Thread Number: 3177
Guess What I Found
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 35279   3/20/2008 at 13:10 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

I got a really cool vacuum today. It came from Ohio, and it lived there all it's life(I'd assume). I can't show you what it is until I get my camera batteries charged, so you'll have to guess for the moment. I'll give a few hints. It's pre-WWII and it's rare, but not insanely rare. I'll be back in a hour or so.

Post# 35280 , Reply# 1   3/20/2008 at 13:45 (5,852 days old) by arh1953 ( River Park, in Port St. Lucie, Florida)        

arh1953's profile picture
Wow, sounds good, that'll be a nice surprise.

Post# 35284 , Reply# 2   3/20/2008 at 14:52 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Ok. Here is the box it came in. It's drenched from sitting in the rain were getting here in Maine today.

Post# 35285 , Reply# 3   3/20/2008 at 14:53 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

And first out is the handle. This should be a bit of a clue.

Post# 35286 , Reply# 4   3/20/2008 at 14:54 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

And the machine itself!

Post# 35287 , Reply# 5   3/20/2008 at 14:56 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

And the very rare original bag. This was a supprise.

Post# 35288 , Reply# 6   3/20/2008 at 14:57 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

And the Hoover Baby 103 in operation:

Post# 35289 , Reply# 7   3/20/2008 at 14:59 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

And a nicer view:

Post# 35290 , Reply# 8   3/20/2008 at 15:02 (5,852 days old) by arh1953 ( River Park, in Port St. Lucie, Florida)        

arh1953's profile picture
That's even better than nice! Lucky you! Thanks for posting.

Post# 35295 , Reply# 9   3/20/2008 at 15:11 (5,852 days old) by hoovercelebrity (Germany)        
Wow!

That's an incredible find...

Really..

Incredible!

**drooling over that bag**

Congrats, indeed!

~Fred


Post# 35297 , Reply# 10   3/20/2008 at 15:14 (5,852 days old) by arh1953 ( River Park, in Port St. Lucie, Florida)        

arh1953's profile picture
Isn't that close to the age of that infamous 1919 Hoover the club has?

Post# 35298 , Reply# 11   3/20/2008 at 15:21 (5,852 days old) by lux1521 ()        

According to Jack's huge Hoover web site, its 1920-1925. The baby model c would have been built in 1919. I have a special model 102 in my collection from 1919-1920 but I don't think it's that rare. A 1916-1919 Model N would be, but I've seen a handful of those around still.

Post# 35303 , Reply# 12   3/20/2008 at 16:21 (5,852 days old) by vacuumkid3 ()        

Very nice! Great find! That bag looks great! It doesn't look like it'll need to much to get it looking brand new! :-) Good luck!

~~K~~


Post# 35341 , Reply# 13   3/20/2008 at 22:55 (5,852 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)        
All I Can Say is WOW!!!

hygiene903's profile picture
Nice Looking Hoover, and the original bag is like frosting on the cake!! Great find!
Jeff


Post# 35390 , Reply# 14   3/21/2008 at 21:48 (5,851 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Thanks for all the nice comments. Right now I'm keeping it out of my room because I'm alergic to it. I'm hoping the bag gets aired out. I'm not going to wash it. I turned it wrong side out and vacuumed it (with a Dirt Devil hand vac on low speed with crevice tool) and that was tricky enough. I also need to get a belt some time soon to test it's carpet cleaning ability. A new convertible belt is too small, a used Convertible belt is too large, and a stretched Eureka belt is also too large. I think a new Eureka belt should do the trick.

Anyway, the interesting part of this story is the mystery of it's origin and the story of it's travel to my home. My story starts about 3 weeks ago when I saw the lot of vacuums in the picture below on ebay, which I'll talk more about in just a bit. I tried for about 3 days to deal with the seller to get the Hoover but that dident work. I then waited for the buyer to collect the vacuums and asked him about it. I made an offer for $30 + shipping ($25). As the offer was going along quite nicely, the guy got the idea that it was built it 1907 (the oldest pattent date on the machine) and that it was extemely rare and he was going to list it on ebay. This is after I had been tracking the thing for a week and a half and caused quite a adrenalin rush for me. I then convinced him that it was built between 1920 and 1925 and it was not as rare as he thought it was. He then took my offer, much to my relife. Then was the scary part about the box sitting in the rain on my porch. It seems like DHL fails to think about these things.

So, back to the other stuff that he still has. You can see a pink GE swivel top, Hoover 800 (another with original bag), some other Hoover, a Kirby classic with attachments in the box, a high end old style Eureka, a Royal, and a Regina electric broom, a high end Hoover Elite, and a bit of newer stuff. All of it worked, and he got it all for $32.00. Any of you who live in Ohio (local pickup auction) can feel free to kick yourselves now. I have offered to help the guy list the remaining stuff, and plan to offer once more in my thank you email. This guy was nice enough and I'd like to see him make some more money on it. I'm also feeling a bit guilty about the price I paid. If you guys could give me some idea about the demand for, and value of the stuff he has I would appreciate it.

It is also interesting to think about what else the original seller has/had. It seems like the original owner of these machines took very good care of them. Since all of the cleaners worked, it seems like there might have been some that diden't work and failed to get into the lot. Makes you wonder what's still out there floating around in Ohio.


Post# 35460 , Reply# 15   3/22/2008 at 15:39 (5,850 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
Wow, what a wonderful find! :D

Lucky you, I'm green with envy! :)

I always think the Baby is a weird-looking cleaner - the nozzle looks too narrow, and the motor looks too high!

My friend Stephen has exported 2 Babies over here, one being a 1916 Baby Model C, which I got to see at our UK Hooverland Meet last year. His is an early one, with white canvas furniture guard, push on-off switch and 2-piece handle. I was shocked how heavy it was, though - despite being the smallest version, it weighed more than the later full-sized machines, because the Model C was still sand-cast.

Be careful with that bag - the manual suggests you don't turn it inside out, or brush it, since this damages the chemical which keeps it dust-tight. Perhaps after 80 years, that doesn't make much of a difference!

Here's a question for the experts; was the Baby 103 die-cast or sand-cast? If it was die-cast, I'd guess it's probably a lot lighter than the Baby Model C.

You might be interested to see this picture from my copy of the 'On Judging an Electric Cleaner' booklet. I think it must be earlier than your copy. In the one you scanned for the forum, the Baby has a 'discontinued' sticker over it, and the prices have been stuck over with prices for the 543, 700 and 961. In this one, the original pictures and prices are intact:



Post# 35465 , Reply# 16   3/22/2008 at 16:05 (5,850 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
Forgot to mention:

Later 103s had the stengthened bag, suspended with a spreader, like the one in the picture above. Yours may be an earlier version, since it has the older-style bag.

Post# 35466 , Reply# 17   3/22/2008 at 16:11 (5,850 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Yeah, that bag is an issue. Right now by biggest concern is keeping it in one piece. I have already had to hot glue the strap to the top of the bag before I took the running pictures shown above.

It does look a bit strange. It is actualy as wide as a standard size Hoover and perhaps slightly taller than the 541. When working on it (belt and brush maintnace) it feels very cramped inside. The belt hardly clears the underside fan case and rubs against the front when trying to close the brush holder.

The 103 appears to be sand cast and is as heavy as a typical 1920s full size. It has the texture on the inside that I think the sand cast models (like my 102) had.

The motor fan is the newer style with the disk under the blades and not the old Model N style.

Like you said in your second post, the bag is an older one. It also lacks the 541 style hand grip or the bag spreader. I wonder what upgrades the later versions had? It seems possible the later ones might have been die cast. It it was sand cast during the run of the 541 it would have been very out-dated. It would have no weight advantage and little price advantage after 1923.

I think I will need to post a few detail photos later to show what I'm talking about.


Post# 35469 , Reply# 18   3/22/2008 at 17:16 (5,850 days old) by lux1521 ()        
I was wrong about the fan!

After taking it apart for some more pics, I discovered it has the old style fan! The fan unit is very interesting. It has a different method of mounting to the shaft and the belt pulley is somehow attached to the fan.

Here are some more pictures:


Post# 35470 , Reply# 19   3/22/2008 at 17:17 (5,850 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Another view of the fan:

Post# 35471 , Reply# 20   3/22/2008 at 17:20 (5,850 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Underside pic 1:

Post# 35472 , Reply# 21   3/22/2008 at 17:22 (5,850 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Underside pic 2:

Post# 35473 , Reply# 22   3/22/2008 at 17:25 (5,850 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Size comparison with 541:

Post# 35523 , Reply# 23   3/23/2008 at 07:54 (5,849 days old) by ge1969 (Jefferson, GA)        

Hey Lux! Does the guy have any tools for the pink GE Swivel-Top? If so, see what he'd take for it and what the shipping would be to zip code 30549 in Georgia. Thanks in advance, Trg

Post# 35594 , Reply# 24   3/23/2008 at 21:53 (5,849 days old) by lux1521 ()        

I've taken a look at the pics again and don't see much of anything else around the GE. Of course I won't know for sure until I ask. I'd assume he would want to list the cleaner in it's entirety if he bothers to sell any of the other stuff. If thats the case I'll make sure you know about it.

Post# 37142 , Reply# 25   4/4/2008 at 00:55 (5,838 days old) by camelotshadow (Valley Village)        
Hey Congrats

Sure is nice to find cool things!


Post# 37160 , Reply# 26   4/4/2008 at 09:30 (5,837 days old) by lux1521 ()        

Thanks! It was a very cool find. It's too bad I can't use it much due to it's age. It's performance is only good enough to pick up surface dirt but thats quite good for an unrestored low end vacuum that is 80 years old.

I might have to use it again sometime soon. I have only used it once since I got a belt to fit it properly. The motor could probably use a bit of work but thats not much of a supprise.



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy