Thread Number: 1439
Decisions, Decisions - Help guys! |
[Down to Last] |
Post# 14694   6/6/2007 at 10:50 (6,140 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Ok... so I am currently in the position to buy one of my first of the Kirby G-Series. This is going to be my primary vac to use and want to make sure I am getting the most for my money. I have found a place that sells some pretty darn nice refurbished Kirby's and givien my budget, I am looking at either a G-3 or G-4. Any suggestions? Are there any major differences in the two models? How close is the G-4 to the G-5 and so on? Is this a smart buy? Do they really clean as well as the reviews I have read say they do? Do the transmissions have a tendancy to mess up any? Of course, my Kirby will be babied to death and will be extremelly well cared for. Any input would help guys! I also have my eye on a Royal metal upright that has been refurbished too.. Kirby or Royal? let the input and debate begin!
|
Post# 14695 , Reply# 1   6/6/2007 at 11:04 (6,140 days old) by air-waycharlie (USA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The G-3 was the first to have "tech drive" and the early models did have problems with the power switch which runs the whole thing. It was corrected by Kirby with the later G-3 models. I think the the all the G series are essentially the same with changes to color, bag style and brushroll design. The last of the line had 2 speed motors that don't serve much of purpose in my opinion. (Kind of like the 2 speeds on a Filter Queen) If you get a G-4 or G-4 and upgrade the brushroll to what is in the G-5/G-6, (groups of staggered brushes that are about 4" long), it is a great vacuum. I would also recommend using the new filtrete bag that is excellent for filtration and allows a lot of air flow. I have a G-3 that has an upgraded brushroll, the new stiff fill tube and has the filtrete bag. It works beautifully and I like the vacuum. I know many vacuum people that do not care for Kirby's but part of the appeal for me is the design and appearance. It really looks like a vacuum cleaner! So, I say go for it and then let us know how it works out. Charlie |
Post# 14696 , Reply# 2   6/6/2007 at 11:17 (6,140 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 14697 , Reply# 3   6/6/2007 at 11:23 (6,140 days old) by kirby519omega ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I would go with the Kirby, I Mean Royals are good vacuums, but Kirby is probably better nowadays. |
Post# 14710 , Reply# 5   6/6/2007 at 12:38 (6,140 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 14711 , Reply# 6   6/6/2007 at 12:40 (6,140 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 14712 , Reply# 7   6/6/2007 at 12:42 (6,140 days old) by sleepdoc (St. Louis, MO)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
If you're not sure about where your G-3 sits on the production timeline with respect to the switch fix, consider the G-4 on that basis. I don't know when that happened, or I'd be of more help. The serial number, located on the right aspect of the power plant gives the month and the year in the first four numbers. The G-3 never had a Micron Magic outer bag, but genuine Kirby micron outer bags are available as replacements. If that matters, you almost certainly need to buy a new outer bag. (It will cost at least $30, probably more.) The G-4 started with a micron bag. If your store really does a good job of refurbing the machines, the outer bags will be clean. I'd unzip the outer bag and make sure it's not coated with dust, carpet freshener, animal hair, etc. Ideally, buy a brand new outer bag regardless, if the cost doesn't matter. The above notwithstanding, you need to actually run each machine you're considering to test the transmission. If the transmission is smooth and quiet, it's good. If it's really loud or if it continues to make noise when the switch is pressed down on the left "neutral" side, then it's developing problems. Last month I paid $125 to put a new transmission on a G-5, and that was a substantial discount from retail with labor. Rec: G-4 with good transmission. Patrick |
Post# 14717 , Reply# 8   6/6/2007 at 14:37 (6,140 days old) by kirbyultimateg (Troy Ohio 45373 USA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Kirby G3 |
Post# 14741 , Reply# 9   6/7/2007 at 07:41 (6,139 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 14759 , Reply# 10   6/7/2007 at 14:45 (6,139 days old) by kirbyultimateg (Troy Ohio 45373 USA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
The G3 was the start of the 7.0 amp motor and self propelled transmission. |
Post# 14761 , Reply# 11   6/7/2007 at 15:11 (6,139 days old) by vinvac (Dubuque IA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Cory, I don't see anyone talking about the Royal. I have three different Royals in my collection and all three of them clean very well. The Royal will be lighter than the Kirby's but won't have the self propelled feature. Converting to use with tools in my opinion may be a little more challenging when it comes time to put the belt back on. The Royal will have good air flow for above the floor cleaning as well. The bags on a Royal probably won't filter as well as the Kirby using a filtrete bag if that is important to you. Either vacuum will serve you well. Morgan |
Post# 14764 , Reply# 12   6/7/2007 at 15:21 (6,139 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 14770 , Reply# 13   6/7/2007 at 18:17 (6,139 days old) by kirbyultimateg (Troy Ohio 45373 USA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Micron Magic/Micron Magic HEPA/3M Filtrete inner paper bags will work on the G3. |
Post# 14771 , Reply# 14   6/7/2007 at 18:22 (6,139 days old) by kirbyultimateg (Troy Ohio 45373 USA)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
QuadraSweep brushroll with four rows of stiff black brushes will not work on the G3. QuadraSweep brushroll with four rows of soft black brushes will work on the G3. Delicate brushroll with two rows of soft white brushes will work on the G3. |
Post# 14772 , Reply# 15   6/7/2007 at 18:47 (6,139 days old) by ian88 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
That's the thing, and forgive me if i'm wrong but thats the beauty of royal vacuums. A brushrolls a brushroll, swap and change stuff..simple, user friendly, what the public wants. Ian |
Post# 14780 , Reply# 16   6/7/2007 at 20:00 (6,139 days old) by hygiene903 (Galion, OH)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
As Morgan said, the Royal won't have the self-propelled feature. But then, the Royal is so much lighter and maneuverable, that you won't need it anyway. And the Royal is just as durable, and cleans as well, as a Kirby, and if you compare new prices, will be about 1/4 to 1/2 the price of a Kirby. Jeff |
Post# 14785 , Reply# 17   6/7/2007 at 21:22 (6,139 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 14788 , Reply# 18   6/7/2007 at 21:56 (6,139 days old) by bisonian (Where the buffalo roamed! (Ocala, FL))   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
Cory, Good luck on the Royal bid. As for the Kirbys, I have a G3, and had a chance a couple of weeks ago to try out my sister-in-law's GSix. Frankly, I couldn't tell much difference between them. Rick |
Post# 14790 , Reply# 19   6/8/2007 at 04:25 (6,138 days old) by ian88 ()   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
And of course, Royal's don't have power drive for the simple reason of them not weighing a ton :P |
Post# 15164 , Reply# 22   6/20/2007 at 12:52 (6,126 days old) by swiveltop (Galveston, TX)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I have a nice G4 that I was going to list for sale,I don't know if mentioning items for sale is allowed here so, slap me if it isn't. Mark |
Post# 15167 , Reply# 23   6/20/2007 at 13:55 (6,126 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
|
Post# 15168 , Reply# 24   6/20/2007 at 14:11 (6,126 days old) by thunderhexed (Edmond, OK)   |   | |
Checkrate/Likes
 
     
I did win the Royal 4000 from Ebay. It's my first Royal so I'm learning how to get used to it. It is definately smaller than a Kirby as well as lighter, but it still reminds me of using my Dual Sanitronic 50! I love how the brushroll grooms the carpet. I have been using hte HEPA type bags in it and they seems to be doing a pretty decent job of dust control so far... Being used, the only thing I had to do was clean the outter bag up. Whoever had it prior to me used it without bag inserts and obviously had a dog or cat (the beg smelled of rank frito chips) After SEVERAL good freshwater rinses and a lengthy air dry, it is amazingly odor and dust free! The only things I don't really care for is the height adjustment mechanism, It's push pedal is very easy to lower but difficult coming back up and the handle seems to lean back quite a bit when the height adjustment is all the way up and the cleaner is in it's "upright" position. I did notice at the vac shop the other day though that some of the other Royals were doing it as well, guess I'm just used to Kirby's leaning forward when upright.. Anyways, I'm farily happy, not bad for $50.00 and still having that showroom shine to it. A hose and few attachments were even included as well as a HEFTY supply of the HEPA type bags. oh yeah.. it's LOUD! It's a squeeler!
|