Thread Number: 17799
Henry Hound experiences. |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 193256 , Reply# 3   8/4/2012 at 17:36 (4,276 days old) by ryry_87 (Earth)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I've tried the Henry Hound. Still prefer my original Henry with the TurboElectric head, it does a fantastic job on carpets, really grooms well CLICK HERE TO GO TO ryry_87's LINK |
Post# 193268 , Reply# 4   8/4/2012 at 18:58 (4,276 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I have to agree with sensotronic, no air driven turbo brush can compete with the electric powerheads in terms of performance or grooming carpet. For starters, they don't slow down when in contact with the carpet. The Hound is the same great performance we all know from the standard Henry, but with the addition of the electric powerheads which I found to do an excellent job.
|
Post# 195476 , Reply# 5   8/16/2012 at 15:06 (4,264 days old) by rutger (England)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Hi all Thanks very much for the input, it helped ! Cheers Dave |
Post# 195484 , Reply# 7   8/16/2012 at 15:50 (4,264 days old) by madabouthoovers ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Dont think they sell the Henry Hound now though - would have to be the Henry Turbo I suppose if you wanted a new one. |
Post# 195487 , Reply# 9   8/16/2012 at 15:56 (4,264 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
and the brushroll. |
Post# 195491 , Reply# 11   8/16/2012 at 16:03 (4,264 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
On my mums thick carpet there's not much in it, the Meile's 2200w motor puts it in-front of the Numatic's 1100w one. On the short pile carpet in my flat I'd say they would be as good as each other. Need to get hold of one for a test now! |
Post# 195493 , Reply# 12   8/16/2012 at 16:04 (4,264 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Nice Miele BTW! Can't edit the incorrect spelling on the above post... |
Post# 195494 , Reply# 13   8/16/2012 at 16:05 (4,264 days old) by madabouthoovers ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Comparison of the Henry and Miele turbobrush heads: |
Post# 195495 , Reply# 14   8/16/2012 at 16:06 (4,264 days old) by madabouthoovers ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Note the Numatic has an inspection flap: |
Post# 195496 , Reply# 15   8/16/2012 at 16:07 (4,264 days old) by madabouthoovers ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The miele has an air bleed valve that enables better rotation on different carpets: |
Post# 195502 , Reply# 18   8/16/2012 at 16:31 (4,264 days old) by beko1987 (Stokenchurch, United Kingdom)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Same here. Where abouts in England are you Rutgear, you're welcome to have a play with mine if you're near Bucks... |
Post# 195912 , Reply# 19   8/17/2012 at 20:48 (4,263 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Steve - another reason to why Numatics are so popular is that they can be used bagless if you run out of bags or if you have forgotten to buy more. When I'm doing my other job as a contract cleaner, I don't particularly like using a Henry that doesn't have a bag installed, but there have been times when I've had to use a Henry without s bag, and it's very versatile to clean out. That's one aspect Miele would never be able to do - they'd have to protect their motors a heck of a lot better.
I also have an S6. The only thing I like about it is the auto cord rewind "comfort" function. Useless exterior body though - just doesn't stand up to scratches and scrapes very well, but then its a heck of a lot smaller and easier to store than Henry - for the mean time - I'd be interested in the 2012 Henry machines that are coming out with the park slot on the back. |