Thread Number: 21809
1998 Hoover Turbopower 2 U2090 |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 243884   8/5/2013 at 17:14 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hey everyone, here is my Hoover Turbopower 2 U2090 in an inordinately bright shade of Alpina Yellow. I got this off eBay last week for £15 the seller was lovely, he was showing me how to use it and I was thinking, yes...I know, I do have 4 already! Bless him. It was in very good condition and the seller let me test it before I bought it and it runs great before and after I cleaned it.
This was the first of the two styles of model U2090, the first one which came out in 1997 was styled like this (pictures bellow) and the other later model from about 2000-2003 had the naff, tacky, cheap lettering on the bag door and cleaner head, but still had the same specification, obviously.
As the Purepower was released at that time (1997) this model was quite a run down Turbopower 2, with no bag-full light and Hoover didn't even include a dusting brush with this model, as it says in the manual, yet it still has the moulding for it!! Even though this model cost only about £99.99 at that time, I still feel it was better than those Purepowers, despite the stonger suction and the top end Purepower was double the price of this Turbopower 2 model!
I didn't need to do much to this apart from give it a good clean and change the filters, the seller provided me with an Electrolux Powerline belt for it!! Bless him. He even gave me the manual, extra bags order form and the guarantee card which were all brandnew and factory sealed in it's packet!! I shall be posting pictures of that later on in the thread.
Now, here is a few before pictures with the after pictures to follow it and then finally the manual.
This is the eBay listing picture, because I stupidly forgot to take a before picture of the assembled machine! This post was last edited 08/05/2013 at 20:08 |
Post# 243885 , Reply# 1   8/5/2013 at 17:16 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243887 , Reply# 2   8/5/2013 at 17:17 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243888 , Reply# 3   8/5/2013 at 17:19 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243890 , Reply# 4   8/5/2013 at 17:21 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243891 , Reply# 5   8/5/2013 at 17:22 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243893 , Reply# 6   8/5/2013 at 17:23 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243895 , Reply# 7   8/5/2013 at 17:24 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243897 , Reply# 8   8/5/2013 at 17:25 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243899 , Reply# 9   8/5/2013 at 17:26 (3,913 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
As I didn't think Hoover reverted to the narrow bore hose until 1999. I also thought they didn't 'down feature' the Turbopower 2 with the absence of certain tools until that time either. Where did 1997 come from? |
Post# 243900 , Reply# 10   8/5/2013 at 17:30 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I got 1997 from Argos 97 and it features this model (U2090) but it does show the dusting brush, short crevice too and narrow bore hose, mine is from a year later and has no dusting brush or short crevice tool but it does state my model on the manual and inside it says it only comes with a wand, long crevice tool and upholstory tool. |
Post# 243902 , Reply# 11   8/5/2013 at 17:37 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243904 , Reply# 13   8/5/2013 at 17:39 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243906 , Reply# 14   8/5/2013 at 17:41 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243907 , Reply# 15   8/5/2013 at 17:42 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243908 , Reply# 16   8/5/2013 at 17:44 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243909 , Reply# 17   8/5/2013 at 17:46 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243910 , Reply# 18   8/5/2013 at 17:48 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243911 , Reply# 19   8/5/2013 at 17:52 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243912 , Reply# 20   8/5/2013 at 17:54 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243913 , Reply# 21   8/5/2013 at 17:55 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243914 , Reply# 22   8/5/2013 at 17:59 (3,913 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Very nice! Mine hasn't got a roundel either! |
Post# 243916 , Reply# 23   8/5/2013 at 18:01 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243918 , Reply# 24   8/5/2013 at 18:03 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243919 , Reply# 25   8/5/2013 at 18:05 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243920 , Reply# 26   8/5/2013 at 18:07 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243921 , Reply# 27   8/5/2013 at 18:12 (3,913 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Alex, did you see what I wrote in message #12? |
Post# 243922 , Reply# 28   8/5/2013 at 18:14 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243924 , Reply# 29   8/5/2013 at 18:21 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yes I did...I think that the picture might of been taken years before, the reason why I think this is because when I washed some of the plastic parts in the bath, the bag door said it was made in 1993, the hood said it was made in 1991! and the body was made in 1994, since the plastic was made for this machine years before it was out (from my knowledge) maybe pictures of an assembled machine before the Turbopower 3, as that is when they did away with the short crevice tool on the Turbopower 2, maybe they assemled one of these yellow ones and photographed it in the earlier 90's ready for Argos to put it in their catalouge in a few years time. That is my thought on the subject. |
Post# 243925 , Reply# 30   8/5/2013 at 18:24 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243926 , Reply# 31   8/5/2013 at 18:29 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
This one was made in 1998 and was the 21 st one off the production line, this is the newer type "Candy dating system" after the serial number there is another set of 4 four numbers, as you can see that is "9821" indicating it was the 21'st one off the production line, unfortunately, I don't think you can get a month from this style of dating system...This dating system applies for the new "Hoover" modles. It says it is made in the E.C which is either Lisbon (Spain) or Cambuslang (Scotland, UK) I reckon this was probably made over here though. ;) This post was last edited 08/05/2013 at 20:03 |
Post# 243928 , Reply# 33   8/5/2013 at 18:35 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243930 , Reply# 34   8/5/2013 at 18:40 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
As I stated earlier, the seller gave me the original manual, extra bags order form and guarantee card, unfortunately, I don't have a scanner so I took photos of them, I hope this doesn't spoil it for you!
There it is in it's original sealed packet...Isn't it weird to think that the documents inside the bag have not been touched by human hands in 15 years. This post was last edited 08/05/2013 at 20:01 |
Post# 243931 , Reply# 35   8/5/2013 at 18:42 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243932 , Reply# 36   8/5/2013 at 18:45 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243934 , Reply# 37   8/5/2013 at 18:52 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243936 , Reply# 38   8/5/2013 at 18:55 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243937 , Reply# 39   8/5/2013 at 18:58 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243939 , Reply# 40   8/5/2013 at 19:00 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243940 , Reply# 41   8/5/2013 at 19:03 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243941 , Reply# 42   8/5/2013 at 19:06 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243942 , Reply# 43   8/5/2013 at 19:10 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243945 , Reply# 45   8/5/2013 at 19:12 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243946 , Reply# 46   8/5/2013 at 19:14 (3,913 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
here: CLICK HERE TO GO TO vintagerepairer's LINK |
Post# 243947 , Reply# 47   8/5/2013 at 19:18 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243948 , Reply# 48   8/5/2013 at 19:20 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243949 , Reply# 49   8/5/2013 at 19:24 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243951 , Reply# 50   8/5/2013 at 19:28 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243953 , Reply# 51   8/5/2013 at 19:32 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243956 , Reply# 52   8/5/2013 at 19:38 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243957 , Reply# 53   8/5/2013 at 19:43 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243958 , Reply# 54   8/5/2013 at 19:46 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243959 , Reply# 55   8/5/2013 at 19:49 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243960 , Reply# 56   8/5/2013 at 19:51 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243961 , Reply# 57   8/5/2013 at 19:54 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243962 , Reply# 58   8/5/2013 at 19:55 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 243980 , Reply# 60   8/5/2013 at 22:41 (3,913 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Well, the colour is rather striking to say the least, I had to take it downstairs for fear of loosing sleep over it! :P I do however love the colour, you can tell they were from the 90's were fashion was at it's brightest! The Turbopower 1's that we had were not the best built machine, but they were not terrible or cheaply built, the plastic was just rather thinnner in areas that it should of been thicker! The Turbopower 2 (released in 1992) was FAR more sturdy and not to mention quieter! The Turbopower 2 didn't perform as well as the good old dirty air Turbopower 1 but they were still dam good! I was really pleased with the condition of this machine, it had the odd few marks and scuffs on it but overall it is pretty good. You got the windtunnle in 1997, didn't you? I have used one of the early Hoover windtunnles that my friend owns, it is VERY good but it is WAY to loud. :P I also Have our version of your Hoover Elite 200...The Hoover Turbolite, it is a very good machine, I still didn't think it was AS good as our Turbopower 1's or Turbomaster, the Turbomaster/Innovations are REALLY good! Alex.
|
Post# 243994 , Reply# 61   8/6/2013 at 01:20 (3,913 days old) by James (Ware, Hertfordshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244013 , Reply# 63   8/6/2013 at 04:01 (3,913 days old) by dysondestijl (east midlands, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
My Dyson DC01 DeStijl had all its manual etc in the original unopened packaging but I couldn't help myself either lol:p |
Post# 244054 , Reply# 65   8/6/2013 at 10:22 (3,913 days old) by thekirbylover (Warrington, cheshire )   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244058 , Reply# 66   8/6/2013 at 11:23 (3,912 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244085 , Reply# 67   8/6/2013 at 13:19 (3,912 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
James - Thankyou :)
Sam - Thanks and your welcome :) I could do with cleaning off some of those marks around the bumper.
Scott - The Turbopower 2's never had any issues from my experience, the only issue they had was that the brushroll bearings were prone to going bad rather quickly and were VERY noisy after a number of uses. The Activator was very good, although the Turbolite/Elite 200 does have a very decent brushroll. I like the look of both the Turbopowers and the Elites for different reasons, although, the Elites seem to have more "sticky out bits" than the Turbopowers, they look more "flush" if you see what I mean.
Jamie - Thanks.
Alex.
|
Post# 244120 , Reply# 68   8/6/2013 at 15:25 (3,912 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244122 , Reply# 69   8/6/2013 at 15:28 (3,912 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244125 , Reply# 70   8/6/2013 at 15:29 (3,912 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244126 , Reply# 71   8/6/2013 at 15:32 (3,912 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244127 , Reply# 72   8/6/2013 at 15:38 (3,912 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244142 , Reply# 73   8/6/2013 at 16:36 (3,912 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
This post has been removed by the member who posted it. |
Post# 244717 , Reply# 74   8/9/2013 at 12:31 (3,909 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 244719 , Reply# 75   8/9/2013 at 12:43 (3,909 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That one has the newer motor, by the sound of it. The original always seemed much smoother sounding, to me. |
Post# 244720 , Reply# 76   8/9/2013 at 12:56 (3,909 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Yh, I see what you mean Benny, this is a 900 watt version, however. I do have another standard version, pictured above, model U2462, that has an 800 watt motor and seems more higher pitch sounding than this, although, that model has the original narrow internal ducting and this 900 watt version, like my Turbopower 3 has a wider ducting, could that be the reason it sounds different? Apart from the 900 watts difference. :P |
Post# 244721 , Reply# 77   8/9/2013 at 13:04 (3,909 days old) by AlexHoovers94 (Manchester UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|