Thread Number: 22821
Oh my days, never heard such rubbish |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 255105   11/4/2013 at 01:57 (3,818 days old) by Adamthemieleman (North Yorkshire )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Stupid Brussels, seems like we will all be seeing less power to our vacuums from now on. Of course, Mr Dyson has had his twopence on the situation. What do you think? CLICK HERE TO GO TO Adamthemieleman's LINK |
Post# 255107 , Reply# 1   11/4/2013 at 02:14 (3,818 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
I actually really welcome this change. Vacuum manufacturers have become lazy putting excessively powerful motors on their cleaners to compensate for poor design. The 2 best selling vacuums in the UK are Dyson and Numatic, both are 1200w. Miele's are rated at 1200w in other parts of the world and Sebo uprights are 1300w max. You don't need anything more than that.
The new legislation will force lazy manufacturers to undertake some proper R&D to make their machines more efficient. |
Post# 255110 , Reply# 3   11/4/2013 at 03:25 (3,818 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
Also, think back over history. How many of our parents, grandparents and even great grandparents had Hoover Juniors? Those were all 250 - 300w max and nobody ever complained about those not picking up.
I have a 1992 Panasonic MC-E44, rated at 700w. The hose suction is equal to my modern Sebo X1.1 and it actually has MORE suction power on the hose than my Mum's old 1800w Electrolux. Why? How? That's simple - it has an efficient motor and is well designed. Similar story with the Hoover Turbopower 2's, all rated between 800w and 1200w depending on the model, but those have very strong hose suction. I am by no means a Dyson fan, but credit where credit is due, their research and development is second to none and they've successfully managed to find a good balance between strong suction power and motor power. The highest rated Dyson was 1400w. I recently used a newer Dyson with a 1050w digital motor and was blown away (no pun intended) by how strong the suction power was. |
Post# 255116 , Reply# 5   11/4/2013 at 06:28 (3,818 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 255120 , Reply# 6   11/4/2013 at 07:53 (3,818 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This topic has been discussed before and though I do welcome it, I am going to reiterate what I have said in the past.
Larger appliances need to lower their usage of power. Washing machines, ovens and electric hobs that use 3000 or more watts need to be lowered. Even those expensive induction hobs that are claimed to save money have 2000 watts minimum. The average household will use far more electricity usage than running around a vacuum cleaner with high power in the day and it isn't as if as buyers or owners, we are limited to using a mains powered vacuum to pick up daily dust - enter the mechanical or cordless sweeper - so what if they don't deep clean? You don't always need to deep clean your home every day.. I suppose if you do, you'll get yourself a dirty fan upright that takes care of the carpets. Not exactly increasing your power usage there with 400 to 850 watts if using a certain clean fan upright... Benny has a great point here regarding what has gone down in the past ("...But then somewhere in the last 20 years it all went pitifully wrong...") What went wrong is the increasing advertising claim that the higher power a vacuum cleaner has, the better it cleans. Hoover are famous for doing this, as were its rivals, constantly putting out the claims and increasing wattage as time goes on. This post was last edited 11/04/2013 at 08:44 |
Post# 255129 , Reply# 8   11/4/2013 at 09:50 (3,818 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Ah but due to the voltage in Canada and the U.S, the models from Miele etc worldwide are exactly the same in terms of the motor. So, where our 2100 watt SEBO D2 appears to be "high" the U.S get the same model with a 1250 watt motor.
Also for hoses... Feet to metres for UK/Europe... That equates to 3.8 metres in European/UK market speak. The SEBO X series has a 3 metre hose as standard (9ft 10), Miele's S7 has a 3.8 metre stretch hose on board (12ft). The basic Vax Mach Air (equivalent to the design of Hoover's Windtunnel Air but with a standard short hose measures 1.1metres/ 3ft.7 which is near useless). I think the main reason that hoses don't get any longer is the simple fact that they would add more weight to the upright design. An upright isn't a "vacuum cleaner station or trolley" where everything that was ever made to be added onto a vacuum cleaner should be stored like a trolley, though I can see how some owners might want it that way. Sadly we can't have everything that as owners, we want with only a few exceptions. The fact that so many brands now offer universal tools right across their ranges means for the most part you can use old tools on same family line models, but then you're compromised to stay with that brand you've always had UNLESS the model you have has the older 32mm sizing, in which you can access other tools that will extend the versatility of your old vacuum from OTHER brands. As buyers though, brands are slow on the uptake to release information on their tube/hose/tool sizing for fear of buyers running to other brands or mis matching on tools. Sadly the Internet has opened up this arena that was once kept hush or back by the dealers and companies. Numatic Henry owners for example often end up buying main size "other brand" or universal air turbo brushes that are cheaper than the ones Numatic actually sell. Numatic's turbo brushes are very good, though from Wessel Werk originally and has been tapered to fit with 32mm sizing. However there are other Wessel Werk turbo brushes on the market that buyers can optionally consider. Tool/hose/tube bore sizes have always been different - some brands claim that a wider bore gives better air flow and less clogging, others offer similar sizing (such as Miele and Bosch who offer same 35mm sizing) whereas the 32mm is a sizing that seems to be made by Vax (TTi), Electrolux, Hoover and major brands, even though some models sadly have the "exclusivity" of unique parts with a bigger size bore/diameter making it useless should you change down to another model from the same brand in years/months to come. |
Post# 255152 , Reply# 10   11/4/2013 at 13:33 (3,818 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Qualtex do make copy tools for Hoover though. |
Post# 255153 , Reply# 11   11/4/2013 at 13:45 (3,818 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I know Qualtex produce copy tools Vintagerepairer but they don't make copy tools that fit the Jazz, Dust Manager Cylinder or any other Cylinder by Hoover that uses the set up of extension tube & floor tool design. |
Post# 255154 , Reply# 12   11/4/2013 at 13:52 (3,818 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Oh I see. How does it differ? |
Post# 255155 , Reply# 13   11/4/2013 at 14:01 (3,818 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Well most Cylinder Vacuums have the floor tool fit on to the outside of the tube whereas Hoover Cylinders have the floor tool going in to the tube. |
Post# 255157 , Reply# 14   11/4/2013 at 14:05 (3,818 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hello. Yes I see that, but these tools are available too, to push inside a 32mm tube (Goblin) and 35mm (Hitachi). I am wondering if these cleaners you refer to use another size altogether? |
Post# 255158 , Reply# 15   11/4/2013 at 14:31 (3,818 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Perhaps they do - but a 32mm tool dosen't fit the Hoover tube. |
Post# 255162 , Reply# 17   11/4/2013 at 14:45 (3,818 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Next, Hoover with pip to fit INSIDE the 32mm end of a tube which has the lock-rings. |
Post# 255163 , Reply# 18   11/4/2013 at 14:46 (3,818 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Finally, Hitachi, to fit INSIDE a tube which has a 35mm diameter. |
Post# 255164 , Reply# 19   11/4/2013 at 14:50 (3,818 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255165 , Reply# 20   11/4/2013 at 14:58 (3,818 days old) by madabouthoovers ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Vintage machines Jamie - like a Hoover Ranger maybe? |
Post# 255166 , Reply# 21   11/4/2013 at 14:59 (3,818 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I have a 1300 watt Hoover Purepower and a 2100 watt Purepower and the hose suction is bearly different, they are about the same.
Now my Turbopower 3 has a 1000 watt motor and so does my Turbopower 1000 (naturally) and I feel the Turbopower 3 has stronger hose suction because of the improved airflow design, don't get me wrong though, the Turbopower 1000 is very powerful and probably was the most powerful upright in 1992!! This post was last edited 11/04/2013 at 15:40 |
Post# 255167 , Reply# 22   11/4/2013 at 15:09 (3,818 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255172 , Reply# 24   11/4/2013 at 15:32 (3,818 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Indeed Steve, things will make a full circle.
Back only 30 years ago you would be hard pushed to find a car in America with an engine smaller than 5000CI, but now the only vehicles with engines that size are busses! Thing is though, at least large rumbling V8 motors had their advantages, what does a high pitched screaming power sucking electric motor have in its favour? Nothing, in my opinion. |
Post# 255173 , Reply# 25   11/4/2013 at 15:34 (3,818 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255176 , Reply# 27   11/4/2013 at 15:52 (3,818 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Wattages need to be restricted Jamie? Are you sure that's your opinion?
Rewind back to an earlier post you created on here. Your Dream Vacuum Cleaner - and I quote...: "For me: 2000 Watt Clean Fan Motor with Variable Speed 10 Litre Bag Four Stage Filtration Brush & Beater bar with a clutch to stop spinning when the cleaner is upright Head Lamp Stretchable hose capable of cleaning 20 stairs A sliding switch to change the motor speed from 1400W-1800W, completely variable "TURBO" Button to increase wattage to full 2000W LCD Screen displaying; current motor speed, bag fill level (a sensor would be fitted to detect the exact bag level), height adjustment level, belt condition (a sensor on the brush roll would detect any belt slippage), and an hour meter displaying the total hours the cleaner has been used for. CLICK HERE TO GO TO sebo_fan's LINK |
Post# 255185 , Reply# 28   11/4/2013 at 17:06 (3,818 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255188 , Reply# 29   11/4/2013 at 17:22 (3,818 days old) by floor-a-matic (somewhere)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
Take a look at the 1960s Amercan Electrolux model G; powerful suction & it only runs at 535 Watts (Not sure how many amps it uses) I bet the old Model G will OUTCLEAN ANYTHING made today! This post was last edited 11/04/2013 at 23:01 |
Post# 255191 , Reply# 30   11/4/2013 at 17:46 (3,818 days old) by super-sweeper (KSSRC Refurbishment Center)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255193 , Reply# 31   11/4/2013 at 18:42 (3,818 days old) by hi-loswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hang on! - What about appliances such as Hairdryers? Are they within this law too? The highest powered one I've seen is 2600w & they're the ones used in my local hairdressers. |
Post# 255194 , Reply# 32   11/4/2013 at 18:46 (3,818 days old) by hi-loswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Also, just to add to previous post. Most Hairdryers average these days from 2000w - 2200w which is about the same as most Vacuums. |
Post# 255200 , Reply# 34   11/4/2013 at 20:47 (3,817 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255245 , Reply# 35   11/5/2013 at 03:00 (3,817 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255284 , Reply# 37   11/5/2013 at 10:47 (3,817 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Who has a Vax Performance sebo_fan? |
Post# 255289 , Reply# 38   11/5/2013 at 12:18 (3,817 days old) by matt8808 (Teesside - North East - UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I personally welcome this change too. Its about time manufacturers were made to stop compensating poor design with an overpowered motor. My Henry autosave is more than powerful enough on the eco 600w setting. The 1200w high setting is only really needed for deep cleans. |
Post# 255312 , Reply# 42   11/5/2013 at 15:28 (3,817 days old) by hi-loswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
What do you think will happen to the cheapy brands of vacuums you can find in places such as B&M Bargains? For example B&M sell Prolex machines that use 2000w motors. Do you think these Vacs will go away or not? |
Post# 255352 , Reply# 44   11/5/2013 at 19:04 (3,817 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
HI-Lo - Jamie appears to own a Vax Performance 2000 watt vacuum - look at his profile.
I should also mention that not everyone is happy to shop at BN and they won't sell vacuums for ever - plus my nearest location store doesn't sell any vacuums at all. Before the likes of BN, there was Poundstretcher, forever selling those Electrolux based Contour Dirt Devil uprights and Dirt Devil cylinder vacuums. Even when you find supermarkets doing their exclusive "similar" floorcare models, they are not all conforming to low power at present though I remember Poundstretcher selling 1200 watt "Eco" versions of Dirt Devil cylinder vacs and you get what you pay for there - plastic tubes and plastic everything. As for Hoover, the highest will probably continue -their new Athos cylinder vacuum that's just been launched has a 2500 watt motor. I wouldn't be surprised if Hoover Europe add that to the Purepower upright eventually. But then when you consider premium uprights like Miele's S7, it too has 1800 watts. |
Post# 255355 , Reply# 45   11/5/2013 at 23:02 (3,816 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
By the way, to all concerned. You might have read this already. There is an energy usage report that provides interesting information and is free to download. It dates from 2011 but I feel it still has bearing. Though based on U.S data, there are some interesting comparisons and links to European info. (Link below)
A couple of screenshots...the first relating to American vacuums amps, which by my calculations roughly translate to 1440 watts, 1200 watts and 960 watts and a rough saving of £5 over that "7 year period." CLICK HERE TO GO TO sebo_fan's LINK |
Post# 255356 , Reply# 46   11/5/2013 at 23:04 (3,816 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 255388 , Reply# 48   11/6/2013 at 12:37 (3,816 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Actually the Vax Mach Air uses a 1200w motor I think. |
Post# 255402 , Reply# 50   11/6/2013 at 14:39 (3,816 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
You're right there, vintagerepairer. He would be the perfect person to explain to other manufacturers that design is important, not motor wattage. |