Thread Number: 26960
My Current Vacuums |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 301465 , Reply# 1   10/11/2014 at 13:49 (3,456 days old) by numatic99 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Another shot. I love the reflection of the TurboPowers on the Hitachi! (Excuse the dust, the Hitachi has been living in a shed and havent wiped it over yet!) |
Post# 301466 , Reply# 2   10/11/2014 at 13:50 (3,456 days old) by Marks_here (_._)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
|
Post# 301467 , Reply# 3   10/11/2014 at 13:52 (3,456 days old) by numatic99 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I found it! Pic of my (Soon to be) DC01. The machine is in a very good condition and has been stored in a cupboard all its life! Will wipe the bumper over when I get it. Thats your lot! Chris |
Post# 301469 , Reply# 4   10/11/2014 at 13:57 (3,456 days old) by numatic99 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi Mark! Thanks, I love them all too! I've noticed, the DA001 picture is rather looong, please excuse that, and I've been informed its a DA001. Chris |
Post# 301480 , Reply# 5   10/11/2014 at 15:20 (3,456 days old) by kirbyloverdan (Egg Harbor Twp . NJ aka HOOVERLOVERDAN ❤️)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 301484 , Reply# 6   10/11/2014 at 16:15 (3,456 days old) by kirbylux77 (London, Ontario, Canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 301501 , Reply# 7   10/11/2014 at 19:22 (3,456 days old) by super-sweeper (KSSRC Refurbishment Center)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
|
Post# 301862 , Reply# 8   10/14/2014 at 17:43 (3,453 days old) by kirbylux77 (London, Ontario, Canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Alex, it's NOT false advertising on the Dyson! To my knowledge, unless someone corrects me here, I have yet to see or hear of any vacuum before the Dyson, Amway Cleartrak or Cyclon that was bagless that incorporated the Dual Cyclone technology. James Dyson DID invent it, & was first to bring such a cleaner to market. All other cleaners before it that were bagless had incorporated some sort of filter in their collection bin. And yes that does include Rainbow, since it used water as it's filter. Any bagless vacuum that does incorporate a filter in it's design is not a TRUE bagless vacuum, since it still has the cost involved of replacing the filter to maintain the vacuum, & it still loses power, which is exactly why James Dyson invented bagless vacuums - to prevent loss of cleaning power & save consumers money on bag & filter replacements.
Rob |
Post# 301865 , Reply# 9   10/14/2014 at 18:01 (3,453 days old) by super-sweeper (KSSRC Refurbishment Center)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 301878 , Reply# 10   10/14/2014 at 19:29 (3,453 days old) by kirbylux77 (London, Ontario, Canada)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Rainbow was NOT a True Cyclonic vacuum, Alex. If it WAS a True Cyclonic vacuum, then it would have a shroud & 2nd chamber to separate the fine dust, like a dual cyclonic vacuum, & possibly have multiple cyclones, just like a Dyson Root Cyclone. The Rexair Model A did NOT have any of those elements! All it has is the Separator, same as the Model B has, & it separated the air from the dirt. However, the fine dust would still go thru the separator & into the motor, which is why Tom says Rexair had what he calls a "hepa filter" on it's exhaust, because otherwise it would blow tons of dust in the air. Oh, and also, the Model A was in 1935, NOT 1936. Rexair introduced the Model B in 1936 & added water to it, they needed to add the water to improve the vacuum's filtration. Please kindly get your facts straight before making posts!
Rob |
Post# 301890 , Reply# 12   10/14/2014 at 22:00 (3,452 days old) by super-sweeper (KSSRC Refurbishment Center)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 301961 , Reply# 13   10/15/2014 at 17:01 (3,452 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
"...which is exactly why James Dyson invented bagless vacuums - to prevent loss of cleaning power & save consumers money on bag & filter replacements..."
Whoops Im afraid not! DC01 and thereafter all have replaceable filters that HAVE to be replaced several months down the line. Some were washable but even then they would eventually have to be replaced. I had a DC01 to DC04. The DC03 and 04 were better in terms of longer lasting filters that didn't need replacing as much. But they still had to be purchased and replaced! |