Thread Number: 15879
Old Kirby
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 169237   2/11/2012 at 17:54 (4,429 days old) by myoldvac ()        

This is a picture of my old Kirby, just wondered if anyone knows which one it is or about what year it was made. It has a 2 stamped in the casting underneath near the back wheels and 495 stamped a few inches away from the 2. It belonged to our grandparents who bought it new. I believe everything is original on it, plugged it in and motor, brush and light all work. Thanks

Post# 169239 , Reply# 1   2/11/2012 at 18:27 (4,429 days old) by Oreck_XL (Brooklyn, New York 11211)        

oreck_xl's profile picture
It is a either a model 513, 514 or 515 circa 1953-55. It is definitely NOT original, the bag as well as the belt lifter for starters have been replaced.

- Hershel


Post# 169242 , Reply# 2   2/11/2012 at 18:34 (4,429 days old) by eurekastar (Amarillo, Texas)        

eurekastar's profile picture
It's definitely been rebuilt. Along with the other items mentioned, the wheels aren't original either. They would be black rubber or grey plastic (for a late 515). Has the builder's plate been removed from the bottom? It will list the model number.

Post# 169244 , Reply# 3   2/11/2012 at 18:57 (4,429 days old) by myoldvac ()        

Thank you all for the info. There is no builders plate anywhere to be found.

Post# 169279 , Reply# 4   2/11/2012 at 23:33 (4,429 days old) by danemodsandy ()        
A Very Fine Driver!

While this Kirby may not be all-original, at least it's been well-maintained, and whatever has been replaced has been done with Kirby parts.

As we collect, I think it's good to remember that manufacturers change and upgrade parts, and that a lot of really nice vacs have such parts on them. To my way of thinking, that does not mean the machine has been bojacked.

My Lux 1205 has the current grey wand sheath on it, and I have a new Lux hose. Both parts are actually better than the originals they replaced - the wand sheath is much stronger, and the hose is more flexible. And they are genuine Lux/Aerus parts, not aftermarket, so the machine is still all-Lux even if it's not all-original.

Certainly, the woods are full of "reconditioned" machines that have been cheaply spray painted and given a set of fitall tools, and those machines are not usually of much interest. But a good old machine that had an owner who cared enough to get factory parts is not to be sneezed at, even if there are collectors who can spot the difference a mile away.


Post# 169281 , Reply# 5   2/11/2012 at 23:37 (4,429 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)        

kirbyclassiciii's profile picture
CLUE: If it has a 6-blade fan, it is either a model 513 or 514; but if it has a 10-blade fan that is original and not a replacement, then it's a model 515.

~Ben


Post# 169326 , Reply# 6   2/12/2012 at 10:59 (4,428 days old) by twocvbloke ()        
"and whatever has been replaced has been done with Kirby

Well, no, the bag is a bojack, the belt lifter looks the same too, the wheels could be bojack too, unless they're genuine ClassicIII wheels, so, not really kept together with Kirby parts... :\

Post# 169336 , Reply# 7   2/12/2012 at 13:41 (4,428 days old) by kirbybag (topeka ks )        
kirby 514 or 515

kirbybag's profile picture
i think its a 514 or 515

Post# 169347 , Reply# 8   2/12/2012 at 15:53 (4,428 days old) by myoldvac ()        

Thank again for all the info on my old Kirby!!

Post# 169351 , Reply# 9   2/12/2012 at 16:28 (4,428 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)        

kirbyclassiciii's profile picture
@myoldvac
Does it have a 6-blade impeller fan or a 10-blade impeller fan? If it is the former then the model # would be 514, but if it's the latter (original and not replaced) then it would be a 515.

~Ben


Post# 169354 , Reply# 10   2/12/2012 at 17:00 (4,428 days old) by myoldvac ()        

Took it apart and I counted 11 blades. Looked up replacement parts and on the website I found it has Genuine Kirby Lexan Fans and I counted 11 blades.

Post# 169586 , Reply# 11   2/14/2012 at 22:39 (4,426 days old) by eurekastar (Amarillo, Texas)        

eurekastar's profile picture
Another way to tell is by looking at the rug plate. It went through a redesign with the 514. The brush roll remained the same but the rug plate was redesigned for easier installation.

Post# 249845 , Reply# 12   9/11/2013 at 18:42 (3,851 days old) by kidkirby ()        

looks like a 513


Post# 249846 , Reply# 13   9/11/2013 at 18:53 (3,851 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)        

kirbyclassiciii's profile picture
The handle grip suggests a 512 or older model... I will add. Thus, I can say this is a definite example of a "Franken-Kirby."

It is amazing what you can do with parts that fit Kirbys of similar vintage.

~Ben


Post# 249858 , Reply# 14   9/11/2013 at 20:17 (3,851 days old) by kirbyvacuum (Long Island New York)        

Very nice looking and very well keeped Kirby i may be wrong but i think it was Made May Of 1949

Post# 249860 , Reply# 15   9/11/2013 at 20:34 (3,851 days old) by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)        

electrolux137's profile picture


The open fork at the bottom of the handle puts it at 513 or earlier. From the 514 on, the fork was solid all the way across, like this one (see photo).

Of course, given all the bojack replacement parts, it could actually be any model from 509 thru 515, especially since there's no serial number plate.

One supposes you're fishing for its value: Probably negligible. It's old and in good condition (assuming the motor runs well) but not collectible. It's just an old vacuum cleaner.



Post# 249891 , Reply# 16   9/11/2013 at 21:23 (3,851 days old) by kirbykid (Horseheads,New York 14845)        

Do you think that the push switch was an upgrade done by a dealer then?


Post# 249905 , Reply# 17   9/11/2013 at 21:34 (3,851 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)        

kirbyclassiciii's profile picture
If it's not a 513, then, yes.

The 513 was the first model to pioneer the foot switch (and later on, the 4 amp motor), but it was the last to use the hollowed-design handle fork.

~Ben


Post# 249936 , Reply# 18   9/11/2013 at 23:01 (3,851 days old) by kirbykid (Horseheads,New York 14845)        

So some 513s had the hollow handle fork and the new foot switch?


Post# 249938 , Reply# 19   9/11/2013 at 23:16 (3,851 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)        

kirbyclassiciii's profile picture
Evan,

All 513s had the hollowed handle fork and the foot switch... the notable change was during the year, in which the motor changed from 3 to 4 amps. The other mid-season change: the handle grip changed color from gray to red.

~Ben


Post# 249944 , Reply# 20   9/12/2013 at 01:30 (3,851 days old) by Electrolux137 (Los Angeles)        

electrolux137's profile picture


Yes, the switch is clue that this may be a 513. (OTOH, see comments below.)

The first reference to the "push-push" switch in Kirby literature that I've come across is in a typewritten, mimeographed & stapled 8.5x11 booklet dated February 15, 1953. I've scanned the cover. (The brochure is 10 pages long; too much stuff to scan.)

Since this brochure was prepared in such a simplistic fashion -- looking more like a schoolteacher's project than official company printed matter for distribution to the publc -- my guess is that it was a small run for a limited number of people, perhaps branch managers and so on.


-ooOoo-


What some people may not realize is that when vac shops -- Kirby or otherwise -- tear down Kirbys for rebuilding, all the parts to one particular machine do not stay together. Rather, all the handle grips go in one bin, the forks in another, the headlight housings in another, the switches in another, the nozzles in another ... and so on. When a machine is put together for rebuilding, they just reach in the various bins for a handlegrip, a fork, a headlight housing, a switch, a nozzle, etc.

The exception to this is machines that are sent in for rebuilding under the orignal-owner warranties, the parts of a given machine are kept together.



Post# 249949 , Reply# 21   9/12/2013 at 03:36 (3,850 days old) by Ultimatevacman ( Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK)        

ultimatevacman's profile picture
To say it's not original I think it looks quite nice. :)


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy