Thread Number: 5111
Kirby Heritage II Rug Nozzle Question |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 57060 , Reply# 1   12/27/2008 at 20:21 (5,590 days old) by chuffle (Rural Pennsylvania)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The motor housings are different too. The large nozzle machine has the housing that was used on the Heritage, without the cooling openings. But what about the serial numbers that don't seem to make sense? Any thoughts or words of wisdom is really welcome! Thanks loads, Joe |
Post# 57071 , Reply# 2   12/28/2008 at 00:12 (5,590 days old) by swingette ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Since ive limited experience with Kirby, im curious about any weight difference between the two nozzles. |
Post# 57079 , Reply# 3   12/28/2008 at 05:35 (5,590 days old) by chuffle (Rural Pennsylvania)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
There is a definite weight difference between the two machines. When picked up, one really notices that the "Classic" nozzle version is heavier than the trimmed down version. J |
Post# 57104 , Reply# 4   12/28/2008 at 13:09 (5,590 days old) by kirbykid63 (Wilmington Delaware)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi the larger head was used on the 1984 models,then the first slim heads 1985 didnt have the green brush light indicators then in 1986 the indicator was introduced. |
Post# 57109 , Reply# 5   12/28/2008 at 13:47 (5,590 days old) by chuffle (Rural Pennsylvania)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Thanks for the explanation, KK63. J |
Post# 253642 , Reply# 6   10/23/2013 at 15:17 (3,830 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
If you still have both of these Heritage IIs, five years later, could you please read the serial numbers off of both of them?
The one with the old-style nozzle casting (141684S) would have a serial number ranging between X8409XXXXX (September 1984) and X8502XXXXX (February 1985), whereas the one with the slim nozzle (141685S, no BPI light) would range between serial number X8503XXXXX (March 1985) and X8602XXXXX (February 1986). ~Ben |