Thread Number: 18177
My latest aqcuisition - Hoover Ranger
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 199095   9/4/2012 at 10:49 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Just bought this from an Ebay seller for £26 - it says its a U4002 but I am not sure of whether it is or not - I thought U4002 model rangers were a different colour to this one - could it have had a replacment hood from a U4014? or is is genuine? the outer bag seems to be in excellent condition, and the bellows are very good. Motor has good brush length, but headlamp bulb is missing. It cleans very well, and I can feel the floor vibrate as it comes near me.
What does Jamie Murray think as I know he is Ranger mad lol?


Post# 199096 , Reply# 1   9/4/2012 at 10:50 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

View of the underside - has a good fan and spindle!

Post# 199097 , Reply# 2   9/4/2012 at 10:51 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Serial plate - Seems to date from August 1975?

Post# 199099 , Reply# 3   9/4/2012 at 10:56 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Cant get over the build quality, that fan is metal, not even Kirby's have metal fans, I wish they would start making them like this again - at nearly 40 years old and it cleans like it was new, and its only using 400W as well - I am joining the Hoover Ranger fan club started by JMurray lol

View of the back:


Post# 199107 , Reply# 4   9/4/2012 at 11:29 (4,245 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
That was pure HOOVER

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
quality....thus, it's still working perfectly!
I have a few Rangers, not my favorite design, but, you gottahave one, or two, or three.
John


Post# 199116 , Reply# 5   9/4/2012 at 11:57 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

This is my first Vintage hoover, all my others are post 1995 models. I am always on the lookout for a good vac, but with the costs of postage and travel I only buy if its fairly local and I can drive to collect it. This cleaner means a lot to me, as it was the first model I ever pushed about as a small child. My parents bought a Ranger identical to this in about 1977 and I was fascinated by it and the noise it made. Always said I would get one of my own one day - and the opportunity arose to bid on this one. I am only interested in cleaners that were made within my own lifescale (1972 ownwards), and now plan to collect more 70's and 80's cleaners when I can find good ones at a reasonable price.
Parts are not as easy to find for vintage vacs, and I dont want to end up with a vac that needs an essential part that is obsolete. Its a bit of a game of chance really as to whether I land on a good vac or one thats a nail.
I must say what a joy it was to use the Ranger after so many years - its unique sound and brushroll hum - the smell of warm 3 in one machine oil - and the amazing thing is it cleans as well as my Kirby G7e.
If the trend now is towards less energy use, why on earth cant manufacturers return to dirty fan cleaners like this in the UK?
I know Jmurray would agree with me on this - he always makes great contributions for such a young age!


Post# 199120 , Reply# 6   9/4/2012 at 12:18 (4,245 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
I'll have to round up alll of my rangers

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
and post them. I, too, have the vacuum from the same year I was born.


Post# 199125 , Reply# 7   9/4/2012 at 12:27 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Well well, t'was you who won it!

I must say if he had a postage option I would have been tempted to bid myself, even though I already have a...

1977 HOOVER SENIOR RANGER U4014!

Ha ha, yes, I do - believe it or not.

That hood is indeed original, that was the difference between the U4002 and U4014, the Hedlite lens was white on the U4014 and the same colour as the hood on the U4002.

I'm sure you are very pleased with your purchase, as am I with my U4014 even 10 months after purchase.

Have you a tool kit for it ? If not, you should buy one. Contrary to common belief they are useful. Alright, you wouldn't do a thorough above floor clean with the tools, but there is more than enough suction for going along the skirting boards or dusting with the fantastic dusting brush.



Post# 199126 , Reply# 8   9/4/2012 at 12:30 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
"I, too, have the vacuum from the same year I was born." I could be VERY nasty and say a Hoover Model O, but I shall not!

I actually don't have a vacuum for the year I was born, just my 1994 Hoover Turbopower 1000 which is one year older.

I never seem to find a 1995 vacuum!


Post# 199128 , Reply# 9   9/4/2012 at 12:34 (4,245 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
They are great, indeed

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
Did something happen to the 'badge'? It seems way off....22 or 23 degrees, depending on the person to whom you speak. Dick Pike swears 22.5, I think. Not that crucial. The tools had the great Tuflex hose. In my opinion, the LAST of the good hoses.

I have a yellow, red, blue Ranger. I'll 'show you mine", soon.


Post# 199130 , Reply# 10   9/4/2012 at 12:40 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

No Jamie I dont have the toolkit for it - but I think my parents still have theirs in the loft, will have to ask. I just cant get over what good condition its in, let down only by a cracked light lens which I superglued, when held to the light its a deep yellow colour, so when I get round to getting a new lamp bulb it should glow up beautifully. Someone removed the old bulb, so theres not one in there, but its a small bayonet pygmy 25W lamp I believe.
Just need to get some spare belts and bags now. Do you think its the original bag, as it looks too clean to me to be original.
Parts for this cleaner are now mostly obsolete which is a shame, but at least I can still obtain motor brushes and a few other bits, but the bellows, outer bag, brushroll, etc are now all gone sadly.


Post# 199132 , Reply# 11   9/4/2012 at 12:42 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Yes I did just notice that John, it is at about 70 degrees I'd say, WAY OFF!

Mine is fine though, if anything a little too straight.

Trust me John when I say I absolutely ADORE the hose I have in my Senior tool kit.

It is thick, glossy, stretchable, strong and just GORGEOUS!

I would love to see "yours", I didn't know for sure if America had the Ranger series, but it seems they did.

A blue one ? Better lock your doors tonight, I may be over to steal it!


Post# 199133 , Reply# 12   9/4/2012 at 12:45 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

The round badge has been stuck back on in a strange position I agree, I tried to lift it off, but dont want to damage it or bend it. All adds to its Hoover charm lol.
Would be nice to see all of gottahavahoove's Rangers, (or Covertibles as they are in the States). This is just the start for me, caught the vintage bug now, so no more Dysons for me for a while lol.
Want more vintage Hoovers, and Electrolux - possibly 502/550/560 etc I'm more interested in uprights, so I need a Hoover of the 80's now - let me guess, the Ranger was replaced by the Turbopower 1 in 1983?


Post# 199135 , Reply# 13   9/4/2012 at 12:46 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Actually Steve, the brush roll and bellows can still be bought from online spares websites.

As for the bulb, yes it is a 25W Pygmy with a Bayonet Cap.

When you buy bags and belts, PLEASE buy Genuine Hoover parts. Nothing compares to them, especially the bags. I just put a Genuine H1 bag in my 1977 Ranger on Sunday just passed for the first time (before then I'd used ElecTruePart bags) and the suction just about doubled!


Post# 199136 , Reply# 14   9/4/2012 at 12:47 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
It was actually replaced by the Turbopower Junior which was the last of the Juniors and the first of the Turbopowers.

Those were early 80s.


Post# 199137 , Reply# 15   9/4/2012 at 12:48 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

The blue ranger is like this one I think - the US version:


Post# 199138 , Reply# 16   9/4/2012 at 12:48 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Scrap what I just said, I don't know what I was talking about, none of that is correct!

Not one of my finest moments...


Post# 199141 , Reply# 17   9/4/2012 at 12:55 (4,245 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Jamie!

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
I have 2 blue ones.
the Ranger was not terribly long-lived here.
AS you know, your "Junior' was our "lightweight, or, "apartment"
Your "Convertible" was our "Dial A Matic". Our "Convertible" was your "Senior". Yes please use ONLY Genuine HOOVER bags, etc. I stood in the plant where all of the HOOVER bags are made. THat'll end on New Year's Eve, sadly. The paper used IS simply, better. Sounds like you, indeed, have a superior hose there.

John


Post# 199142 , Reply# 18   9/4/2012 at 12:56 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Love the look of the Blue Ranger, but I think the UK mustard/brown colour is so ultimately 1970's. Why are they called convertibles? I assume its to do with the tools that slide into the back of the cleaner base?
Will probably get genuine bags, but the belts can be aftermarket cant they? after all, the Ranger does snap them quite regularly if I remember back to my mother's one in the 70's, she was always using a pair of nylons (Pantihose) to replace them when she ran out of new belts lol.
Looked at Espares, and Buyspares, both had no bellows or anything much else to be honest - found a set of bellows on Ebay, might bid for them so I have a spare one, as I can imagine they split quite easily.


Post# 199144 , Reply# 19   9/4/2012 at 13:01 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
NO NO NO! Genuine belts too.

I had a Genuine Hoover belt in my Ranger from January to August and it was still fine when I removed it but I decided to replace it just for good measure.


Post# 199145 , Reply# 20   9/4/2012 at 13:01 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Jamie, is your Ranger a top fill tube or bottom fill? mine is the bottom fill tube with tight rubber band to hold the bag on. I am wondering if the U4014 was a top fill bag, whereas the 4002 was bottom fill. Its got a cheapo bag in it at the moment, do I need the Hoover H1 type bags? and the V5 belts?

Post# 199146 , Reply# 21   9/4/2012 at 13:02 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Here is the complete brush roll for sale:


CLICK HERE TO GO TO jmurray01's LINK


Post# 199148 , Reply# 22   9/4/2012 at 13:07 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Post# 199149 , Reply# 23   9/4/2012 at 13:09 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Mine is top fill.

Yes - H1 bags and V5 belts!


Post# 199150 , Reply# 24   9/4/2012 at 13:14 (4,245 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
The owner's manual

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
(leaflet) over there.... clearly states: For optimim perfoemance, it is impearative that you use only GEHUINE HOOVER parts.
They really DO make the world of difference. Non-HOOVER belts were used in a Convertible, and, it strained too much, etc...it was NEVER the same, again. THe Converyible was named that way because ,:All you have to do is insert the attachments and the motor clicks into high-speed. It "converts" into an above the floor cleaner. Thus....CONVERTIBLE. The Dial A Matic was a bit different. You could insert the hose to clean above the floor. But, THe DIAL set the suction strength. There were different strength for FLOOR cleaning, OR for TOOL use. You simply turned the DIAL. There is "lesson ONE' in American HOOVER. Quiz tomorrow, lol.
John


Post# 199153 , Reply# 25   9/4/2012 at 13:17 (4,245 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
bad spelling,

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
sorry, Arthur is on my lap. (Arthur is one of my cats, in case you were wondering about that).


Post# 199154 , Reply# 26   9/4/2012 at 13:22 (4,245 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Ah, right - I found that little switch on the underside when pushed it speeds up the motor to 600W - so thats what the "convertible means" my Kirby does this as well, speeds up the motor when the hose is locked onto the front.
Thanks for the links Jamie - have bookmarked them.

For the bit extra they cost, I'll order the Genuine bags and belts. Have found these bulbs (link) would they fit?


CLICK HERE TO GO TO madabouthoovers's LINK


Post# 199158 , Reply# 27   9/4/2012 at 13:52 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
While you're posting a picture of that Ranger, upload one of Arthur too, I love cats.

Here is mine, now you show me yours!


Post# 199159 , Reply# 28   9/4/2012 at 13:54 (4,245 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Yep those are the bulbs.

Post# 199169 , Reply# 29   9/4/2012 at 15:18 (4,244 days old) by tommymilan (milano)        

tommymilan's profile picture
To my experience Mod U 4002 was bottom fill and Mod U 4014 was top fill, the same top filling system as that used in later juniors, taking the same bags as previous models. the only other version of the "ranger" vacs was the commercial, grey with huge reusable cloth bag and later in the early eighties, mod U 4197 with USA top fill system (it was was a USA made vac) red hood , white handle and greyish plaid like bag with red details. See links!
Best Regards,
Tommy


Post# 199175 , Reply# 30   9/4/2012 at 15:55 (4,244 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

I thought it might have been something to do with Top or Bottom fill bags - I dont know which type is more efficient, obviously most clean fan vacs top fill now, so a bottom fill bag is a novelty for me.
Bags and belts ordered here:
(good value postage at only 89p)
Will go to lighting shop tomorrow to get bulbs as I aint paying stupid postage for snail mail to smash em during postage.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO madabouthoovers's LINK


Post# 199234 , Reply# 31   9/5/2012 at 06:12 (4,244 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Here is a picture from an eBay listing last year showing that the U4002 does indeed have the hood and bag that yours has which is original.

Post# 199244 , Reply# 32   9/5/2012 at 07:33 (4,244 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Actually

vacbear58's profile picture

While Steve's 4002 does appear to be all original, the one in the picture above has a replacement bag

 

Steve, your 4002 does seem to be in very good condition and you are lucky that the cable hooks are both intact - these often get damaged or broken off all together. The headlamp lens would have originally been white, the discolouration of yours is very common with this model  - either the lens changes colour of its own accord or the colour bleeds in from the surronding hood.

 

Whatever, its a very nice find you have there

 

Al


Post# 199245 , Reply# 33   9/5/2012 at 08:04 (4,244 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
So sorry, yes that does have a replacement bag.

