Thread Number: 18153
UK Hoover Bag Designs |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 198726   9/2/2012 at 14:54 (4,247 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I was wondering if anybody could give me a guide as to what designs Hoover UK used on their paper bag packages throughout the years ?
Reason being, I currently have a back of H1 bags which are the style in the URL provided below. Incidentally I actually won the auction for those H1 bags so I shall have another pack soon. CLICK HERE TO GO TO jmurray01's LINK on eBay |
Post# 198814 , Reply# 1   9/2/2012 at 23:46 (4,246 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The models pictured it looks like they would be U.S.A Hoover Type C bags. Bottom fill bags where you slide thick rubber band over bag that slips onto collar. The current Type C and similar Eureka F&G, have a paper collar that slips onto the plastic tube. The paper collar acts as a tube to lead the way and create a Top Fill bag, so the bag goes up the paper tube and drops down into the bottom of a separate portion of a bag, just like a Type A.
|
Post# 198835 , Reply# 2   9/3/2012 at 02:28 (4,246 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 198857 , Reply# 4   9/3/2012 at 05:45 (4,246 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 199002 , Reply# 5   9/3/2012 at 21:47 (4,246 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 199664 , Reply# 7   9/6/2012 at 16:30 (4,243 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I haven't received the eBay ones yet (and they will be in good condition as they are sealed) but I have a pack of the same bags and they are truly the best bags I have ever used!
Even after using the Ranger a few times they can still be compressed EASILY when the machine is running. It is genuine all the way, at least for my H1s. |
Post# 199734 , Reply# 8   9/6/2012 at 20:17 (4,243 days old) by Rolls_rapide (-)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That package was late Eighties, into the 1990s. Previous 1980's Hoover bags came in a clear cellophane wrapper, which tore readily. Later 1990 bags came in the Candy-ised purple wrapper. |
Post# 199758 , Reply# 10   9/7/2012 at 00:51 (4,242 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 199793 , Reply# 12   9/7/2012 at 10:06 (4,242 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I tried exactly what you are suggesting many years ago when my parents owned an Oreck XL. Back then they had 4 layer dust bags and the original 2 layer green dust bags for the Oreck. It kind of worked - but the problem was that once you cut a bag in half, or however you do it, you'll loosen the sealed paper to the bag, causing the layers to fall in, making it difficult to tie the bag around the round dust channel feeder in the bottom or top fill tubes in the Hoover uprights. I found that, compared to the 300 watts of the Oreck XL, the increased power in the Hoover uprights often pulled the bag away from the rubber ring, no matter how many times i tried to get more of the paper's top over the ring. Clearly although Hoover's own bags had dual layers of filtration, they were designed to fit instead of using another brand's dust bag.
I've often wondered why it wasn't possible for brands to offer a zipped section of material similar to an electrostatic filtration that could be attached to the inner part of the outer soft bag of an upright vacuum. That way, it could hold back any escaping dust as well as act as a main filter and allow owners to just take off the inner section of material after the bag instead of have the owner remove the entire outer bag for periodic cleaning. Hoover evidently just didn't bother to offer this and instead had the owner go through the palaver of removing the entire outer bag should it get caked in dust - brushing it out could only remove it half way, damp cloth washing the inner bag often meant ground in dirt often got more ground in unless you were lucky enough to own another vacuum, like a cylinder vac to suck out excess dust that had clogged the outer bag that had come from the dust bag. |