Thread Number: 28005
/ Tag: Brand New Vacuum Cleaners
i got a play with the new dyson cinetic upright |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 312936   1/22/2015 at 16:51 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
i was at and i was surprised as they have the new dyson display on display what a surprise.so here's my experience it is fantastic it feels more study then the 41mk2 it doesn't flex as much and the spine has been made thicker.and all my god the ball is so much bigger is so easier to maneuver.and it actually has two hepa filters it has one on each side of the ball so they are gonna last so long.this is probably the best dyson dyson have ever made.the plastic just feels so much stronger and durable i will have a side by side with the mk2 to show the differences in the plastic.i haven't got one but i desperately want one
|
Post# 312937 , Reply# 1   1/22/2015 at 16:53 (3,374 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
And I thought the MK2 was good! I still want th Mk2 wthough cos its blue. What's the performance like vs dc41 mk2? Is it a noticeable difference? |
Post# 312941 , Reply# 2   1/22/2015 at 17:28 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 312942 , Reply# 3   1/22/2015 at 17:30 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
is the difference between the spine on the new one and the 41mk2.one has been made thicker and no holes |
Post# 312943 , Reply# 4   1/22/2015 at 17:35 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
and here's a picture of the hepa filters i took a picture of each side of the ball and there's a filter on each side. |
Post# 312944 , Reply# 5   1/22/2015 at 17:38 (3,374 days old) by ralph123 (Little Rock, AR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
4    
"All others lose suction. Only Dyson Cinetic science doesn't." So are they saying they've been lying in the past about no loss of suction with other Dyson machines? |
Post# 312946 , Reply# 6   1/22/2015 at 17:40 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
and hair shows the difference between the dc41mk2 in ball size
|
Post# 312947 , Reply# 7   1/22/2015 at 17:42 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 312948 , Reply# 8   1/22/2015 at 17:46 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 312981 , Reply# 9   1/22/2015 at 21:23 (3,374 days old) by ralph123 (Little Rock, AR)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
So what happens when the tiny little jets get clogged with sticky dirt? Do they offer any way to clean the cyclone assembly, or do they just expect you to upgrade every couple years? |
Post# 313000 , Reply# 11   1/23/2015 at 00:56 (3,374 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The ends of the cyclones are made of a flexible material that vibrates-this is supposed to keep the cyclones from clogging-but the tiny orifice can still clog.Kinda unique. |
Post# 313003 , Reply# 12   1/23/2015 at 01:41 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313004 , Reply# 13   1/23/2015 at 01:48 (3,374 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
and you never have to clean the cyclone is self cleaning.but it is safe to wash the cyclone but you have to wait a few days for it to dry.
This post was last edited 01/23/2015 at 03:03 |
Post# 313009 , Reply# 14   1/23/2015 at 02:48 (3,374 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yes just fine dust th3e fluff and larger particles won't pass through the shrowd. |
Post# 313017 , Reply# 16   1/23/2015 at 07:13 (3,373 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Ironically to my mind it doesn't matter what claims Dyson makes on having not to clean any filter. You still have to clean the brush roll periodically just like any other upright UNLESS you want the brush roll to clog up and then put up with the brown dust as it clogs the see through hose month after month. There's a reason to why so many other brands don't use see through hoses as a result.
I suspect Dyson will probably be trying out with a new larger tangle free brush roll in the same way as their pet hair tool demonstrates. |
Post# 313040 , Reply# 17   1/23/2015 at 12:36 (3,373 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I would get one if they made the cyclone blue like the DC41 has |
Post# 313044 , Reply# 18   1/23/2015 at 12:56 (3,373 days old) by turbomaster1984 (Ripley, Derbyshire)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
SO it still wont go under a bed or low coffee table?
Looks like they have not improved the bucket seal - looks like people will have to come into contact with allergens, dirt, and all the things these machines are supposed to protect us from everytime it gets emptied. Theres muck all over it - looks like it needs wiping every time you empty it to make it seal properly again. Interesting. No advances there then still a dirty messy process. |
Post# 313045 , Reply# 19   1/23/2015 at 13:01 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313047 , Reply# 20   1/23/2015 at 13:07 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313048 , Reply# 21   1/23/2015 at 13:08 (3,373 days old) by turbomaster1984 (Ripley, Derbyshire)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
|
Post# 313049 , Reply# 22   1/23/2015 at 13:13 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313050 , Reply# 23   1/23/2015 at 13:15 (3,373 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Rob do you have a personal vendetta with Dyson? Nothing but criticism. |
Post# 313057 , Reply# 24   1/23/2015 at 13:57 (3,373 days old) by Madaboutsebo (Midlands, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Great pictures showing the New Dyson Cinetic Upright (DC75 I think??) dy0nb0y.
I did wonder if the bigger ball was to accomadate the bigger cinetic cyclone technology. Do we know what the motor wattage is? Looks very narrow on the inner collection chamber(s) for the fine dust to collect. I see there is a red fill line on the main bin now. I would still think you will get some slight fine dust collect near the oscillating tips but obviously not on them, I mean on the gaps between each cyclone tips. Maybe the next future development would be for a 'take apart' cyclone to periodically wash out!! One thing I notice is when you empty any Dyson bin be it into a kitchen bin, dust bin (trash can) or into a plastic bag the rubber seal on the trap door does get a bit dusty from emptying it. I used to wipe mine clean to make sure I was getting a good seal. My thought was any dust and grit on the rubber seal will not give a good seal once closed. Plus I use to remove the seal periodically to clean as dust and grit did get trapped under the rubber seal where it fits around the trap door. |
Post# 313062 , Reply# 26   1/23/2015 at 14:15 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
it is narrow but it comes out really easily but there is a slight coaching of dust near the cyclones it doesn't accumulate after time it's only just a fine liar of dust.that's what happens to the canister as well just a light coating of dust and this model you never have to clean cyclone assembly it will get dusty but thats point:) and even if there is dirt on the seal it will still make a perfect seal really no point cleaning as to me it doesn't make a difference and it still seals really well. |
Post# 313063 , Reply# 27   1/23/2015 at 14:19 (3,373 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
You're probably right Dyson boy it will still seal properly but I like to give it a wipe anyway. Must be my OCD :-) |
Post# 313065 , Reply# 28   1/23/2015 at 14:21 (3,373 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hehe But not like that will affect anything though, but still a wipe is nicer! |
Post# 313067 , Reply# 29   1/23/2015 at 14:24 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313070 , Reply# 30   1/23/2015 at 14:29 (3,373 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Haha :-) Do you know how many watts the Big Ball has? |
Post# 313071 , Reply# 31   1/23/2015 at 14:30 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313072 , Reply# 32   1/23/2015 at 14:34 (3,373 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Oh right it's quite a bigger motor than the DC41 Mk2 then. They will have to reduce that to no more than 900 watts in 2 years time. I think I'll get one before then. |
Post# 313073 , Reply# 33   1/23/2015 at 14:37 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313076 , Reply# 34   1/23/2015 at 14:42 (3,373 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Personally I think between 1300w and 1600w is about right but we shall see if the further reduction goes ahead. |
Post# 313077 , Reply# 35   1/23/2015 at 14:43 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313078 , Reply# 36   1/23/2015 at 14:48 (3,373 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yes it's a big ball beast. Haha |
Post# 313079 , Reply# 37   1/23/2015 at 14:49 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313080 , Reply# 38   1/23/2015 at 14:50 (3,373 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
:-) |
Post# 313084 , Reply# 39   1/23/2015 at 15:24 (3,373 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Lol, and what's the performance like in comparison to the dc41 mk2? Is it very noticeable? |
Post# 313086 , Reply# 40   1/23/2015 at 15:30 (3,373 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313208 , Reply# 42   1/24/2015 at 08:35 (3,372 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313505 , Reply# 43   1/27/2015 at 07:55 (3,369 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 313530 , Reply# 44   1/27/2015 at 12:59 (3,369 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 313621 , Reply# 45   1/28/2015 at 04:41 (3,369 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I agree with this review CLICK HERE TO GO TO marcusprit's LINK |
Post# 313622 , Reply# 46   1/28/2015 at 06:32 (3,368 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
But they still haven't got the new improved floorhead in the US yet not sure why? |
Post# 313628 , Reply# 47   1/28/2015 at 08:57 (3,368 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Mark! Thought u left? If not then YAY!!! |
Post# 313630 , Reply# 48   1/28/2015 at 09:00 (3,368 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Haha I decided not to leave and to be a new calmer Mark :-) |
Post# 313631 , Reply# 49   1/28/2015 at 09:04 (3,368 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
When the Dyson bashers post on here I will just bite my tongue :-) |
Post# 313635 , Reply# 50   1/28/2015 at 10:16 (3,368 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Lol omg Dont change for no 1- your unique |
Post# 313658 , Reply# 51   1/28/2015 at 16:05 (3,368 days old) by Rolls_rapide (-)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Photo 1 of 20, appears to reveal... a Phillips screw!?! What happened to the Torx screws? |
Post# 313696 , Reply# 53   1/29/2015 at 05:39 (3,368 days old) by marcusprit ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Good to hear Mike. They are now a lot quieter. The sound on older models used to annoy me but not anymore. |
Post# 313704 , Reply# 54   1/29/2015 at 08:36 (3,367 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I think all Dyson'shave good suction apart from the DC01,02,03 and 24 |
Post# 314144 , Reply# 55   2/2/2015 at 09:58 (3,363 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
This post has been removed by the member who posted it. |
Post# 314155 , Reply# 56   2/2/2015 at 10:50 (3,363 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Nice dc59 mate! :) I might get one after I get a dc41 mk2 |
Post# 314175 , Reply# 57   2/2/2015 at 11:27 (3,363 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|