| Thread Number: 555 Filteraire vs. Filtrete Vacuum Bags |
Post# 5515-12/9/2006-22:51 ||| sudsmaster (Northern California) |
|
The commercial Eureka I recently acquired uses Eureka LS bags. These are marked "Filteraire", and I assume they have some sort of microfiltration. So far I haven't found any non-Eureka versions of the LS bag.
|
Post# 5787-12/15/2006-10:45 ||| My-ellie (plainsfield, ohio) |
|
Filteraire bags are lined with melt-blown polypropelene, which is an electrostatic filter material. This 'coating' keeps the dust from escaping through the pores of the bag, but the bag tends to clog a little faster than standard non-lined bags. Filtrete bags are cloth-like. They filter very, very well and tend to keep airflow going at 100% for quite a long time.
|
Post# 5838-12/15/2006-23:47 ||| sudsmaster (Northern California) |
|
My-ellie,
|
Post# 5898-12/16/2006-19:19 ||| swingette (Texas) |
|
ive used filteraire style bags before. used then exclusively for a while on a F&G Eureka upright to clean my parents house. ive also used the Micro-lined version on my type-A Hoovers. im my experience the bags actually maintain airflow longer. the standard F&G bags and standard Hoover type A bags always clog faster, much faster. if you do a test with talcum or flour, you will see the difference. |
Post# 5980-12/18/2006-01:05 ||| sudsmaster (Northern California) |
|
Thanks for your input, Swingette. For what it's worth, I've vacuumed several times with the original Filteraire bag in the Commercial, and have not noticed any decrease in suction.
|