Thread Number: 31553
/ Tag: Brand New Vacuum Cleaners
What do you think of the new numatics? |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 348721   3/27/2016 at 03:32 (2,944 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi all
So I was wondering what do you think of the new numatics. Now I personally think they are not as good as a 80s or 90s model, but they still are good. The only thing I don't like is the floor tools on the new ones as there all plastic where as the the ones that came with the john and the Lewis where metal based. I have 2 of the new numatics, a James and a Lewis. Please share your thoughts Thanks Daniel :) |
Post# 348723 , Reply# 1   3/27/2016 at 05:50 (2,944 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
How would you define "not as good"? |
Post# 348729 , Reply# 3   3/27/2016 at 08:23 (2,944 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 348734 , Reply# 4   3/27/2016 at 08:41 (2,944 days old) by vacuumlover (UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I can't give my opinion on the newer models as I don't have any experience was th older models. (with the exception of my old nuvac.) Personally I really don't like the new floor tools. |
Post# 348744 , Reply# 5   3/27/2016 at 09:47 (2,944 days old) by citroenbx (england)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 348764 , Reply# 6   3/27/2016 at 14:10 (2,944 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I really don't like the AutoSave models at all, but I absolutely love my current Henry. I find the new floortool gives far greater performance over the old one. Even in low power mode and with a plastic based floortool, the current models pick up way more than the autosaves I owned ever did.
In my experience, the best models Numatic have made are the first NVR machines from 1985 into the early 90's and the current models.
I've also noticed in conversations that a lot of people who say they don't like the new floortool, do so because it doesn't feel "Numatic" enough, as though it's somehow taking away from what they associate with the brand rather than actually basing an opinion on the performance. |
Post# 348841 , Reply# 8   3/28/2016 at 06:03 (2,943 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I think with a lot of commercial use the new style floor tools would wear out. I don't know why numatic didn't use the free flo style floor tool with the new lower wattage machines. I brought a non genuine one off eBay for £6 something! It picks up much better than the one that came with my James.
|
Post# 348842 , Reply# 9   3/28/2016 at 08:27 (2,943 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 348848 , Reply# 10   3/28/2016 at 09:43 (2,943 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I have always adored the James model, probably because it was the first Numatic I ever bought. Simple, robust and so easy to use. I didn't mind the single speed to be honest as it was hardly noisy. I eventually sold it on and bought the first wave of Numatic Henry vacs under the eco tag. It is just as good if not more convenient as James with Henry's bowler hat cord rewind.
I eventually sold Henry off to a friend in need. Mine originally came with the plastic sole plate Wessel Werk derived floor head but much prefer the metal sole plate as it glides better. |
Post# 348862 , Reply# 11   3/28/2016 at 12:52 (2,943 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 348879 , Reply# 14   3/28/2016 at 17:55 (2,943 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Good point, Benny.
The beauty of the older floor heads is that they are a touch longer, so they can clean expansive areas quickly. At the end of the day though they're all made by Wessel Werk and go under the following model numbers: 61061 (double pedal) 61065 (single pedal) 61066 (grey with blue colour pedal) 62066 roller style single activation with single pivot wheel underneath. The newer single pedal ones are designed in such a way where when the floor head is pushed forward, the rear single wheel at the joint of the neck underneath pushes forwards but on the return, only the sole plate and lint pickers pull back on the flooring, so as not to leave wheel marks. It's quite ingenious and its a design that was added to the roller bar style single "pedal" after the 2 way pedal floor head that Numatic used to add with their vacuums before the Eco tagged machines that came with the single pedal floor heads. The 62066 was added to a few German brands including that of SEBO with their C cylinder vacs. All of these floor heads are still available to buy.
View Full Size
|
Post# 348920 , Reply# 15   3/29/2016 at 02:20 (2,942 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 348922 , Reply# 16   3/29/2016 at 03:49 (2,942 days old) by oliveoiltinfoil (England, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I dont discriminate. Build quality of numatic products has not deteriorated. I think the new head design is superior to what they have been using and more suitable for home environments not to mention actually performing better. That new head which a we know is from Germany probably doesnt cost any less than the older one which was pretty generic anyway, despite having a metal base plate.
|
Post# 348923 , Reply# 17   3/29/2016 at 04:34 (2,942 days old) by spiraclean (UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
First thing I always did with any Numatic up to now was ditch the floor head it came with. The original style was OK on glued down commercial carpeting, but around the house I never cared for them much. Seemed to me that all the suction was focused in the centre, and they could be an absolute bear to push. Not keen on the way they sometimes flip up and lose contact on the backstroke either.
My preferred replacement was the Wessel Werk RD275, which most of us would recognise as the same head supplied with the Vax 2000/4000 series. One of the best I've used on hard floors, and worked well on carpets too without giving the user a workout. The current head is more or less the same as that supplied with the Sebo K series (to get a stainless steel baseplate, you had to step up to the D series). Never thought there was much to choose between them, both performed fine for me with the only difference being the plastic version was lighter. |
Post# 348925 , Reply# 18   3/29/2016 at 05:46 (2,942 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Not true, the quality has absolutely deterioriated, but the same could be said for all brands. Not just vacuums too, the quality of many household items has dropped across the board.
I've got a late-80's HVR in the garage. Granted, it's in need of some repair work, but the build quality of the body is far better than the current model. It's most noticeable in the handle and cord rewind. |
Post# 348927 , Reply# 19   3/29/2016 at 06:22 (2,942 days old) by oliveoiltinfoil (England, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 348933 , Reply# 20   3/29/2016 at 07:52 (2,942 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I think the build quality has defanatly gone down hill. I have many older numatics from 1988 onwards. I see many broken auto save henrys on eBay saying "not working" etc. My favourite numatic has to be my cream and brown Henry. It's got every thing except the brown hose and tool adaptor! I would say that it is much better than the James by a long way!
|
Post# 348935 , Reply# 21   3/29/2016 at 08:06 (2,942 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Given that I don't work in the factory, I can't provide a detailed explaination. I'm sure someone on here is far more of an expert on plastic science than I am. But in use, the plastic on the handle is a lot thinner, causing the handle to bend when carrying the machine. The cord rewind causes the whole machine to shake from side to side and you can hear the cheaper plastic internal parts do not work smoothly together. The older machine doesn't have this problem - the machine stays complete still when winding the cord in and the cord rewind is smooth. It also feels a lot tighter (for lack of a better word) fitted to the top of the machine.
The tools have also deteriorated in quality - the dusting brush now has cheaper bristles instead of the high quality, soft bristles previously used. Same with the hard floor tool which uses to be made of horse hair. The tool adapater used to be made of hard, glossy, smooth plastic and is now made of a rough, matt plastic that is considerably thinner than the older version. The overall build quality of the machine is less solid than it used to be. The plastic on the body is thinner and more prone to scuffing - the older machines seem to be made of higher quality, thicker and more rigid plastic. I'm sure it's already been said elsewhere about the cheaper quality motor in the current machines too. Until you've actually put both cleaners side by side, it's difficult to understand just how much the build quality has deteriorated. Nothing to hinder the performance of the machine, but certainly noticeable. I don't think Numatic are alone in this though and I don't think it's restricted to vacuums. Everyone is cost-cutting to keep their prices low with rising production costs - without prices going up, it's envitable that cuts would be made somewhere. |
Post# 348936 , Reply# 22   3/29/2016 at 08:07 (2,942 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 348945 , Reply# 23   3/29/2016 at 10:49 (2,942 days old) by oliveoiltinfoil (England, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Well you have to remember plastics have changed in recent years. They are made from more recycled materials and there is a constant push for weight saving.
The bristles on the dusting brush on henrys are natural horse haris aren't they? And given the fact henrys have been less than £100 for several years, i dont think they have cut corners too much. Henrys are still well built and very reliable. |
Post# 348950 , Reply# 24   3/29/2016 at 11:40 (2,942 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I do that all the time. The auto save idea was crap I and that single speed is best. For example, my 1990 henry is very reiable. I brought it for £1.50 at local second hand shop. It was missing the tools and filter and it didn't work. All it was, it was the cable had a break in it (very common on vacuum cleaners) but after that was repaired the motor ran as sweet as a nut.
Here's a picture of it. Daniel. |
Post# 348952 , Reply# 25   3/29/2016 at 11:51 (2,942 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
I like the twin speed model, just not the AutoSave. It was a bit of a gimmick although I suppose it opened people's eyes to not needing crazy wattages.
No, it's definitely not horse hair anymore. As I said, I don't think it's enough to effect performance or reliability. I'm still a major advocate for Numatic's, but when compared with the older models, there is a noticeable quality difference. As you said Oli, Numatic have managed to keep Henry at a very reasonable price so it's kind of to be expected. |
Post# 348955 , Reply# 26   3/29/2016 at 12:17 (2,942 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The dusting brushes are definitely not horse hair any more as turbo500 said and to be honest with you I don't rarely use a dusting brush. But for the people who do, if I was you, by a replacement brush from somewhere.
View Full Size
|
Post# 348958 , Reply# 27   3/29/2016 at 12:43 (2,942 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 348961 , Reply# 28   3/29/2016 at 12:46 (2,942 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
When I had my James vac, I preferred to use old Hoover Telios dusting tools. Much more manageable.
The Eco Henry I owned for a short while also had a non-washable filter basket. The older James I owned was fitted with a washable one. It is true that Numatic have cut corners with a few design aspects but nothing major in my opinion, or barely noticeable to NON-collector buyers. |
Post# 348964 , Reply# 29   3/29/2016 at 12:53 (2,942 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 349030 , Reply# 30   3/29/2016 at 23:07 (2,941 days old) by thermokid (Casper, Wyoming)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I love my Henry Xtra... But now I am looking for a purple numatic.. I think they are James.. I am not sure... |
Post# 349031 , Reply# 31   3/29/2016 at 23:11 (2,941 days old) by thermokid (Casper, Wyoming)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I meant to say a Lewis not a James.. Anybody know where I can buy a Purple Numatic that runs on 110 ? |
Post# 349039 , Reply# 32   3/30/2016 at 02:33 (2,941 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 349042 , Reply# 33   3/30/2016 at 05:03 (2,941 days old) by oliveoiltinfoil (England, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The simple fact that they have kept the price the same for several year kind of outweighs the cost cutting, although i am not convinced that those things would hamper reliability too much. Thing is, people would rather pay less for something with less quality, than better quality at a higher price. Even if Numatic sold the henry for £140 which i think is a fair price for a British built machine, which is still a well made machine.
|
Post# 349048 , Reply# 34   3/30/2016 at 07:50 (2,941 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
Oli, I agree with you. Like I said, I don't think any dips in quality have been enough to cause any problems in performance or reliability. Infact, I think the current models are better cleaners than the AutoSaves and the twin speed models with the push-down switch (those were the most unreliable Numatics ever made!). It wasn't a criticsm of the cleaner or Numatic as a company - as I've said, the current Henry is my main cylinder at the moment. It was just an observation as a vacuum collector.
|
Post# 349051 , Reply# 35   3/30/2016 at 10:11 (2,941 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Well the price hasn't actually stayed the same. It has fluctuated between £90 to £120 brand new. Its only been in the last couple of years and thanks in part to Tesco where Numatic has been on sale from £70 rather than closer to £100.
Personally I'd like to see twin suction telescopic tubes as opposed to the fixed height and somewhere at least on the machine that gives a bag full indication. It isn't hard to do - I've seen other tub style vacuums that have a bag indicator on them. Numatic know what they could do, but they are intentionally keeping things basic to perhaps eliminate things that will go wrong short term. |
Post# 349056 , Reply# 36   3/30/2016 at 10:54 (2,941 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Henry's have always been around £100. I've only ever seen them go over that in mail order catalogues like Kays and Grattan, where prices are higher than the high street anyway. When Curry's sold them in the mid-late 90's, they were always £99.
The priciest I've seen them as of late is £109 (excluding Bright House, of course) and that's in Very. Again, a credit company and I guess the modern, online equivilant of the mail order catalogues. |
Post# 349060 , Reply# 37   3/30/2016 at 11:34 (2,941 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
James is currently on sale at Tesco for £109 and £92 at Co Op. A shame really. I think that's a bit high when originally mine cost £74 many many moons ago.
I find that once you've had a Henry in your life, its difficult to go back to a James model because the James model hose is a great deal shorter and at times ankle bashing can occur. Also I got the hellish "lighter" painted grey aluminium pipes with James that were inclined to fall off half way through cleaning even when they were tightly screwed together. |
Post# 349105 , Reply# 38   3/30/2016 at 16:41 (2,941 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 349107 , Reply# 39   3/30/2016 at 17:04 (2,941 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 349153 , Reply# 40   3/31/2016 at 10:08 (2,940 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 349399 , Reply# 44   4/3/2016 at 10:36 (2,937 days old) by Numaticrule29 ( london uk)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 349516 , Reply# 46   4/4/2016 at 15:41 (2,936 days old) by deluxevacs (Bath)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi numatic rule im vacsfoodreviews on youtube
i dont like the autosave technology at all prefered the simple hi lo switches also i think numatics are more cheaply made nower days
View Full Size
|
Post# 349525 , Reply# 47   4/4/2016 at 18:18 (2,936 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Storage of tools might not affect tools that some owners might not notice upon but it took Numatic a number of years to add a park in slot at the back of Henry vacs to finally allow for better storage of the vacuums. I also don't think that would affect sales but it has obviously hit a raw nerve at Numatic to go and add it to the machine.
I also had a few of those tool clips - I dont know how I managed it but they would either snap off in my keep or whenever I slid in the dusting brush, it just never locked in properly and would pop up mid way through cleaning. |
Post# 349546 , Reply# 48   4/5/2016 at 03:59 (2,935 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I see a lot of good points and personal comfort issues here. And that makes complete sense. That means most of the conversation here is about the attachments, more so than about the actual vacuum canister. Lets face it, when we vacuum, it's the wands, the hose, and the attachments that we interact with. The canister just sits there doing its thing. We only occasionally flip the switch or move the canister/cylinder about.
I'm wondering, more and more, why vacuums aren't sold by the piece, like desk top computers, TV entertainment systems, and other groups of similar products are. I mean, when you want to build your home TV system, you buy the TV, the receiver, the sound system, the furniture units, etc each in separate boxes often made by separate companies. Same thing with desk top computers. You chose the computer, the monitor, the printer, the scanner, mouse, etc.
Some people prefer certain feature, other don't need as much.
It's the same thing with canisters. Canisters seem to differ from year to year, yet attachments have pretty much stayed the same for decades. Each of the items should be sold separate, instead of all boxed up. Not only that, if the manufacturers would come to an agreement where they will have the same connections on the machine end, then it would save a lot waste and duplication.
Imagine going to the shop, to the vacuum department, and having first different new canisters ONLY boxed up (in smaller boxes) to chose from. Each priced lower because its the base unit ONLY and all have the same hose attachment port.
Then you move down the rack to the hoses. Different brands but all with the same type end, each in a plastic bag and hanging on the rack, some electric, some not, some longer than others and in different colors.
Then you move to floor tool. Electric power nozzles, rug tools, floor tools, turbo brushes, etc. Again different brands, colors, price points, features.
Then you move to smaller attachments. dusting, crevice, furniture, pet, window, motorized furniture, etc. Again different brands, colors, price pionts, and features.
And finally to bags and filters. Now this we already are familar with. One can buy different brands and types of bags, belts, and filters for their vacuum. You don't have to buy only Electrolux bags for your Electrolux, for example. You can buy 3M or whatever, and you don't have to settle on just paper, you can buy HEPA.
Anyway, it seems like everyone all around, from customer to manufacturers, would benefit from giving the consumer the freedom to buy and customize the type vacuum they NEED and want, verses having to buy a box load of parts, some of which may never get used, or not all the parts are liked.
I've kind of distracted the conversation here, about Numatics, and I apologize for that.
|
Post# 349563 , Reply# 49   4/5/2016 at 09:36 (2,935 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
IN my experience with U.S forums, it seems to me America has always been rather staid in their approach to offer customers optional tools to extend their use with their vacuum cleaner. There is a valid reason for this though: to make money.
In the mid 1990s it was impossible to get Miele optional cleaning tools for example - in the U.S - unless you went to an independent and source that tool you require at a high price. Even now when I look upon Amazon.com, it seems to be a rather restricted area where vacuum cleaner tools are concerned. Amazon UK on the other hand has lots of tools to buy. The UK and Europe have had a different approach; other tools have always been available but rather to the blind ownership of the owner who didn't know they existed or could be used with their vacuum cleaner. Not their fault for the most part because the user manuals for the vacuums don't suggest optional parts unless you own Miele, Bosch, Vorwerk or SEBO. Lack of info online regarding 32mm and 35mm tools from the actual brands hasn't helped the owner, either. Its only been in the last couple of years that brands are beginning to slowly release info about compatible optional tools. |
Post# 349575 , Reply# 50   4/5/2016 at 11:33 (2,935 days old) by delaneymeegan (Mary Richards lived here)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
"The UK and Europe have had a different approach; other tools have always been available but rather to the blind ownership of the owner who didn't know they existed or could be used with their vacuum cleaner. "
Right, well in the U.S., if you bought a new Eureka, Kenmore, Electrolux, Hoover, and no doubt other brands, you'd get a owners manual and a separate flyer with pictures of replacement tools and a few additional tools as extra, available from the manufacturer. But these were always labeled the same manufacturer.
It's like if you buy a Hoover, you can only use Hoover accessories, and likewise with other brands. But we know that's not true, nor is it a legitimate boundary.
It just seems it would be to the manufacturers, and everyone's advantage to sell the pieces individually. Manufacturer's could almost get rid of their separate parts departments, and consumers would have more choices, and the market would organize as each part would be it's own product.
For example: I'm still considering getting a Henry vacuum, but I would pair it with a pn, and probably wouldn't use any of the tools typically included with a Henry. I would add a Eureka crush-proof electric hose and a Eureka OR Electrolux pn. This would mean the cleaner would need to have a receptacle added to plug in the electric hose. Adding the receptacle's not a big deal to me, but for others, that may be beyond their scope. If the cleaners were simply equipped with a receptacle, the consumer could add what they want.
In the UK, canisters with pns, are not as abundant. If the consumer could buy a separate boxed pn and easily add it to their canister, regardless of brand, I would think there would be more sales, and certainly a happier consumer.
Likewise in the U.S. and other places. There are these quality floor tools from Germany, for example. If the consumer had those options readily available, it would seem it would just be better all around. |
Post# 349601 , Reply# 51   4/5/2016 at 14:35 (2,935 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yes but owners that aren't collectors aren't likely to buy a canister/cylinder in the hope that one day they can upgrade to a PN. Only some brands have already fitted half of the components for that facility to take place - but not all.
What is better all round for owners isn't necessarily better for the brands. Eliminating the separate parts departments isn't a viable solution - some brands don't even have parts divisions in the same country, but act as an outsourcing centre to cut costs. |