Thread Number: 28720
/ Tag: Recent Vacuum Cleaners from past 20 years
HOOVER WANTED |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 320518 , Reply# 1   4/5/2015 at 22:44 (3,280 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 320550 , Reply# 2   4/6/2015 at 08:56 (3,280 days old) by suckolux (Yuba City, CA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 320552 , Reply# 3   4/6/2015 at 09:23 (3,280 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
Personally, I would never trade the amazing Hoover model 63 for a 20 year old Eureka Bravo or Hoover Elite. Both are machines made at one of the lowest points in quality - mass produced for Wal-Mart and K-Mart to sell cheap. The Kirby salesmen would trade them in constantly, and we threw all of them away. Even then, they were not worth rebuilding and selling - that's how unreliable they were. Keep the 63, and go to a local vac shop - tell them the next one they get from a trade-in you'll give them $10 for it. They'd rather get $10 than throw it away and get nothing.
Keep the Hoover 63 - it's a very good example of high quality. And one of Hoover's best cleaning machines ever. |