Thread Number: 29779  /  Tag: Pre-1950 Vacuum Cleaners
Why canisters?
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 331597   8/12/2015 at 23:58 (3,172 days old) by chad (texas)        

I remember how upset my ma would kit with me... She had a brand new Bissell canister machine that I despised using. Yes, it would pick up a bowling ball, and would probably suck start a Harley. But, havin to drag it around all of our stuff was a pester. She also had a Kirby upright that would pull itself around depending on whether you were pushing or pulling the handle. But, alas, I always liked the old brown trimmed Kirby built in 1960-1970 something. It make nice mechanical sounds, and didn't sound like fellatio gone wrong. My question is, other than looking neat, why would someone want to use a canister vac? Is it mainly for folks that have stairs? I'm not downing anyones preferences, I'm just not informed enough to understand it...

Post# 331599 , Reply# 1   8/13/2015 at 00:11 (3,172 days old) by kenkart ()        
I personally

DO NOT like uprights, I do have a few very vintage ones, but normal day to day vacuuming, I ALWAYS use a tank or canister,an upright is ok for a run thru the middle of the floor, but a canister gets under and around furniture much easier...of course I use a straight suction machine most of the time.

Post# 331605 , Reply# 2   8/13/2015 at 01:45 (3,172 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

I use BOTH machines--upright for carpet(Kirby,Royal,Sanitaire,Tacony tandem air) for carpets-Canisters for anything else.(NSS M1,Sebo D2,Meile,TriStar,Compact)

Post# 331619 , Reply# 3   8/13/2015 at 10:20 (3,172 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
I use both also, but the canister has more flexibility? I can reach and get to things that an upright has no chance at.I also do not have wall to wall carpet to deal with either.

Post# 331620 , Reply# 4   8/13/2015 at 10:36 (3,172 days old) by hydralique (Los Angeles)        

IMHO nothing beats a good Kirby for carpets and rugs where you need a revolving brush. Some of the canister powerheads may clean as well but I've not seen one with the convenience of the Kirby toe-tap height adjustment that makes getting a good rug seal simple and quick.

 

However, there are plenty of instances where suction is needed and a brushroll won't work: crevices, furniture and walls that need dusting, etc.  Kirbys (and other uprights) usually have hoses but most are nowhere near as convenient to use as a canister, even if they attach easily you can't pull an upright around like a canister. Most uprights have less suction too. So you really need both, plus it's a great excuse for more than one vacuum!

 

You might keep an eye out for a good Compact or classic (early) Tristar canister. They are really small and lightweight, built as well as a Kirby, easy to repair and have fantastic suction. I'd rather drag one of them out when I need a hose than mess with the Kirby hoses, and the Compact has better pure suction too.


Post# 331621 , Reply# 5   8/13/2015 at 10:55 (3,172 days old) by Vacuummania ()        
Just like the others said...

Uprights are great for carpets, or quick touch-ups, but canisters can fit under or around things that you'd have to move so your upright could get there.

I prefer canisters on my bare floors, even though some uprights allow you to turn off the brushroll for bare floors. Straight suction wands and brushes just do the job better and with less weight.

Also, they're great for cleaning couches, around the edges of walls and other tight spaces.

I hated to use our canister growing up because I wasn't holding the hose properly. When you do it like this picture, you only need to pull a bit with your left hand/arm and the canister follows you easily.


  View Full Size
Post# 331624 , Reply# 6   8/13/2015 at 12:04 (3,172 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)        

dysonman1's profile picture
Canisters have all the advantages as far as attachment use goes. Uprights simply cannot compete. Canister vacuums are the preferred machine for people who dust with their dusting brush, who vacuum the sofa each time they come to it, who use the crevice tool every time they clean, and who vacuum their floors with the bare floor brush. People who vacuum ceiling fan blades, dust shelves, walls, and ceilings. People who clean their car, stairs, or under beds. People with Rainbow canister vacuums can mop floors, unclog drains, blow up balloons, dry spots on the rug, and suck up car barf with no ill effect on the machine. Upright just clean rugs. They are terrible with attachments - the stretch hoses are a nightmare. Uprights are heavy, much louder, and much bigger when used with attachments. They also fall over.

Ideally, a home would have a canister vacuum for "cleaning house" and an upright to maintain the carpets.

I have always used a canister (although I have uprights for 'quick cleaning', I grew up with the wonderful Rainbow and go to know about ALL its uses. So far, I've never seen any other vacuum that could do MORE than a Rainbow. In fact, I've never seen any other vacuum that could do as much as a Rainbow either.


Post# 331628 , Reply# 7   8/13/2015 at 12:56 (3,172 days old) by RainbowD4C (Saint Joseph, Michigan )        

rainbowd4c's profile picture
For me it's just a preference. I bought a brand new Shark Powered True Pet and for the most part I liked it. I prefer my canister the most just because regardless it's easier for me to clean around the furniture, up the stairs, up the walls knocking cobwebs. Uprights just don't give me the flexibility that I need when cleaning. I use my Rainbow more than I use my Shark, just because it's a preference for me. When I do use the Shark I use it mostly as the lift away or upright because the hose is hard to work with. Most uprights today the hoses are difficult to work with which is why I chose to use a canister.

Post# 331644 , Reply# 8   8/13/2015 at 15:57 (3,172 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)        
It really depends...

human's profile picture
Up until the past few months, during which I fitted my PN1 with a new brush roll and acquired a nice PN2, I used my upright Kirby G5 and G6 machines for the carpeted areas and my Electrolux metal canisters (1205 and Super J) for the hardwood floors. Now, I'm just as likely to use an Electrolux on the carpet because it's lighter and more maneuverable in tight spaces. I've also recently acquired a Hoover Quik Broom Supreme that I use on the hardwoods, even though a broom and dustpan work just as well.

When it comes to using other tools, I'll always reach for the canister because it's more convenient to just disconnect the power nozzle and maybe the wand as well, and put on whatever tool I need. Not only is it more convenient, but the Electrolux hoses and tools are all far superior in quality to their Kirby counterparts. When I was nine years old, I was mightily impressed when the Kirby salesman who demoed a Classic Omega in our living room showed how easy it was to turn it into a 'canister' but as an adult more than 40 years later, I find that conversion process on my own Kirbys to be a total pain in the posterior and not worth the trouble. I use them for what they're best at--vacuuming carpets in an upright position--and use an Electrolux canister for everything else.


Post# 331648 , Reply# 9   8/13/2015 at 16:23 (3,172 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
That works!

Post# 331663 , Reply# 10   8/13/2015 at 19:17 (3,172 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

In the UK you will find that the love of canister cleaners is usually amongst those who find it so much easier to get them in & out of spaces in our tightly packed, small, cluttered homes.

As a nation, we are one of the few where upright cleaners have always been a popular choice, because of the mass of fitted carpets we have. But in recent years the trend has been towards hard-flooring. Whether this has seen a shift to the purchasing of canister cleaners, I don't know as I don't have any statistics to hand. What does surprise me is that some die-hard upright users I know have homes with virtually no carpets and yet the upright cleaner is still their first choice.

I have always liked uprights for carpets, and canisters for everything else, including the edges of carpets. The convenience and power I find in a canister when used for the tasks I have outlined has yet to be found in an upright when using a vacuum cleaner for any length of time.




Post# 331851 , Reply# 11   8/16/2015 at 18:08 (3,169 days old) by dartman (Portland OR)        
I have a couple of the older Royal canister vacs

Like said I have the older 413 power tank a Kirby guy sold me almost new back about 90, and a newer Starks/Royal 4650 with the nice Panasonic power head I found on Craigs list for 25 bucks.
As a family we had a few Kirbys and they were fine but very loud and heavy, plus I don't think any of ours were the newer propelled models.
Then later as houses and finances changed we got a couple of good canister vacuums with the better power heads and they are quieter, lighter, and easy to manuver and get under all the crap I have.
The power head on the 4650 will really seal to the carpet nicely with like 4 foot settings from auto, low, medium, and high, plus it has power head off and on on the handle, and motor/suction control slider to turn it down on delicate surfaces, and like said all the tools are right there on the back of the vac.
Now not saying if I found a smokin deal on a good Kirby or Royal upright I wouldn't get it but the canister, especially that 4650, I think does as nice a job as any of the Kirbys I remember using, though it has been a long time. Plus the better canisters seem to be all over used for cheaper then the uprights, though the old school Royals and others can be just as much depending on how fond the seller is of them.
We also had a rebadged Tristar I remember that worked very well and was just cool looking and the bag was easy to change, dump, clean. It also had a pretty good power head though not as nice as that latest Royal I found.


Post# 331861 , Reply# 12   8/16/2015 at 20:27 (3,168 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
I love to use a good upright on the carpets, but they are room rugs?? so after that there is over half the house still not cleaned, need a hose! Happy I have both of course.On the long weekly clean it's a cannister/ powerhead so I can do it all.Used to take me half a day, now I am done, as in tired of it at about 2 hours.

Post# 331862 , Reply# 13   8/16/2015 at 20:31 (3,168 days old) by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)        
"To Each His Own"

electrolux137's profile picture
Post# 331863 , Reply# 14   8/16/2015 at 20:31 (3,168 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
We were always upright vacuum people in our family.

gottahaveahoove's profile picture

Although I know attachments aren't the strongest,   for everyday,  they're fine.

  However,  for canister cleaning, I DO appreciate the Constellation.. great suction,  great tools, etc. I have  a Connie plugged in at all times,  ready to go.  I even like the Celebrity..... looks like a crushed, (compressed) Connies......... excellent suction,  large bag,  Ultraflex hose (L O V E that hose), etc.

 John


Post# 331864 , Reply# 15   8/16/2015 at 20:40 (3,168 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
Our whole family was canisters! One had a Kirby, my first play with an upright.

Post# 331866 , Reply# 16   8/16/2015 at 21:03 (3,168 days old) by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)        

electrolux137's profile picture
~
~

I like the Constellation and Celebrity machines very much, although the Celebrity makes an awful racket. But it's really cool looking -- just like a classic flying saucer from a 1950s UFO film!

I've had a few different machines come and go over the years. Currently I have one Celebrity (orange "economy model") and three Constellations -- orange, turquoise and yellow (the one that's tilted). The turquoise is my favorite although I really like the tilted look of the yellow one.

(Sorry, being more a Kirby & Electrolux kind of guy, I don't know the model numbers of very many Hoovers.)


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 16         View Full Size
Post# 331870 , Reply# 17   8/16/2015 at 22:51 (3,168 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
You've got to love

gottahaveahoove's profile picture

Miss Connie Hoover.  Here are a few of mine.


Post# 331879 , Reply# 18   8/17/2015 at 05:35 (3,168 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

Personally, I find you get far more flexibility with a cannister vacuum. Going from hard floors, to thick carpet, to stairs, to upholstery, to dusting, to cleaning the car all without having to change machines. I don't think I've found a surface yet that can't be vacuumed with a cannister.

 

Uprights are far better for larger areas of carpet. Of course, over the years, uprights have developed dramatically in terms of on-board tools for above floor cleaning, but I find using an upright for hose use can be quite cumbersome.

 

At home, I usually have both an upright and a cylinder on the go for various jobs. The urpright is my go-to quick clean up machine. The wider cleaning head and upright position make a nice mid-week tidy up very quick and easy. But when it comes to doing the big clean up on the weekend when I do all the dusting and vacuum behind the furniture, the cylinder and all the tools come out to play.


Post# 331884 , Reply# 19   8/17/2015 at 06:37 (3,168 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
In my opinion, an upright is best used for carpeting and nothing else. A canister is much easier to use for all other cleaning tasks.

Combination vacs (power nozzle canisters and uprights with onboard tools) end up compromising cleaning effectiveness and ease of use in an attempt to merge the two devices. They are also heavier and bulkier and complicated and over-engineered and more prone to have problems.

For me, it's much easier to start cleaning a room with a suction only canister from top to bottom - even getting rid of surface litter on carpet with the carpet nozzle. Then I use my low-amp lightweight fan-first upright to finish the room by deep cleaning the carpet from far end to door - backing out as I go along.

So much easier to clean with a pair of vacs like this.


Post# 331889 , Reply# 20   8/17/2015 at 09:56 (3,168 days old) by RainbowD4C (Saint Joseph, Michigan )        
In my own opinion.

rainbowd4c's profile picture
I think that a canister with a good power nozzle, and long hose it just as effective as an upright. I hardly use my Shark. I use it mostly if the pet hair is to much for the Rainbow, or if I just don't feel like fumbling with the water tank. I have a huge livingroom and I can vacuum the entire living room and maybe only move the Rainbow twice if I'm just doing the carpets. If I'm doing the furniture and knocking cobwebs then I am more prone to move the vacuum a little more keeping it close to me.

Post# 331890 , Reply# 21   8/17/2015 at 10:19 (3,168 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

I think that a canister with a good power nozzle, and long hose it just as effective as an upright

I agree! In some cases, I think a PN cylinder is better as cylinder/canister vacs tend to generate more suction than uprights.

I personally couldn't be bothered with having to lug 2 machines around the house during a clean up.


Post# 331903 , Reply# 22   8/17/2015 at 16:17 (3,168 days old) by luxman107 (USA )        

How do you do above the floor cleaning or hard surface floors without a canister?

Post# 331906 , Reply# 23   8/17/2015 at 16:47 (3,168 days old) by pinkge (Indianapolis,Indiana)        
canister cleaning...

I use my GE Pink and coral 1955 for cleaning my home.Has very strong suction and love the dusting tool to do my dusting,and the flip rug/floor tool cleans my carpets and floors very well.
Michael


Post# 331910 , Reply# 24   8/17/2015 at 16:59 (3,168 days old) by Vinvac (Dubuque IA)        

vinvac's profile picture
I like using a canister simply because my house is small and changing attachments on my Kirby can be challenging for space issues.

I would put my Ultimate G up against any of my canisters as far as tool suction and cleaing performance.

I use my Super J or Lux Special most of the time when using a canister.

My daily cleaning team would be my Oreck Platinum XL and the Buster B canister. I added the wheel kit and love it for the size of our home.



Post# 331912 , Reply# 25   8/17/2015 at 17:06 (3,168 days old) by bikerray (Middle Earth)        

bikerray's profile picture
I use a canister (Electrolux, Rexair or Rainbow) for above floor cleaning and an upright (Kirby or Hoover) for the carpeting.

As to just an upright, ever tried running a Kirby over the books in a bookshelf? That brushroll doesn't help the book jackets at all.


Post# 331915 , Reply# 26   8/17/2015 at 17:29 (3,168 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
My team of choice right now each weigh under 20lbs: my white Miele S8 FreshAir canister with spotlight handle, and my Hoover Platinum Bagged upright. I am finding the team to be excellent performers! Quiet, powerful and really easy to use. And they both take up no more room than a power nozzle canister in my closet....

I really dislike deep cleaning carpet with a power nozzle canister: I like to work from far end backwards to doorway and with a canister this is very difficult to do as you are constantly pushing the unit backwards behind you with your foot. Canisters are meant to be pulled behind you....so not the best set up for leaving behind a nicely groomed plush carpet with no footprints...:-)


Post# 331919 , Reply# 27   8/17/2015 at 17:58 (3,168 days old) by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)        
For pinkge...

electrolux137's profile picture
~
~

My maternal grandmother had a pink G.E. Whenever we'd go visit her I wanted to use it but she wouldn't let me. "It's not a toy," she would admonish. Instead, I had to content myself with her dumb ol' Bissell carpet sweeper.

I've had a couple of them over the years; the one in the photos was the nicest. Alas, it was a victim of our great exodus from our former apartment of nearly 20 years. I had to make some very hard decisions as to what could come along.

P.S.: My other grandmother had a Roll-Easy, which she was all too happy to let me use to my heart's content!


CLICK HERE TO GO TO electrolux137's LINK


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 4         View Full Size
Post# 331923 , Reply# 28   8/17/2015 at 20:32 (3,167 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
Beautiful pink GE! And right on topic, too!

Why? Because it had a neat feature by which you could push the vac out of the way by hooking the carpet nozzle onto a hook in the canister's dolly and push the unit with the wand assembly - no bending required! :-)


Post# 331925 , Reply# 29   8/17/2015 at 20:42 (3,167 days old) by electrolux137 (Los Angeles)        

electrolux137's profile picture
~
~

Like this ... :)


  View Full Size
Post# 331936 , Reply# 30   8/18/2015 at 00:01 (3,167 days old) by spiraclean (UK)        

spiraclean's profile picture
Canister with PN for me too. Previously I always had an upright for carpets, and a suction-only canister for everything else, but find the all-in-one approach more convenient because I can go from one task to another on the fly without switching from one cleaner to another.



Post# 331949 , Reply# 31   8/18/2015 at 05:22 (3,167 days old) by Mike81 ()        
Canister for me

My apartment is small and has a lot of tight/shallow places so canister with the powerhead is natural choice for me. I have about 50/50 carpet/hard floors. My only complaint is that i don't like using the powerhead on the bare floors. It's just too clumsy. Light parquet nozzle is far easier to use on bare floors.
My carpeted area is free of obstacles, so I would love to add upright to my collection. It's just that here in the Finland all vacuum cleaners for sale are canisters. Except Kirby which cost FAR too much for me. I sure would love to own one.


Post# 331965 , Reply# 32   8/18/2015 at 10:52 (3,167 days old) by sptyks (Skowhegan, Maine)        
I live in an apartment...

sptyks's profile picture

that is quite spacious and carpeted throughout except bathroom and kitchen.

 

I convert my Kirby Sentria to canister mode and do all of my above floor cleaning first and then use the bare floor nozzle for kitchen and bathroom, then I convert it back to an upright which takes less than a minute, and vacuum all of the carpet. I find that the suction through the hose is more than adequate for my above floor cleaning.


Post# 331968 , Reply# 33   8/18/2015 at 12:06 (3,167 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
Easy and quick for me to convert the Kirby to canister mode, however I don't find it very pleasant to use this way or handy.Hose short and down low, bag, even folded still clumsy, suction, well air flow is good anyway and on hi the noise is not very relaxing. It works, just not how I want to use a Kirby

Post# 331975 , Reply# 34   8/18/2015 at 14:10 (3,167 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Today's "Vacuum of the Day"

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
is my perfect canister.

Post# 331979 , Reply# 35   8/18/2015 at 15:36 (3,167 days old) by kenkart ()        
CONSTELLATION

I love the ones that are "angled", like this one.

Post# 332014 , Reply# 36   8/19/2015 at 04:38 (3,166 days old) by Mike81 ()        

I am trying to survive with these.
Now I am trying to decide which canister is for the powerhead.


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 2         View Full Size
Post# 332022 , Reply# 37   8/19/2015 at 07:43 (3,166 days old) by chad (texas)        
Above floor cleaning

I reckon I actually do have a canister vacuum. I've got a 5 horsepower rigid shop vac that I use around the house. It converts to a leaf blower that I use to blow the webs and dust off of the ceilings and walls. Then after it all settles I vacuum it up. Gotta love bein a bachelor. I'm also one of the few fellers that has compressed air quick connects in every room in my house. It's more handy than you would ever think.

Post# 332025 , Reply# 38   8/19/2015 at 08:43 (3,166 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
Yep that says bachelor for sure! Wow, I thought I had handy crap around

Post# 332210 , Reply# 39   8/21/2015 at 20:45 (3,163 days old) by fan-of-fans (USA)        

fan-of-fans's profile picture
I guess because I grew up around them, that I've always liked canisters best. I like how they can go from cleaning carpets and floors to furniture, walls, ceilings, etc. I have never found an upright that was especially good for above floor cleaning. It always seems the suction is either weak, or the hose fights and pulls the machine over on me. And canisters are easier to pull around than trying to move the upright while using the hose, and constantly worrying that it is going to tip over and break something.

Not that I don't like uprights, I really like my Eureka 1934A for doing the carpets. In fact, I probably like it better than even a power nozzle canister for doing just that. But if I'm going to do a full vacuuming, I often use a power nozzle canister.


Post# 332221 , Reply# 40   8/22/2015 at 00:51 (3,163 days old) by Sries (Tacoma WA)        
I love canisters but...

sries's profile picture
I have a house with lots and lots of doors and door ways. It doesn't have a very open floor plan. So I'm always afraid I'm going to pull my canister around a corner and scratch the paint all up! I get very parinoid while cleaning my house sometimes. And it doesn't help that 80% of my house is hard wood floors. :) So sometimes I just use a broom. And I use an upright for the carpets.

Post# 332261 , Reply# 41   8/22/2015 at 17:14 (3,163 days old) by kirbylux77 (London, Ontario, Canada)        
Versatility & Power

kirbylux77's profile picture
That's what it boils down to for me. Yes, I have uprights & use & like them too. But for a apartment dweller like myself, especially when you have small closets, a PN canister is better than a upright. Especially if the apartment has cramped rooms with lots of furniture in them....much easier to get in between a coffee table & couch in a small room with a canister, as well as underneath furniture such as beds.

Also, the fact that a canister can do hard floors easier & much better is a HUGE advantage. Uprights, even if you use a floor brush with the upright's hose & wand, they are more awkward to clean hard floors with, & their motors don't produce as much suction as a canister either. And here in Ontario, it seems the trend with apartments is when they get renovated, hard floors of some kind or other gets put in instead of carpet, so there is a VERY REAL chance if I move tomorrow I may not be able to make use of a upright.

Speaking of suction power, that's another advantage a PN canister offers over a upright....the canister motors are larger & produce much more airflow & suction. Let's see a upright try & match the 100" Waterlift that a Miele canister produces, or the 116" Waterlift the new Aerus Guardian Platinum canister produces. Most clean air uprights today produce around 80" to 85" Waterlift. I do have a phobia about dirt embedded in carpets....if I move tomorrow into a fully carpeted apartment, I am more confident that a PN canister will remove a previous tenant's dirt more thoroughly before using a carpet extractor than a clean air upright.

All those reasons for me is why a canister rules the roost in my daily cleaning routine.

Rob


Post# 332270 , Reply# 42   8/22/2015 at 21:06 (3,162 days old) by kenkart ()        
RE Airflow and suction..

Actually, a open fan upright moves more air than most any canister,for instance, a NSS Pig with a dirty air open fan design has poor suction, but tremendous airflow.The highest airflow canisters were the Sunbeam Dual Deluxe and the Apex Strato Cleaner, the reason was they had one large fan, more air can be moved by one fan than with two, the extra distance and turns the air has to make with 2 fans cuts down the airflow, but increases the suction, for example, a 2 speed Filter Queen pulls around 100 to 105 inches of waterlift, but put a Baird airflow meter on it, and it only pulls it back about 3/4 of the way, a Apex Strato Cleaner I have from 1957 pulls about 85 inches of waterlift, but will snatch the airflow indicator all the way back with an audible snap, as will the Kirby upright, while the Kirby has MUCH more airflow than most canisters it has relatively poor suction.

Post# 332293 , Reply# 43   8/23/2015 at 07:50 (3,162 days old) by Mike81 ()        
Airflow and suction

There is one (what I know of) one modern canister vac with good airflow and especially suction.
Philips PerformerPro FC9193 has astounding 500 airwatts which is some kind of benchmark for canisters.
It was tested by Finnish Consumer Reports and they reported slightly over 500 airwatts. It was measured from the hose end. Hose in it is much larger in diameter than typical canister.
Airflow 108 cfm (51 l/s)
Suction 145 inches of water (36 kpa)
Many manufacturers only show measurements from straight from the motor which doesn't really tell the truth.

Now this beast is gone thanks to the new EU regulations.


  View Full Size
Post# 332295 , Reply# 44   8/23/2015 at 08:22 (3,162 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

"
Now this beast is gone thanks to the new EU regulations. "

I sense dissapointment, if not more. Powerful as the cleaning may have been (I have no reason to disbelieve you), it does not tell the story of how good the machine was at cleaning.

Washing machines here in the UK can heat water to 90 degrees, but that doesn't mean it is the right thing for all laundry. Our cars can go over 100 miles per hour, but on many roads it's not safe to go over 30mph. The power behind something does not indicate how well it does it's job.


Post# 332305 , Reply# 45   8/23/2015 at 12:37 (3,162 days old) by Mike81 ()        

Yes exactly.
My point was that there is (or was) modern canisters that have good airflow + suction. Compared to weaker straight suction canisters this makes it to pick up more far away from the nozzle and especially from the high pile delicate carpets are cleaned deeper. Delicate carpet can't always take agitation from the brush roll. But this suction combined with the good full size powerhead would make this Philips one great deep cleaner.
And yes I don't like how the EU regulates how powerful vacuums we can have.


Post# 332317 , Reply# 46   8/23/2015 at 14:57 (3,162 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Hi again. But that's what I was saying too - does the power you describe have any statistics to prove it cleaned better?

Post# 332320 , Reply# 47   8/23/2015 at 15:30 (3,162 days old) by Mike81 ()        

It would clean better if the weaker vacuum would have similar floor nozzle. For example vacuuming heavy cat litter or grit, weaker vacuum takes more slow passes to get everything up.
This is my own experience. I use same nozzles for all vacuums I test.
Maybe I should make a video of it.
I forgot to mention that my parents have that Philips what I mentioned.
But like I said, these are my own opinions, not absolute truth.


Post# 332326 , Reply# 48   8/23/2015 at 17:17 (3,162 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
In my most recent Which magazine, Electrolux have a new washing machine on the market that claims the old energy efficiency labels have to be rewritten... I didn't read it carefully but only noticed the title in the magazine.

Speaking as one who has bought quite a lot of new EU law passed "eco" vacs though, I do notice a difference between some brands and previously high models versus new eco versions. The higher powered ones are a bit more powerful, even in the lower bands.

The one aspect that I love about cylinder vacs though is the simple fact that they come with an auto cord rewind. Not many uprights in the UK have auto cord rewinds.


Post# 332335 , Reply# 49   8/23/2015 at 18:23 (3,162 days old) by Vintagerepairer (England)        

Sebo Fan, I have the last 2 Which? magazines here, if you can let me know where the article was I will look it up (I can't see it having looked already). Energy ratings were flawed from the outset and I said as much when they were first introduced about 20 years ago. Having an alphabetic system immediatly restricted the grading to no more than 26, and was made worse by beginning it at "G" as the worst and ending with "A" as the best.

Appliances were set to improve on performance year on year, and that was one of the main purposes of having the energy rating systems. I always thought that it should have been numeric, starting at 10 and going down to 1 as the worst for appliances on sale at the point where the scheme was introduced. From 10 the numbers could go on into infinity, the higher the number, the more efficient the machine was. There would have been none of this A+++ that we are seeing now.

To return to vacuum cleaners, I too liked the automatic cordwinders on cylinders, though of course there are so many reasons why they have been left off uprights, some of which include extra weight, the need to make the cleaner larger, the fact that manual cord hooks work well on an upright, and I do know of instances where people have been physically harmed by a 13amp plug whizzing back into the cleaner at waist level!


Post# 332363 , Reply# 50   8/24/2015 at 03:27 (3,161 days old) by vacuumlover (UK)        

I personally prefer uprights but I do use canisters.

It's far easier to switch from carpet to hardfloor, as Chris stated.Another reason I use them is because I don't like using uprights on hardfloors or stairs.

Sometimes they're far easier to move around in in awkward places.


Post# 332364 , Reply# 51   8/24/2015 at 04:48 (3,161 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

I agree with Benny - just because a clean has more suction does not automatically mean it will clean better. Sometimes, less is more and stronger suction can often by too strong and make the cleaner difficult to use.

For hard floors, above floor and upholstery cleaning, you only need low suction and a good dusting tool anyway. Carpets may require more, but again, this doesn't have to be enough suction to suck the papaer off the walls. You don't get dust mites wearing little seatbelts and clinging on for dear life.

I recently got a 700w Miele C3 ElectroComfort. Even with the straight suction AirTeq floorhead, it cleans carpets and hard floors perfectly. Certainly no less than my 1600w C2 Cat and Dog. Yes, it's true that it doesn't have the same amount of suction as the 1600w model, but it still cleans just as well.


Post# 332366 , Reply# 52   8/24/2015 at 06:20 (3,161 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
I just thought of another reason I prefer uprights to power nozzle canisters for cleaning carpet: the size of the bag. Most classic fan-first uprights have bags larger than canisters, and these large bags can handle the large amounts of fluff and embedded dirt brought up by a revolving brush. My Hoover Platinum Lightweight bagged vac has a HUGE bag - only need to change it 3 or 4 times per year. Suction only canisters don't need such large bags for the surface litter they are collecting. The smaller bags allow for smaller canister units that are easier to carry up onto stairs and counters and into car interiors.

Post# 332377 , Reply# 53   8/24/2015 at 10:23 (3,161 days old) by kirbylux77 (London, Ontario, Canada)        
Brian

kirbylux77's profile picture
Good point about the size of the dust bags on fan-first uprights. However, there's a disadvantage to that - poor suction & airflow. Go ahead & open up your Hoover & see the fan on it, the fans on these 8 lb cleaners are pathetically small, they really don't produce much airflow to properly clean with. The one exception being the Tacony 8 lb uprights, those do have a proper fan in them. These 8 lb uprights rely primarily on the cleaner's brushroll to do the majority of the work.

The other major disadvantage with fan-first cleaners, the ones where the fan is mounted to one side, motor pulley on the other side & dirt tube on the side, is even when using HEPA Cloth bags the suction & airflow drop off really quick with hardly any dirt in the bag. Try using a Hoover Elite, (fan first) Dirt Devil Featherlite or Oreck XL with a HEPA bag in it, you'll be lucky if you can get the bag 1/3rd full before it's lost 70% of it's power. At that point, the brushroll is just grinding the dirt back into the carpet. The only fan-first uprights I have found you can pack the bag right full is the Kirby & Royal Metal uprights, it seems that fan-first uprights that have the fan positioned in the centre & the dirt tube right in the middle of the nozzle seem to maintain their power better. I would suspect the same could be said of the Eureka F&G uprights & Hoover Convertible, but haven't used either extensively to know for sure. The Eureka F&G's & Hoover Convertible's flaw, however, are those round belts that seem to last a relatively short time & need constant care & replacement.

Brian, do this little test with your Hoover Platinum - With a new bag, turn the vacuum on high speed, put the vacuum on it's back, & put your hand close to the dirt tube on the powerhead, you can feel the airflow rushing into the dirt tube. Then when your bag is 1/3rd to 1/2 full, do that same test, you'll notice the airflow has dropped off considerably. Then, when the bag is full & ready to be changed, go ahead & borrow your Mom's Kenmore canister....with a clean bag in the Kenmore, & after vacuuming with the Hoover with a full bag, run the Kenmore over the same areas. I think you'll be disgusted with what your Hoover has left behind & I wouldn't be surprised if the bag was at least 1/4 full of dirt & carpet fibers your Hoover wasn't picking up.

Rob


Post# 332379 , Reply# 54   8/24/2015 at 10:49 (3,161 days old) by Mike81 ()        
Turbo500

My original point was that there is canisters that produce massive airflow. I said it because some people think only dirty air uprights can do it. Somehow conversation went out of track.
I agree that you don't need "super suction" to clean well. If the floor nozzle is designed well. We are already seeing new design floorheads for the low wattage vacuums which makes them perform just as good as high wattage vacs.
And what it comes to my own vacuums. I just sold my bagless Electrolux U.performer with 2100 watt motor.
Now I have just old vacuums. Late 80's Volta U258 and early 90's AEG Vampyr 402. Both have "only" 1000w motor. I actually like them more than modern vacs and suction on those certainly isn't weak. I am more than happy for the cleaning results both can produce.
I use Miele powerhead on my carpeting.


  View Full Size
Post# 332389 , Reply# 55   8/24/2015 at 12:28 (3,161 days old) by sptyks (Skowhegan, Maine)        

sptyks's profile picture

One thing I prefer about Fan First uprights like Royal and Kirby is that they have wider floor nozzles than most canister power heads and with large areas of open wall to wall carpet, this translates to fewer passes to clean the same area of carpet. Also I find that my back hurts more when I use a canister with power nozzle as I seem to be more bent over and applying some pressure to get the power nozzle to deep clean better. Maybe it's because I'm used to the Tech Drive on my Sentria. I feel like my carpet is cleaner when I use my Kirby Sentria. 

 

The canister I used was a fairly new 1200 watt Miele that I borrowed from my Brother. I think it was a Classic C1.


Post# 332437 , Reply# 56   8/24/2015 at 21:34 (3,160 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
Thanks for that Rob.

I really am not so sure I need such massive amounts of suction or airflow in an upright: our old Eureka Vanguard Cordaway Box-Top Rugulator 2083 had very little airflow when the hose was attached to the pan converter for above-the-floor cleaning. But it was enough to clean carpets with excellence as most of the work was done by the brush-roll. Later on we had the bottom of the line Eureka Bravo (Elite Clone) which also had wimpy suction but boy could that thing clean carpets !!!! It was lightweight like an Oreck and only had a 7amp motor. But in all cases the top-fill bag was huge and kept cleaning well for many weeks as the top-fill bags filled.

The ability to remove dirt from carpets does not solely depend on suction or airflow - it depends just as much on the design of the brush roll, and the whole design of the cleaning end of the vacuum (wheel adjustment, brush roll cavity, dirt path from carpet to bag). Bag-first power nozzle canisters require the air to travel a long way from carpet to bag, and they are far more sensitive to the volume of dirt collected in the bag to maintain cleaning ability....methinks :-)


Post# 332459 , Reply# 57   8/25/2015 at 06:27 (3,160 days old) by kenkart ()        
The above comment!

Is VERY true, without a good nozzle or brushroll, you just cant clean a rug, A Dyson has a ton of power...but a very poor..IMHO brushroll, A 3 amp 1950s Royal will pull dirt behind one all day, as will a Eureka 260 or a 61-2 or 3 Hoover.

Post# 332526 , Reply# 58   8/25/2015 at 17:15 (3,160 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
VR I have copies June, July, August and September. I can't seem to find it being listed in the magazine. But then its late evening and I'm rather tired. Suffice to say it would have been mentioned because I certainly didn't dream it. You can find out more by visiting Electrolux's link regarding their new washer with claims that the present energy label will have to be "rewritten."

CLICK HERE TO GO TO sebo_fan's LINK


Post# 332725 , Reply# 59   8/29/2015 at 05:01 (3,156 days old) by DaveTranter (Central England, U.K.)        
@ Chad (reply #37)

At risk of hijacking the thread...... 'Compressed air quick-connects in every room'...

KUDOS!!!!!

AND a 5hp shop vac!! You obviously live in the bachelor pad that I dream of!!

I also live in a cross between a house and a machine shop, with a bit of Frankenstein's laboratory thrown in for good measure, but I've never thought to install piped air.... Next year's project, maybe??? Hmmmmm ;-)

All best

Dave T


Post# 332729 , Reply# 60   8/29/2015 at 06:23 (3,156 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

Are we referring to a REAL 5Hp "shop vacuum"?The ones touting this are LOCKED ROTOR "HP"That the shop vac makers love to advertise-not useful motor power!The power drawn in a lab just before it burns out.

Post# 332730 , Reply# 61   8/29/2015 at 06:31 (3,156 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        
Another issue regarding "eco" vacs

sebo_fan's profile picture
One other little issue that seems to be saddling these eco vacuums in my opinion isn't just the lower motors that brands now have to fit by law, but heavier suction only floor heads. I can't abide the double pedal AirTeq pedal on my S8 Ecoline. Far too bulky and far too heavy to push around. I find using any one of Miele's standard suction only combi heads to be just as effective, but Miele are not alone here.

Brands are making adjustments to suction combi floor tools to meet the EU regulations, but without much thought to the owner. The separate farcical floor heads supplied with my Hoover stick vac reinforces that evidence. Difficult to push and not entirely practical when a combi suction floor tool would have been better.

I note that Hoover have already started to replace certain Enigma cylinder vacs with just a single combi floor tool to the nonsense of the carpet nozzle and hard floor rubber wheel nozzle floor heads that were originally supplied.

Meanwhile Miele have started to put out new models with 800 watts with their standard suction floor head as opposed to reliance on the double pedal heavy floor tool instead.


  View Full Size
Post# 332777 , Reply# 62   8/29/2015 at 22:34 (3,155 days old) by chad (texas)        

As far as my shop vac goes.....I don't know if the motor will power a go cart or not. I just know it has a 2'id hose, and would probably suck start a harley. I'm sure the rating probably is at the point of failure. Any idears who makes Ridgids vacuums for them?


Post# 333114 , Reply# 63   9/2/2015 at 22:51 (3,151 days old) by calipilot227 ()        

A canister works better for me, simply because a compact power nozzle can get to places (in my small, cluttered apartment) that a bulky upright cannot.

Post# 333128 , Reply# 64   9/3/2015 at 05:12 (3,151 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
There's a lot of usage in canister vacuums, not least hand held vacuums (corded) with many attachments that some buyers prefer because of the smaller sizes, lighter weight, easier accessibility. Also the prices are generally cheaper for a basic all rounder if you know what you are buying.

Post# 333228 , Reply# 65   9/4/2015 at 15:48 (3,150 days old) by CharlesKirby66 (Manteca, CA)        
Why canisters?

charleskirby66's profile picture
Simple... canisters for everything that is not wall-to-wall carpets, mattresses, and heavy rugs. Wall-to-wall carpets and heavy rugs benefit from having the suction source as close to the carpet and nozzle as possible, thus making an upright a better choice.

Anything that's not porous is easier to clean with a canister. Kirby's Zippbrush attachment gives you the triple-cushioned vibration in canister mode, which is a blessing for sofas, car carpets, comforters, even cleaning lint off of clothes!

I'm glad that I don't have to choose between upright and canister with my Kirbys. I have both units (and more!) in one!


Post# 333278 , Reply# 66   9/5/2015 at 00:38 (3,149 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

I seldom use my Kirbys as "canister" use the canisters in my collection instead.Put the Zipbrush on my NuTone central unit-that brush almost takes off!!!

Post# 333333 , Reply# 67   9/5/2015 at 19:02 (3,149 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Also, canisters in my experience are great for cleaning the car out with. I've tried my Sebo uprights etc or others with hoses that then need extra length extension hoses, but a canister can simply be slotted into the front passenger footwell and then stretched or lifted over to other seats when cleaning close up. So much versatility there, or if leaving it in the boot etc.

Post# 333334 , Reply# 68   9/5/2015 at 19:22 (3,149 days old) by vacuumlad1650 (Wauponsee, IL)        

vacuumlad1650's profile picture
I never knew why i like canisters. I like the convenience of having just one unit with an upright buy a canister is easier to store, clean above floor with, and is overall more maneuverable. I do like uprights, but canisters have more features.

Post# 333341 , Reply# 69   9/5/2015 at 23:12 (3,148 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
Just cleaned for almost 2 hours with canister, extension wand, dusting brush, crevice tool and upholstery tool, all above floor or in cracks, just easier with the canister for me. Miele went to task this time, works fine, quiet too

Post# 333345 , Reply# 70   9/6/2015 at 02:55 (3,148 days old) by tolivac (Greenville,NC)        

Car vacuums-for me its the NuTone 430 with a 40ft hose.The machine stays inside.Same with my newly acquired "Porta Vac" with a ProTeam FS 6 Backpack vacuum fastened to the cart.I use the Porta vac inside for many canister vac chores.Long cord and hose-it gets handier all the time.I dusted off an older ProTeam Backpack-PV100 and use it more now.Just have to avoid those "Bump into tragedies"!

Post# 333706 , Reply# 71   9/11/2015 at 09:09 (3,143 days old) by n0oxy (Saint Louis Missouri, United States)        
canisters all the way for me

I use canisters, either portable or a central vacuum because of their flexibility. I don't have any carpet, but even if I did, having a canister with a power nozzle should clean as well as an upright, and in some way better since it's much easier to get under beds and other furniture. So far, I have not seen any uprights that will do above the floor cleaning as well as canisters. Canisters provide more suction and air flow through hoses, and will not tip over the way uprights can. Sometimes I will use one of my central vacuum power units, and sometimes I will pull out one of my portable canisters. As far as cleaning floors other than carpet, here is a link to the best nozzle in my opinion. It doesn't use a brush, but it gets the suction really close to the floor. I've tried several hard floor nozzles, and nothing even comes close to this one.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO n0oxy's LINK


Post# 333712 , Reply# 72   9/11/2015 at 10:56 (3,143 days old) by Mike81 ()        

Wessel-Werk RD285 hard floor nozzle you had in the link looks excellent! I would love to try one.
My choice for hard floors is Twinner. Its design is from 90's and it's still in sale.


CLICK HERE TO GO TO Mike81's LINK


  View Full Size
Post# 333724 , Reply# 73   9/11/2015 at 15:45 (3,143 days old) by n0oxy (Saint Louis Missouri, United States)        
twinner

The twinner sounds interesting, but it sounds like it still uses pads which may need to be cleaned or replaced. The wessel werk nozzle has nothing that really needs to be cleaned, although it is dishwasher safe. With the wessel werk nozzle, I can easily get in to corners and around edges. I would suggest anyone looking for a good hard floor nozzle to get one, I do have several other hard floor brushes in my collection but I have never used them since I got this. Apparently it won a design award, and I can definitely understand why.

Post# 333745 , Reply# 74   9/12/2015 at 06:35 (3,142 days old) by Mike81 ()        

Those pads will wear down over time, but they sell replacement pad package when they do.
When you go to the shop where twinner is for sale there is always pad package next to it. One way to keep the profit coming for twinner company. That is something I don't like.
I got to mention that when twinner first came out in the 90's it changed the whole canister vacuuming experience for Finnish (and for other north coyntry) people.
I remember when my parents got their first twinner. They praised it to heaven, but over time they got a bit frustrated replacing pads. They also used it for the rugs.
Wessel-Werk RD285 seems better and there is one nozzle what look quite similiar.





Post# 334157 , Reply# 75   9/17/2015 at 19:09 (3,137 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
As far as I know, Menalux are a trader company who sell a lot of Electrolux based tools. It might be different elsewhere. I like the Twinner but I'm less of a fan of the Wessel Werk RD285. Hoover sent me one to try when I moaned about the awful hard floor tool I got with my Hoover stick vac. It is marginally better but it is no way a good combination tool as the marketing suggests. I sent it back.

It is just about fit for hard floors.
Much prefer the older Parquet brush nozzle without advancing waves set into the design.

Interestingly though both SEBO's Deluxe Parquet floor tool and their Kombi Deluxe tools have almost four way air flow channels, so they suck the dust in from a bit more than just the front. I have also used my Kombi floor tool many a time without adjusting from carpet to hard floor and it rolls with no damage on hard floors.


Post# 334403 , Reply# 76   9/21/2015 at 15:37 (3,133 days old) by n0oxy (Saint Louis Missouri, United States)        
wessel werk nozzle on carpet

I have not tried my wessel werk rd 285 on carpets, since I only have hard floors and it works great for that. Actually, even if I had carpets, I would not use that nozzle, for carpets, I would only use a power nozzle with a spinning brush, for carpets, nothing else would do nearly as well probably.

Post# 335221 , Reply# 77   10/5/2015 at 00:56 (3,119 days old) by KIRBYDOG ()        
Upright for Older Wool Carpeting

Who would believe that such a simple question would produce such a large number of responses!

I recently learned that for vacuuming "Persian" carpets and Wool wall to wall carpeting, a vacuum that had strong suction ONLY was to be used. So, I have not done right by my wool bedroom carpeting or the living room "Persian" 9' x 12' rug!! I was using a less powerful Eureka canister (with the power head "on"), so some damage was done. I switched to a "new" Hoover Windtunnel upright with the ability to turn off the brush and just "suck" up dirt. My, my! What a difference. The "Persian" nap just came right up; "fluffy", so to speak. BUT, the canister design would allow me to have an easier to use hose and/or head arrangement. So, I agree that having at least one of each is effective.

Does anyone have a suggestion for a "vintage" vacuum that is strong enough to refresh the nap on wool, but avoid pulling the carpet off the floor? My inherited Rainbow DID lift the fancy non-wool carpet and left me with wrinkles in two places. Kicking the carpet got me nowhere!!


Post# 335273 , Reply# 78   10/5/2015 at 20:02 (3,119 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)        
I love canister vacs!!

durango159's profile picture
I have 1 upright and about 8 canisters to my personal collection. But I have 3 other uprights that I'll be selling and 2 other canister vacs that I'll be selling. All of my canister vacuums are electric power nozzle equipped. I don't do straight suction only machines because my favorite part of a vacuum cleaner is the brush roll!!

I usually vacuum a room moving backwards towards the entrance. Therefore, I've just gotten very accustomed to wheeling the suction unit back with my foot while concentrating on deep cleaning with power nozzle. With a good designed cleaning head and system I've never had a problem with cleaning power. I used to live in a home that 2 Kirby G4's in addition to some others. I took care of her vacuums for her. The Kirby brush rolls were adjusted properly for wear according to numbers on end caps, belts were in good shape, bags were genuine Kirby and in good shape and machine was clean. I've watched Kirby videos about going one position deeper after hearing brush roll touch carpet as well. But several times after doing a room with her Kirby, I went back over it later with one of my Hoover power team canisters. The room didn't look groomed enough by the Kirby and I felt the Hoover left it cleaner! I also didn't appreciate the Kirby self propel sending my arm back so rapidly into filing cabinets and doors many a time.

I love carpet lines and grooming patterns although the rake like pattern from a baseplate of a Shark doesn't excite me as much! I'd rather see the agitator pattern than the base plate rake.

A primary reason why I prefer a power nozzle canister vacuum to an upright is that when maneuvering around furniture and behind things the only thing I have to push around is the power head that is at maximum about 3.5" high and then the wand is less than 1.75" with the pigtail cord and connectors. I don't like the bulk being pushed around with a heavy upright. I find the bulky upright always getting caught on various things or rubbing along furniture and with a soft bag machine that rubbing can cause a dust cloud emission. Just look at the pictures below- all you have to maneuver into tight obstacles is that super thin wand and it can be used with handle at numerous angles to make fitting into really tight areas fairly possible!

In addition to less bulk and easier maneuvering around obstacles a canister vac makes vacuuming under beds possible under the reclining sofas- cause I always open those out while vacuuming around sofa and many other areas. I can change from power nozzle to attachment mode in just a few seconds to grab something along a wall or cobweb up high, etc. Stairs are tremendously easier to do with a canister vac. Generally I use the upholstery nozzle on my steps but I've also just used the power nozzle on the stairs and then went back over the edges with crevice tool.

Just many options on a canister that I prefer over an upright. Now I do still like uprights and can see why many like them but for me my preference is canister. For every one time my upright gets used I've probably used a canister with power nozzle about 20 other times!!

Also big hefty Kirbys have a built in self propelled system in addition to self propelled Windtunnel and Eureka had one years back. Well every good power nozzle I've ever used the brush roll is the self propel system!!

That's just my 2 cents!


  Photos...       <              >      Photo 1 of 6         View Full Size
Post# 335305 , Reply# 79   10/6/2015 at 09:19 (3,118 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)        

suckolux's profile picture
Totally agree! Well put there! I will use an upright for a quick clean, but then later in the day I find myself wondering what I have missed!

Post# 335353 , Reply# 80   10/7/2015 at 08:56 (3,117 days old) by jodan3399 (Brownsville, PA)        

I love my vintage tri-stars canisters. Just so much easier for me to switch attachments and maneuver.

I think it's just a matter of preference and how you use them.




Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy