Thread Number: 17730
Favourite Vintage Brand and Why ?
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 192211   7/30/2012 at 01:38 (4,281 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Mine has to be Hoover, because they are simply the best, better than all the rest!

To put it in more detail; they invented the brush roll, made many models with the "Hedlite" (some people see as superfluous but I disagree!), had fantastic suction coupled with the brilliant brush roll design to beat the carpet deep down and what's more, were made to LAST.

I can't see how you could beat that...


Post# 192217 , Reply# 1   7/30/2012 at 03:15 (4,281 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Jamie!

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
You can't! In my house, it's HOOVER all the way!
John.


Post# 192218 , Reply# 2   7/30/2012 at 03:18 (4,281 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
I'd never have thought!

Post# 192224 , Reply# 3   7/30/2012 at 05:29 (4,281 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        
Well...

turbo500's profile picture

interesting question.

Of course, the rule back in the days of old was Hoover for uprights and Electrolux for cylinders. Which a customer opted for would depended on their home, their personal preferences and the type of flooring. It was not uncommon for someone to own one of each.

 

I certainly love my old Hoover cleaners. I really don't think anything has come close to the carpet cleaning performance of the Turbomaster. However, I always found Electrolux to be better built and far more practical cleaners - especially where uprights were conerned.

 

With that in mind, I am going to make a controversial statement. Up to 1980, Hoover were the biz. But from then onwards, especially after the introduction of the Turbopower and despite those being a huge seller and excellent on carpet, they weren't of the best build quality and had a mass of strong competion. I think Hitachi are probably my favourite cleaners from 1980 onwards. The CV50 and CV60 were fantastic cleaners. Well built, high performing and practical.


Post# 192227 , Reply# 4   7/30/2012 at 07:00 (4,281 days old) by vinvac (Dubuque IA)        

vinvac's profile picture
For me it would be Kirby or Royal. They were the first upright to have descent tool suction and were a complete home cleaning system. Plus the Kirby had the lifetime rebuild warranty, both Royal and Kirby were ahead of the game with cords.

Then Eureka. Their brush roll was super! Their first design with all brush would out clean any upright of the time. Then as they progressed and started with the VG1 and VGII it just got better. They also had a longer cord. Tool usage was nothing to brag about but they figured out a better adapter system earlier than Hoover.

Even with their later top mount conversion tools, they provide a seal plate to improve on the suction.

Don't get me wrong, I like Hoover! But Hoover was not popular in WI where I grew up..Eureka, Kirby, Royal and Lux were the main stay. You rarely saw a Hoover in a home.

Morgan


Post# 192240 , Reply# 5   7/30/2012 at 09:48 (4,281 days old) by richardlxixxx (Jupiter, Florida)        
John and Jamie

AND THE WINNER IS - THE AMERICAN ELECTROLUX VACUUM!!!!!!

 

Electrolux is my favorite vintage vacuum cleaner.  I have never been a fan of upright vacuums and prefer canister vacuums for their versatility.  When you are cleaning an entire house, it just makes more sense to use one vacuum that has superior suction and airflow, hence the American Electrolux tank.  If you have a noisy, messy, dusty Hoover upright - how do you clean above the floor?  With the ineffective upright attachements?!  To do a proper cleaning, you would have to have a tank vacuum for the rest of the house, especially wood floors and area rugs.  When Electrolux developed the power nozzle for their tank vacuums, Electrolux really became the Cleaning Standard of the World.

Of course, Hoovers were less expensive than the Electrolux and therefore a household could afford to have two machines.

I grew up in and Electrolux house and my Mother was a very detailed and neurotic cleaner.  Everyday was like spring cleaning.  No vacuum satisfied her like the Electrolux and she tried them all.

This is my opinion and experience.  Please no death threats!!!!

Stay well,

RichardCool


Post# 192243 , Reply# 6   7/30/2012 at 10:08 (4,281 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK)        

turbo500's profile picture

I agree with Richard that a canister/cylinder with a powerhead would be the practical option and probably the most effective to use as a daily cleaner as you have the deep cleaning agitation of an upright combined with the high suction and versatility of a cylinder.

 

Sadly, cylinders with powernozzel's have never been very popular in the UK. Usually, only the very top end cleaners had them. Hoover and Rowenta both had cylinders with PN's in the 1980's, but I don't think Lux ever did over here. I also don't think there is currently a cylinder with a PN on sale here - the airdriven turbo brushes seem to be more popular.


Post# 192245 , Reply# 7   7/30/2012 at 10:09 (4,281 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Are you thinking what I'm thinking John ?

Human cannibalism is still legal in some areas you know...


Post# 192252 , Reply# 8   7/30/2012 at 11:29 (4,281 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
......and, there still are the good old-fashioned

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
illegal things, too.
Morgan, yours was NOT a HOOVER town. How sad for you.Well, I simply count my blessings everyday.
Or, Jamie, to quote Joan Crawford, "TINAAAAAAAA, bring me the ax"!


Post# 192259 , Reply# 9   7/30/2012 at 11:59 (4,281 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2)        

sebo_fan's profile picture

For vintage, it has to be Hoover - no other brand IME has ever produced so many different styles, colours and models. Thus, they are worth collecting, looking out for, finding brochure merchandise and other things. I adore the Art Deco inspired models too.


Post# 192269 , Reply# 10   7/30/2012 at 12:28 (4,281 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
I'll take his legs and arms, you take his torso. We'll bury him inside his Electrolux at sun down.

Post# 192281 , Reply# 11   7/30/2012 at 12:56 (4,281 days old) by edgar (Belgium)        
philips

edgar's profile picture
Fot me, it is Philips

Post# 192291 , Reply# 12   7/30/2012 at 13:44 (4,281 days old) by eurekastar (Amarillo, Texas)        

eurekastar's profile picture

My favorite vintage upright is the pre-516 Kirby.  They have a lot of character.  Plus, when the 4 amp motor was introduced on the 513 during mid production, they became a much more efficient and effective cleaner.  Kirby now has a 4 row brush roll that can be installed that really makes them a cleaning champ!  As for canisters, it is a toss up between the Compact/Tristar and Rainbow. 


Post# 192293 , Reply# 13   7/30/2012 at 13:48 (4,281 days old) by eurekastar (Amarillo, Texas)        
My Kirby 4C

eurekastar's profile picture

Not many of these were produced because soon after they went into production, the United States entered World War II.  This is also unique among Kirby models because it has a felt lined bag.  I guess Kirby was trying to improve filtration. 


Post# 192311 , Reply# 14   7/30/2012 at 15:06 (4,280 days old) by Vinvac (Dubuque IA)        

vinvac's profile picture
LOL


You have to find me first....and I am not worried...neither of you would be caught touching an Electrolux...



Post# 192322 , Reply# 15   7/30/2012 at 15:50 (4,280 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Well that ain't strictly true, I do own three... :)

Post# 192323 , Reply# 16   7/30/2012 at 15:53 (4,280 days old) by Durango159 (State College, PA)        
HOOVER. It Beats, As it Sweeps, As it Cleans!!

durango159's profile picture
For me it's Hoover. Growing up it's all I knew. My maternal grandmom had a Convertible, my aunt had a convertible, my paternal grandparents had a Convertible and we got them a Dimension 1000. My parents had a convertible and Celebrity Elite. Then we inherited my paternal grandparents convertible and Dimension 1000 plus got a Decade. Now we did have problems with the Celebrity powerhead breaking, but the adult users, not me in that time period, were also vacuuming with lights turned off in the room and not seeing my sisters barbie toys left on the rug. So when Barbie's toy plastic kettle got stick in the vent of the power head, I understood why the room stunk like a skunk.

The school district used Sanitaire and most hotels I went to had Sanitaire, but when I saw them shaking the bags out, I couldn't take that.

Hoover, Nobody Does it like you!


Post# 192341 , Reply# 17   7/30/2012 at 16:53 (4,280 days old) by kenkart ()        
Apex!

Not the most popular, but the most powerful vintage vac by a mile!!

Post# 192365 , Reply# 18   7/30/2012 at 18:54 (4,280 days old) by richardlxixxx (Jupiter, Florida)        
Call Off the Cannibals

Okay Guys, no cannibals and no chopping up of my body parts.  What are you guys from Brooklyn?  You sound like some of my  relatives that bury people in building foundations.

At least a few agree that a tank type vacuum is the most efficient way to clean, especially if equipped with a power nozzle.  No John, not that type of power nozzle!

I will give you this, Hoover did make some very pretty and stylish vacuums.  However, they did not have the power of an Electrolux.  Besides, the XXX and the LX electrolux vacuums were magnificently styled vacuums.  They could be used as boat anchors, but they were absolutely beautiful and very powerful.  The Electrolux vacuums that followed, up until the Diamond Jubilee, were the best and most efficient vacuums produced.  And also great looking vacuums.  Kind of like classic cars - beautiful paint combinations and lots of shiny metal parts.

The last great Electrolux was the Olympia One.  After that the company declined.

Now John and Jamie, everyone is entitled to an opinion.  This is mine. 

By the way John, if you really want the "Palace" cleaned properly, I will show up with my Miele.

A great day to all.  Stay well,

Richard


Post# 192371 , Reply# 19   7/30/2012 at 19:07 (4,280 days old) by kirbysthebest (Midwest)        
Well Kirby

Of course,
BTW--Bill that is the most beautiful collection of Kirbys I have ever seen.

Please remember me fondly in your will, or at Christmas, or Easter, or birthdays, or . . .


Post# 192377 , Reply# 20   7/30/2012 at 20:17 (4,280 days old) by kirbybag (topeka ks )        
has to be kirby

kirbybag's profile picture
kirby i think its number one great vacuum.

Post# 192415 , Reply# 21   7/30/2012 at 22:17 (4,280 days old) by beerad (Beautiful Vancouver BC)        
Filter queen and Electrolux.

Filter queen, because of the power, longevity, durability, and diversity what it can be used for.

Electrolux, because of the beautiful hummmmm of their motors, iconness, beauty, memories, quality, and conversation pieces.


Post# 192481 , Reply# 22   7/31/2012 at 08:39 (4,280 days old) by papasvacs (Lauderdale Lakes, FL)        
Well, , I hesitate to say this, but...

papasvacs's profile picture

I grew up in an Electrolux home/family. That was 60 years ago. 

 

My Mom's uncle was an Electrolux salesman.  She had an XXX, Grandma had an XXX.  Aunts had LX usually.  That was the newest models for my family.  After the XXX, Mom went to Sears with a PN.  That did not last long, though.  A Hoover Convertible followed with a Lux tank for dusting and floors.

 

Paternal Grandma had a "gorgeous" Kenmore Commander.  I have one like it today!

 

After the LX's, relatives went to compact.  A couple had Eureks.  Not very brand loyal, were they?  Oh well.... "variety is the spice of life..."

 

When I was older, I had a variety of Hoovers.  We always had a Lux tank in there too.

 

Now I have a collection of brands.

 

Greg F.


Post# 192513 , Reply# 23   7/31/2012 at 11:59 (4,280 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
hmmmmmmmmmmm

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
a family that just couldn't 'commit'. I've heard about that sort of thing. That's too bad.
My late father's side ,(lived in the South), had Electrolux, Mummy's side all had HOOVER. Some of them have 'strayed'...in numerous aspects. But, not I.. in ANY aspect.


Post# 192514 , Reply# 24   7/31/2012 at 12:05 (4,280 days old) by richardlxixxx (Jupiter, Florida)        
John

I am quite sure you have strayed!!!  Strayed far!!!! Far from the straight and narrow.  LOL.  Like I haven't!! huge LOL

Richard


Post# 192530 , Reply# 25   7/31/2012 at 13:17 (4,280 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
Richard!

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
hmmm, define 'straight and narrow'.... I can guarantee, from CERTAIN things, I've never strayed.

Post# 192537 , Reply# 26   7/31/2012 at 13:53 (4,280 days old) by BrianKirbyClass (Eudora Kansas)        

briankirbyclass's profile picture
Richard in Florida,i agree and see your point, but i have to agree to disagree that the last best Lux was the Olympia.
I have a 1984 Silverado that has been going strong ever since it was brand new, and to this day (July of 2012) is going as strong as ever, and It has had VERY heavy use over the years.
There is no bearing noise in the motor,, no whinning in the wind down, the Automatic Control works perfectly, the Cord Winder is still tight, and there has NEVER been a problem with it. Its never seen a repair bench. The suction power is as strong as when the machine was brand new.
I did buy a new saran hose for it in around 2000.
Those short braided hoses were definatly a problem.
Other than that, absolutely no problems with that Silverado whatsoever.
I would have to say that after almost 30 yrs of heavy use,and still going strong,especially with it never having had to be serviced in any way, you cant get much better than that. (in my opinion anyway)

The PN 5 is still going strong too,,never been serviced, same belt and brush roll as was installed at the factory.
Looks like i may have to replace the brush roll in the near future, but there aqain, after almost 30 yrs of heavy use,,i say AMEN!


Post# 192563 , Reply# 27   7/31/2012 at 16:58 (4,279 days old) by richardlxixxx (Jupiter, Florida)        
Silverado

Bridan,

 

You are correct.  I did make a mistake.  The Silverado was the last great Electrolux.  It was basically a newer version of the Olympia.  After the Silverado, Electrolux started to use a smaller motor with fans that spun at a higher rpm.  The old motors were much better and less problematic.  I am very partial to my Olympia.  Bought it brand new, still have it, and it is pristine.  I retired the Olympia several years ago and replaced it with a modern Miele S5 Champagne.  I wanted Hepa filtration, superior suction, and a quiet vacuum.  The Miele delivers on all that.  If Electrolux had just improved on the Olympia/Silverado, I would still be using an Electrolux.  The new Aerus vacuums are expensive, ultra noisy, ineffiencent vacuums that are simply not worth the money. 

 

Stay well,

 

Richard


Post# 192569 , Reply# 28   7/31/2012 at 17:53 (4,279 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

I think there are a good deal of brands where I could say I had a favourite. One thing which I feel I can safely say is that we've always had such a huge choice in the UK and regardless of what one's home is like and what needs to be cleaned, there would be a vacuum cleaner to match it, more or less. My mother had two Hoover cleaners across a 35 year period, the first being a 370 which she sold in the early 1950's to buy the 262. Both were 2nd hand and neither were chosen by her as there was no choice really; they were offered to her as private sales and she could only say yes or no. But she did like them both. When she used an Electrolux upright in the later part of the 1960's she was converted forever.

It needs to be remembered that although the Hoover Turbopower was of a build quality which was inferior to the likes of the Junior and Senior, it was still reasonably robust and Hoover had already blotted their copy books in respect of reliability and build quality when they made the Starlight, Junior Deluxe, and later High Power Compact. All of those tended to fall to pieces one way or another. I always thought the Turbopower was designed to only be strong 'enough'. It had Aurelius built in deliberately. Time and again I would have a Turbopower bought in for repair for one thing, usually a fault which brought the cleaner to a halt, be it loss of power or loss of suction, and I'd end up finding half a dozen other problems with it. The trick was to second-guess what the customer was willing to pay, try to fix as much of it as I could, and try to avoid having the cleaner sent back to me in 3 months time by someone who thought I was somehow to blame for the latest problem.

In that respect, Juniors and Seniors, plus many of the Electrolux cleaners were easy to repair as stocks of 2nd hand parts were in great supply. The likes of Philips and Hitachi were very good machines, but difficult to repair in many cases as there were few donor cleaners around and / or new parts were very expensive. So for ease of repair, I'd have to list Hoover and Electrolux as my top two.


Post# 192570 , Reply# 29   7/31/2012 at 17:53 (4,279 days old) by 2011hoover700 (owosso michigan)        

2011hoover700's profile picture

For uprights mine are hoover, I personally had more each for thair own reason do what I like in an upright vacuum than others I have. For canisters I don't have a favorate, I like all of mine for their own reasons.


Post# 192571 , Reply# 30   7/31/2012 at 17:54 (4,279 days old) by vintagerepairer (England)        

Aurelius? I wrote failure built in. I have no idea why it says Aurelius.


Post# 192596 , Reply# 31   7/31/2012 at 21:27 (4,279 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)        
Favorites!

hygiene903's profile picture
I have several favorite vintage vacuums and will post a few of them here. For starters, a model 903 Electro-Hygiene, shown here with attachments and the extra accessories Kit. Built in Feb. 1983, this was one of the last Electro-Hygienes made. As Morgan said, their suction with attachments is outstanding.
Jeff


Post# 192598 , Reply# 32   7/31/2012 at 21:31 (4,279 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)        
Another Electro-Hygiene

hygiene903's profile picture
This one is a model 2-230. One of the last of the straight suction models, it was built around 1953-1954. Shown here with attachments but unfortunately it is missing the wands, floor brush, and crevice tool.

Post# 192600 , Reply# 33   7/31/2012 at 21:34 (4,279 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)        
Now a Hoover

hygiene903's profile picture
The model 28 has always been one of my favorite Hoover uprights, and is one of the vacs I always felt EVERY collector should own. Here it is with attachments, instructions, and box.

Post# 192602 , Reply# 34   7/31/2012 at 21:36 (4,279 days old) by vacu-finder ()        

Bill,......
The Kirby is truly a fine peice of equipment. I would put the Kirb at the top for Favourite Vintage Brand.

Why...? THe metal of course, the gleaming metal in all it's glory.


Post# 192603 , Reply# 35   7/31/2012 at 21:39 (4,279 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)        
Or a Hoover 825

hygiene903's profile picture
Always wanted one of these and now I have one! This one was one of the machines I received last year, and is all original except for the bag, and it is a genuine Hoover replacement.

Post# 192604 , Reply# 36   7/31/2012 at 21:40 (4,279 days old) by vacumaniac ()        

Bill your Kirby collection is STELLAR!!!!! LOVE IT!!!

Post# 192605 , Reply# 37   7/31/2012 at 21:41 (4,279 days old) by bagintheback (Flagstaff, Arizona)        

bagintheback's profile picture
For awhile I really liked Eurekas, simply because of their large F&G bag in the back. I've since learned Hoover is the way to go. After using competing machines, Hoover is almost always better. My favorites are their models from the late-70s to the late-90s.

Post# 192615 , Reply# 38   7/31/2012 at 22:30 (4,279 days old) by motojoejo (MO)        

I love classic Hoover - convertibles, connies and dial-a-matics. The colors and the designs with some being ahead of their time. I still use my gramma's convertible since it cleans well and doesn't hurt my sensitive ears~ it's actually pleasant to hear.

Post# 192731 , Reply# 39   8/2/2012 at 00:19 (4,278 days old) by gottahaveahoove (Pittston, Pennsylvania, 18640)        
You've got to love

gottahaveahoove's profile picture
that HOOVER "hum"!!
John.


Post# 192739 , Reply# 40   8/2/2012 at 03:53 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Nothing beats it John. I never enjoy the sound of a Vacuum Cleaner as much as I enjoy using one of my Hoovers to hear the dull roar of the low wattage dirty fan.

Post# 192789 , Reply# 41   8/2/2012 at 09:06 (4,278 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland)        

jmurray01's profile picture
Well to be honest I can't fault Electrolux on their cylinders or uprights.

My 1982 Electrolux 502S still works like the day it was made as does my 2000 Electrolux Tango Z5001 cylinder.


Post# 192870 , Reply# 42   8/2/2012 at 18:48 (4,277 days old) by jodan3399 (Brownsville, PA)        

My neighbor's mother gifted her with a Tri Star years ago, I remember her showing it to me and I thought it was the neatest vacuum I'd ever seen, it looked like a metal torpedo on wheels.

Never saw one again until years later when her husband called and asked me if I wanted this old vacuum they had in the shed before they put it out to the curb.

That's it on the right, the one on the left I found curbside about a block away from me about 2 weeks later.


Post# 192877 , Reply# 43   8/2/2012 at 20:03 (4,277 days old) by pnluxconvlvr (Georgia)        
Thanks bagintheback for sharing !

pnluxconvlvr's profile picture
That " Hoover Difference " ad is awesome. The all metal Hoovers are amazing too.

Post# 193063 , Reply# 44   8/3/2012 at 14:39 (4,276 days old) by eurekaprince (Montreal, Canada)        

eurekaprince's profile picture
As my Vacuumland name suggests, I have always loved Eureka vacuum cleaners - especially those from the Eureka Williams era (about 1960 - 1975). Not quite sure what it was about them, but I have always found the industrial designs of their vacs to be more beautiful and attractive then those of any other brand. To me, those Eureka vacs had a certain sleekness and symmetry and balance in their look, resulting in an understated elegance that somehow transmitted a sense of "quiet confidence." Even the subdued colours (beiges, greens, blues) communicated that sense of quiet confidence. The simplicity of the Eureka Williams graphic and logo and the smooth lines of the attachments stand out as representing this subtlety.

Does anyone at Vacuumland know the name or names of the industrial designers that worked for the Eureka Williams company in Bloomington, Illinois? I'd like to salute them!!!!! :-)


Post# 345457 , Reply# 45   2/26/2016 at 07:20 (2,975 days old) by KirbyCollector (Columbus Ohio USA)        

kirbycollector's profile picture
My favorite vintage brands are Kirby Royal and Hoover

Post# 345468 , Reply# 46   2/26/2016 at 08:53 (2,975 days old) by rugsucker (Elizabethton TN)        
"industrial designers"?

This should include George Walker in the early 50s.He also did work at Ford including early T-Bird.Would be interesting to know who did the award winning Mighty Mite & Ultra & Express & Precision & ?

Post# 345472 , Reply# 47   2/26/2016 at 09:23 (2,975 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Hmmmm,

Eureka Star has bucoup' Kirby's!
Geoff, that Hoover 825, is it styled by Raymond Lowey?
Now that is better looking than most vacuums period!
Eureka!!
I've got them, that's my collection.


Post# 345474 , Reply# 48   2/26/2016 at 09:28 (2,975 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Sorry, Jeff in Gallion Ohio,

Not Geoff.

Post# 345475 , Reply# 49   2/26/2016 at 09:30 (2,975 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
jodan3999,

Now I know it's a small world. My grandomothers brother had a shoe store or two there way back in the 1960's.

Post# 345495 , Reply# 50   2/26/2016 at 11:37 (2,975 days old) by human (Pines of Carolina)        

human's profile picture
I growing up, we were pretty much brand agnostic when it came to vacuum cleaners. The earliest one I remember was a pink and gray Lewyt canister, which was replaced by a tan and green "Brady Bunch" Hoover Convertible, and later with an uber noisy Singer upright. There was also an Electrolux 1205 (sans power nozzle) in the mix that Dad pulled from a neighbor's trash pile. The canister worked great but the hose leaked like a sieve.

As for my own preferences, Kirby is the clear winner for uprights, and I use mine strictly in the upright configuration. While it's cool that they can sort of convert to a canister-like configuration--a feature that impressed me mightily when I saw a Classic Omega demonstrated when I was about nine years old--I now see that they really aren't all that great as canisters; in fact, they're terrible and that's where my canister of choice come in.

That particular honor goes to Electrolux, specifically the 1205 and its immediate successor, the 14xx series (aka, Golden Jubilee, Super J, Olympia One, and Silverado) all with power nozzles, of course. Honorable mention goes to the power nozzle-equipped metal Eureka canisters from the '70s.

For Electroluxes, my power nozzle of choice is the PN-2 with the PN-1 as a close second, almost a toss-up, really. I've never used a PN-4, so I can't comment on that one, but I just don't like the L-shaped design of the PN-5 and later nozzles. It may be because I'm left-handed and the 'outrigger' is on the wrong side for me, so I'm constantly snagging it on furniture legs and such. I strongly prefer symmetrical designs. Try using a butter knife with your left hand and you'll see what I mean. There's no excuse for them to be designed that way, none at all.


Post# 345514 , Reply# 51   2/26/2016 at 14:44 (2,974 days old) by rugsucker (Elizabethton TN)        
designers,continued

Raymond Loewy did the post war Singer uprights.
Henry Dreyfus did Hoovers from at least 30s-50s and later did work for Singer.


Post# 345516 , Reply# 52   2/26/2016 at 14:58 (2,974 days old) by citroenbx (england)        

citroenbx's profile picture
vax 121 1990



Post# 345541 , Reply# 53   2/26/2016 at 21:15 (2,974 days old) by compactc9guy (Bathurst NB)        
Compact Tristar

compactc9guy's profile picture
My favorite vacuum is Compact my god father sold them back in the day and my grand mother had one too she passed in feb 2015 so my Compact holds memories .But my first vacuum was .... Hoover Celebrity IV power-matic s3131 .Loved it but the motor was to noisy and we got rid of it .Now i own a Compact Electra C9 looove it ! Power to spare suction is amazing unbelievable air flow , metal construction is built to last , the motor is maintenance free winch i love just keep on going .

Post# 345550 , Reply# 54   2/27/2016 at 04:26 (2,974 days old) by vacerator (Macomb Michigan)        
Vax,

See; Rigid and Craftsman shop vacs.


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy