|
Thread Number: 22198
New Toy! |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 248979 9/3/2013 at 18:58 (3,881 days old) by PoconoVacMan (Northeast Pennsylvania) | ||
 Today I stopped in one of the local vac shops, Sweeper Central, to pick up a package of genuine Hoover Type M bags for my Dimension canisters. Not only did I leave with the bags, but I also left with a genuine Hoover replacement hose for my rust colored Dimension and a beautiful gold and white Dial a Matic! Big thanks to the owner for his generosity today!
Pictures to follow! 
| ||
| Post# 248980 , Reply# 1 9/3/2013 at 19:00 (3,881 days old) by PoconoVacMan (Northeast Pennsylvania) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 248981 , Reply# 2 9/3/2013 at 19:01 (3,881 days old) by PoconoVacMan (Northeast Pennsylvania) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 248982 , Reply# 3 9/3/2013 at 19:02 (3,881 days old) by PoconoVacMan (Northeast Pennsylvania) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 248983 , Reply# 4 9/3/2013 at 19:03 (3,881 days old) by PoconoVacMan (Northeast Pennsylvania) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 248991 , Reply# 5 9/3/2013 at 19:20 (3,881 days old) by kenkart () | ||
|
That is A nice one!The Dial A Matic in my opinion, set the stage for all modern uprights, because it was the first of its kind. | ||
| Post# 248992 , Reply# 6 9/3/2013 at 19:22 (3,881 days old) by vac-o-matic (Saint Louis, Mo.) | ||
|
Nice DAM Matt! That might be one of or possibly the final non self-propelled model, someone on here will know that. Congrats on a nice find! | ||
| Post# 249014 , Reply# 7 9/3/2013 at 22:22 (3,881 days old) by kirbyvertibles (Independence, KS) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 249018 , Reply# 8 9/3/2013 at 23:03 (3,881 days old) by kirbyloverdan (Egg Harbor Twp . NJ aka HOOVERLOVERDAN ❤️) | ||
That John Gregory  | ||
| Post# 249173 , Reply# 9 9/5/2013 at 12:50 (3,879 days old) by Oreck_XL (Brooklyn, New York 11211) | ||
Hoover DAM Chronology
I know the Persian Gold U5015 is seen fairly commonly and was part of the 1978 lineup, along with its power drive cousin the U6039-030 (right before the Concept 1), but when was the green U5017 produced? I thought with a higher model number it was a slightly newer model? Also, why did Hoover tack on the -030 model designation during the production run of the U6039? Any info would be much appreciated.
- Hershel | ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
