ever could

Post# 339832 , Reply# 17   12/22/2015 at 17:18 (3,041 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

"I suppose if the machine was at fault they have a level of responsibility to rectify the damage caused"

This is where it's very confusing in UK law, because a manufacturer has absolutely no contract with a consumer what so ever, unless the manufacturer has sold direct to the public, in which case they are both manufacturer and retailer. As such, there is no obligation on the part of a manufacturer to do anything when there is a problem - this falls to the retailer.

However, as we all know, a manufacturer usually offers some sort of guarantee which is in addition to a consumers statutory rights, and once a guarantee has been offered it is supposed to be honoured.

Manufacturing faults and product recalls are often handled by the manufacture as a matter of goodwill or other moral obligation. But rarely are they duty bound to do something about a problem. Usually being forced into rectifying a situation comes after consumer pressure or a court ruling.


Post# 339850 , Reply# 18   12/23/2015 at 04:35 (3,040 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
I like my new Vax tub. Yeah it is noisier and it takes a bit more effort to wash carpets with..

But, the more important factor I've realised is that I am no longer wearing out my carpet.

Carpet textures are not always the same; yet whilst they may require a moving brush roll to remove dirt when DRY, in my experience aggressive brush rolls can cause more damage to carpet when WET. I know from experience that my old Bissell upright used to rip out a lot of wool when it was used to wash my carpets. I can't afford to keep replacing carpet for the sake of keeping it clean.

Ive returned to using suction only wash heads, and at times where it requires, the Vax Spinascrub brush floor head. It does a good job and it alleviates the pushing when using the standard floor head.


Post# 339854 , Reply# 19   12/23/2015 at 06:13 (3,040 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture
I wonder if it's possible to use the Vax spinscrub brush on a George? That would certainly make George less back-breaking to use.

Don't get me wrong, I think the George does a great job, but it's very time consuming and that fishtail nozzle is a real pain to use.


Post# 339856 , Reply# 20   12/23/2015 at 09:30 (3,040 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
If George has loose water feed tube then yes there should be no problem as the water feed tube slips into the spin scrub brush.

Incidentally regarding filtration, a HEPA ring is available with the Vax tubs and it has been available for some time.


Post# 339875 , Reply# 21   12/23/2015 at 16:10 (3,040 days old) by sanitaire (anchorage, alaska)        

I have a couple of hoovers, gravity fed solution and suction powrd spinning brushes and decent suction too remove water. I use my rug dr. for bigger jobs. 3 gallon, 80psi pump. used hot tap water. my largest machine is 8 gallons and has a drag wand or power nozzle. it's 200psi and heats the water too 190 degrees. the heat gets the soil removed quicker from the carpet and it dries quicker. plus it used too vacuum motors too recover the water. it needs dual circuts too run...a green light will light up when you have found one....as a vac collector and janitor, the commercial cleaning products work much better....

Post# 339898 , Reply# 22   12/24/2015 at 01:45 (3,039 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

Fishtail nozzles were meant for spot treatment, cleaning-not doing a whole floor.Oh my aching back if I tried to use the one on my Rainbow for a complete room.The powered carpet cleaner tools are best!

Post# 340178 , Reply# 23   12/29/2015 at 19:34 (3,034 days old) by watsonw (Newport, Shropshire, UK)        
VAX POWER PRO

Hello Matt,

Genuinely sorry about your experience.

I bought one end of this Oct and sent it back and was re-payed around end of Nov.

I found the machine cumbersome and lacking in sufficient suction to cover the whole area of that large recovery nozzle on carpet and hard flooring; useless with the 'squeegie'.

Out of curiosity I had twenty five year old George set up and was alarmed to see just how much water he pulled out!!

That will teach me not to listen to hard selling tv ads!!

I do remember that around twenty years ago Vax brought out a combined upright cleaner and carpet/upholstery washer which was in green and closely resembled
the electrolux 'Glider/Contour' models in appearance.

I don't remember the above vax really catching on and they were around two hundred pounds or thereabouts even then if my memory serves me?

I will stick with good old 'Georgie Boy'!!!




Walter, Shropshire.



Post# 340180 , Reply# 24   12/29/2015 at 19:47 (3,034 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)        

delaneymeegan's profile picture

Nice job documenting your ordeal. Patience is key, as you've seen.

I'm not a fan of carpet washers like this. Without adequate suction to remove dirt, all the rest of the parts are useless. Just makes a bigger mess.


Post# 340181 , Reply# 25   12/29/2015 at 19:53 (3,034 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Walter, the cleaner you talk of was the ill-fated 8000 series. Not only did it fail to catch on in any great number, the first cleaners were filled with design faults and had to be recalled many times on many points.

The 8000 went on to become the New Wave - same cleaner but with the height control as a dial on the front and not a slider on the side. All the faults were supposed to have been rectified by then.

However, the biggest issue with these cleaners was that in solving the problem the cleaner was built for bought with it a host of new problems. We need to remember that although these cleaners were uprights, they were only upright in everyday dry-cleaning mode. To wet clean, one had to attached two large water tanks and a separate full tool kit. Vax sold these cleaners on the basis that they felt their consumer wanted an upright for everyday cleaning and thought that this was what prevented some consumers from buying a canister Vax.

However, the upright Vax was very big, very expensive, and had lots of large apparatus to be stored away from the cleaner for wet cleaning. These parts were almost as big as having a standard Vax canister. Ultimately, it was almost the same price to buy a Vax canister and a separate dry-only upright -say a Panasonic- too. Each cleaner would have excelled at specific tasks, would have cost about the same (combined) as one Vax upright, and storage wise would have taken about the same space.

What Vax should have done in my opinion was to make a basic dry-only upright cleaner to sell as a package with the wet & dry canister, or else team-up with Electrolux or Hoover to sell one of their cleaners in a package, either under the Electrolux name or badged as Vax.

The upright Vax 3-in-1 failed on so many levels.


Post# 340800 , Reply# 26   1/6/2016 at 14:45 (3,026 days old) by Matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)        

New carpet got fitted today... Very pleased with it :)

  View Full Size
Post# 340805 , Reply# 27   1/6/2016 at 15:48 (3,026 days old) by Marks_here (_._)        
OMG

marks_here's profile picture
I love that pattern!! Well done you!!

Post# 340808 , Reply# 28   1/6/2016 at 16:45 (3,026 days old) by oliveoiltinfoil (England, UK)        

oliveoiltinfoil's profile picture
Very well done to you chap. I do not like Vax products, have never got on with them. Since TTI took them over, they produce cheaply made crap quite honestly. I did not see for example the hype about the air cordless. I had one for a couple of days but took it back and order my dyson dc59 at the time. I know its about twice the price but it is more than twice the machine.

Vax carpet washers are possibly the worst. I have a thing about keeping my carpets washed and cleaned. We have had several carpet washers over the years and they all have not been powerful enough. Water extraction, as you say, is the main problem.

If you are ever interested in a machine which genuinely scrubs carpets back to brand new, which extracts nearly as much water as it puts down, get the bissell big green. Amazon sometimes have them at around £350. They usually retail for around £450 but they are damn worth it. They are commercial grade. They have a huge rotating brush and an extraction nozzle which is spring loaded to make maximum contact with the floor.

They are fantastic. Increasably well built and are much better than the rug doctors as well.


Post# 340826 , Reply# 29   1/6/2016 at 20:44 (3,026 days old) by floor-a-matic (somewhere)        

Do U have the Rinsenvac there in the UK? They are/were great machines; especially the RV-85 with PB-850 Power Brush

Post# 340973 , Reply# 30   1/9/2016 at 04:47 (3,023 days old) by Madaboutsebo (Midlands, UK)        

madaboutsebo's profile picture
Glad you have managed to sort out your ruined carpet and get some compensation from VAX, Matt8808.

Love your new carpet looks cool.

I've only ever used a Bissell carpet washer (apart from an earlier VAX121 tub back in the late 80s early 90s!), and the dry power systems from SEBO and Vorwerk.


Post# 341023 , Reply# 31   1/9/2016 at 20:15 (3,023 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
Carpet looks great!


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy