Thread Number: 18070
My new Hoover Constellation and 119 Junior
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 197427   8/26/2012 at 03:21 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        

I found this nice red/white Hoover Constellation 867A last week and got it torsday. This red one is our latest connies from early 70īs. It cost only 3,50 euros + postage so it was cheap. This Junior I bought about a year ago but I cleaned it yesterday.
Hope you like pictures=)
Best Regards Markus


Post# 197428 , Reply# 1   8/26/2012 at 03:22 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 867A Constellation

I love these old style yellow dustbags=)

Post# 197430 , Reply# 2   8/26/2012 at 03:25 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 867A constellation

a double instulated model with the white cable. There are not any scraches in this paint.

Post# 197432 , Reply# 3   8/26/2012 at 03:26 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 867A constellation

Type plate. 600W motor

Post# 197433 , Reply# 4   8/26/2012 at 03:27 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 867A constellation

non floating model with the blowing function.

Post# 197434 , Reply# 5   8/26/2012 at 03:30 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover Constellation

I found this catalog picture of walk on air-Hoover. This must be our only floating model in Finland!! Funny because I thought there are not any of them=)

Post# 197435 , Reply# 6   8/26/2012 at 03:32 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 119 Junior

There he is=) This must be from early 1950īs

Post# 197436 , Reply# 7   8/26/2012 at 03:33 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 119 junior

in quite a nice shape

Post# 197437 , Reply# 8   8/26/2012 at 03:36 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 119 Junior

A type plate

Post# 197438 , Reply# 9   8/26/2012 at 03:37 (4,255 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover 119 Junior

Front. I have somewhere the hose and nozzles which came with this vacuum but maybe I found them some day=)

Post# 197444 , Reply# 10   8/26/2012 at 05:34 (4,255 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
If you are trying to make me jealous Markus, IT IS WORKING!

You know I love Hoover so and none more than those two beauties!

I shall have to seek Constellation (see what I did there ?) in the vintage Hoovers I already own since I have no money for more just now...


Post# 197451 , Reply# 11   8/26/2012 at 06:33 (4,255 days old) by portable (Corvallis, OR)        

portable's profile picture

Beautiful vacuums, Markus. That Constellation looks like it is brand new!


Post# 197519 , Reply# 12   8/26/2012 at 15:26 (4,254 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Well I never knew the Constellation continued in the none-floating format following it's discontinuation on the UK market in the 1950's. Then to see it was the much later style fitted with the none-floating base. Markus do you know why your country did not have the style sold in the UK and USA? I am wondering to myself if it could be due to the amount of hard-floors in Europe. I cannot see the Constellation floating on a floor as comfortably as it would a carpet.

Post# 197524 , Reply# 13   8/26/2012 at 15:51 (4,254 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
The Constellation was discontinued in the UK in the 1950's ? I thought it went on through the 1960s.

Post# 197568 , Reply# 14   8/27/2012 at 04:07 (4,254 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

No, you know it went on for longer and I am sure you know I know that too. It made until the early 1980's in the UK. What I said was that the none-floating format was discontinued in the UK in the 1950's. The original Constellation cleaner had a hole in the top for the hose and a flat base on which it sat. It stayed like this for a few years, before having the base changed in such a way that it could then float across carpets.

I think it was 1959 when the Constellation was changed so drastically into the style which it became famous for. The first model was pink and, the very last one yellow and white. It is an unusual cleaner in the sense that from 1959 until the early 1980's, it was on sale and to the naked eye was virtually unchanged. Indeed even to those in the know, there were only a handful of minor changes to the cleaner during that time which we could note. I do remember a woman telling me that she had owned two Constellation cleaners, one in pink and one in blue. I can think of very few other vacuum cleaners which have been on sale for over 20 years without any major changes to the styling. Of the top of my head, I can only think of the Numatic Henry.


Post# 197570 , Reply# 15   8/27/2012 at 04:49 (4,254 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
I did think it went on at least until the 1960s but wasn't 100% sure (I'm not all that knowledgeable on Constellations) hence my asking.

I hope it didn't sound like I was being cheeky, I really wasn't.

If it did, I am sorry.

Thank you for the extra information though, I never knew the UK had a non-floating Constellation, I thought the Celebrity was the non-floating Hoover cylinder of the time, but I shouldn't be surprised I was wrong about that since those two models are the ones I know least about.


Post# 197572 , Reply# 16   8/27/2012 at 04:54 (4,254 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

There were two celebrity cleaners in the UK, one had wheels and automatic cordwinder, the other lay very flat on the floor and would float too. Although the Constellation was a popular cleaner, I didn't think a choice of floating vacuum was ever necessary.

Post# 197577 , Reply# 17   8/27/2012 at 05:14 (4,254 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
That is interesting - so there was a Celebrity which was more basic than the Constellation and a Celebrity which was more advanced. The Constellation was a half way house so to speak.

I personally don't see a real need for it either, there after all was nothing wrong with wheels, or even the sliders to a certain extent, but the floating idea did take off (as a gimmick or not that is debatable) but hey ho, it makes it what it is today - a desirable classic.

It is a bit like the Dyson "ball" I suppose, something which some say makes things easier and some see right through, but they all consider buying... Well, except for me, I hate Dysons...


Post# 197582 , Reply# 18   8/27/2012 at 05:41 (4,254 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

The Celebrity Air-ride, which was the floating model, was comparable to the Constellation. The main difference was it's size. It was like a squashed Constellation. I think also it had telescopic tubes, being from the USA.

Post# 197583 , Reply# 19   8/27/2012 at 05:43 (4,254 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
But the Constellation did not have automatic cord rewind so I wouldn't that make the Celebrity Air-Ride superior ?

I know this is a big ask, but do you know if the motor wattage were different between the two ?


Post# 197586 , Reply# 20   8/27/2012 at 05:53 (4,254 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

No beacause the Air ride did not have that feature. As I said, there were two celebrity cleaners in the UK, one had wheels and automatic cordwinder, the other lay very flat on the floor and would float too. The superior model had the wheels. The basic model was the floating version. I do not know the wattages but I am sure the Air ride was getting on for 900w. You can see it and others here:

CLICK HERE TO GO TO vintagerepairer's LINK


Post# 197587 , Reply# 21   8/27/2012 at 05:56 (4,254 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

This was the other Celebrity on sale in the UK, although the UK model had no P N.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO vintagerepairer's LINK on eBay


Post# 197588 , Reply# 22   8/27/2012 at 06:00 (4,254 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
I see! I got a bit muddled up it seems.

My goodness, that Celebrity on eBay is very high tech!


Post# 197624 , Reply# 23   8/27/2012 at 11:59 (4,253 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover Connie

Hi, our constellations had been made here in Finland with licence by Havulinna Oy as most of Hoover products like washing machines. These made only to finnish markets. Havulinna made Hoover products at least 1952-1962 when company owner Veijo Havulinna was Hoover CEO in Finland. I think a yellow Hoover 427 vacuum was latest finnish made Hoover in 1978.

And because we didnīt have any wall to wall carpets (only 1970īs), maybe Constellation doesnīt float so good and exhaust air raised the dust in the air=)

Best Regards
Markus


Post# 197636 , Reply# 24   8/27/2012 at 14:42 (4,253 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

I love the connies and use both my original one and maytag satellite regularly, very quirky little retro vacuums. ultimately, I think they're still quite an effective machine, they don't do a terrible job on carpets and they're lovely to use for the above the floor stuff.



Post# 197640 , Reply# 25   8/27/2012 at 16:08 (4,253 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
How would you say the Constellations perform on carpets with the standard floor tool Ryan ?

I know a pet hate of mine is "scrubbing" a carpet with a straight suction cylinder which is why I keep my cylinders for hard flooring mainly, but perhaps the Connie is better ?

Reason being, I'm THINKING of perhaps looking into buying one for my collection.


Post# 197642 , Reply# 26   8/27/2012 at 17:05 (4,253 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Jamie yours is an interesting question, as there were three different floor tools supplied with the Constellation as time progressed. Two were used for about 10 years each, one after the other. The final one, the pedal tool, was not used on this cleaner for long but was of course used on a good deal of cleaners on sale both at the same time as and after full discontinuation of the Constellation.

Originally the floor tool was mounted on rollers at the front of the tool. Early cleaners had a long row of rollers along the length but a later and more common style of this tool had two small rollers, one in each front corner. A red plastic strip assisted in the removal of threads and a spring loaded brush stripe moved up and down inside the head. For a more firm cleaning action, the brush strip could be locked firmly in place. It could also be locked out of the way altogether, but the instructions didn't ever seem to mention this. Unless of course my memory fails me yet again and it was the locking the brush out which was not mentioned. Either way, there were three options for the brush strip.

When the emerald green Constellation went into production around 1970, Hoover dispensed with this floor tool in favour of the style which could be used with brush side down for floors, or flipped over to the smooth section for carpets. I am sure a good deal of people used these tools brush side down for carpets to aid cleaning performance. Like I say, this tool was used for about the next ten years or thereabouts, it may possibly have been a little less. The pedal tool which was being supplied with the top model Freedom cleaner was used as the third and final choice. As time progressed even further into the early part of the 1980's, so Hoover used the same plastic tool kit on the Constellation, as was supplied with both Freedom models which flanked the Constellation in the cylinder range for this period.

Of all of the tools, I liked the pedal style the most as I felt it had good surface contact with carpets and also a good set of bristles for floors. My least favourite was the original floor tool. I don't think it was very good for carpets, but it was very easy to use. It was not at all good for hard floors and any Constellation owner would have done well to purchase the standard Hoover floor brush separately.


Post# 197643 , Reply# 27   8/27/2012 at 17:05 (4,253 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

I found them pretty useless on very short pile but on medium and thick pile they seem to do well. The standard floor tool is wheeled and has 'comb' strip which grooms and seems to part the carpet fibres so that deeper dirt can be lifted out by the suction. Mine does a great job on my living room carpet. later ones had a flip over floor tool which wasn't as effective

Post# 197644 , Reply# 28   8/27/2012 at 17:11 (4,253 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

My Connie floor tool..

Post# 197645 , Reply# 29   8/27/2012 at 17:13 (4,253 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

excuse the dirt lol, but you can see the red comb strip and brushes in this one..

Post# 197717 , Reply# 30   8/28/2012 at 09:33 (4,252 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Constellation

vacbear58's profile picture
Congratulations on more great finds Markus.

Firstly what a great 119, it is a very long time since I saw one on such good condition. Can you let us know the serial number and perhaps we might be able to get a date of the cleaner for you. From what you have told is I expect that Hoover upright cleaners were rare in Finland. You are particularly lucky that the handle appears to be original and intact - these often dry up and crumble away.

Now for the Constellation. Is that an original colour for this machine? It looks great but I wonder from what seems to be paint spray from the inside of the top of the cleaner. But once again more detail differences between cleaners of different territories ...... This is the earlier style of flipover nozzle only ever seen here on the TOL Conquest model - eventually all models had the flip over (until the pedal style that Benny describes on the Freedom) but with plastic coupling and hoover roundel on the front - as Markus demonstrates from his catalogue scan other constellations in Finland had this version with the metal coupling.

Again Markus, could this hose be a replacement? That style of suction control was only seen here on the Harlequin (419/429), Conquest (507) models and Comvertable/DAM models. Although the constellation always had one right back to the 822 (and the 822 might have been the first UK suction cleaner to have such a suction control) it was of a smaller design - I was going to say simpler but it does not get much simpler than this.

Back with the catalogue for a moment - although that style floor nozzle was used with early models 417G, by the mid 1960s (around the time of Smoke Pine/Swedish Green) it had been dropped here in favour of the larger white floor nozzle as with Ryan's Constellation. That smaller style nozzle did carry on here on the Hooverette until production ended. The 417 shown in the catalogue had the later style flipover nozzle - it was not in production long - it was the last version being replaced after amost 20 years by the updated styling 427.

Benny, I hate to correct you but in fact there were four different nozzles on the Constellation - you are absoluly correct for Constellation 862 onwards, but the 822 and 822a had separate carpet and hard floor nozzles - the floor nozzle was similar in style to the white one used on Senior/Harlequin models (in fact first seen on the 417 in 1953, but first series only - on 417C & E variants it reverted back to the earlier 402 style). The carpet nozzle was similar to the US Aerodyne nozzle again first seen on the first 417 series but dropped on the 417c onwards.

I would agree with what I think is the general opinion here that the white carpet nozzle that Ryan shows just above was actually pretty good at cleaning carpets - much better than the earlier or following versions - when I bought my Maytag Satellite I did a comparison with my 867A and although the Satallite was much better I was surprised at just how good the white nozzle was.

Markus, it is interesting insight into the Finland manufacturing facility, in some Hoover documentation I have from 1958 they describe it as being their own facility although perhaps they sold it off at some stage to the CEO.

Al


Post# 197731 , Reply# 31   8/28/2012 at 11:43 (4,252 days old) by markus79 (Finland)        
Hoover Constellation

Hi Al!
I am sure that the hose and the color are original because I owned the same machine about a ten years ago. I also wondered why there is red paint inside the top=) Here is a picture from 1971 magazine. This model sold with detachable wheel stand until the 1977. Last colors were red, blue and gray.

PS. Junior type number is 503247
PSS. Tomorrow I get my first Hoover Portable which I bought with 10 euros+postage last week.

Best Regards
Markus


Post# 197732 , Reply# 32   8/28/2012 at 11:46 (4,252 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
That has to be the best floor tool I've ever seen! Or maybe I'm just biased for Hoover... :)

Either way, if I do buy a Constellation I now know it will do a good job on the carpets. I must admit though, nothing will beat (pun intended) the good ole uprights!


Post# 197733 , Reply# 33   8/28/2012 at 11:47 (4,252 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
A detachable wheel stand ? Was that a hovering model that could be used with wheels also ?

That is ingenious I must say...


Post# 197750 , Reply# 34   8/28/2012 at 14:19 (4,252 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Jamie the wheel stand will likely before the none-floating model.

Vacbear, it was rather short-sighted of me to mention in an earlier message the first two Constellations available in the UK and then not refer to them later on when talking about floor tools. As you quite rightly say, these models had two separate attachments but do you happen to know if all these cleaners had the buckle arrangement to hold the attachment or did some early attempts ever have the push fittings like the 417 cylinder, the sort I call the Electrolux style?



Post# 197758 , Reply# 35   8/28/2012 at 14:49 (4,252 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
I would think they all used the "lock" mechanism for tools and if any used push fit they would have had to be very late models by my reasoning.

Post# 197761 , Reply# 36   8/28/2012 at 14:57 (4,252 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

No Jamie, Hoover used to have buckles on the back of the tubes on some of the oldest cleaners made after the 612. They also had straight push fit tubes on some cylinders, before standardising the fitting to a buckle on the front. This would have been early 1950's.

Post# 197767 , Reply# 37   8/28/2012 at 15:46 (4,252 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
When I said "lock" mechanism I meant what you describe as the "buckle".

Post# 197768 , Reply# 38   8/28/2012 at 15:54 (4,252 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Yes I realise that, but what I am saying is, is that during the 1940s and 1950s Hoover were also using push fit tubes on some cylinder cleaners, the same as they began doing again in the 1980s. You said by your reasoning these would be later models, but the reality was that it was earlier models which had push fit tubing and accessories. Hoover then ran with the buckle / lock arrangement on the front of the tubing for all cleaners, changing only in the early 1980s to the ring fitting on plastic tubes instead of a lock / buckle on a metal tube. Push fit tubing was then used from the mid-1980s on budget cleaners like the Portapower and Sprite, and on total system uprights, becoming much more widespread during the 1990's.

The only exception to the above was the Hoover-branded Aqua Vac wet and dry cleaners sold in the early 1980s. These had the same fittings as the Aqua Vac of the same period, which was a 32mm plastic push fit with push button clip similar to that of a Philips cleaner.


Post# 197770 , Reply# 39   8/28/2012 at 16:18 (4,252 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        
Speaking of which...

The 1983 Hoover Powervac..

Post# 197771 , Reply# 40   8/28/2012 at 16:19 (4,252 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        
page 2

the cheaper version..

Post# 197772 , Reply# 41   8/28/2012 at 16:19 (4,252 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

Super..

Post# 197773 , Reply# 42   8/28/2012 at 16:20 (4,252 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
I see, thank you for elucidating.

I never did understand why Hoover used that arrangement for the tools, why not just use push fit tapered tubes and tools ?


Post# 197774 , Reply# 43   8/28/2012 at 16:20 (4,252 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

back page..

Post# 197777 , Reply# 44   8/28/2012 at 16:23 (4,252 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
On a side note, that Austin went off the road in 2004, it actually lasted a long time considering they all rusted away sooner or later.

Post# 197779 , Reply# 45   8/28/2012 at 16:24 (4,252 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

wow not bad for a Metro lol

Post# 197782 , Reply# 46   8/28/2012 at 16:27 (4,252 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Indeed.

Post# 197785 , Reply# 47   8/28/2012 at 16:30 (4,252 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Ryry, it has been fascinating to see those pictures. Thank you.

Jamie, I think no one will know the true reason as to why any manufacturer did what they did. Now, I like the push fit tubes above anything else as I think the connection is solid and mostly the tubes do not wobble. However, there is one very strong argument against them, and that is the fact that quite often the attachments and the tubes stick to each other, making removal incredibly difficult.

It could be that Hoover wanted a fitting which was firm but also easily removed. For me, I don't like tubes with fiddly buttons and clips as I think the tubes are just too wobbly. But it comes down to personal preferences. Factor into this also if you will that so many cleaners have used 32mm push-fit tubes, meaning that the consumer could use parts off other cleaners if required. A good deal of people did just that. At least with Hoover's own unique fitting they could cling onto a slightly greater portion of the spares market, even if other companies were making none genuine parts to fit Hoover.

Then going back to what I said a while ago about having to build failure into a product, the tubes and accessories on Hoover cleaners did wear out more quickly than others. So you can chose several reasons for their decision to use the fittings which they did.


Post# 197806 , Reply# 48   8/28/2012 at 17:38 (4,252 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Pip and clip

vacbear58's profile picture
Benny

An interesting topic you have raised, inspite of the background noise.

As far as I am aware all Hoover cleaners had some sort of locking mechanism going right back to the start. The mechanism was updated and simplified with the introduction of the 160 and 375, which also brought in lighter weight wands and tools.

The first sign of friction fit tools appears in the UK with the model 402 in 1948 and I believe model 50 in the USA although later versions of that cleaner adopted a locking mechanism again. Although the tool kit for the model 119 was superficially the same as the earlier 375 it too was friction fit although those of the 612 retained the earlier locking mechanism.

In the UK the first sign of "pip and clip", what came to become the Hoover standard, was first seen here in the model 417 in 1953. Curiously these were on the underside of the wands, tools etc. - the only time as far as i am aware they were seen in that position. In 1956 with the introduction of the Constellation and 638 and the "blue" colour scheme with the first stretch hoses in the UK the pip and clip arrangement moved to the upper side where it stayed. But for some curious reason the 417 reverted back to the earlier style friction fit tools - the only model to have them, even dustettes had pip and clip tools. At this time the 417 was somewhat downgraded, presumably to help differentiate it from the Constellation (although there was little difference in price) and probably to reduce cost - a stupid measure as it involved the maintenance of a completely separate inventory line for that one model until 1962 or so when the 417G was introduced - all the tools and wands were unique to that model, where they were consistant across the rest of the range.

To the best of my knowledge, pip and clip (or pip and locking ring) were maintaned here until the end of the 1980s until the launch of the Galaxy although some models retained the locking ring method until the early 1990s. Turbopowers and turbomasters with on board tools had friction fit tools but I do not know when the other models (like the Turbopower Junior) lost their pip and ring fitting.

Al


Post# 197816 , Reply# 49   8/28/2012 at 17:50 (4,252 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
119 Date

vacbear58's profile picture
Markus
Does the 119 number beging with the letter K or KG. If KG then yours is one of the very last 119 models produced from the latter part of 1956.

Thank you for posting the picture of the Constellation which again confirms the suction control for this model and the metal coupling flip over nozzle. Curious too that it shows an upholstry brush rather than the upholstry nozzle.

I hope you can see the paragraph in the attached scan about housewives in Finland demanding more Hoover washing machines :)

And you do realise that we shall be GREEN with envy (especially is it is green) when you post the pictures of your new Portable for such a great price, you seem to be having great luck at the moment :)

Al


Post# 197819 , Reply# 50   8/28/2012 at 18:03 (4,252 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Hello vacbear. Yes, I was mentioning the clips on the back of the tube earlier. It was around 1986 when Hoover reverted to a push fitting, this time plastic tubing, using it on the Spirit cylinder and one of the Portapower models. Although different in design from the cylinder tools, a 32mm push fit was introduced on all Total System Turbopower and Turbomaster cleaners as time progressed. From here, Hoover then ran two styles of tools, with the pip and rings being used on tool kits for upright cleaners which had separate tools, and on the more expensive cylinders.

The likes of the Galaxy which you mentioned, the Jet, Sprint, the Vouge, Aria, Arianne, Telios, and more all used this push-fit tubing, some cleaners even having metal tubes by then. I am not sure when the clip and ring disappeared altogether, but it was widely used across the Alpina range and as far as the Turbopower Junior went, they never did have push-fit tubes, only pip and rings. So I think the pip and rings were used well into the 2000's.


Post# 197918 , Reply# 51   8/29/2012 at 06:34 (4,252 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        
Alistair..

Changing the subject briefly, did you get my email about the 417 Alistair?

Ryan


Post# 197939 , Reply# 52   8/29/2012 at 08:25 (4,252 days old) by vacbear58 (Sutton In Ashfield & London)        
Just as well you mentioned it Ryan

vacbear58's profile picture
As you were in my junk (yeah yeah, I know - in my dreams LOLOLOL)
mail. Should not be a problem, as far as I remember they are not too far buried.

Al


Post# 198043 , Reply# 53   8/29/2012 at 15:46 (4,251 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)        

cool lol well give me a shout when you find it :)

Ryan



Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy