Thread Number: 32905
/ Tag: 50s/60s/70s Vacuum Cleaners
Origin of the term "Bojack" |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 360007   9/27/2016 at 14:15 (2,760 days old) by wyaple (Pickerington, OH)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
When I joined this forum a few years ago, I spied the term "Bojack" being used most often, usually with a derogatory meaning as to quality and non-OEM status. After reading Carroll Gantz's vacuum cleaner book, I found on page 128 a reference to Bojack. He states that Hoover originated the term to refer to any competitor.
I can only imagine the usage... Hoover engineer: "Today, we will do a tear down of this new Eureka cleaner..er, I mean BOJACK machine and see what makes it tick." On this website, it appears that Bojack usually refers to any part that is non-OEM, but not to an entire machine. Some language correction may be in order here for those highly Hoover oriented individuals. Original Designation.....Hoover Designation Kirby Avalir...................Bojack Avalir Rainbow E-Series..........Bojack E-Series Oreck XL.......................Bojack XL Simplicity Freedom.......Bojack Freedom Electrolux Super J........Bojack Super J Does anybody know how Hoover actually picked the word "Bojack"? Sounds like a contraction of some kind... Bill |
Post# 360015 , Reply# 1   9/27/2016 at 17:16 (2,760 days old) by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)   |   | |
This post has been removed by the member who posted it. |
Post# 360028 , Reply# 2   9/27/2016 at 23:08 (2,760 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'm with you I'd never heard the term until I found Vacuumland. Here, it does seem to refer to inferior non-OEM parts. To me, the idea of inferiority is important. I don't necessarily think of a third party part that's made to OEM specifications--what they call LKQ or like kind and quality in the auto repair business--is necessarily 'bojak'. Likewise, I don't consider a machine restored with OEM parts from a different model from the same manufacturer as 'bojak'. I prefer to refer to them as 'franken-', as in a 'frankenkirby'.
|
Post# 360043 , Reply# 3   9/28/2016 at 09:12 (2,759 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
From what I understand, bojack first referred to an individual, a competitive vacuum salesman. Here's one hypothetical usage: John L. is a Hoover salesman, back when Hoovers were sold door to door by armies of factory trained salesmen.
Tom G. is an Electrolux salesman at the same time in history. John might call Tom a 'bojack' salesman, or he might say Tom sells Bojack machines. Trade-in vacs are referred to, by John L. as Bojack cleaners. This was at a time when door to door salesmen conned themselves into thinking that the brand they were selling was so much superior to anything else, that they could 'look down' their eyes at any other cleaner as being inferior or 'bojack'. Later on - non-original parts (which were, for many years, inferior to original in quality) became "bojack parts". For example, single ply Electrolux bags sold in vac shops or grocery stores were referred to as "bojack bags". An F&G Eureka style bag set up on a Kirby (in order to use disposable bags) would be a 'bojack' style, since it made he machine work less well (cut down on airflow). |
Post# 360045 , Reply# 4   9/28/2016 at 10:22 (2,759 days old) by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
~
Regardless of the origin of the word, "bojack" now refers to non-OEM vacuum cleaner parts*, such as the ones sold by non-factory-authorized vac shops. "Fit-All" - "To Fit" - etc. cloth bags, for example. And, yes, the crappy one-ply Electrolux paper bags sold in grocery stores (I haven't seen any of these in years).
There's generally a tone of cheapness and inferiority around bojack parts even though sometimes bojack parts are better-made and of higher quality [or the same exact product**] than OEM!
P.S. I looked the word up on Dictionary.com and it's not there. So it hasn't officially been accepted into the lexicon of the English language.
------- *As far as I know, the term is not used in any other category of manufactured goods.
** Multi-Filter Electrolux bags are made by the same company that makes them for Electrolux and are identical, other than not being labeled as "Genuine Electrolux." (Electrolux hasn't manufactured its own bags for many years.) While the "Brand-X" bags are literally the exact same product as the "Genuine Electrolux" bags, they are much less expensive. The difference is only important to those who are (foolishly) "brand conscious" and NEED to have that brand name. |
Post# 360058 , Reply# 7   9/28/2016 at 15:03 (2,759 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
makes sense, like as in somebody jury rigged it. |
Post# 360065 , Reply# 8   9/28/2016 at 20:41 (2,759 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
|
Post# 360079 , Reply# 9   9/29/2016 at 07:53 (2,758 days old) by RainbowD4C (Saint Joseph, Michigan )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 360096 , Reply# 10   9/29/2016 at 14:26 (2,758 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 360099 , Reply# 11   9/29/2016 at 14:57 (2,758 days old) by vacuumlad1650 (Wauponsee, IL)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 360102 , Reply# 12   9/29/2016 at 15:34 (2,758 days old) by Caligula (Wallingford, Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 360107 , Reply# 13   9/29/2016 at 17:43 (2,758 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 360109 , Reply# 14   9/29/2016 at 18:04 (2,758 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 360111 , Reply# 15   9/29/2016 at 18:30 (2,758 days old) by Caligula (Wallingford, Connecticut)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 360114 , Reply# 16   9/29/2016 at 19:55 (2,758 days old) by KirbyClassicIII (Milwaukie, Oregon)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|