I wasn't paying attention when I posted that, it was a spur of the moment thing.

So the lens would have been white (like my U4014) when new ? I presume the U4014 had a better quality lens then that didn't discolour ?

I know what you mean about the cord hooks. My top cord hook is fine, but the bottom one has a chip which leaves a jagged edge that I almost always scrape my hand on while wrapping the flex around the hooks after use.


Post# 199252 , Reply# 34   9/5/2012 at 09:59 (4,244 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Went to Asda today and found these SBC halogen bulbs, and they fit in the ranger well - remains to be seen how long they last though with all the vibration that they get when the Ranger is running. They are 28W and £2 for 2. Give a good light from the front of the Ranger too!

Post# 199253 , Reply# 35   9/5/2012 at 10:00 (4,244 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Here is a pic of the Ranger with the bulb fitted:

Post# 199254 , Reply# 36   9/5/2012 at 10:04 (4,244 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

The light is not as bright as the photo shows - I turned the flash off on the camera, so its a bit brighter than in reality - but I am really pleased with the result, as the only Pygmy bulbs I could find in SBC were only 15W. I got some of these as well, in case the halogen ones blow very quickly. I know you can get 25W pygmy bulbs on Ebay but I dont trust postal companies to get them to me without breaking them, and you just dont know the quality of cheap bulbs on Ebay either!

Post# 199256 , Reply# 37   9/5/2012 at 10:14 (4,244 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Wow, that's bright!

My Ranger just has the standard fridge size lamp rated at 25W.

Bright enough for me, but I may consider upgrading some day after seeing that.


Post# 199259 , Reply# 38   9/5/2012 at 10:24 (4,244 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Jamie, honestly its not as bright as the photo, but the bulb has a much shorter , thicker filament than a standard pygmy, so I was thinking it might be more resilient to vibration. I wont be using the Ranger as a daily driver anyhow, as I vac every day having 2 cats, but I will post back on the subject if the bulb does die prematurely. On the subject of the hoover symbol, I have removed it, and re-stuck it with superglue, in a better position:

Post# 199261 , Reply# 39   9/5/2012 at 10:34 (4,244 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
It looks like you've got that angle down to a T!

I would think that it should last longer being a candle bulb, but who knows.

I haven't had the bulb go on my Senior in my ownership (10 months) and I don't know how long it was in there before me buying it. You never know, it could even be the original bulb.

You are NOT using the Ranger as a daily driver!? That is abominable!

Ha ha, nah, I understand.

I would use my Ranger daily if it were not for the fact I don't want to put too much ware and tare on it plus the handiness of the permanently fitted long hose on my Turbopower 2 is much more suited for daily "running the Hoover over".


Post# 199265 , Reply# 40   9/5/2012 at 10:43 (4,244 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

When you have a vintage Hoover that you cant just go online and order whatever it needs when parts break or wear out, you have to make sure you use it only sparingly, be very careful with it. I would love to be able to get a new headlight lens for mine - but they are just not available any longer. I will be keeping it in a dark cupboard, so that it cant be faded or damaged by sunlight, and bringing out occasionally to savour its beauty and loevely sound. Yes Jamie - you should always keep your Ranger wrapped up in cotton wool, as the older it gets, the more valuable it will become, as parts for it all but dissappear.

Post# 199266 , Reply# 41   9/5/2012 at 10:57 (4,244 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
That is all too true Steve.

I am lucky in that apart from the lower cord hook mine is 99% MINT except for about two or three VERY light scratches which you don't notice after a good polish and buff.

Did you ask your parents if they had the tool kit by the way ? It would be a very good thing to have for when you do bring it out of the closet, as it were...



Post# 199275 , Reply# 42   9/5/2012 at 11:20 (4,244 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
"ware and tare"

vacbear58's profile picture

I think you mean "wear and tear" .........


Post# 199280 , Reply# 43   9/5/2012 at 11:27 (4,244 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Al, I can only apologise.

I'm not concentrating today it seems.


Post# 199648 , Reply# 44   9/6/2012 at 14:47 (4,242 days old) by borusa (Edinburgh)        

borusa's profile picture
Steve, not sure if it takes the same bulb but got a replacement for my dirt searcher junior in Asda of all places. On holiday just now but can check when I get back if it is.

Post# 199650 , Reply# 45   9/6/2012 at 14:53 (4,242 days old) by hooverboy81 (Myrtle Place)        
My Ranger

hooverboy81's profile picture
From '81 (i was told). This was left in my last house by the previous owners. :)Sorry for the fuzzy photo, I'm NOT a photographer lol :(

Post# 199651 , Reply# 46   9/6/2012 at 14:55 (4,242 days old) by borusa (Edinburgh)        

borusa's profile picture
Scrub last comment - just saw your previous comment


Post# 199652 , Reply# 47   9/6/2012 at 15:10 (4,242 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

Andy - Asda indeed do actually sell the small bayonet pygmy bulbs but only in 15w rating which is a little dim in the Ranger, especially as mine has a discoloured lens, and the long delicate filaments in these pygmy bulbs seem prone to breaking with all the vibration from the brushroll and banging about that most vacs get on the average cleaning session. When I saw the candle bulb with a small halogen capsule inside it, I thought that the shorter more thick filament might stand up to a bit more vibration than the old pygmy type bulb originally used - which I beleive was a 25w rather than 15w.
Time will tell if these substitute bulbs do indeed last longer as they fit perfectly and give a nice bright light, but the 28W versions were in short supply at my local Asda, with only 2 packs left on the shelf - I guess they wouldnt be in great demand being small bayonet cap

Hooverboy81 - nice ranger, one of the later models going by the date - you call them convertibles over there so I learnt. Gottahaveahoove would like that as well as he has several Rangers in different colours.


Post# 199661 , Reply# 48   9/6/2012 at 16:25 (4,242 days old) by guardsman69 ()        

OKAY GUYS I AL LET YOU HAVE YOUR SAY NOW I AM GOING TO WEIGH IN.....JOHN LONG AND I ARE AT THE POLAR END OF THIS DEBATE......THE HOOVER RANGER SERIES UPRIGHTS OR THE HOOD SHAPE I SHOULD SAY WORLD PREMIRED IN 1975 WHEN THE HIGH PERFORMANCE HOOVER CONVERTIBLE 6.0 AMP WITH TOOLS COLLECTION WAS BORN.....TO USE FREDS TERMINALOGY THE CONDIMENT COLOR COLLECTION......RELISH U4057.....HORSERADISH U4059 ....KETCHUP U4061 AND MUSTARD U4063......BUT THE CATALOGUE AND UPSCALE SALES MARKETS NEEDED A UNIQUE LOOK FOR THIS CATALOGUE SHOWROOM LINE.....THUS BRINGING BACK THE EXCLUSIVE 1973 EUROPEAN RANGER LOOK BACK TO OUR SHORES.....THERE IS NO OTHER MORE DISTINCT AND ATTRACTIVE LOOK TO A HOOVER CONVERTIBLE THAN THE RANGER UPRIGHT HOOD STARTING WITH MODELS U4037 MUSTARD AND U4039 KETCHUP WERE THE FIRST RANGER WEARING BEAUTIES TO GRACE THE AMERICAN MARKET AND RAN ALL THE WAY UP TO THE FINAL SEARS EXCLUSIVE AND HOOVER VAC SHOP SUPREMACY MODELS IN 1993......IT WAS HOOVERS GO TO TIMELESS CLASSIC HOOD DESIGN SIGNIFYING QUALITY , BEAUTY , CLASS AND ELEGANCE.....EUROPEAN STYLE AND FLAIR AT ITS BEST AND A TRUE BEAUTY.....HOOVER BLASTED OUT THIS LOOK THROUGH OUT THE 70'S INTO THE 90'S A TRUE WORK OF ART.....MY FAVORITES ARE THE U4039....POPPY.....U4115...LIGHT RED.....U4195-001 BRITTANY BLUE.....U4121 SEA BLUE MEDIUM....U4185/U4311/U4037-001 GOLD TONE AND THE U4423 IN OLYMPIC BLUE.....AN AMAZING 19 YEAR RUN .....FROM A SERVICE PERSPECTIVE ...MORE HOOVER CONVERTIBLE OWNERS AND THERE ARE HUNDREDS IN THIS CLIENT BASIS ARE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE A HOOVER CONVERTIBLE RANGER HOODED CONVERTIBLE REPAIRED BECAUSE OF THE ILLUSION IT CREATED TO THE CONSUMER OF ITS GREATER WORTH .....I GOT SO CARRIED AWAY I FORGOT I LEFT THE CAPS ON .....SORRY FRED MY BAD.....JUST A JOYOUS AND PASSIONATE POSITIVE RESPONSE

Post# 199761 , Reply# 49   9/7/2012 at 02:58 (4,242 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

"DJ Copy" items written-spots and announcements-written in caps for easy reading on air by radio station disc jockeys.The items were put on a copyboard in front of the DJ's microphone.

Post# 199768 , Reply# 50   9/7/2012 at 03:48 (4,242 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
4003

vacbear58's profile picture
What about the U4003 model? I appreciate the headlight apperature is rather different to the UK built Ranger, but otherwise it is very similar - apart from the switch arrangements. The UK Ranger (and indeed the South African one I have too) did not have the height adjuster "window" on the top of the hood but similar to the 4003 at the base of the handle on the other side to the handle release.

As far as I know, we has three domestic varities of Ranger made in the UK - the 4002 as noted above in a very attractive yellow colour, U4014 in green - this also had the top fill bag (this model has been posted about so much in the last few months I am sick looking at it) and a later exclusive model (about 1982 or so) in a rather attractive cream and brown finish.

There was also at least one (although I am pretty sure there are more) commercial version in grey with no headlight, metal cord grips, the "traditional" handgrip and a shake out bag. We also had two US produced models - the 4003 and the 4143 (I think - "tomato ketchup" LOLOL).

Al


Post# 199772 , Reply# 51   9/7/2012 at 05:18 (4,242 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        
(this model has been posted about so much in the last few mo

Had to lolol - I presume you mean Jamie Murray's, he really does love and cherish that cleaner, he's only 16 and doesnt have a lot - he just wants to belong and feel important with the same as everyone else. After all, thats what these forums are for, showing off and being pround of your cleaner - OK, some of us might not have hundreds of pristine vintage models, or be able to afford to buy a lot, but Jamie is young and he shouldnt really kept being put down by comments like that. I know you meant it to be a bit funny, and I did laugh, but poor Jamie might take it a little differently. Everyone here was young once and proud of their few posessions, wanting to fit in and belong and show off what little they had - give Jamie a break.

Post# 199822 , Reply# 52   9/7/2012 at 14:01 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Ok, I found 2 of them

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
I believe 'mustard' in the the basement, awaiting some attention.
So, Jamie, "I'm showing you mine', as it were. I'll dig out some tools later.


Post# 199824 , Reply# 53   9/7/2012 at 14:03 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Up close and personal

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
WEll, there they are. My 'Rangers"

Post# 199828 , Reply# 54   9/7/2012 at 14:17 (4,241 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

They are lovely Gottahaveahoove - I assume the difference between the delux model and the blue one is the height adjuster gauge on the top of the hood which the delux has but the blue model doesnt.
I also note that the hoover logo is on the opposite side of the hood to mine, and the cord winders are also on the other side of the handle, so quite a few subtle differences!


Post# 199830 , Reply# 55   9/7/2012 at 14:23 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Yes

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
Everything is on the other side here. Powerful vacuums, for sure! They need a little rub with soap, it seems. THey were stashed away, out of harm's way for over a year.

Post# 199831 , Reply# 56   9/7/2012 at 14:28 (4,241 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

I noticed too they dont appear to have a foot operated on-off switch, is that an American thing as I am sure I read most of your vacs have on-off switches on the handle somewhere. Are the switches on the back of the handle?

Post# 199832 , Reply# 57   9/7/2012 at 14:30 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Even on all of the older ones

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
as well.

Post# 199833 , Reply# 58   9/7/2012 at 14:31 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
That photo was from an old minimeet.

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
The 'boys' were having fun with a hose...don't ask. I'm very glad to say, I've ost weight since then. Yikes!

Post# 199839 , Reply# 59   9/7/2012 at 14:45 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Yes, the regular cleaners all have the switch in the handle

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
It is SOOOOOOOOO convenient.

Post# 199842 , Reply# 60   9/7/2012 at 14:47 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
The old Lark, Apartment, (lightweight) YOUR 'junior'

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
and the commercial GUARDSMAN all have the swith at the base.

Post# 199843 , Reply# 61   9/7/2012 at 14:50 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
All of the Dial A Matics (your Convertible)

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
and even the later Convertibles which have the slider switch, are all in the handle

Post# 199845 , Reply# 62   9/7/2012 at 14:56 (4,241 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

I dont like the location of the switch on that Guardsman, I mean, the bag would get in the way, and its quite high up to raise you foot as well. I prefer handle switches, but even the newest hoover turbopowers seem to still retain the foot switch, but the UK TP1, TP2 and TP3 had the switch on the bag housing.


Post# 199847 , Reply# 63   9/7/2012 at 15:01 (4,241 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

The UK TP4, on sale now, next to a UK hoover Freedom, also with foot switch

Post# 199848 , Reply# 64   9/7/2012 at 15:05 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
I agree totally about the Guardsman.

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
One could easily 'kick the bag'. Our apartments, (Junior over there) has the switch in the exact same spot as yours.
The new plastic Elites were made with the slide switch half way down the cleaner. It was cheaper to do that. It was NOT progress. All the new HOOVERS have the swithch back on top, but, in the front. Oh, well, you can't have everything. Where would you put it?
Hope the photos helped.


Post# 199851 , Reply# 65   9/7/2012 at 15:18 (4,241 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

On that Gaurdsman - I would have the switch on the hood, in the same place as our Rangers had the switch, in front of the handle release pedal.
I cant understand why manufacturers place the on off switch in different locations on the same model for UK or US use, I can only assume that its traditional for American cleaners to have the switch, like a lightswitch, on the rear of the handle. In the UK market - anything goes lol Our older type Juniors here have the switch on the base, on the left side of the raised part of the hood, with the more modern ones having a combined handle release/on switch built into the same pedal!

older type UK junior - red button foot switch


Post# 199854 , Reply# 66   9/7/2012 at 15:28 (4,241 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
yep,

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
that's ours, exactly, well, except for the plug, or course.

Post# 199884 , Reply# 67   9/7/2012 at 18:09 (4,241 days old) by tommymilan (milano)        

tommymilan's profile picture
ehehe this post makes me want to bring one of my hoover rangers from my country house where my collection is set to my flat in milan to play with it on my white carpet... but which one? 4002 or 4014? I'll let you know!
greetings Tommy


Post# 199918 , Reply# 68   9/7/2012 at 22:49 (4,241 days old) by guardsman69 ()        

i think the length of this post is a testament to the love all hoover collectors on both sides of the atlantic and in all countries have for this hoover....i hope you all loved my custom built hoover prototype hoover u4115 hooded power surge upright hoover tti used in the dirty house infomertials ...it was built out of all metal parts and were all new from stock....i built it for our former president chris gurreri to use in the opening segment along with my model o ,82 connie and 300 all from the models and samples vault.....it was the best looking upright in the segment .....and is now kept in the engineering division at tti....who knows maybe the ranger will ride again tonto....i hope gareth will whip out his south africa photos of his version of the ranger ....his green one is awesome

Post# 199922 , Reply# 69   9/7/2012 at 23:20 (4,241 days old) by madabouthoovers ()        

I didnt think it would end up an epic post lol. I wanted that model because it was the cleaner that was used in our house when I was aged between 5 and leaving home at 18. That particular model is in my fathers loft now, and they use a Hoover Turbopower 4, but my mother liked the Ranger, and I used to like it as well, hence getting my own Ranger, having not pushed one around for over 22 years. Its amazing how endearing a vacuum cleaner can be so that one yearns for it all these years later, and I fully expect to keep my Ranger till I die, as I see it as part of my heritage. It was one of the last "True" Hoovers before the advent of the 80's and the plastivacs, and the product of decades of Hoover evolution. Its very sad to see what happened to Hoover UK over the last 20 years, and I dont think they will ever regain the crown they once had of building the greatest vacuum cleaners in the world, so popular that the verb hoovering was named after them.
Its great to see that the Ranger in it many forms around the world has so many fans, and I hope that long may that continue.
Here's to the Hoover Senior Ranger!


Post# 199994 , Reply# 70   9/8/2012 at 17:31 (4,240 days old) by Rolls_rapide (-)        
"Here's to the Hoover Senior Ranger!"

Succeeded by the Hoover Senior Powerplus, as you all know.

(Apologies to ryry_87, for nickin' his pic!)


Post# 199995 , Reply# 71   9/8/2012 at 17:36 (4,240 days old) by Rolls_rapide (-)        

I remember seeing a magazine article about a television actress or presenter, an older lady - can't remember who it was. Anyway she had a Powerplus in the photo.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy