Thread Number: 27115  /  Tag: 50s/60s/70s Vacuum Cleaners
Trident Vacuum
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 303465   10/28/2014 at 01:56 (3,461 days old) by Collector2 (Moose Jaw, Sk)        

collector2's profile picture
Hey Guys:

Just added another, not often seen, machine to my collection (Thanks Al). A Trident model U156a (Made by Electrolux England). Does anyone have a manufacture date for this machine? I believe it is late 1960's but I'm not certain. The only other Tank type Trident I have seen is pretty much the same as this but blue and white (U156?) Does anyone know if there were other tank type machines under the Trident name?


  View Full Size
Post# 303478 , Reply# 1   10/28/2014 at 07:23 (3,461 days old) by funvacfan (Canada)        
Beautiful

funvacfan's profile picture
Lovely, and so complete! Great fresh colour too.

Guy


Post# 303484 , Reply# 2   10/28/2014 at 08:31 (3,461 days old) by watsonw (Newport, Shropshire, UK)        
1967-70ish

Hello Doug,

How are you these days?

I have a complete 156 (including sprayer - unused)and instruction booklet which features this model having the same hose with white nylon one piece louvre type suction control and dual dusting tool clip as our uk Z100 which appeared in 1967 with the 80 as the middle model. The 'TRIDENT' tubs appeared around 1973 when lux went over to the sealed motors beginning with the UK Z330 over here.

The other trident 156 type cylinder I know of had a grey/blue covered body and I think pre-dated the 156. Al has one and like your 156 has a 'bojack' hose.

The original hoses fitted to the 100/80/94/310/330/345 were not robust like the previous Z55/65 types.

I think I have a spare complete/mint unused sprayer?

I could send you a copy of my instruction booklet?


Regards, Walter.


Post# 303486 , Reply# 3   10/28/2014 at 08:58 (3,460 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Trident

vacbear58's profile picture
Doug always does such a good job of rejuvenating grubby and dirty cleaners :)

These Trident cleaners are a bit of curiosity. Before the 1980s Electrolux where not known at all for doing exclusives with one exception at the end on the 1950s - the Norvac based on the 55 model, then technically obsolete.

However in 1965 they seem to have changed this policy brining out not one exclusive but three! Two of these seem to be just colour variations of their existing 64 & 65 models - respectively U137 & U138. These were designated "Challenge" models so were probably sold through mail order catalogues - there were Goblin "Challenge" models too.

But the other was different. This was the U136 and was designated the Trident. It was clearly based on the then mid-line 65 model (the new TOL 90 model having been introduced that same year) but with some subtle differences. The most significant if these was the re-styled rear panel which lost the separate cord storage point, had a smaller switch (actually the same as the 90) and a much simpler flat exhaust filter rather than the cup (for want of a better word) style filter used for the previous 20 years or more on models 30, 55, 62 & 65. It was 2 more years before this same rear assembly would make its way to the mainline Lux cleaners with the model 80 in 1967.

The other main point of differentiation was on the front panel which has the bag full whistle (only just seen for the first time on the TOL 90 that same year) and a bag catch which was on the front top of the cleaner (rather like Hoover models) - to the best of my knowledge this was the first time in the UK that they adopted this arrangement since the model XI

The colour picture is not mine, this particular cleaner came up on ebay, its the only one of these I have ever seen


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 303488 , Reply# 4   10/28/2014 at 09:11 (3,460 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Trident

vacbear58's profile picture
Its hard to tell but it appears that the front profile of the cleaner is somewhat different to the other Lux cleaners of the time.

The model was then updated to have a front similar to that used on the Lux 65 and then 80 with the two side catches. It retained the bag full signal.

I should have also pointed out that instead of the combination carpet/floor nozzle it featured separate ones, as seen here only on the 62 model, although they were used for many years in other sales areas, notably Australia.

Here is the later version (mine!), it is interesting to note how the tools are colour co-ordinated to the cleaner even though it must have been very small volume production run. My cleaner had an addendum to the instructions showing the suction control on the handle (then only seen on the new TOL 100) which would imply a date of 1968 when the 100 was introduced.

Note how everything about it absolutely shouts Electrolux right down to the box, I must check it out to see if there is an address for Trident on the box separate from Electrolux themselves.


  View Full Size
Post# 303489 , Reply# 5   10/28/2014 at 09:22 (3,460 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
And finally Doug's

vacbear58's profile picture
The implication is that this machine would have come along at the end of the 1960s, certainly post 1968. Whether or not it continued beyond 1969 (when the 80 range on which this was based was replaced with the all new 91 series) I cannot say.

If I am honest I do not care for this version as much as the earlier ones (does not stop me having one though LOLOLOL) although it still has its little quirks such as the coloured co-ordinated rear grill - in the Lux 80 its plain.

I am not aware of any other tank style cleaner to bear the Trident name. There was a further Trident model which is very obviously based on a Volta model.

I see Walter has commented above in the thread, so that makes four of this particular model I now know of. And he is absolutely correct, the hoses of all Electrolux models from about the 80/100 on to I think the 355 (the introduction of the lightweight ridged plastic hoses) were never durable, always seeming to break at the handle end

Al


  View Full Size
Post# 303490 , Reply# 6   10/28/2014 at 09:28 (3,460 days old) by Collector2 (Moose Jaw, Sk)        

collector2's profile picture
Thanks for the information guys. I would imagine that, since the blue one was still out in 1968, that would probably make the yellow one starting in 69 or 70 and running till 73 when the other style took over.

Doug

PS - email you shortly Walter


Post# 303492 , Reply# 7   10/28/2014 at 09:47 (3,460 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Trident

vacbear58's profile picture
The annoying thing is that none of the later Trident models appear in "Which Electrolux Is It?", only the first in an earlier edition si we can only speculat on the age.

It would be interesting if Markus or Edgar (or anyone else) could comment to know if these models (or ones like them) appeared in mainland Europe or anywhere else come to that as there was such a wide variety of Electrolux models produced over their many sales territories under many different names

Al


Post# 303523 , Reply# 8   10/28/2014 at 16:23 (3,460 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Well the reason it does not appear in the Electrolux marketing literature is because the Trident cleaners were sold exclusivly door-to-door by the then field salesmen. Although the cleaners were stamped with the Electrolux name on the rating plates, that was pretty much as far as the connection with Electrolux went. They liked to play it down, if you will, as they didn't want consumers who'd seen a Trident in-home demonstration to go out and buy the almost identical model in the shops. That said, the Trident did come with a number of additional attachments to entice the consumer / offer more perceived value etc. which would not have happened in-store.

Of course the similar model in store would have been the 65 and later the 80, both of which had 3-way combination floor tools. Does having a seperate floor and 2-way carpet tool therefore make the Trident a "cheaper" cleaner for being less sophisticated...or does seperate dedicated tools make it more "exclusive"? You decide.


Post# 303526 , Reply# 9   10/28/2014 at 16:41 (3,460 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Doug I found this when I was searching around on Yahoo just now. It's same as yours only with less parts. I think it is sold though.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO vintagerepairer's LINK on eBay


Post# 303586 , Reply# 10   10/29/2014 at 00:33 (3,460 days old) by Collector2 (Moose Jaw, Sk)        

collector2's profile picture
Hi Benny

Yep same one but with the original hose by the look of it. At least I know what the hose looked like now if I ever come across one. Thanks!

Doug


Post# 303587 , Reply# 11   10/29/2014 at 00:36 (3,460 days old) by Collector2 (Moose Jaw, Sk)        

collector2's profile picture
LOL that is the same argument as the Canadian vs US Electrolux's. In the US the dual (flip over) accessories were considered deluxe because you only needed 3 pieces, while in Canada they were used only on the bottom of the line as you weren't getting a full set of parts.

Post# 303594 , Reply# 12   10/29/2014 at 03:49 (3,460 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
More Trident

vacbear58's profile picture
I have no recollection of seeing that Trident that Benny's search threw up, I wonder how I missed it as the listing title has several of the criteria words I use when searching ebay - I would have discussed it with Doug too had I seen it. Maybe someone got in quick with the best offer and the listing got completed.

I think that the Trident must have been marketed slightly above the 65/80 on the basis of the bag full indicator and the suction control/tool clip which did not appear on the two successor models to the 80 (91 & 94) - it took the introduction of the 305 (where Electrolux segmented their MOL offer) for these to appear at this level. And remember the Trident was two or more years ahead of the 80 in terms of the rear of the machine and the simpler filter arrangement.

It is also curious that Electrolux chose to market a machine door to door at this stage (1965) and to carry on doing so for what seems to be at least 4 - 5 years as you would not have thought the sales volume would have been there to justify the cost in terms of different tooling and production sequence (as the handle & mounting are completely different to the mainstream models), cost of colour coding the tools and the costs of maintaining the mobile work force.

Did I ever mention that I am one of those "bean counters" that so many people are so swift to shoot their mouths off about? (Sorry, that's a different rant)

I have it on good authority that Hoover abandoned the concept of door to door sales in around 1960, the likes of Vactric & Bylock were long gone by this stage and I doubt that Goblin would have been doing it either.

Al


Post# 303600 , Reply# 13   10/29/2014 at 05:28 (3,460 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        
Bean Counter

Good morning Vacbear. Dare I ask what the bean counter refers to (if it's anything I've said, I must apologise).

I quite agree with you, that you'd think by this period of time we talk about that door-to-door selling would have been long gone for high-end appliances like vacuum cleaners. I too concur that you wouldn't think there was the demand even for a cleaner like this to be sold on the doorstep. I only know what I know about it because the man who sold me my shop in 1979 was very clued up on Trident - his father has been a salesman for Electrolux. It's times like now where I wish I'd asked more. Who'd have thought that in 35 years time we'd be sat at home with a tiny computer talking to folks all over the world!

I would not be at all surprised if at some point we see that these Trident cleaners had appeared in a different variation for a none-UK company; as you say Vacbear, to make the tooling etc. for the small number of parts which differed from the mainstream models would have come at a cost. However, one area where savings were made (albeit I expect very small savings) is that as you see on the rating plate of the cleaner in my link, there is no mention of BEAB mark. I am quite sure these cleaners were safe enough to meet the BEAB standards, however, as that approval was principally required to sell products through electricity board showrooms (without it the showrooms would not stock appliances) it was redundant on the Trident as they were never going to be sold by UK retailers, electricity boards or otherwise.

The individual tools supplied with the Trident were most likely in production already for other cleaners made in the UK for the export market, so I don't think that would have been much of an issue, indeed as we see with Dougs cleaner, the generic white parts would have been used for a good deal of UK models too.

However, I must reiterate that the Trident was not to be likened to mainstream Electrolux models on sale at that time, rather the Trident (which I believe from memory was more expensive than a cleaner bought in-store and would have had finance available on it) was unique and came with a host of attachments, like the sprayer and as we saw recently, a "hobby kit". One thing I do not understand for the life of me is why there was no automatic cordwinder. In a time when this feature was virtually none-existent on cleaners sold in store, I am sure it would have been a real selling point when demonstrated in a customers front parlour.


Post# 303601 , Reply# 14   10/29/2014 at 05:38 (3,460 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        
305

Vacbear, I must add that the 305 as I remember it did not have the hook to accomodate the dusting brush on the back of the hose wand, rather it used the round valve as seen on the 302. However, it did have a plastic sleeve on the wand.

This deluxe suction-control-cum-dusting-brush-holder was confined mainly to the top-models until the early 1980s, whereby Electrolux then simply had the "top of the range" wand, with its plastic sleeve and deluxe suction control, or else bare metal with no controller, rather than a choice of controllers and sleeves.


Post# 303603 , Reply# 15   10/29/2014 at 06:33 (3,460 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Bean counters

vacbear58's profile picture
Benny

I don't want to hi-jack Doug's thread by veering off, but a quick explanation. Quite often here and in the sister site AutomaticWasher folks will sound off about "bean counters" aka cost accountants as being the downfall of manufacturing in the western world.

I do not deny that SOME will have had their part to play along with bankers, executives, shareholders and the stock market in general. However, they talk about "bean counters" like they were something new. When I trained, in the mid to late 1970s, I was taught by men (and one woman who was actually streets ahead of the rest of them) in their 50s and 60s who had being doing the job all their lives until veering off into education.

In very many cases it is the "bean counters" that helped keep these organisations running and indeed many still do, often in difficult circumstances. So sometimes it gets very annoying when men and women doing their best get bad mouthed in this way.

Rant over


Post# 303604 , Reply# 16   10/29/2014 at 06:48 (3,460 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Cordwinder

vacbear58's profile picture
There are probably a couple of reasons for this Benny.
Firstly the Trident was based on the smaller bodyshell of the 65/80 so to accommodate the cord winder they would have needed to use the larger 90/100 body shell.
Secondly, with the 90 and to an extent the 100, Electrolux established and entirely new market segment for cylinder cleaners, one of the defining features of which was the cord winder. I am guessing that the basic price for the Trident (before such extras as sprayer and hobby kit) would have been pitched somewhere between the 65/80 (£29) and the 90/100 (£38) whereas if it were based on the 90/100 it would have had to have been pitched above the £40 mark - a lot of money back then. At least based on the 65/80 they perhaps could catch some of the middle ground although I don't doubt that, with the extras, it could well have been pushing on £40, if not more.

There is one thing that Doug can maybe check for us - the wattage of the cleaner. Early 80s were 400 watts, late 80s 550 watts. It would be interesting to note the wattage of the yellow Trident. Unfortunately I will not be able to check the wattage of my earlier model for a few more weeks

Al


Post# 303613 , Reply# 17   10/29/2014 at 09:17 (3,459 days old) by Collector2 (Moose Jaw, Sk)        

collector2's profile picture
Hey Guys

The Wattage of the Trident is 550 W while the wattage on the Model 65 is 450W, the Model 80 is 500 W and the Models 90 and 100 are 550W.

The tooling for a lot of the Trident parts would have already been available at the factory. The rug and floor nozzles are the same as those previously used on the model 62 (below)1957 - 1959


Post# 303638 , Reply# 18   10/29/2014 at 13:44 (3,459 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        
Counting the beans

Vacbear, I too do not wish to hijack the thread but I did want to thank you for taking the time to explain that to me. Let the ignorant think what they like, but don't take it as a personal slight as you'll get upset too. As you say, it is the very same people whose ability to balance the books was what kept many businesses going. One only has to look at messages on this website which demand that manufacturers should make this product in that shape, or bring back a long deceased model, that retailers who are still trading haven't a clue what they are doing, and that company X who has taken over company Y has ruined it, to see that not many people in the world have much real understanding of what it means to be in business. I do not say this to be disrespectful of said people, nor do I claim to know a lot about the world myself, but having been in business I do know a thing or two in that quarter, thus it's easy to see when others don't.

Back to this Trident I found on Ebay. My cleaning lady was here today and it is she who shows me how to do everything on the computer (other than to type as I learnt how to touch type many, many moons ago when I was in the Civil Service) and she showed me how to send a message to that seller. I wondered if she was able to elaborate more on her original sellers description. I was dumbfounded to get a reply within the hour, and what a warm response it was too. I'll try to work out how to copy it to here, if anyone would like that?


Post# 303673 , Reply# 19   10/29/2014 at 19:04 (3,459 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        
Something else I found

Was this link to an old thread on this site. I noted several things. In order that the cleaners appear:

The first pictures show a charming little canister cleaner, the likes of which I've seen several of over the years. Note the 2-piece metal tubes; this would have been to reduce the packaging needed, just as it was with the later Electrolux slimline cleaners of the 1980's. As the cleaner was physically a different shape from the usual long cylinders, one long pole would not have packed so well. Note also that this cleaner has BEAB approval, in contrast to what I said about earlier cleaners.

Moving to the yellow U156a, there is only one digit difference in serial numbers between that one pictured and the one I found on ebay (serial numbers 910 and 914). I wish I knew how to read Electrolux numbers properly in order to find a date.

Finally the drawing of the U136, note how it uses the bayonet style fitting. Electrolux did of course take this forward as their only fitting from model 80 and 100 onwards, but until then it was very much the bottom of the range hose connector, despite being the best.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO vintagerepairer's LINK


Post# 303703 , Reply# 20   10/30/2014 at 04:35 (3,459 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Copy & paste

vacbear58's profile picture
Benny

I was glad you got a good response from that seller, it quite restores one's faith in human nature & good manners when things like that happen. If you want to share it with us it is quite easy.

Firstly it is helpful to have windows open for both the message you received and this thread in Vacuumland - move down to the "Add your reply to this message thread" area - the bit with the cartoon of the woman with the pink Hoover Senior at the top.

Go to the start of the part of the message (if not all of it) that you want to share. Holding down the left button on your mouse, drag the mouse to the right and possibly down which should highlight the selected text in blue. Release the left key on the mouse.

Holding down the Ctrl key (it should be on the extreme left hand side and bottom row of your keyboard) press the letter C - this is a short cut key to COPY the selected text.

Click over on the Vacuumland "Add A Reply ...." box and click into the message box that you normally type into. Once again holding down the Ctrl key, type the letter V whereupon the text you selected from the message should appear in the box - the technical term here is "Paste".

You can then add your own text, both before and after the message, as you wish. You will of course also have to give your reply a title as usual in the box under "Subject Drift". Once you have pasted the text you can close the message from the ebay seller as soon as you care to.

Hope this is clear

Al


Post# 303706 , Reply# 21   10/30/2014 at 04:54 (3,459 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Hello Vacbear. Thank you for that, it's the same as when I copy and paste links then. I live and I learn. I am going out for most of today, it is rare it seems, but will attempt later.

Post# 303707 , Reply# 22   10/30/2014 at 04:54 (3,459 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Trident and Volta

vacbear58's profile picture
Benny

As far as I am aware the (Rob's) Trident canister was never seen here as an Electrolux but one or two orange ones branded Volta have shown up over the years. The Floor nozzle would tend to indicate early to mid 1980s but that is not absolutely reliable as Electrolux did tend to use a variety of nozzles across various models and territories.

Unfortunately, no one has ever been able to tell me how you can date Electrolux models from the serial number, but I note that the one you found on ebay and Mike's in the attached thread have the same "Prod Number" so I wonder of that could be the same production batch. Unfortunately I cannot get to mine at the moment to see how mine compare, but perhaps Doug could let us know the details from his.

As I noted earlier up the thread the rear assembly of the Trident appeared some two years ahead of the same assembly being fitted to the 80 - the replacement of the 65. Also, they did move to a bayonet fitting (from a push to release) on the 90 during it's production run although I don't know exactly when that was. I have never seen a 65 with anything other than the push to release coupling. No doubt some bean counter pointed out how much cheaper and easier it would be (and at no loss of functionality) to use bayonet fittings across the range :)

Al


Post# 303709 , Reply# 23   10/30/2014 at 05:12 (3,459 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Vacbear, indeed the nozzle with that little blue Trident was not seen on UK cleaners until the 1980's (I think the UK 350E was the first to have it and the very, very late 350 being the only other). Even the Swedish variation of the 350E had a different floor tool. However, I have seen numerous photographs on here from Markus where that same floor tool was well used on several none UK cleaners, and this must have been during the earliest part of the 1970's. Certainly that blue Trident is from the 1970's, of that I am quite sure.

I would not be at all surprised if there were cost implications surrounding the production of the bayonet fitting hoses for all cleaners, as standardising anything usually brings lots of savings with it. The hose fitting for the 65 and so on was of course metal, and very heavy at that. There would also have been a lot of sub-assembly which went into it too, and to what end? The bayonet fitting was a much superior design in my book, even to the point where much later in life Vax and ETA used it for their own.

The hose fitting for the original 90 was a failure as the stiff hose put too much pressure on it. Production moved to the 3-peg bayonet very late in the date, like you I do not know when, and it was around this time that the sprayer gun became an optional accessory rather than one which was included.



Post# 303716 , Reply# 24   10/30/2014 at 07:59 (3,459 days old) by watsonw (Newport, Shropshire, UK)        
blue trident tub/canister

I remmember seeing and trying one when brand new (although only 14 I was very impressed with the design and performance) at the house of a friend of my grandmother's who had bought this from a rep; a relation of hers' also bought one @ 1973-4. These cleaners were certainly much more attractive than the contemporary mainstream lux models of the same period. My grandmother, her friend and the friends relation all lived in an affluent part of Glasgow which might indicate that the tridents by then really were higher priced as I know for a fact that both my grans' friend and relation were very well off. Gran was secure enough: she just did'nt like cylinders!!!!

Post# 303780 , Reply# 25   10/30/2014 at 19:35 (3,458 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        
The reply from the ebay seller

This is what the seller of that Trident cleaner said to me regarding her Trident when I asked how she acquired it and why it was replaced:

"Dear Mr Broadbent. I will tell you what I know about my little vacuum cleaner, whether or not it is of interest or helps you, only you can decide. My mums sister Vera was the one who bought it, we think in the later part of the 1960's, certainly not before then but maybe into the 1970's. Aunt Vee never married and lived with my grandparents, caring for them as well as working full time as a bank teller. The point of me telling you this is that she never really got out much socially and often made purchases at the door - my mother joked that it was the only chance Vera got to enjoy the company of a gentleman, but in reality I think this was possibly quite true.

My mum was Aunty Vee's only sibling and was some 11 years older than mum, therefore she tended to take charge and as mothers only child, she idolised me. When a man came knocking the door one night selling vacuum cleaners, it turns out she invited him in and bought one. I am told that the cleaner was then put in her bedroom cupboard in preparation for the day I left home. I did not leave until the day I got married in 1974! I duly received the Trident as a wedding present. Grateful as I was for it (my friend only had a Ewbank sweeper!), I was always conscious that it looked rather old. As you said, there were lots of attachments for it, many of which I never unpacked because I only needed the main parts, and over the last 40 years have disappeared to goodness knows where.

I used the Trident exclusively for exactly 10 years, it performed well as I had very few carpets, but in 1984 my husband and I moved to a brand-new three storey town house which was wall to wall carpet in every room except for the kitchen. I was heavily pregnant with my third child and found it impossible to use that vacuum anymore. Because of this I bought a Goblin upright, I only remember it because it was the cheapest I could find and money was very tight. It did not last very long at all, between myself as a working mum, my husband, and a baby sitter who used to help clean for me, it got a lot of abuse. After that I cannot begin to tell you how many vacuum cleaners I had as we've had so many, other than to say all were upright and that in recent times I had the obligatory Dyson, although that too is long gone. The Trident was really my cleaner as neither my husband nor the occasional cleaning ladies I've had have ever used it much. I kept it because it seemed to be easier for many jobs and above all never broke down, so forever came in handy as a stand-by when whichever upright I had at the time conked out.

All of the attachments for my Trident were thoroughly worn out and thrown away, the only reason the carpet tool was in such good condition was because I barely used it as it never cleaned that well. I couldn't tell you how many tools from other cleaners have been used on it, in fact even the flex was off another of my more recent cleaners as the original went off with the most horrendous bang when I was cleaning my stairs about two years ago. My husband put that flex on for me.

I only sold the cleaner as I recently retired and we have now downsized to a very small flat. Literally everything we did not need had to go. I was hoping one of my sons would take the Trident off me if only to use for their cars, but I am sure you know what young people are like. I got about £65 for it after fees and postage, interestingly my sons did not object to me spending the money on them! I hope this is of some use to you. Regards. Maggie."

I have to say I was not expecting quite the detailed response I got, though yes, I did find it interesting. Rather kind of her to take the trouble to write back at all, I thought. But still doesn't say an awful lot about the initial sale and purchase of the cleaner, sadly.



