Thread Number: 1532
'Newly beautiful in line and finish...'
[Down to Last]

Vacuumland's exclusive eBay Watch:
scroll >>> for more items --- [As an eBay Partner, eBay may compensate vacuumland.org if you make a purchase using any link to eBay on this page]
Post# 15629   6/29/2007 at 11:32 (6,137 days old) by vintagehoover ()        

'Model 725 is the finest electric cleaner ever built. 25% more efficient than any previous Hoover. A new type cloth bag with an opening on the top for simplified removal of the dirt. A more powerful, smooth-running ball-bearing motor. An improved fan. An automatic friction-stop handle control. Non-rusting, Nitralloy beater bars...'

My latest addition, and one of the most well looked-after cleaners I've seen! Highly polished, and very few scratches. Pity about the vile 60's bag, but flex is original.

Handle/handgrip is a bit of a mystery...


Post# 15630 , Reply# 1   6/29/2007 at 11:33 (6,137 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
Another view:

...

Post# 15631 , Reply# 2   6/29/2007 at 11:36 (6,137 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
'An Empire Product'

...

Post# 15632 , Reply# 3   6/29/2007 at 12:40 (6,137 days old) by ian88 ()        

Was the bag made in the 60s an intentional replacement by Hoover? that colour grey is an odd choice for a 60s Hoover is it not?

Ian


Post# 15636 , Reply# 4   6/29/2007 at 13:02 (6,137 days old) by vintagehoover ()        

Yeah, you see them on lots of vintage Hoovers. I guess they thought grey would be neutral enough not to clash with the colour schemes of the 400/700/800/900 machines, as well as the 160/262, which they also fit...given that the owners of pre-war and 1940's Hoovers still in use in the late-1960's might be of the 'older generation', and prefer not to have the loud, garish colours being used on the new machines of the age! Black would have looked a lot better, but maybe it costs more to dye fabric black or something...

Post# 15637 , Reply# 5   6/29/2007 at 13:33 (6,137 days old) by ian88 ()        

Well, Hoover had -some- machines with grey bags didn't they, whilst there were no black ones..they'd have to buy in black dyes and all sorts I presume, even more overheads if they used that vinyl covered fabric that the late 60s/70s bags had.

Ian


Post# 15641 , Reply# 6   6/29/2007 at 14:26 (6,137 days old) by myhooverco ()        

Jack...

You have done a wonderful job with your 725. The orange triangle came out nice too. Those "700" series machines worked very well and were so quiet and durable. You are very lucky to have such a fine example to have in your collection. Thanks for posting the photos. Here are some photos of mine. I too have the later replacement bag. Mine is a very late one with two speeds too!

--Tom


Post# 15642 , Reply# 7   6/29/2007 at 14:27 (6,137 days old) by myhooverco ()        

Here is her close-up....

Post# 15643 , Reply# 8   6/29/2007 at 14:27 (6,137 days old) by myhooverco ()        

It still has the original plug but a replacement black cord.

--Tom


Post# 15647 , Reply# 9   6/29/2007 at 14:39 (6,137 days old) by petek (Ontario)        

There appears to be a crest on the top of both those machines.. is the UK one different than the US one?

Post# 15648 , Reply# 10   6/29/2007 at 14:48 (6,137 days old) by vintagehoover ()        

Tom, your 725 looks great! The US replacement bags are so much more attractive than ours! Your motor cap is different too, of course - ours have the royal coat-of-arms, not the 'servant of the home' logo.

Mine is a 1-speed model, so it's not a late one, but it has the 1-piece motor cap, like the 750...I have an earlier machine in which the cap, orange band, and metal band are all separate pieces.

It also has the unpainted cord hooks, which I've only ever seen on the US models. The handle is round at the top, with a round bakelite end-plug, rather than an oval one. The hand-grip itself doesn't have the Hoover logo on it anywhere (it hasn't worn off!), and a totally different pattern to the usual kind...wierd!


Post# 15649 , Reply# 11   6/29/2007 at 14:52 (6,137 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
Crest:

Here's a pic which shows the Royal coat-of-arms on the UK machines. The US machines have the 'Servant of the Home' seal, as on the back of instruction manuals.

I do actually have an American motor cap in my possession, oddly found on a UK 700-motor given to me in a box of spares. I'd post a picture of that too, but it's in a box in the attic somewhere and I don't have time to dig it out - maybe one of the US guys wouldn't mind posting a pic of it?


Post# 15653 , Reply# 12   6/29/2007 at 16:48 (6,137 days old) by buffster ()        
Jack and Tom...

Those are beautiful vacuums! I love the shine on your machine Jack. And, I love your flooring, as shown in the first pic of this thread. The next time I get to the UK it would be great to have a mini meet and get to know all of the UK members.

Mike


Post# 15654 , Reply# 13   6/29/2007 at 17:35 (6,137 days old) by 74simon ()        
Lovely!

Did it not need any polishing up or anything? It looks well nice. At least the bag is genuine Hoover, and not some horrible 'The Vacuum Cleaner' type number...

The square O's on the bag indicate it was replaced some time after 1967, so the cleaner was nearly 40 years old when it was replaced! That's durability...

Pete - this cleaner is Canadian built, hence the 'Empire product' text on the badge. Apparently it was one common for American companies to build UK market goods in Canada, which as part of the British Empire incurred more favourable import tax terms.

Jack - as an aside, do you know which were the first Hoover models to be built at Perivale?


Post# 15655 , Reply# 14   6/29/2007 at 17:53 (6,137 days old) by vintagehoover ()        

Hi there Si! I have given it a polish, but it looked pretty good before, too. It didn't need the extensive buffing that many of my cleaners have needed. Clearly it's been well cared-for in its time, not flung in a damp shed for 60 years!

The 750 was the first to be built in Perivale, presumably along with its cheaper sister model, the 425...earlier 750s (like yours, I believe!) were still 'Empire Products'. Later ones like my one are Perivale-made. I don't know at what point production switched, or which of the two are rarer!

Having mentioned the 425, looks like it gained or lost 30w of power during its production run (depending on which ratings plate is older!):


Post# 15698 , Reply# 15   7/1/2007 at 06:54 (6,135 days old) by junior1975 ()        
What a beautiful 725!!!!!

Jack,

You are such a lucky so and so sometimes. I know I have just managed a couple of lucky finds in my time, one of which is now in your posession. A good home without any doubt.

You ought to post a picture of the handle dude, the thread is enthralling, but no pic of the said handle and grip which is such an anomaly.

Looking forward to getting down to see you once more.

I need to play with the early 912 beforeI get married and any chance is no longer viable. LOL.


Nice addition.

Speak to you soon,

Clark.



CLICK HERE TO GO TO junior1975's LINK


Post# 15699 , Reply# 16   7/1/2007 at 07:20 (6,135 days old) by ian88 ()        

Partners not liking collection..bah, any i've been with didn't mind at all (who I told :P) they just accepted it as my quirk lol.

Ian


Post# 15825 , Reply# 17   7/2/2007 at 18:20 (6,134 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
Clark :)

I know, I'm a very lucky boy! Building up my collection now because it won't be long before I have a car, bills etc, and I may find I suddenly have a great deal less disposable income!

Would be great to see you again sometime; let me know when you'll be around. Looks like I'm gonna be quite busy from the next few weeks onwards, so sooner's better than later!

I'll post a picture of the handle when I get a chance...


Post# 15830 , Reply# 18   7/2/2007 at 19:18 (6,134 days old) by myvacsrock (USA)        

WOW that 725 polish is simply *MINT*

Post# 15839 , Reply# 19   7/2/2007 at 21:28 (6,133 days old) by myhooverco ()        

Here is the logo from the top of the 700 series. I had a hard time capturing it because of the glare. It says "Servant to the Home" and "HOOVER".

--Tom


Post# 15855 , Reply# 20   7/3/2007 at 05:36 (6,133 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
'Servant to the Home'

Thanks for posting that pic, Tom! Here's a scan of the logo from the back of the 700's manual:

Post# 15862 , Reply# 21   7/3/2007 at 08:16 (6,133 days old) by dial-a-nap (Omaha - the home of the TV Dinner)        

dial-a-nap's profile picture
That is one beatiful cleaner!

Post# 15871 , Reply# 22   7/3/2007 at 13:50 (6,133 days old) by myhooverco ()        

Oh...yes, this is much easier to see. The details are blurred in my photo. Thanks!

--Tom


Post# 15879 , Reply# 23   7/3/2007 at 17:26 (6,133 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
Tom:

I would have scanned the logo sooner and saved you the trouble, but I had to dig out the scanner, clean the glass, plug it all in, and find and download drivers from the internet since we lost the startup cd years ago, before I could scan the page!

Post# 15880 , Reply# 24   7/3/2007 at 18:05 (6,133 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)        
Jack and Tom,

hygiene903's profile picture
Those are both beautiful 725's. And I'll bet they both run great. too!!
Jeff


Post# 15882 , Reply# 25   7/3/2007 at 18:25 (6,133 days old) by vintagehoover ()        

Mine runs fine, although the carbons could do with replacing. But basically, runs like new; not bad for 78! I used it to clean a few rooms today. The replacement bag's a real let-down, it LEAKS dust! You switch it on and a cloud rises up all around it, which you don't get at all with the original bags.

Post# 15897 , Reply# 26   7/3/2007 at 21:58 (6,132 days old) by lux1521 ()        

That model 725 looks very nice, especialy considering you have not restored it. Too bad about the trouble with the replacement bag. I have seen some aftermarket bags that look quite nice and work quite well. I find that it really depends on what machine you put them on when it comes to how good they look. Darker colors seem to work better for some reason.

Post# 16225 , Reply# 27   7/11/2007 at 16:08 (6,125 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
I'm happy to report...

...I now have an original bag for my 725, thanks to a very generous donor who wishes to remain anonymous!

Post# 16244 , Reply# 28   7/11/2007 at 23:00 (6,124 days old) by luxg ()        

Jack that is really a beauty!! So happy you found the orginal bag.

Post# 16255 , Reply# 29   7/12/2007 at 10:26 (6,124 days old) by myhooverco ()        

Jack...

All I can say is WOW! (drool)....That is a very beautiful machine. It has a very good home too. Thanks for sharing it with us.

--Tom


Post# 16257 , Reply# 30   7/12/2007 at 11:21 (6,124 days old) by vintagehoover ()        
See it clean!

Quick video I made this afternoon...

CLICK HERE TO GO TO vintagehoover's LINK


Post# 16258 , Reply# 31   7/12/2007 at 12:35 (6,124 days old) by luxg ()        

Jack that was fantastic, that Hoover sounds just like new, you have done a fine job!!

Post# 16275 , Reply# 32   7/12/2007 at 17:54 (6,124 days old) by arh1953 ( River Park, in Port St. Lucie, Florida)        
Great Looking British Hoover

arh1953's profile picture
I would have left a comment on YouTube, but it just won't register any of them. Your home is a showcase for that beauty!


Forum Index:       Other Forums:                      



Comes to the Rescue!

Woops, Time to Check the Bag!!!
Either you need to change your vacuum bag or you forgot to LOG-IN?

Discuss-O-MAT Log-In



New Members
Click Here To Sign Up.



                     


automaticwasher.org home
Discuss-o-Mat Forums
Vintage Brochures, Service and Owners Manuals
Fun Vintage Washer Ephemera
See It Wash!
Video Downloads
Audio Downloads
Picture of the Day
Patent of the Day
Photos of our Collections
The Old Aberdeen Farm
Vintage Service Manuals
Vintage washer/dryer/dishwasher to sell?
Technical/service questions?
Looking for Parts?
Website related questions?
Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Our Privacy Policy