|
Thread Number: 16696
baged or bagless 2 |
[Down to Last] |  |
| Post# 178107 4/23/2012 at 08:54 (4,379 days old) by kirby (passadena md) | ||
|
i sucept i might be opeaning up a can of warms here like the original post did but any way what do you perferr a baged vacuum or bagglees | ||
| Post# 178111 , Reply# 2 4/23/2012 at 09:17 (4,379 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 178116 , Reply# 3 4/23/2012 at 09:27 (4,379 days old) by kirby (passadena md) | ||
|
where is your old thread i looked and could nt find it can you post a link to it | ||
| Post# 178119 , Reply# 4 4/23/2012 at 09:31 (4,379 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 178120 , Reply# 5 4/23/2012 at 09:35 (4,379 days old) by kirby (passadena md) | ||
|
i disagree with you i think baggless is best | ||
| Post# 178121 , Reply# 6 4/23/2012 at 09:43 (4,379 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 178125 , Reply# 8 4/23/2012 at 11:10 (4,379 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 178135 , Reply# 10 4/23/2012 at 12:05 (4,379 days old) by turbomaster1984 (Ripley, Derbyshire) | ||
il Ditto it cos I can 
thing is there seems to be a thing for someones threads to gain as many posts as they can get to somehow simulate popularity.
Have noticed that for a while now, and once a topic gets around 70 or 80 posts you find it then gets repeated by someone who wants to be popular. Always backfires and thread gets ignored. Had just the same over at aw.org about a Hotpoint thread where 200 odd pictures were posted and 3 months later a "have a go" member wanted us to post it all again depsite it being in the archives. turned out he wanted a popular thread. Highly original huh. Its NEVER the amount of posts a thread gets but the QUALITY inside them that makes a good thread. Have read some really good threads where only 1 post has been made and its been informative and cleared up a matter without any need for other questions or ponders let alone drivel to bump the count up. | ||
| Post# 178142 , Reply# 12 4/23/2012 at 12:54 (4,379 days old) by blakaeg (NW London, UK) | ||
|
I prefer bagless for convenience and no extra running costs (Dyson and Vax Machs) and bagged for suction power and dirt disposal. | ||
Post# 178145 , Reply# 13 4/23/2012 at 13:10 (4,379 days old) by kloveland  (Tulsa) |
||
What about Electrolux! | ||
| Post# 178212 , Reply# 14 4/23/2012 at 19:00 (4,379 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
I prefer bagged to be honest -the only advantage of having bagless/cyclonic (and the only reason I have such a machine) is to clear up all the bird seed and dry pet food on a daily basis - fine if its on a hard floor whereupon dustpan and brush time - but if its on carpet and ground in, a bagless, cyclonic upright takes over from my old cordless, "bag-less" Black and Decker dust buster.
| ||
| Post# 178214 , Reply# 15 4/23/2012 at 19:05 (4,379 days old) by FantomLightning (Ohio) | ||
|
David... With all due respect... If you're going to jack a very popular thread that was already created and discussed, at least put the effort into correctly spelling things... | ||
| Post# 178276 , Reply# 17 4/24/2012 at 07:10 (4,379 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland) | ||
|
| ||
| Post# 178295 , Reply# 18 4/24/2012 at 08:49 (4,378 days old) by kirby (passadena md) | ||
|
Well i don't really apriciate the way you are bashing me STOP IT! thanks. Ps I am thinking about repoteing you don't TICK me off! | ||
| Post# 178309 , Reply# 19 4/24/2012 at 09:33 (4,378 days old) by Turbo500 (West Yorkshire, UK) | ||
 | ||
| Post# 178330 , Reply# 20 4/24/2012 at 12:16 (4,378 days old) by sebo_fan (Scotland, UK, member AKA ukvacfan, & Nar2) | ||
|
UM.. JM Can I draw your attention to something that you are clearly missing?
This is an aspect I realised when I created my own thread posts - UNLESS YOU PAY, the threads that you create get dropped to the bottom of the view list on here and then become locked into archives. So even if you complain about a thread that has been "copied," how can others make different points or voice their opinions if old threads get locked?? | ||
| Post# 178338 , Reply# 21 4/24/2012 at 12:43 (4,378 days old) by jakesvacs () | ||
|
Back to the original topic... I like both, nothing like a retro vacuum with a bag, but there is the coolness of the multi-cyclonic vacuums! | ||
| Post# 178354 , Reply# 22 4/24/2012 at 13:45 (4,378 days old) by jmurray01 (Scotland) | ||
|
" Isn't there a minimum age requirement on this foru
If there isn't there should be Chris.
Then maybe threads like this would be avoided. I'm not saying all young members are bad, far from it, but my point is do you really think an adult would copy a thread already created with 118 posts in it displaying many points of view ? All I'm saying is this thread is not required. And as for you reporting me David, don't even bother, I'm simply displaying my point of view, and if anybody needs reported, as I already said, it is you. If I've offended anybody, sorry, but I say what I feel. | ||
| Forum Index: | 
| Other Forums: |
|
|
|
|
|
Comes to the Rescue!
