Thread Number: 29023  /  Tag: 50s/60s/70s Vacuum Cleaners
Power Nozzle vs. Power Nozzle
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 324393   5/8/2015 at 18:01 (3,247 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)        

human's profile picture
I really didn't set out to do a power nozzle shootout today but sometimes those things have a way of falling in your lap and you just have to go with them. I was vacuuming my bedroom with my newest toy today--Electrolux Super J with a PN5--and just for fun, I ended up finishing the job with my PN1 to see how they compared. The test wasn't completely scientific because the PN1 has a brand new brush roll in it and the PN5's brush roll, while in good shape, does have a few miles on it.

First impressions of the PN5: It's powerful and quiet but it can be a little cumbersome in close quarters. The little 'outrigger' on the right side tends to catch the legs of furniture. It did a great job on the "realtor beige" carpet but fell a bit short on the Persian rug. It got about 95 percent of the cat hair up, but when I shined a strong flashlight on the rug, there was still plenty of hair still visible.

It was at this point that I decided to switch over to the PN1. The first thing I noticed was that in close quarters, its more compact design was much more maneuverable. And having a brand new brush roll, it effortlessly got up all of the remaining cat hair from the Persian rug. On the beige carpet, it got in one pass what took two with the PN5. The other thing I noticed with the PN1 was the noise level. It's a shrill screamer compared to the PN5. It's not the squeal of bad bearings, the motor just has a higher pitched note.

Conclusions: From a performance standpoint, in their present conditions, the PN1 has it all over the PN5. I'm not inclined right now to replace the brush roll in the PN5, but I have no doubt that would even up the odds. I definitely prefer its low purr to the PN1's more shrill voice but I question the functionality of the PN5's L-shaped design.


Post# 324398 , Reply# 1   5/8/2015 at 18:51 (3,247 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
my #4 is not quiet either, but normal for a Lux to me

Post# 324411 , Reply# 2   5/8/2015 at 21:40 (3,246 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)        
PN3?

human's profile picture
With all this talk of power nozzles, why did Electrolux skip directly to the PN4 from the PN2? What happened to the PN3?

Post# 324415 , Reply# 3   5/8/2015 at 22:27 (3,246 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
Not a clue! And I think mine is a pn 4 A, so there must have been more than one 4?

Post# 324433 , Reply# 4   5/9/2015 at 06:02 (3,246 days old) by kenkart ()        
PN

1 and 2 are my favorites, my thinking is the much narrower brush opening concentrates the suction, the Omni Flo is easy to operate though.

Post# 324438 , Reply# 5   5/9/2015 at 08:59 (3,246 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)        

human's profile picture
After blaming so much of the difference on the brush rolls, I decided to compare them visually and tactilly. It turns out the PN5's brush roll appears to be pretty new. The bristles are just barely softer than those on the brand new PN1 brush roll, nowhere near as soft as those on the brush roll I took out of the PN1 a couple of weeks ago. The biggest difference I see is the PN1's bristles stick out of the nozzle housing just slightly further than the PN5's. That and the more concentrated air flow could account for the difference.

Post# 324443 , Reply# 6   5/9/2015 at 09:33 (3,246 days old) by rugsucker (Elizabethton TN)        
PN-3 ?

There really wasn't an all different PN-3.I think it was just the version of the PN-2 for the comm CB.Would have longer 3 wire cord,ground wire screwed to lid and comm brush(3 row or later with 1 beater bar).

Post# 324445 , Reply# 7   5/9/2015 at 09:42 (3,246 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)        

dysonman1's profile picture
PN3 was a Canadian Power Nozzle.

Post# 324504 , Reply# 8   5/9/2015 at 20:26 (3,245 days old) by kirbylux77 (London, Ontario, Canada)        
Tom

kirbylux77's profile picture
When you say the PN3 was a Canadian model, are you thinking of the 2nd PN that was offered for the 89? Not the PN1, but the second lime green PN that had the brushroll height adjuster on the side & was short-lived since the brushroll height adjuster was problematic. It was replaced with the dark green version which was identical but no brushroll height adjuster.

Rob


CLICK HERE TO GO TO kirbylux77's LINK


Post# 324508 , Reply# 9   5/9/2015 at 20:48 (3,245 days old) by ronni (USA)        
Re: PN-3 (USA)

I was told by a longtime Electrolux salesman that the USA did, in fact, have a Model PN-3 power nozzle. It was manufactured for the Model CB (commercial tank--with a grounded plug).

Succeeding 3-wire pns bore letter suffixes:

PN-4C
PN-5C
PN-6BC
PN-7BC

After the PN-7s the model #s became 4-digits (in 1989) followed by the current alphanumeric pattern used since 1994. It seems to me that since that time separate model #s were used for the commercial pns, but I'm not completely sure since they aren't as common as the 2-wire versions.

It would be interesting to know if the commercial versions of the PN-1s (used for the Model CA and early Model CBs) had a letter suffix or special model id.


________

Regarding the PN-5 I have one, too, but am not as impressed with its performance as I am with the PN-4A. I think it may be due to the floating wheel feature with which the PN-5 was designed. In effect, it seems to skim over the surface more than "digging dirt" (an old Electrolux sales term). That feature was only used on them, so I'm guessing that my opinion shared by many others including Electrolux Corp. executives.


Post# 324568 , Reply# 10   5/10/2015 at 10:12 (3,245 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)        

human's profile picture
Ronni,

Thanks for your enlightening information. I agree about the PN5. I would have liked to have found a PN4 or PN2 for my Super J, but that PN5 was the proverbial bird in the hand, especially at the price I paid for it. Oh well, maybe someday.


Post# 324597 , Reply# 11   5/10/2015 at 20:35 (3,244 days old) by ronni (USA)        

You're welcome, Edgar.

The PN-2s and PN-4s do pop up on Craigslist ads from time to time for decent prices. In fact, just yesterday I saw a Super J in a thrift store with its original PN-4 for $20; but since I already have one I passed on it. It wasn't in the best of shape, anyway.

_____

To Rugsucker ... in rereading the thread I came across your comment on the PN-3. I was only quoting tig21er on saying that there was a USA PN-3 and didn't mean to contradict your earlier comment. Had I read it before I would have responded differently. I value your vast amount of personal knowledge and hope my comment didn't suggest otherwise.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy