Thread Number: 28905  /  Tag: Recent Vacuum Cleaners from past 20 years
Cyclonic vacuums vs Filter in bin vacuums
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 323086   4/23/2015 at 18:37 (3,262 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        

OK, I have been thinking about this for quite some time...
I never really seen a FIB (Filter in bin) vacuum with a burnt out motor, the actual filter is like nowhere but in the bin, quite a good idea for increasing the life of a vacuum because it is being maintained when it is being emptied, a bit like a bagged vacuum. The filter gets cleaned as you empty it, but it's bloody messy.

Cyclonic vacuums are excellent for constant power. Dyson for example, people don't really wash the filters on theirs, hence why so many burnt out motors are becoming a problem. It's like using a FIB vacuum without emptying it
Cyclonic vacuums are more hygienic to empty due to lack of filter tapping/brushing etc. Boom goes the motor after a couple of years, the filters stay cleaner for much longer on a cyclonic machine though.

I have seen not many, but dozens of Dyson DC04's with burnt out motors when they use the same motor as a Henry. Henry's hardly burn out (great engineering of Britain here from both Dyson and Numatic, but I recall the Ametek DC01 motors saying "Ametek Italia"?) Anyways that's that
I would be happy to own a Vax v-006 170W Turboforce


Post# 323094 , Reply# 1   4/23/2015 at 19:31 (3,262 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
I'm confused. What do you mean by a filter in the bin? Do you mean like the type where Vax used to fit twist to remove paper pleated cones that sits centre of the plastic bin with a top lid that has to be taken off and the dirt flies past the filter when the bin is spilt into a refuse bin? It doesn't really get cleaned if the dirt is flying past it...The paper pleated cone is supposed to be removed and brushed clean, but it still won't be as clean as the paper pleated HEPA cartridge that usually sits in front of a motor exhaust on a bagged vac.

IME cyclonic vacs are not great for "constant power." Not even Dyson in my experience. Prolonged yes, but not constant. You know yourself that all cyclonic vacs are different. Not down to the copied Dual cyclone Dyson method of NLOS filters but rather sealed suction and airflow. A lot of cheap bagless vacs have lousy leaks, Parwaz. Even that Dyson Cinetic that was recently shown from a You Tube video shows dirt in the motor from the Cinetic design.

Cyclonic vacs are NOT "more hygienic" to empty though, either. Until brands start to make cyclonic filters that don't sit so close to the top of the bin, dust like pet hair that sticks to the top that requires it to be agitated to fall to the bottom will forever be required to be removed by hand.

You won't get that in a bagged vacuum.


Post# 323104 , Reply# 2   4/23/2015 at 20:57 (3,262 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)        

niclonnic's profile picture
One notable brand that has the "filter in bin" design is Dirt Devil. Most Dirt Devils have a paper pleated filter in the center of the dirt container. As these filters clog, the vacuum loses suction. When it's time to empty, they are absolutely disgusting to clean. Dust flies all over the place.

Cyclonic vacuums, such as Dyson and Fantom, are excellent in my experience. However, some companies that have copied Dyson's dual cyclonic technology have developed inefficient cyclones that will clog the filter and eventually cause the machine to lose suction.

I find that cyclonic machines with bottom-empty dirt cups leave a little to be desired. A lot of manufacturers have placed the emptying lever near the bottom of the cup. So you have some contact with the dirt as you empty it. They also contain static electricity, so you may be shocked when emptying it. Dyson, on the other hand, has placed the emptying lever near the bin handle, which makes it a lot more hygienic to empty.


Post# 323112 , Reply# 3   4/23/2015 at 23:22 (3,262 days old) by FantomLightning (Ohio)        
IMO...

The Dirt Devil F1 filter set up is actually one of the best I've seen. Due to the cone shape of the filter it does have a weak cyclonic action, spinning heavier dust and debris to the outside of the bin. For what it is it maintains suction incredibly well, better than some cheap dual/multi cyclonic machines I've seen. On top of that the F1 filter is made out of a seemingly softer pleated material than most, you can clean all the dust off with another machines crevice tool in one pass leaving the filter looking new again. The F1 based machines also tend to have super aggressive brushrolls to clean carpet well, I'd chose one over a Dyson any day. In all honesty I've never had an issue with any of my "filtered cyclonic" machines.

Post# 323120 , Reply# 4   4/24/2015 at 02:20 (3,261 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        

I agree with you Narayan, and yes I was referring to that :P lol
I have had no problem with Dyson's constant suction really, even when I vacuumed 4 bottles of Shake n vac the other day, but when it's used for lots plaster etc it can either blow up or lose suction.
The derooted DC07's filters hardly get dirty TBH, even ater 6 months they stay spotless, unless paster or something fine gets sucked up in huge amonts :/


Post# 323129 , Reply# 5   4/24/2015 at 05:58 (3,261 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

There is absolutely no doubt that multi-cyclonic, high efficiency cyclonic vacuums are far superior to single cyclonic, low efficiency, "filter-in-bin" vacuums.

 

I've seen heaps of burnt out single cyclone cleaners over the years. The filter doesn't get cleaned when you empty the bin as Tayyab said. Most of those pleated HEPA filters can't be washed, so unlike a Dyson or high end Vax where one would wash out the filter to maintain it, this can't be done with the cheaper bagless vacuums, so the only option is to bang or brush the dust out of the filter which, aside from being incredibly messy and unhygienic, doesn't remove all the dust.

 

The minute you turn on a bagless cleaner of that design and dust hits the bin, the suction is compromised.


Post# 323131 , Reply# 6   4/24/2015 at 06:17 (3,261 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
"...There is absolutely no doubt that multi-cyclonic, high efficiency cyclonic vacuums are far superior to single cyclonic, low efficiency, "filter-in-bin" vacuums..."

Very true, but at the same time before all this bagless cyclonic design came along, vacuum owners didn't really have to worry about cleaning out dust when a bag contains it all. That's my point in a nutshell.

As consumers we're constantly being told how bagless passes BAF awards as well as being healthy for allergy sufferers using the HEPA filter as the barrier to dust. it simply isn't true at all. Yes, bags do clog but that "cloud of dust" that some brands and models provide due to a lack of dust seal closures is MINIMAL compared to the dust created when emptying a bottom release dust bin, even worse with the filter in the bin idea.


Post# 323134 , Reply# 7   4/24/2015 at 06:23 (3,261 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        

I think the only cyclonic vacuums that work are only dysons though, my ex "mate" has a vax Air 3 and the filters get a chunk of dust on them after several uses

Post# 323135 , Reply# 8   4/24/2015 at 06:28 (3,261 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

Agree completely Nar. I've always, ALWAYS found bagged to be more convenient and more hygenic, even as a 7 year old when I was first playing with DC01's and DC03's, I always thought they were messy.

 

My Mum has a Vax Air reach. Granted, it only get's used upstairs and to clean the car, but she uses it a few times a week and the filters usually last about a month-6 weeks before they need cleaning. Not that she ever cleans it, I always end up doing it for her. Much to my annoyance.


Post# 323136 , Reply# 9   4/24/2015 at 06:30 (3,261 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
IMO it doesn't matter if one or two brands are able to demonstrate that. What Dyson need to develop is a cyclonic shroud that doesn't sit too close to the top of the inner bin. Thus, minimising any clogged dust like pet hair that gets stuck and then needs to be removed by hand when it doesn't come out the first time.

Post# 323138 , Reply# 10   4/24/2015 at 06:39 (3,261 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
Yes Chris, bagged vacs do provide more convenience and hygiene but the general consumer has been fed too much on the "no need to buy bags" Dyson mantra, only to find several months down the line that they are up to their elbows in dust and cleaning filters.

However, with the requirement to clean every day due to pets, I can see the worthwhile point of owning a bagless vacuum. Or in a home that has children playing all the time where dirt is forever going to land on carpets.

I recently sold my Vax Mach Air Reach to a friend in need who has just inherited two rescue dogs. It wasn't a hard task to come to in terms of finding an excuse to keep it; I still have a bagless Hotpoint cylinder vac. It barely gets used unless family members visit with pets on tow and the dirt.dust and pet hair can be emptied after use.

The beauty of bagless is that you CAN empty as you go; same with Gtech sweepers, dust busters et al.

The only similarity with bagged vacuums is that both require brush rolls to be cleaned off when hair gets wrapped around the brush roll; but so many owners tend to forget this and more so if the bagless vac requires the filters to be cleaned again.


Post# 323159 , Reply# 11   4/24/2015 at 11:09 (3,261 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        

I think Dyson should cover half the shroud with plastic, the side where dirt enters the bin and make a shroud with a larger surface area on the other side from the top of the shroud to the bottom, if not about an inch or two less

Post# 323174 , Reply# 12   4/24/2015 at 14:57 (3,261 days old) by Mike81 ()        

I have bagless AEG/Electrolux UltraPerformer/UltraActive and it has just single cyclone.
But I like the design. Cyclone is separate from the canister. That means that dust won't keep spinning in the cyclone. Dust just spins extremely fast through the cyclone and settles down to the bin without clogging the mesh filter in the cyclone. Of course it allows some fine dust go to the filter. For single cyclone it's good if you ask me. I wash the filter about once in a month.
Bin and the cyclone assembly is clear and see through. It's very easy to wash completely.
However I prefer bagged UltraOne. It has the same motor, but has more airflow and suction. It's also quieter.

Cyclone in action:




Post# 323176 , Reply# 13   4/24/2015 at 15:03 (3,261 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
The Hotpoint Trolley vacs use a similar design even though they are not NLOS and also a few Black and Decker hand helds that use that kind of cyclone.

Post# 323190 , Reply# 14   4/24/2015 at 19:12 (3,261 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)        

niclonnic's profile picture
I also have had no problems with Dyson's suction power. My DC07 Animal's filter remained spotless after countless uses. I washed them every 6 months, and the water ran clear each and every time. The only time when the filter got dirty was when my mom vacuumed off an extremely dirty air purifier. There was black dust flying into the canister, and some of it got to the filter. I then washed it, and it never came back to its original color.

10 months ago, my mom bought some Arm & Hammer Carpet Odor Eliminator powder to get rid of the DC07's dog smell. It worked; however the filter dirtied after use. I think some of that powder got to the motor!

We went through the entire box, and now the dog smell is gone! And even better, the Dyson still works beautifully!

As I've stated before, Dyson is the only company to have perfected cyclonic technology.

Below is a pic of my DC07, AKA my old profile pic. My mom now owns it.


  View Full Size
Post# 323192 , Reply# 15   4/24/2015 at 19:32 (3,261 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        

I agree :D

Post# 323195 , Reply# 16   4/24/2015 at 20:18 (3,261 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)        
Sebo_fan

niclonnic's profile picture
I've had to untangle brushrolls on occasion -- clutched Dysons often suffer from this.

A couple of weeks ago, I caught a restaurant employee (her name is Kat) untangling the brushroll on a Bissell stick/hand vac.

Sadly, it's a joy of many vacuum cleaners.


Post# 323206 , Reply# 17   4/24/2015 at 22:33 (3,261 days old) by man114 (Buffalo NY)        

I wouldn't really say Dyson has perfected cyclonic dirt separation, there still is working room. They don't even have the best filtration using the design, The 11 amp Fantom Thunder does the best job by far of dry multi cyclonic separation, probably followed by a well maintained DC07. I think if Dyson had enough airflow rough some of the designs they could do a fantastic job of filtering. I'm fairly convinced you need large airflow through the Cyclones to get good separation.

Post# 323207 , Reply# 18   4/24/2015 at 22:40 (3,261 days old) by FantomLightning (Ohio)        
I'd...

Have to agree. The Fantom machines do seem to have a great balance with the dual cyclonic system they employ. The bin design in the Thunder, and similar shape in the Lightning and Cyclone XT do a great job at keeping larger things like pet hair compressed and moving instead of getting hung up and stopped like in many newer machines.

Post# 323208 , Reply# 19   4/24/2015 at 22:57 (3,261 days old) by man114 (Buffalo NY)        

I'm surprised Euro-pro never attempted to simply make new copies of the Fantoms in China as the patents expired. They would still outperform the Euro-pro designs, they could have easily been modified for pre motor filters. I know the Thunder had a high parts count but the other designs were about half, and with cheap labor, I can't see why they didn't. Churning out $99 Furys would still be a winner.

Post# 323209 , Reply# 20   4/24/2015 at 23:23 (3,261 days old) by FantomLightning (Ohio)        
I'm...

Still amazed they decided to shut Fantom down and start making the Infinity and Shark Navigator machines under their respective names. I would've thought if you were gonna attempt to be the first real Dyson competitor in the US it'd be better to use an established brand like Fantom. The main reason they didn't/couldn't keep making the original machines is all the patents (I don't know if they didn't want them or couldn't get/afford them) went to Westinghouse for the Wired and Unwired machines, but it was only the Fury, Cyclone XT, and the Wildcat as a cordless machine. Even those were pathetic as they used the single cyclonic "Crosswind" designs. God knows what happened in the end to the Thunder.

Post# 323210 , Reply# 21   4/24/2015 at 23:32 (3,261 days old) by mark40511 (Lexington, KY)        
Speaking of Fantom

mark40511's profile picture
I had a Fury in the late 90s. God I hated that vacuum! I never had the Fantom Thunder - I think that came later after the Fantom. The Thunder HAD to be an improvement over the Fury. The one thing I hated about the Fantom (other than emptying a bagless vacuum and dust flying), was the dirt bin seemed to barely have a seal and when vacuuming along, you could actually see dust collecting on the outside of the vacuum.

Post# 323212 , Reply# 22   4/25/2015 at 00:00 (3,261 days old) by FantomLightning (Ohio)        

I haven't had that issue with my Fury, or any of my Fantoms for that matter. The Thunder actually came before the Fury, the model line went like this. Original Fantom, Fantom Thunder (same as the original Fantom but with some cosmetic changes and a HEPA filter as standard), Fury, Lightning, Cyclone XT, Wildcat. The Thunder and Fury both went through motor and cosmetic changes with the Fury having I believe 4 different styling and color changes over it's life, as well as 2 or 3 different amperage motors in the original green model. Later on when Fantom stopped licensing Dysons dual cyclonic system they came out with the Crosswind models, a blue Fury and Cyclone XT with single/filtered cyclonic dust bins and washable electrostatic filters that had originated with the Wildcat. After Fantom went bankrupt the name and trademarks went to Euro-Pro, while the designs of the Crosswind models and the Wildcat went to Westinghouse to be turned into the "Wired" and "Unplugged" machines.

Post# 323220 , Reply# 23   4/25/2015 at 06:17 (3,260 days old) by parwaz786 ( )        

I would like to now of the best upright Dyson that can handle LOADS of hair and can still work well as the only vac being used in a 3 story multi floored (mainly carpeted) house with a large family

Post# 323223 , Reply# 24   4/25/2015 at 07:44 (3,260 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture
So can my SEBO/Task SM2, also known as the SEBO G2 in the U.S...

Post# 323234 , Reply# 25   4/25/2015 at 10:55 (3,260 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)        
Speaking of Fantom...

niclonnic's profile picture
I had a Fantom Fury when I was a little kid. I never got to use it, but I remember watching my mom vacuum with it in our 2-bedroom apartment with dark brown carpeting and 3 cats. I believe it was the 10 amp version, with the dark green collection bin, teal bumper and teal handle grip. I remember the way that the collection bin worked. This was all when I was a very young child, from kindergarten through 1st grade.

Sadly, my family got rid of it when we moved out of our apartment in the summer of 2001. So the Fantom Fury holds a special place in my heart, and I truly feel that it is a masterpiece of a vacuum cleaner.

I would love to find another Fantom Fury. One of these days...


Post# 323273 , Reply# 26   4/25/2015 at 14:23 (3,260 days old) by mark40511 (Lexington, KY)        
I think I confused Thunder with Lightning

mark40511's profile picture
It was Lightning that came after Fury - at any rate, when you connect the dust cup to the vacuum, it never felt snug to me, like it was BARELY there. It was on properly though! So when I would vacuum, I always felt like some of the swirling dirt would escape and you could totally see the outside of the vacuum getting really dusty as you vacuumed. At the time I was living in a duplex that had a back deck and I would always take it outside to empty it into a shopping bag and I also remember this black SCREEN at the top that would always be caked with dirt that you had to clean off. I hated the entire experience with that vacuum......I did like the way it looked though. It was a pretty vacuum with the black and teal.



Post# 323283 , Reply# 27   4/25/2015 at 15:23 (3,260 days old) by niclonnic (Bonney Lake, WA)        
Interesting story!

niclonnic's profile picture
With my Fury, my mom would dump the collection bin into the kitchen trash can after every use. I also remember the screen that would stay in the vacuum when the bin was removed.

You're right, the Fantom Fury was quite a sleek machine. Funny thing is, black and teal are my high school colors!

It's too bad that Fantom went out of business...


Post# 323488 , Reply# 28   4/27/2015 at 18:51 (3,258 days old) by floor-a-matic (somewhere)        

What about bagged cyclonic vacuums like a Compact/TriStar? I think they aren't messy but sanitary to change the paper bag & get cyclonic action that will beat ANY multi-cyclonic vac; & still have great suction/airflow


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy