Thread Number: 5598
Why would you buy?
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 61876   3/7/2009 at 17:30 (5,527 days old) by methodistbill ()        

So which would you buy and why? Compact/Tristar or Filter Queen? Which has the better power nozzle?

Post# 61877 , Reply# 1   3/7/2009 at 17:56 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
Tristar

best vacuum ever. Im looking to buy one.

Get a CXL though. Not one of the new ones. Superior suction. Same motor as on fq but the design is much better and more compact.


Post# 61884 , Reply# 2   3/7/2009 at 18:14 (5,527 days old) by xraytech ()        

Bill,
Both are excellent vacuums with great suction and superior filtration. But I would choose the Compact/Tristar because I think they pull around a little easier and the convenience of the disposable bag over empting the Filter Queen. Either one is a good choice, but for the tri star as said above don't buy the new ones they are not of the same quality as the ones made like the Compact design.

Sam


Post# 61892 , Reply# 3   3/7/2009 at 19:25 (5,527 days old) by danemodsandy ()        
TriStar!

The nice thing about a TriStar is that it's bulletproof, idiot-simple technology backed up with superb build quality. The canister is a housing, a fan, a motor, and a switch, period - unlike today's nervous-Nellie, electronically-controlled vacs, there just isn't anything to go wrong. Way before there was HEPA, TriStar was offering quadruple filtration (cloth bag, paper bag, motor filter and after filter); when you use one, there is no vacuum-cleaner smell at all.

Unlike a Filter Queen and some of the other "specialty" vacs, a TriStar is easy to figure out and use, basically like every other canister vac, only better. The TriStar power nozzle on the later CXL, DXL and EX-20 machines is really really good, leaving the carpet fluffy and clean but not leaving harsh grooming marks. I have a cat and a Bissell ProHeat 2X carpet machine, which for most Bissell owners, means that the Bissell pulls up a lot of pet hair that their vac missed; many new Bissell owners complain about having to pick up ginormous wads of pet hair when they use the cleaner. I didn't have that problem at all, even with a tuxedo cat on ivory carpet.

I second the statement that you need to get one of the older, IEC-built machines based on the Compact design, not one of the new MG-series machines. The new machines don't have the Ametek motor, and while the canister housing is still magnesium alloy, there's an awful lot of plastic used for wands and the PN. And the price is very high for a new one - I understand that list price is about $2600.

Figure about $400 to buy a decent CXL or later Compact-style machine and put it into really good shape with the complete selection of tools. I have never repeat never repeat never seen a Compact-style TriStar offered on eBay that was complete and correct.

P.S.: Bill, I've been trying to email you, but it keeps bouncing. Any idea what's up?


Post# 61894 , Reply# 4   3/7/2009 at 19:34 (5,527 days old) by kirbyvertibles (Independence, KS)        

kirbyvertibles's profile picture
I am a huge filter queen lover but I would have to say that if it were the better power head I was looking for it would be the Compact/ Tri-Star. Love both machines though!!!

Post# 61895 , Reply# 5   3/7/2009 at 19:36 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
HUH?

Never seen a compact style tristar that was complete on ebay??? They are all over the place.

For cheap too. $200-$300


Post# 61896 , Reply# 6   3/7/2009 at 19:41 (5,527 days old) by ericaustin (Dallas, TX)        

I got mine with paperwork/bags/tools complete for 30.00 on Craigslist!

Post# 61897 , Reply# 7   3/7/2009 at 20:01 (5,527 days old) by methodistbill ()        
Sandy

Let me try emailing you and then try replying to my email. Don't know why it would be bounding back. I the Model G cord, straps, and wheel to Cody. I do have another turquoise hose cord, but it is not OEM.

Bill


Post# 61898 , Reply# 8   3/7/2009 at 20:33 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
ericaustin.

We are all really jealous... Man I wish I could find a deal like that

Post# 61899 , Reply# 9   3/7/2009 at 20:38 (5,527 days old) by kirbykid1 ()        

Um Tri Star easy to use?

NOOOOO. Go for a Filter queen like a majestic or triple crown. There simple to clean up and operate. Let face it neither of these cleans never lose suction. Its like using a normal vacuum the clog. But they still mantain suction longer. Did you think of a Dyson DC17. Great upright vacuum. The Dyson Baby canister will be coming out get that. Your getting a vacuum cleaner the never clogs and cleans deep. What about a Miele

Filter queens are great vacuums but there is only one problem which is emptying it. but it will clean just as well if not better then a Tri Star. The power heads have never been the best but still very good. You have the cellulose cone that you replace once a month. ITs very simple to do and you can wash it and remove any odors. Go for a Filter queen, Dyson, or Miele.



Post# 61900 , Reply# 10   3/7/2009 at 20:59 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
Yea right

I would never buy a diesoon as they are terrible and cant pick up anything. I tried a Miele today while at a store. Terrible and cheaply made. overpriced.

Filter queens are hard to use. A tristar- just twist in the hose and plug it in, press the switch. Thats it. So easy. The most simple machine to use.

Filterqueens have too many accessories and buttons.


Post# 61901 , Reply# 11   3/7/2009 at 21:00 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
Easy to clean?

A filter queen takes 10x as long to clean out and is less sanitary. Its like emptying a shopvac!

The Tristar is simple. a little paper cup. Pull it out and throw away. Really simple.


Post# 61902 , Reply# 12   3/7/2009 at 21:16 (5,527 days old) by vintagehoover ()        

'I would never buy a diesoon as they are terrible and cant pick up anything.'

A few people will disagree with you there.

'I tried a Miele today while at a store. Terrible and cheaply made. overpriced.'

More than a few people will disagree with you there.


Post# 61903 , Reply# 13   3/7/2009 at 21:22 (5,527 days old) by kirbykid1 ()        

Cheap plastic crap. yah Sure. Um No it is the best canister vacuum made. Hell you cant even adjust the suction on a tri star. It clogs so fast. Ugh I cant even go there. Maybe you should read up on your vacuums. Oh Dyson is using a digital motor in there new cleaners. So guess what no carbon dust. No Filter unlike the Tristar that takes what 4 or 5. Yeah I would rather buy one vacuum and not have to replace filters.

Post# 61908 , Reply# 14   3/7/2009 at 21:56 (5,527 days old) by aeoliandave (Stratford Ontario Canada)        

aeoliandave's profile picture
Compact over Filter Queen hands down.

Both have the original nostalgic look if that's a consideration, weigh about 12 pounds hoseless & tool-less and pull 80" or more. All conditions being equal both resist clogging and suction loss longer than any other consumer grade vacuum cleaner.

Filter Queens come in basic black or brown with mylar stuck-on prone to scrape damage graphics, have a plastic bucket (the steel bucket adds more weight) and the dolly tends to fall off when picked up and bumped unless you get the salmon pink one with the cordwinder trolley. And frankly, looks old fashioned and frumpy. Which has it's own charm of course. On the plus side the Filter Queen can have a tool ring to carry all those accessories but they will contact walls and furniture before the ring bumpers do.

The Compact/Tristar comes in many cheerful colors, has a sleeker narrower shape, doesn't bang your leg so much trundling up & down stairs and takes up less room in the closet.

Emptying an FQ is like emptying a Shop Vac without the bag - you really want to be outside. Compact you simply grasp the bag ring like knitting bag handles, close, lift & toss. No need to shake the cloth bag every time, the paper liners are that good.

Power nozzles? No contest. As many have noted before the FQ PN is like pushing a stubborn shoe box around particularly against the nap - and it skews laterally because the wand swivel connector is poorly designed & inherently wobbly. The Compact PN goes where it's pointed.

Filter Queens are top heavy. Compacts are low to the ground and un-dentable magnesium.

As much as I adore the 6 different FQ models I have, if that's the form factor I'm after I would choose the all polished chrome steel Fairfax with the racy red accents. It's just more modern...and takes an optional capacious paper bag in the bucket.

Compacts? I third the statement that you need to get one of the older, IEC-built machines based on the Compact design, not one of the new MG-series machines. There's simply no other vacuum cleaner like it, unless you drift over to the 'Design Gone Bonkers' Haley'sComet, MiracleMate, or VortecForce school of awkward styling...and the we're really talking weight penalty.

Dave, "the more you know, the more you know."

Miele is rightly the class leader of canisters...and Dysons?...in this thread's league they have no class, just 'classtic'.


Post# 61910 , Reply# 15   3/7/2009 at 22:07 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
Miele

How can anyone love a piece of $#I%. These things are like any walmart vacuum. CHEAP!!!!! CHEAP!!!!

They could not even perform on the stores demo. I almost laughed when they attempted to pick up some fluff stuff and paper. It took soo many passes. My kirby could do it in 2. My mom- a vacuum no-nothing-at-all. Laughed when we got in the car. She knows and could care less for vacuums. She said that was a poor excuse. And with that price tag... not even considering.

I would take a 45 year old Kirby over a New Miele just because they are that bad. Not to mention dIEsOON who is just one step above miele. Yes- I would buy a dieson before a Miele.

They are just CRAPtastic machines.

Tristar all the way.

CLOGGING!?!?!?! My grandfathers tristars have NEVER NEVER NEVER had a problem. Never clogged. EVER.. One of the MIELEs at the store in fact clogged up. The guy blushed and said the machine was not working right and quickly switched to another. Which it still did the same thing


Post# 61916 , Reply# 16   3/7/2009 at 22:20 (5,527 days old) by kirbykid1 ()        

Oh My I must make a youtube video. Some people will never learn!!!!!!!!! Did you ever think of this. If compacts never clog then why do they need a bag. Why didnt they use cyclonic action only? Yeah I went there.

Post# 61917 , Reply# 17   3/7/2009 at 22:23 (5,527 days old) by aeoliandave (Stratford Ontario Canada)        
Let's try to stay focused, people.

aeoliandave's profile picture
Comparing apples against birds. The thread is about Compact/Tristar or Filter Queen and which has the better power nozzle.

In our humble and helpful collective opinions...


Post# 61918 , Reply# 18   3/7/2009 at 22:23 (5,527 days old) by kirbykid1 ()        

Um May I ask you something. When I say clog I hope and pray to god that you know I mean the bag pores not the actual hose or wands. Right?


Post# 61919 , Reply# 19   3/7/2009 at 22:30 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
Opps

Sorry I thought you ment the hose. What do you mean by pores? its a paper sack so it does not really clog...

Anyways... tristar does have a cyclonic type system. They never actually clog on the inside because all the dirt collects on the back wall and the air is always free to move.

My old dyson had a clog in the hoses several times. And all my other bagless cyclonics clog after it gets about 1/4- 1/2 full.


Post# 61920 , Reply# 20   3/7/2009 at 22:47 (5,527 days old) by xraytech ()        

Actually everything clogs in time, including the pores in the TYristar and the filter cone in a FQ. The Tristar and filterqueen just manage maximum suction longer than other models because of their cyclonic action.

Post# 61922 , Reply# 21   3/7/2009 at 23:01 (5,527 days old) by danemodsandy ()        
Brandon:

Again, I've never seen a really complete TriStar on eBay. By that, I mean one that has everything a TriStar came with new, with all the parts being original, factory TriStar tools and attachments. I see a lot of TriStars offered with new tools, meaning that a set of new plastic universal tools is included. But finding one with all the factory TriStar tools it came with when new, and an instruction manual? Hasn't happened on any eBay auction I've ever looked at. Not once.

A late TriStar (CXL, DXL, or EX-20) should come with:

CANISTER: Cloth bag, paper bag, motor filter, and afterfilter (either the standard afterfilter or the high-filtration Filter-Fresh filter). A cord-winding clip should be present on the bag door, and a plastic cord retainer should be present down where the pigtail of the hose plugs into the canister. The TriStar emblem on the left side of the canister should be present and unbroken; since it mounts through holes in the canister body, a missing emblem causes air leaks that decrease suction. Many eBay sellers try to hide this defect by photographing the canister only from the right side.

HOSE: A genuine TriStar hose has a pigtail on the canister end, and a grip on the other end; the grip end should have a socket for the PN cord. Early versions have reinforcement cuffs at each end; later ones don't, but both are genuine. Aftermarket hoses have a pigtail on both ends.

POWER NOZZLE: Many of these look complete, but are not. The TriStar PN is supposed to have nylon spacers and felt dust washers on the brushroll shafts, as well as a foam dust seal on the motor. Often, someone replacing a belt or cleaning the brushroll bearings neglects to replace all these parts correctly, leading to rattles, poor cleaning and grooming, and increased motor wear. The foam dust seal on the sole plate also needs to be in good shape. There should be two wands with unbroken plastic cord channels.

TOOLS: There should be a dusting brush, a crevice tool, and an upholstery/drapery tool, all in clear/glitter plastic. The upholstery/drapery tool should have a little snap-out grille in beige or clear plastic. There should be a beige plastic tool caddy that snaps onto the PN wands; it holds the dusting brush, drapery/upholstery tool, and crevice tool. There should be an aluminium floor tool saying "Cyclonic" on it. There should be either a clear/glitter "rug shoe" that snaps onto the floor tool to convert it to a rug tool, or an aluminium rug tool saying "Cyclonic."

In addition, there should be an instruction manual.

Brandon, if you ever find an eBay auction for a TriStar that includes all this, I'd love to be alerted, because it will be a first for me.


Post# 61923 , Reply# 22   3/7/2009 at 23:37 (5,527 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
oh I see

Ok. But manual- do you really need one for a tristar? They are so easy to use any idiot could!

Post# 61924 , Reply# 23   3/8/2009 at 00:05 (5,527 days old) by danemodsandy ()        
Brandon:

No, you don't really need a manual, as you correctly point out. But having one is one of the things that makes the difference between an average, used machine and one that is collectors' quality. It's kind of like show cars - there's a big difference between a nice old car and one that wins prizes.

Post# 61925 , Reply# 24   3/8/2009 at 01:51 (5,527 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

The "Cyclonic" action in the TriStar cleaners is due to "wingtip" vortexes like on an airplane wing-the Orig design TriStars were built by an aircraft manufacturer-they built airplanes during and before WW2.The hose intake is the same pitch as an airplane wing.This gives you the powerful vortex in the TriStar bag.Also a collector should look out for TriStar sales demo kits-I have one-there is a transpare nt plastic top with a hose attachment-so you can show the customer how the unit works after picking up 10 pounds of sand and putting a test filter on top of the sand-and the machine still picking up.Another cause of weak suction-and airflow from TriStar machines is loose screws holding the canister body halves together.After many years of use-these can get loose-only takes a moment to tighten them-turn the machine over-and the screwholes are evident.

Post# 61927 , Reply# 25   3/8/2009 at 05:08 (5,527 days old) by beerad (Beautiful Vancouver BC)        
Brandon

I am curious to know exactly what models of Miele did you try??I have owned a Miele Solaris for the past 4 years, and it is the most pwerful, quiet, durable vacuum I have used.

Post# 61931 , Reply# 26   3/8/2009 at 08:52 (5,526 days old) by myvacsrock (USA)        
I second that...

I have owned a Miele for quite sometime now, and correct me if i am wrong, but i personally think it is the best canister around.

The SEB-236 power nozzle is incredible
The hose is long without tripping over it, and it will never crush, nor tangle.
It is probably one of the quietest things on the market, even on the highest speed setting.
It is fairly light in weight too. in my honest opinion, very durable as well.
Overall, i think it is a pretty kick @$$ vacuum.

If it was worth it, my $0.2 was given...

~Kyle


Post# 61934 , Reply# 27   3/8/2009 at 11:10 (5,526 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
I know now

I was watching a terrible demo of the ?s5? I think it was. I watched youtube videos and now I really like them... (and want one!)

The guy that did the demo didn't know what he was doing and had something way wrong on the vacuum.


Post# 61956 , Reply# 28   3/8/2009 at 17:18 (5,526 days old) by aeoliandave (Stratford Ontario Canada)        

aeoliandave's profile picture
Yer a good feller, Brandon. Speaks highly and to your credit that you read and fully comprehended the posts, dug into doing your own research, evaluated the findings and will give Miele another chance and a fresh look-over.

At this point you can probably do your own Miele Demo. :-)

Perhaps you will kindly re-visit that vendor and gently correct the manager/salesman alone behind closed doors away from customers.

Dave


Post# 61961 , Reply# 29   3/8/2009 at 18:07 (5,526 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
I used one!!

I went back to another store, and well... they had a new S5. I used it, and well... it was truly great!!! Love it. Just still to expensive and well... I dont have a job yet :(

Post# 61999 , Reply# 30   3/8/2009 at 23:35 (5,526 days old) by danemodsandy ()        
And Now, The TriStar Cons...

Just so no one thinks I'm Mr. Rah-Rah for TriStar, a rabid booster who refuses to see that there are any thorns on the rose, I wanted to list some things that I think are drawbacks to the Compact-based generation of machines. They are:

LACK OF SUCTION CONTROL: A vacuum's hose should have a suction control, for delicate things like lampshades. Especially when the hose in question carries a list price of $160.

LACK OF A CORDWINDER: This one is a bit tricky. A TriStar has a 30-foot cord, which has all kinds of advantages, but the tradeoff is that you can't have a reasonably-sized cordwinder with that much cord. Not even the new MG-series machines have a cordwinder, which is a bit surprising to sales prospects contemplating the purchase of a $2600 vacuum for the first time.

FLOOR AND RUG TOOL PROFILES: TriStar's cast-aluminium floor and rug tools are the highest-quality tools I know of, a real throwback to the good old days. I just wish they'd made them with a lower profile that could get under furniture more easily. Lux managed this with a flip-over tool.

ENOUGH WITH THE SALES/SERVICE TERRITORIES: In the U.S., a TriStar dealer isn't supposed to have anything to do with customers outside his territory, even for parts sales. That's a real problem in some cases, like mine. Our TriStar service centre here is run like Barney Fyfe owns it, hardly ever coming up with parts quickly. Other TriStar dealers in other states don't want to deal with me, probably feeling that my call is a trap set up by TriStar corporate. Fortunately, TriStar Canada is easy to deal with (I think all that sales territory crappola is illegal there - correct me if I'm wrong, petek or aeoliandave), and so I use them instead of Mayberry R.F.D.

But that's really the list; I'm really pretty happy. I've gotten used to the lack of a cordwinder, and if I have to move the occasional piece of low-to-the-floor furniture, it's good for my heart and my waistline. The little snap-out grille on the upholstery/drapery tool decreases the suction for vacuuming curtains, and I've learnt to hold the dusting brush slightly away from lampshades I prize. And TriStar Canada couldn't be a nicer bunch of people (Note to whoever once called Canadians "decaffeinated Americans" - you say that like it's a bad thing).

So, those are the cons as I see 'em.



Post# 62052 , Reply# 31   3/9/2009 at 16:04 (5,525 days old) by methodistbill ()        
Just bought a clunker!

Well, I just bought a Compact clunker off of Ebay for $30. I'm curious to see how it turns out. The listing said it doesn't come with bags, so I guess I'll need to buy the cloth bag and the paper filter bags too. Any suggestions on OEM or generic? Does it matter? Also, I heard that you can use a Eureka Vibra Groomer brush roll in the power nozzle. Anyone know about that. I won't be surprised if it needs a new brush roll and belt too. Thanks!

Bill

P. S. Thanks for the spirited debate on this thread!


Post# 62056 , Reply# 32   3/9/2009 at 16:18 (5,525 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
VII

Yes you can. ttuee2006 did in his youtube vid on his Tristar CXL.

Only buy genuine tristar filter bags. Then off brand paper bags. I think tristar parts are much more quality than others.


Post# 62060 , Reply# 33   3/9/2009 at 16:36 (5,525 days old) by danemodsandy ()        
Bill:

I don't recommend the Vibra-Groomer brushroll in the TriStar PN; for one thing, it's not necessary, because the stock brushroll is very good. For another, it can cause rattling and noise that you shouldn't be getting with a TriStar. Also, you say you bought a Compact - if the machine says Compact instead of TriStar, you may have a PN made by Eureka, instead of the current generation of PN.

You should go to the TriStar Canada website (www.tristarvacuumscanada.com...) and take a look at the parts list for the EX-20, which should be substantially identical to your machine, if it has the current generation's PN. If it is, I highly recommend that you compare the exploded parts view to what you have in your PN, so as to check for missing spacers, dust seals, etc. I can tell you that replacing anything missing makes a huge difference in the noise level and cleaning abilities of the PN.

If you have the Eureka generation PN, I'm sure someone here will be better-versed in it than I am, and can assist you.


Post# 62064 , Reply# 34   3/9/2009 at 17:49 (5,525 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
What model is it?

Most/ all compacts dont use PNs so you better check that it has the plug near the hose port. My Grandfather has a Compact electra. The green one- with a CXL nozzle.

Post# 62072 , Reply# 35   3/9/2009 at 19:28 (5,525 days old) by danemodsandy ()        
Brandon:

Compacts had PNs in the '60s, but I believe they were an option and didn't sell well. Those old ones are very rare. In the '70s, Compact began offering them regularly; I understand that those are the Eureka-made ones. At some point (I'm still not sure when), the present design began to be offered. I'm not sure if it was ever used on machines branded Compact, or if it was part of the change-over to TriStar.

Post# 62074 , Reply# 36   3/9/2009 at 19:58 (5,525 days old) by methodistbill ()        
Eureka Made

It has the Eureka made PN. I think it is the model that was made from 1990 to 1992 (according the the Canadian website). I can't find a model listing on the US site. I think it was around 2000 that the company was taken over by the same corporation that owns Aerus. That's when the PN changed to the newer Electrolux style (me thinks).

Bill


Post# 62085 , Reply# 37   3/9/2009 at 21:13 (5,525 days old) by brandon_w_t ()        
CXL

This is a tristar vacuum. If its from 1990 at least. A very good vacuum. Nice find. I have been looking for one forever.

Post# 278166 , Reply# 38   4/25/2014 at 11:13 (3,652 days old) by floor-a-matic (somewhere)        

Fred Nelson? had a IEC built TriStar PN in sea green; very rare TriStar 2-1000 PN in that color

If anyone has a Compact Always Beauty Clean PN and/or Turbinette they don't need anymore, I would like to have the ABC and/or Turbinette

Was there a mini Turbinette (for vacing stairs & upholstery) available when the Compact C8 was the current model? NOT counting the TriStar Whirl Away that came with the DXL/EX-20



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy