Thread Number: 17716
Carbon Brushes... |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 191938   7/28/2012 at 17:08 (4,289 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
OK, I know how carbon brushes work and that they wear down, but my question is how quickly ?
I know it is probably in the same league as "how long is a piece of string ?" but if anybody could help inform me I'd be grateful. For example, do certain things make them wear down quicker ? And under well maintained circumstances do they even wear at all ? Also, what are the early symptoms of worn brushes ? I know nothing other than the role they play in the motor, so any information would be greatly appreciated. |
Post# 191940 , Reply# 1   7/28/2012 at 18:17 (4,289 days old) by alexhoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
How quickly the carbon brushes burn down depends on how often or how much you use the vacuum cleaner, if you had a vacuum cleaner that had 1cm long carbon brushes that had worn down over time, that could last you a year, on average use, but again it depends if you vacuum daily, weekly, and how many hours you vacuum for. I am not aware there are any specific symptoms of carbon brushes wearing out, however, I do know that if one, or both of the carbon brushes are worn down too much, resulting in them not contacting the comutatuor propperly, the vacuum will cut out and therefore will not work until they are replaced. |
Post# 192040 , Reply# 3   7/29/2012 at 08:34 (4,289 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Well I'm pretty lucky then!
I have two vacuums which are older than 30 years - my 1977 Hoover Senior and my 1951 Hoover Dustette. Both of which still run like brand new with no repairs what so ever in their lives, as do all my other Vacuum Cleaners. The reason I believe they do so is because I don't use too low a height setting (where applicable), don't block the air ways, change the bag before it gets past half full and keep the filters spotless. |
Post# 193769 , Reply# 4   8/7/2012 at 18:16 (4,279 days old) by vacuumfreak95 (Aransas Pass, Tx)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 193864 , Reply# 5   8/8/2012 at 11:43 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 193879 , Reply# 6   8/8/2012 at 14:19 (4,278 days old) by vacuumfreak95 (Aransas Pass, Tx)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 193880 , Reply# 7   8/8/2012 at 14:54 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 193896 , Reply# 9   8/8/2012 at 16:01 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I totally agree Benny, those 600W motors are truly brilliant.
I know I shouldn't jinx it, but I don't believe my 1977 Senior will ever die, at least not through motor problems. Although you say the motors never broke down, did you ever have to replace the motor brushes in those or were they pretty much everlasting on those old dirty fans ? |
Post# 193907 , Reply# 11   8/8/2012 at 16:28 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Did you ever use a commutator stone to seat the brushes like some people say you should ?
On that subject, do you know where I could buy replacement brushes for the Turbopower 2 motors ? I don't need any just now but for future reference I decided to try and find a source but cannot find a single one! |
Post# 193917 , Reply# 13   8/8/2012 at 16:45 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 193929 , Reply# 14   8/8/2012 at 17:08 (4,278 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
No, never. I never saw one with a burnt out motor either. The motors were very good. Electrolux of the same period was another matter altogether. |
Post# 193931 , Reply# 15   8/8/2012 at 17:13 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|