|
Thread Number: 22503
Which 1990 - Vacuums |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 251906 , Reply# 3 10/2/2013 at 18:20 (3,851 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK) | ||
Ooh would you look at that, Electrolux and Miele getting the best buy's. Not a Hoover in sight. Sorry, Hoover-nuts. ;).
Benny, the way I understood it was that there was a lot of back stick of the original Turbo2's (z1055 and z1065) that continued to sell more units than both the Glider and Contour post launch. So based on this, Electrolux brought back the Turbo2 but in an even more basic design and as a budget cleaner. And let's be thankful they did, the z1070 was better than both of the higher end cleaners. Also, the cleaner pictured about is a z1055, not a z1070. | ||
| Post# 251921 , Reply# 5 10/3/2013 at 00:02 (3,851 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 251934 , Reply# 7 10/3/2013 at 09:36 (3,851 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 251938 , Reply# 8 10/3/2013 at 10:53 (3,851 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom) | ||
|
I'm sure they clogged up when abused by the average idiot, but as a member of this forum, I don't imagine you'll use it like that! | ||
| Post# 251959 , Reply# 9 10/3/2013 at 17:14 (3,850 days old) by kirby505 (Arizona) | ||
|
Could I get a copy? | ||
| Post# 252027 , Reply# 11 10/4/2013 at 14:23 (3,850 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK) | ||
Not a Hoover in sight. Sorry, Hoover-nuts. ;).  | ||
| Post# 252030 , Reply# 12 10/4/2013 at 15:32 (3,850 days old) by vintagerepairer (England) | ||
|
FAR too good? No, they do feature in the magazines. The photographs of the test results say so. As the original comment refers to, where they don't feature is in any of the best-buy categories. | ||
| Post# 252032 , Reply# 13 10/4/2013 at 15:39 (3,850 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 252042 , Reply# 14 10/4/2013 at 16:57 (3,849 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK) | ||
|
This post has been removed by the webmaster. | ||
| Post# 252045 , Reply# 15 10/4/2013 at 17:33 (3,849 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
|
This post has been removed by the webmaster. | ||
| Post# 252046 , Reply# 16 10/4/2013 at 17:48 (3,849 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK) | ||
|
This post has been removed by the webmaster. | ||
| Post# 252084 , Reply# 17 10/5/2013 at 04:46 (3,849 days old) by thekirbylover (Warrington, cheshire ) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 252098 , Reply# 18 10/5/2013 at 09:09 (3,849 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK) | ||
|
from what I saw of them there was nothing wrong with them | ||
| Post# 252181 , Reply# 19 10/6/2013 at 09:33 (3,848 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
|
From that test page and copies of my own Which magazines, I have noted a few mentions of a vacuum cleaner called the "Medivac Microfilter." There is reference to it on that first post, second scan from Which.
Is this a model made by Numatic or another company? Looks like an old metal tub from the Numatic company... 
| ||
| Post# 252188 , Reply# 20 10/6/2013 at 11:11 (3,848 days old) by dysondestijl (east midlands, UK) | ||
|
Yes it's numatic-made :) | ||
| Post# 252279 , Reply# 21 10/7/2013 at 15:35 (3,847 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 252331 , Reply# 22 10/8/2013 at 02:54 (3,846 days old) by Ultimatevacman ( Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 252980 , Reply# 23 10/15/2013 at 02:08 (3,839 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom) | ||
|
Proper Scans Page 1 
| ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