Post# 303789 , Reply# 26   10/30/2014 at 20:03 (3,458 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Vacbear, from that other thread I was just reading about Walita, you posted this link. Have a look at the fastener on the bag cover. Does it remind you of anything...?

CLICK HERE TO GO TO Vintagerepairer's LINK


Post# 303790 , Reply# 27   10/30/2014 at 20:04 (3,458 days old) by super-sweeper (KSSRC Refurbishment Center)        

super-sweeper's profile picture

what a great story! I love tales like those! laughing


Post# 303834 , Reply# 28   10/31/2014 at 03:39 (3,458 days old) by z30soulbrother (West Midlands, UK)        
trident

love the yellow Trident 3 houses in my street owned them when i was a kid you would see them out cleaning cars weekend days

Post# 303839 , Reply# 29   10/31/2014 at 04:32 (3,458 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        
3 houses in my street owned them

You say you live in West Midlands. This one on ebay was in Birmingham, as was the one in the photographs in that other thread (says collected from central Brum). I wonder if the West Midlands are was a hot-spot for the Trident sales team?

Post# 303854 , Reply# 30   10/31/2014 at 09:40 (3,457 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Provenance

vacbear58's profile picture
Thanks for posting the story of the Trident in Birmingham, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. Its always interesting to know the history of cleaners, I always ask when I am picking one up.

I am glad the instructions worked :)

It curious that she thought it old looking in 1974 as it was not that old, although I suppose by 1974 Hoover, Electrolux 91/94 and Goblin were all showing models with handles on the front covers which maybe looked more streamlined - they had more "squared off" bodies too. It seems like it gave her good service though :)

£65 was not a bad price for it at all, I paid £50 (collected it) for the blue one although the yellow one I have was a lot cheaper.

My blue one came from, or at least lived in Huddersfield, and Doug's came from Tyne & Wear. The first Trident I ever saw (blue) was in Northern Ireland, so in Si's case it may just have been a lucky or good salesman hitting a vien of gold. peer pressure might have had something to do with it too.

Nice to see you posting Si, it must be a year since I picked up that 80 for Doug from you - doesn't time fly

Al


Post# 303913 , Reply# 31   10/31/2014 at 18:25 (3,457 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Vacbear, I too thought that it made for an interesting read, indeed I'd like to know more and based on her last reply I am sure I'd get another. However, I don't want to put her to that bother!

Like you, I was also intrigued at the comments about the cleaning looking old in 1974. So, with little else better to do, I sat and pondered the point. By my calculations, this woman must have been in her early 20's when she got married, if she has only just retired. Now, I realise I can speak only for myself at that age (I can just about remember it) and I will readily say my perception of many things then was not what it is now. What was "old" to me then might actually have only have been a few years in age. To be given a brand-new cleaner which was already four or more years old may have felt like 10 years to a young bride!

I then also considered the 'loaf' shape of the cleaner, with its rounded top and silver glides underneath. By 1974 a lot of cylinder cleaners were of course much more square and rigid in their styling, and above all, a lot were mounted on wheels. They also didn't have the levers on the side to clamp the front cover in place; I'm thinking along the lines of the Electrolux 330 and 94 here, the Hoover Freedom, and the vast array of imported cleaners which were largely constructed of plastic and had a bag with went in through the top or middle, such as Meile and Philips. So in that respect, I can possibly see why it may have been seen as dated. Clearly though, at least I think so anyway, it is apparent that the woman was very appreciative to have a vacuum cleaner at all, and of course it was also brand-new into the bargain.

What amazes me is that from her message it sounds like the Trident certainly earned its keep, and whilst the tools had all been killed-off, the hose remained in tact. In my experience they were the first thing which people wore out.


Post# 303915 , Reply# 32   10/31/2014 at 18:30 (3,457 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Another point, she said she got about £65 after fees and postage. I have no idea at all how much either set her back, but I'd be certain it must have been at least £20-25 for the two? So she must have sold for a lot more than £65.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy