Thread Number: 23542
Dyson dc54 |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 263693   1/17/2014 at 13:00 (3,723 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Everybody look at New Dyson DC 54 has just been released In the United Kingdom At £450 is expensive the the price will probably go down in a year or so It looks like a pretty good vacuum I'll probably sell my Dyson DC 39 to get this As soon it becomes cheaper They do two models in England they do the animal and multifloor It definitely looks amazing Fantastic technology .What do you think of it???
CLICK HERE TO GO TO dys0nb0y's LINK |
Post# 263700 , Reply# 1   1/17/2014 at 14:05 (3,723 days old) by thekirbylover (Warrington, cheshire )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 263709 , Reply# 3   1/17/2014 at 14:28 (3,723 days old) by gsheen (Cape Town South Africa)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 263726 , Reply# 4   1/17/2014 at 16:06 (3,723 days old) by parwaz786 ( )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
OO I would love to get a cheap one in 10 years time and use it for PLASTER DUST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bagless henry with the ugly looks |
Post# 263728 , Reply# 5   1/17/2014 at 16:21 (3,723 days old) by madabouthoovers ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Now in Currys - £460 but they are out of stock, surprise surprise CLICK HERE TO GO TO madabouthoovers's LINK |
Post# 263737 , Reply# 6   1/17/2014 at 16:47 (3,722 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Does look cool, but I'll wait for it to be £13.56 worth of winning bid on ebay to have a play! Or go to currys/john lewis and have a play... |
Post# 263781 , Reply# 7   1/17/2014 at 20:15 (3,722 days old) by super-sweeper (KSSRC Refurbishment Center)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 263815 , Reply# 9   1/17/2014 at 23:34 (3,722 days old) by super-sweeper (KSSRC Refurbishment Center)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 263832 , Reply# 11   1/18/2014 at 03:08 (3,722 days old) by madabouthoovers ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Now also available for £460 in Agro-s: CLICK HERE TO GO TO madabouthoovers's LINK |
Post# 263855 , Reply# 12   1/18/2014 at 10:46 (3,722 days old) by dysonman1 (the county)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
2    
You know, $750 dollars for a Dyson that never requires filter maint. is not that much. We have far more expensive vacuums (the $1500 Riccar Radiance Premium comes to mind) that can be purchased in retail stores. Heck, the Miele Unique is $1500. $750 is not a lot of money. I'll be buying one as soon as they come here. BUT, it BETTER have an electric power nozzle for the U.S. market.
|
Post# 263865 , Reply# 13   1/18/2014 at 11:33 (3,722 days old) by thekirbylover (Warrington, cheshire )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
but why the current cleaner head provided seems to do a good job, and hasn't James sent you one yet?
CLICK HERE TO GO TO thekirbylover's LINK This post was last edited 01/18/2014 at 12:01 |
Post# 263875 , Reply# 14   1/18/2014 at 12:05 (3,722 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
3    
£450 for a cleaner which has wobbly plastic tubes. Do I need to add to this? |
Post# 263878 , Reply# 15   1/18/2014 at 12:10 (3,722 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 263889 , Reply# 16   1/18/2014 at 12:49 (3,722 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That video of it being kicked downstairs is interesting. Who is going to be doing that to it under normal circumstances? I'd much prefer to see a video of someone vacuuming with it and see how they get on. |
Post# 263924 , Reply# 17   1/18/2014 at 15:14 (3,722 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 263957 , Reply# 18   1/18/2014 at 17:25 (3,721 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 263966 , Reply# 19   1/18/2014 at 17:42 (3,721 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 263977 , Reply# 22   1/18/2014 at 18:19 (3,721 days old) by hi-loswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
^__^ |
Post# 263983 , Reply# 24   1/18/2014 at 18:39 (3,721 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
It may well reach £500 but you will still get people paying that, sadly. |
Post# 264004 , Reply# 29   1/18/2014 at 19:58 (3,721 days old) by bagintheback (Flagstaff, Arizona)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I'm excited to see that this technology at least exists. Dyson has been misleading the public for almost 20 years now touting their design never looses suction, when in fact it does since the pre-motor filter clogs fairly easily. Now that issue is out of the equation, and they have a product worth selling. My one concern are those flexible cyclones. If any sort of moisture gets inside them, all the dust will turn to mud, preventing any oscillation and clogging the entire system. |
Post# 264065 , Reply# 31   1/19/2014 at 09:12 (3,721 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Well lets face it, with most of Essex people with their bling, the S8 UniQ is fit for people who like to splash out money on the highest model available.
The S8 UniQ isn't your every day run of the mill vacuum cleaner designed for the masses. How can one spend that much for a suction only vacuum cleaner? Well people are prepared to pay - in the same way they are prepared to pay more for a premium brand any way. The same kind of thought has for many years, given the average buyer the question of how the SEBO X is so expensive when it uses bags. They don't realise what that vacuum cleaner does in terms of its actual usage and cleaning performance. |
Post# 264073 , Reply# 32   1/19/2014 at 10:34 (3,721 days old) by hi-loswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
I don't see the point myself, a Vacuum Cleaner is an appliance to clean your home, it's not a fashion accessory. |
Post# 264093 , Reply# 33   1/19/2014 at 14:22 (3,721 days old) by keiththomas (Northumberland, England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
|
Post# 264119 , Reply# 34   1/19/2014 at 16:54 (3,720 days old) by dys0nb0y (Luton)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 264126 , Reply# 35   1/19/2014 at 17:06 (3,720 days old) by HI-LOswitch98 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
1    
Even still £351 is a LOT of money. |
Post# 264167 , Reply# 38   1/19/2014 at 18:58 (3,720 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The target audience that perhaps Dyson is trying to pull in are those who feel that cleaning filters is preventing them from buying a Dyson again or new customers who have had to clean filters all the time to prolong the power - pity the prices can't be lowered because I feel that's the area Dyson is simply missing the point from producing.
In my opinion and experience, it doesn't matter that Dyson may well eliminate the need to clean filters - the shroud is still too thin where pet hair will still get stuck up the sides. That last video in French shows the lady putting her hand into the centre of the filter which is pretty big but what about the thin sides where dust is likely to get clogged? Until Dyson makes a secondary mechanism that physically scrapes the top shrouds where the sides are concerned, thus pushing the dust or scraping off the thin sides to push down into the rest of the dirt at the bottom of the bin, you'll still be inclined to dip your hand into the bin area to remove dust, manually. Though paper pleated based, the Morphy Richards Endurance bagless vac has an ingenious turn dial scraper that literally scrapes dust off the inner shroud. It doesn't make it completely clean though but at least the bits you'd be inclined to pick off has been scraped off and allowed to fall down. Bosch also have a similar mechanism but Im not sure if it is offered on their latest bagless cylinder vacs.. In short, whilst a self cleaning filter is all very well, its about time Dyson moved on with answering other concerns that the existing dust bin design points to. |
Post# 264253 , Reply# 40   1/20/2014 at 14:54 (3,720 days old) by ultraperformer (Derbyshire, UK, Europe)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Dyson cyclones are already very efficient the filters in mine stay very clean for a long time so it's hardly a laborious chore as it is! That said in a few years when they are reduced and better tested I might get one but never at that RRP! I suppose we will see a new version with the digital motor in the future maybe even more expensive than this!
|