After approximately one-year in the UK and Australia, Dyson is now launching the Cinetic with two variants in Canada.

DC78 Turbinehead at $699.99 

DC78 Turbinehead Animal for $799.99.

As usual the only difference between the two of them are the tools that are included.

 
With its launch, Dyson now states that all cyclonic vacuums before it lost suction and this is the first that will not even though it utilizes a user inaccessible post-motor HEPA filter. While Dyson says it's tested with "10 years’ worth of test dust", just like all the Dyson's before it, it's not to be used on “larger types and quantities of dust or debris” and “…not use(d) on rubble, ash or plaster”. 

I could swear those are the materials that are responsible for clogging a vacuum bag, but I digress...
 
With the launch, Dyson appears to have paid people to blog about it. At the link below, one blogger goes into detail about the bins full of dust, nine-thousand hours of testing and $250,000 of "aggressive" dust used to test it, but negates to mention that it's not to be used for "quantities" of dust. They even go as far as calling it "filterless"...

And there's Dyson, making bagged vacuums look like fools again! 

It is most bizarre when people on here fight against the Dyson mantra and those who are for it.

The "no loss of suction" merely reiterates the multi cyclonic design of prolonging suction, often in early Dysons being able to go well past the "max fill" mark and still expect the vacuum to pick up dust and dirt.

It does not refer to cleaning filters, or having a filter on board. Filters are there to filter after all. They are not put in place to catch all the dust that the vacuum cleaner picks up. The only aspect that changes is with the design of the cyclones and how variable dust is put through the shrouds before it lands at the bottom of the bins.

The design element that brands have put in place in reality mean that some filter do indeed do more than filter and catch lots of viewable dust. But that's because some brands persist in making single cyclones as opposed to many. 

I've said it before and I'll say it again - I like the prolonged loss of suction power in a Dyson vacuum - however I do not like the plastic designs and I am not in favour of Dyson over the healthier proposition of dust in a bag. Bags may clog but they're a heck of a lot easier and far more hygienic.

I highly doubt you would have to replace a bag every three days but it depends on the brand, model and dust bag capacity. On the basis that your Dyson DC39 has a 2 litre dust capacity, most dust bags on larger vacs have capacities of 4.5 litre, 5 litres and 7 litres or more if you have a Numatic.

Rainbow in the 1930s, Filter-Queen in the 1940s, You're telling me Dyson was the first bagless vacuum in 1993? Oh please, Even Fantom was around under their commercial name, "Vectron", by 1984! Who on earth cares about a wimpy turbine-head, i wonder why you need one on bare floors, Guess Dyson couldn't get the dirt without it. Powered Nozzles are the way to go, I'd love to see Dyson dig into a rug and remove dirt like none other. Time and time again i state that Dysons are lies, A lie you're unfortunately trapped in, dysonboy. Dyson can cram as many cyclones as they want into their vacuum, I've proven time and time again that Fantom is the more efficient cleaner. the amount of sand and fine particles the Dyson leaves behind is shocking, especially when people are forking out $700 to be a show-off to the neighbors. even with a broken cyclone, the Fantom had no problem with cleaning and filtering sand. 

Parwaz, You're finally getting it, Dyson isn't what it says it is! 

It's time for you to give up!

Don't you know when you've been outgunned?

There are many superior vacuums that are so much better than Dyson.

Take Kirby for one. any Kirby can outclean a dyson, and a Kirby doesn't even have any cyclones in it.

He's been out-gunned 84 times now. Did you never see the test I did with my Fantom and DC07? I sure as bwerk have factual evidence. I put the Fantom and Dyson up to the same amount of sand, 3 times. The Fantom won all three. You shouldn't make such claims without researching. A bag, water, rather you like it or not, ALL vacuums have a filter material, even Dyson. Dyson has filters, which means Dyson uses bags. Yep, that's right. A bag is a filter, and a filter is a bag. They both requirement replacement over time. There is no way of avoiding this. Bagless is nothing more than a fancy bag, as in bagless, filters require replacement.in bagged vacuums, bags require replacement...are you getting any of this or am I wasting my breath? You need to understand there's faults in Dyson, faults that can and will not be corrected until James loses money.

Oh, and power-nozzles rule, that turbo nozzle won't do a thing when it runs out of batteries! Before you know it, all Dysons will have that turbo nozzle, and they all will be cordless. Dyson says he cut the hassle of the cord, what hassle? It's going to be a HUGE hassle when the battery dies. Why wait for it to charge when I can have much-better cleaning power, on demand, and for as long as I want? I really need to throw better-built vacuums at my DC07 more often, maybe after 248 videos, the world will see that even the common Bissell can triumph over Dyson.

Ok Dyson boy, you have Deal. When a DC65 appears on my doorstep, I'll do the test.until then, I'm not giving Dyson my money. I never tamper with machines, the Dyson had the bin loose for that first second of the test. Guess why? It was broken, and even broke more during testing! I'm remaking the video with a better-condition DC07 when I have the chance. I saw 2 Dysons at the Flea-Market the other day, I might just have to buy one to prove a point! 

If the Thunder showed up once more in the isle of Wards, Kmart or Target,I would have to buy one in every color! The store would love me! 

There's only one thing I commend Dyson for and that's the easy-access brush. Using coins instead of screws wasn't a half-bad idea. Only when you remove the brush, you're in for the worst belt change of your life!

Here is a fine example of a machine that will and has out-lasted your Dysons and will still out-clean them without hesitation! There's a good reason I'm not buying another bagless. Yuck.

I could not resist!