Thread Number: 21299
Vintage Royal model 133 |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 238378   6/30/2013 at 20:34 (3,950 days old) by mark9564 (Camano Island, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'm looking for any info on this model vacuum, what year it was made if its worth buying? |
Post# 238380 , Reply# 1   6/30/2013 at 20:36 (3,950 days old) by mark9564 (Camano Island, WA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Another pict |
Post# 238381 , Reply# 2   6/30/2013 at 21:09 (3,950 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 238382 , Reply# 3   6/30/2013 at 21:43 (3,950 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 238398 , Reply# 4   6/30/2013 at 23:37 (3,950 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
133 is a model I never heard of before. Could be a pre-war machine or early post-war (mid to late 40's). Either way, the bag is definitely a replacement. Original would have been a shake out bag. I have that same bag on a model 602 that was built in 1981. I also have a model 189 that looks similar to the 133, pictured here.
I agree with Tom, if it has a two speed switch, BUY IT! Two speed Royals are quite rare. Jeff |
Post# 238565 , Reply# 5   7/2/2013 at 10:01 (3,948 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 238566 , Reply# 6   7/2/2013 at 10:02 (3,948 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|